|
2015Bubble
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:32:35 PM |
|
Browsing train pics on google keep you guys updated..
|
|
|
|
|
|
brg444
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:49:25 PM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.
|
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1031
Sine secretum non libertas
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:51:24 PM |
|
A little upping and of a sudden the monkey changes his mind, likes BTC for the next 20 hours or so. He may be right, but I'm tired of being jerked about, so I will stay out for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feri22
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:52:45 PM |
|
Who is ready for 500's...
I am ready for the 2MB block size limit first... i hope the Core devs will come to senses soon or better, i hope Gavin and Garzik will team up and run own btc client...i was never more worried than right now...if bitcoin will fail only because of its politics, how fuck*d up it would be?
|
|
|
|
|
BldSwtTrs
Legendary

Activity: 861
Merit: 1010
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:53:46 PM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Last time some people proposed a fork there were little girls Core devs bitching everywhere about how that was an attack against Bitcoin. At least by now the rethoric has drift toward acknowledging that choice is good thing, not a bad thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feri22
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:56:22 PM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:58:11 PM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF lol 1MButthurt strong here.
|
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Diamond Hands
Legendary

Activity: 4256
Merit: 12801
|
 |
December 29, 2015, 11:58:59 PM |
|
Block size increases, altcoin proposals like XT & Bitcoin Unlimited etc can be discussed here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162684.4360Segregated Witness will be carried out so can you guys discuss block sizes in the relevant thread.
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:00:24 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feri22
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:00:33 AM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF lol 1MButthurt strong here. I forgot i am in speculation thread, i don't know why i expected mature arguments from people like you 
|
|
|
|
|
|
brg444
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:01:36 AM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on btctalk and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:09:09 AM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on btctalk and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off. Bitcoin is not about community, it is about money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feri22
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:12:18 AM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off. And who decide what community is representing Bitcoin exactly? You? So when someone (most people or at least large group of people) is not happy with current development of Bitcoin you say him fuck off or fork off? How is that different from the goverments? Play by our rules or you go to jail...Play by our rules or fuck off....Well, we will see who will be right in the end but i am sure that if censoring ideas, discussions and arguments and people with closed mind like you will effect bitcoin in any way, we have lost the fight for freedom of finance and other uses, bitcoin could have
|
|
|
|
|
BldSwtTrs
Legendary

Activity: 861
Merit: 1010
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:12:36 AM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on btctalk and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off. Bitcoin is not about community, it is about money. Bitcoin is not about money, it's about settlement layer (dixit Blockstream employees).
|
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:13:48 AM |
|
Meanwhile BankAmericoin, Applecoin, FBcoin and others are going to roll out their products and the first mover advantage will be squandered.
You seem to be missing the point of why we are here. BTC is not first mover in the ...centralized payment systems or centralized currencies space. The systems you mention, if they are ever created, will compete with visa, paypal, etc: Centralized stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:14:06 AM Last edit: December 30, 2015, 12:45:59 AM by Fatman3001 |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off. Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers. Seriously, if you want Bitcoin as it is you'll have to do a MaggieCoin fork where you arrest its development and take the rest of your inbred sect with you. GMaxwell can be your leader.
|
|
|
|
|
|
brg444
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:22:01 AM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off. Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers. Did you volunteer yet? Who's going to lead development of your new coin. Peter R?
|
|
|
|
|
|
brg444
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:23:35 AM |
|
Bitcoin is not about community, it is about money.
+1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feri22
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:28:16 AM |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off. Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers. Seriously, if you want Bitcoin as it is you'll have do a MaggieCoin fork where you arrest its development and take the rest of your inbred sect with you. GMaxwell can be your leader. Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
December 30, 2015, 12:29:29 AM Last edit: December 30, 2015, 12:46:16 AM by Fatman3001 |
|
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:
At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount
When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount
At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...
Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so. Fork off if that doesn't make you happy. Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF  the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off. Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers. Seriously, if you want Bitcoin as it is you'll have to do a MaggieCoin fork where you arrest its development and take the rest of your inbred sect with you. GMaxwell can be your leader. Instead of coming up with an adequate response I'll just edit your post and write some nonsense. I know. I'm a fucking loser. Sorry to hear that. But don't be too hard on yourself. Life can throw you a curveball from time to time. It's not the end of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|