Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 01:50:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 14334 14335 14336 14337 14338 14339 14340 14341 14342 14343 14344 14345 14346 14347 14348 14349 14350 14351 14352 14353 14354 14355 14356 14357 14358 14359 14360 14361 14362 14363 14364 14365 14366 14367 14368 14369 14370 14371 14372 14373 14374 14375 14376 14377 14378 14379 14380 14381 14382 14383 [14384] 14385 14386 14387 14388 14389 14390 14391 14392 14393 14394 14395 14396 14397 14398 14399 14400 14401 14402 14403 14404 14405 14406 14407 14408 14409 14410 14411 14412 14413 14414 14415 14416 14417 14418 14419 14420 14421 14422 14423 14424 14425 14426 14427 14428 14429 14430 14431 14432 14433 14434 ... 33304 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26368441 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
December 30, 2015, 07:26:56 AM

Today's edition: Political Contributor to the Central Committee of the Inhibit Party of the Technical Consensus Union.

Quote
[00:08] <petertodd> bramc: but today we have a blocksize limit low enough that everyone has access to reasonably low orphan rates
[00:08] <petertodd> bramc: (remember that the networking code we have right now on the p2p network is *really* inefficient)
[00:09] <bramc> petertodd, And the blocksize limit is staying down there, by design
[00:09] <petertodd> bramc: what do you mean?
[00:10] <bramc> petertodd, The current 'plan of record' is for the block size to de facto go up by less than 2x with segwit and otherwise stay put, at least for now
[00:10] <bramc> For exactly that reason
[00:10] <petertodd> bramc: sure

Not tonight, dear.

Always cute.

Butthurt must be disorientating for 1MB4EVA being so vigorously advocated by bitorrent's creator.
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714182620
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714182620

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714182620
Reply with quote  #2

1714182620
Report to moderator
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 08:00:20 AM

Coin



Explanation
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
December 30, 2015, 08:40:18 AM


Yes... it's confirmed to be happening in BJA's head.

Honest injun. Cry Cry Cry

Okay, I'll bite.

What part of the analogy dont you like, or feel is less than accurate?
Andre#
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 08:49:17 AM


Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Indeed, there's no plan to increase the block size, since the Core devs are determined to shift Bitcoin to a new economic policy without first achieving overwhelming consensus. Hence, if the community becomes unhappy enough, they will fork off, indeed. Whether this will be done by adopting a Bitcoin version that allows for a larger max block size, or by ditching Bitcoin for an alt, remains to be seen. But there is a limit to how much a minority can harass the majority, no matter how much power that minority has. History is littered with examples of that.
Feri22
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 748
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 08:51:33 AM

Blocks are consistently far from being full! Blockpocalypse! You heard it here first! The sky is falling! We MUST switch to centralized Bitcoin and larger blocks!







This is such a FUD that with 2MB you will have some kind of centralization...it is pure bullshit
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 09:00:24 AM

Coin



Explanation
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
December 30, 2015, 09:00:31 AM

Blocks are consistently far from being full!

This is true. We still have some time. But the nature of exponential growth means we will hit it fairly soon and hard.

It will also start to be an issue before 100%. I'm not sure what the exact level would be but I'm thinking around 85%

It's already an issue. I'm finding myself telling newbies at Chaos Communication Congress about alternatives to Bitcoin because Bitcoin has "this problem".

EDIT: And I can tell by their faces they are reducing their planned investment about 10-fold at that moment.
Andre#
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 09:03:03 AM

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.


 Grin Grin Grin
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
December 30, 2015, 09:43:07 AM

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.


damn that's good. Where's the "give gold" button?
Hunyadi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000


☑ ♟ ☐ ♚


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 09:57:32 AM

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.


damn that's good. Where's the "give gold" button?


+1
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:00:25 AM

Coin



Explanation
flagpara
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:11:18 AM

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.


Ahahahahah!
That's so true it hurts xD
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:22:44 AM

someone should post to r/btc
r0ach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:34:48 AM

I'm excited by the large amounts of shorts already in ready to be squeezed.  Do these guys ever learn?  It's probably the same people who got squeezed when the price was $330.
luckygenough56
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012



View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:35:35 AM



r0ach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:39:31 AM





Lol @ that chart.  I sold at 450 before it went down and hoped it would go to 1 penny so I could rebuy but there was far too much buy support at $400-410.  China pulled out completely to try and crash it on purpose but there was way too much western money to prop it up.  I bought back in at the 420's.  There's also WAY too many shorts already in now that have to buy back in for it to even crash now.  The fact that it's still going up even after all those shorts means the rise is back in business.
flagpara
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:40:21 AM

I'm excited by the large amounts of shorts already in ready to be squeezed.  Do these guys ever learn?  It's probably the same people who got squeezed when the price was $330.

Just careful people.
You know everyone is here saying things like "omg we gonna reach XXX$ soon". But lots of people say that all the time. And 99% of the time they're wrong.
Damn the number of people who said we gonna reach 1k$ before the end of the year...
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3514
Merit: 9495


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 10:51:15 AM

Just careful people.
You know everyone is here saying things like "omg we gonna reach XXX$ soon". But lots of people say that all the time. And 99% of the time they're wrong.
Damn the number of people who said we gonna reach 1k$ before the end of the year...

A lot of people 'predict' stuff & make bold statements on the price buddy. Many know their prediction is unrealistic in the short term (both bulls & bears) but they try to make noobs buy in or sell to affect the market.

Realistically not enough of the bitcoin market are even on here so no FUD or attempted price manipulation will ever work here but people certainly try.

There are even paid shills & trolls who try to control price direction. The best thing to do is just ignore MOST people here & do what's right for you & your financial position & future.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 11:00:26 AM

Coin



Explanation
flagpara
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 30, 2015, 11:19:26 AM

Just careful people.
You know everyone is here saying things like "omg we gonna reach XXX$ soon". But lots of people say that all the time. And 99% of the time they're wrong.
Damn the number of people who said we gonna reach 1k$ before the end of the year...

A lot of people 'predict' stuff & make bold statements on the price buddy. Many know their prediction is unrealistic in the short term (both bulls & bears) but they try to make noobs buy in or sell to affect the market.

Realistically not enough of the bitcoin market are even on here so no FUD or attempted price manipulation will ever work here but people certainly try.

There are even paid shills & trolls who try to control price direction. The best thing to do is just ignore MOST people here & do what's right for you & your financial position & future.

Agreed. That's why I closed everything at 450$, and I don't regret it ^.^
Pages: « 1 ... 14334 14335 14336 14337 14338 14339 14340 14341 14342 14343 14344 14345 14346 14347 14348 14349 14350 14351 14352 14353 14354 14355 14356 14357 14358 14359 14360 14361 14362 14363 14364 14365 14366 14367 14368 14369 14370 14371 14372 14373 14374 14375 14376 14377 14378 14379 14380 14381 14382 14383 [14384] 14385 14386 14387 14388 14389 14390 14391 14392 14393 14394 14395 14396 14397 14398 14399 14400 14401 14402 14403 14404 14405 14406 14407 14408 14409 14410 14411 14412 14413 14414 14415 14416 14417 14418 14419 14420 14421 14422 14423 14424 14425 14426 14427 14428 14429 14430 14431 14432 14433 14434 ... 33304 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!