Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 12:17:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.8%)
7/28 - 11 (9.1%)
8/4 - 16 (13.2%)
8/11 - 7 (5.8%)
8/18 - 6 (5%)
8/25 - 8 (6.6%)
After August - 72 (59.5%)
Total Voters: 121

Pages: « 1 ... 14333 14334 14335 14336 14337 14338 14339 14340 14341 14342 14343 14344 14345 14346 14347 14348 14349 14350 14351 14352 14353 14354 14355 14356 14357 14358 14359 14360 14361 14362 14363 14364 14365 14366 14367 14368 14369 14370 14371 14372 14373 14374 14375 14376 14377 14378 14379 14380 14381 14382 [14383] 14384 14385 14386 14387 14388 14389 14390 14391 14392 14393 14394 14395 14396 14397 14398 14399 14400 14401 14402 14403 14404 14405 14406 14407 14408 14409 14410 14411 14412 14413 14414 14415 14416 14417 14418 14419 14420 14421 14422 14423 14424 14425 14426 14427 14428 14429 14430 14431 14432 14433 ... 33874 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26485246 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 02:04:43 AM


Nice additional info ChartBuddy Smiley
peonminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 531


Crypto is King.


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 02:08:22 AM

Blocks are consistently far from being full! Blockpocalypse! You heard it here first! The sky is falling! We MUST switch to centralized Bitcoin and larger blocks!





yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
December 30, 2015, 02:09:19 AM

Bitcoin is not about community, it is about money.

It's a good job too, looking at what dregs we have here.
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 2296


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 02:42:52 AM


I need to rework it a little.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3892
Merit: 11106


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 02:43:40 AM

Blocks are consistently far from being full! Blockpocalypse! You heard it here first! The sky is falling! We MUST switch to centralized Bitcoin and larger blocks!








Yeah... this whole fullblocalypse is causing bitcoin to crash upwards...


Please fix it!!!!!!!!!!!!    Shocked Shocked Shocked
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 2296


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 02:45:42 AM

Blocks are consistently far from being full!

This is true. We still have some time. But the nature of exponential growth means we will hit it fairly soon and hard.

It will also start to be an issue before 100%. I'm not sure what the exact level would be but I'm thinking around 85%
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 2296


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 02:53:45 AM

It will also start to be an issue before 100%. I'm not sure what the exact level would be but I'm thinking around 85%

Something similar to this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_congestion#Congestive_collapse
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
December 30, 2015, 02:53:50 AM

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.



ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 03:00:27 AM

Coin



Explanation
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 03:06:43 AM

It will also start to be an issue before 100%. I'm not sure what the exact level would be but I'm thinking around 85%

Something similar to this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_congestion#Congestive_collapse

It's tough to get an accurate picture with a single number. Usually, the less than 10 min blocks are going to be smaller, and coinbase only blocks are going to be tiny.

If you plan max capacity to avg capacity... you're going to have issues.  Undecided
suda123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 03:24:55 AM

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.






Ahuwhauwhhauwhusushwusuhshshudisjsj can someone vouch if this is happening?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3892
Merit: 11106


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 03:46:10 AM

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.






Ahuwhauwhhauwhusushwusuhshshudisjsj can someone vouch if this is happening?


Yes... it's confirmed to be happening in BJA's head.

Honest injun. Cry Cry Cry
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 04:00:24 AM

Coin



Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 05:00:28 AM

Coin



Explanation
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 2296


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 05:19:10 AM

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.


Blockstream Saddles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbWg-mozGsU

Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 2296


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 05:26:12 AM


It's tough to get an accurate picture with a single number. Usually, the less than 10 min blocks are going to be smaller, and coinbase only blocks are going to be tiny.

If you plan max capacity to avg capacity... you're going to have issues.  Undecided

Yeah, that's why I'm thinking 85%. Not every block needs to be full to cause problems and empty blocks will probably still be mined bringing the "average" down significantly. Probably actual transactions/average max transactions might be a better measure. Empty blocks are probably best just ignored completely for calculations.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 06:00:29 AM

Coin



Explanation
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 06:11:27 AM

Today's edition: Political Contributor to the Central Committee of the Inhibit Party of the Technical Consensus Union.

Quote
[00:08] <petertodd> bramc: but today we have a blocksize limit low enough that everyone has access to reasonably low orphan rates
[00:08] <petertodd> bramc: (remember that the networking code we have right now on the p2p network is *really* inefficient)
[00:09] <bramc> petertodd, And the blocksize limit is staying down there, by design
[00:09] <petertodd> bramc: what do you mean?
[00:10] <bramc> petertodd, The current 'plan of record' is for the block size to de facto go up by less than 2x with segwit and otherwise stay put, at least for now
[00:10] <bramc> For exactly that reason
[00:10] <petertodd> bramc: sure

Not tonight, dear.

Always cute.
suda123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 06:21:16 AM

Today's edition: Political Contributor to the Central Committee of the Inhibit Party of the Technical Consensus Union.

Quote
[00:08] <petertodd> bramc: but today we have a blocksize limit low enough that everyone has access to reasonably low orphan rates
[00:08] <petertodd> bramc: (remember that the networking code we have right now on the p2p network is *really* inefficient)
[00:09] <bramc> petertodd, And the blocksize limit is staying down there, by design
[00:09] <petertodd> bramc: what do you mean?
[00:10] <bramc> petertodd, The current 'plan of record' is for the block size to de facto go up by less than 2x with segwit and otherwise stay put, at least for now
[00:10] <bramc> For exactly that reason
[00:10] <petertodd> bramc: sure
[00:11] <bramc> Big booty bitches
[00:11] <petertodd> His name is John Wick
[00:13] <theymos> BANS FOR YOU BANS FOR YOU EVERYONE GETS A BAN!!
[00:14] <satoshinakamoto> ill fkn rekted ur fayce themoys


Not tonight, dear.

Always cute.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 07:00:23 AM

Coin



Explanation
Pages: « 1 ... 14333 14334 14335 14336 14337 14338 14339 14340 14341 14342 14343 14344 14345 14346 14347 14348 14349 14350 14351 14352 14353 14354 14355 14356 14357 14358 14359 14360 14361 14362 14363 14364 14365 14366 14367 14368 14369 14370 14371 14372 14373 14374 14375 14376 14377 14378 14379 14380 14381 14382 [14383] 14384 14385 14386 14387 14388 14389 14390 14391 14392 14393 14394 14395 14396 14397 14398 14399 14400 14401 14402 14403 14404 14405 14406 14407 14408 14409 14410 14411 14412 14413 14414 14415 14416 14417 14418 14419 14420 14421 14422 14423 14424 14425 14426 14427 14428 14429 14430 14431 14432 14433 ... 33874 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!