Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[realr0ach]

OT

Brightburn was awesome !!!!!!

I didn't think so, as it was just an inverse, complete replica copy of superman, almost to the point where you could predict what would happen next every second of the movie.  The entire movie was derivative in nature and couldn't stand on it's own two feet unless people already knew of the Superman story in the first place.  It was a cheap, Weird Al parody marketed as a serious movie - not exactly the definition of awesome.

[1713584438]

1713584438

[Krubster]

What's up Wall Observers,

Just a heads up to any new investors. Don't panic sell, hold on to those precious coins. A drop like this is nothing unusual. In every bull-run we've had several 20-30% corrections, just to reach new heights.

Let me share you a story about my first bull-run back in 2012, when BTC went from ~$5 to $266. I bought in at around $10. When my BTC had doubled or so in terms of fiat value, I thought it would be a great idea to diversify some, so I bought a 0.5 oz gold coin for 60 BTC and 40 BTC worth of silver. If I would have hold on to those BTC, the same amount would have given me 400 oz gold bar today (thanks Gyrsur for your updates).

Don't be like me back in 2012. Hold on to your coins. We are still very early in, in this bull run.

Cheers,
Krubster

[JayJuanGee]

the essence of the reality of the matter is that an overwhelming majority of people do not really know bitcoin beyond having had heard the name, so anyone making suggestions, including Traxo, that everyone knows about bitcoin is engaging in a kind of exaggeration that is not even close to our actual facts on the ground situation.

Do not put words in my mouth which I never spoke.  

I actually specifically said "heard about" it - as in heard the term "bitcoin".

Everyone heard about bitcoin by now.
"heard about" or "know about"?

I haven't met anyone since 2017 who hasn't heard about something called "bitcoin".
And mostly they know it's some type of a currency.

My point still stands, and you are bat shit crazy if you actually believe that people know about bitcoin... which is the main relevant point.. why the fuck else talk about it... you are merely trying to suggest that adoption is widespread, and it is not.. that is the relevant point.

.. so who cares whatever the fuck you actually said because your implications are clear, you are leaving a kind of implication that many people know about bitcoin and they do not.... so don't be getting conveniently caught in technical details about what you said when it is sufficiently clear that you are spouting out inaccuracies.. because the essence of what you are saying seems to be a purposefully misleading statement because it suggest inaccurate facts about adoption and/or opportunities for adoption, which is surely not even close to the case.   

[bones261]

Sure, go for it.

How do you shave your llama sack?

Carefully and using a procedure I learnt from confirmed sources.

Do any of these confirmed sources come in the form of cute pets? The two guinea pigs that I have are doing a shit job giving me inside pointers on the BTC market or advice on other matters.

[JayJuanGee]

Tend to agree with JJG.  

My vote is the same as yours, and almost always I am wrong

Why can I not give negative merits.

why would anyone give you the power to increasingly fuck things up any worse than you already are able to with your "free speech" nonsense proclamations?

Furthermore, you are bad enough about NOT even using your positive merits, so who would be dumb enough to give you negative power...

Look in the mirror, roach... you are a social misfit..

instead of being proud of such status..


Get a (mental) grip, roach!!!

[Traxo]

the essence of the reality of the matter is that an overwhelming majority of people do not really know bitcoin beyond having had heard the name, so anyone making suggestions, including Traxo, that everyone knows about bitcoin is engaging in a kind of exaggeration that is not even close to our actual facts on the ground situation.

Do not put words in my mouth which I never spoke.  

I actually specifically said "heard about" it - as in heard the term "bitcoin".

My point still stands, and you are bat shit crazy if you actually believe that people know about bitcoin... which is the main relevant point.. 

Again, stop lying. I did not say that.

why the fuck else talk about it... you are merely trying to suggest that adoption is widespread, and it is not.. that is the relevant point.

.. so who cares whatever the fuck you actually said because your implications are clear, you are leaving a kind of implication that many people know about bitcoin and they do not.... so don't be getting conveniently caught in technical details about what you said when it is sufficiently clear that you are spouting out inaccuracies.. because the essence of what you are saying seems to be a purposefully misleading statement because it suggest inaccurate facts about adoption and/or opportunities for adoption, which is surely not even close to the case.   

Then we could say same about this quote: 

Pretty well everyone I know has heard of bitcoin.

But clearly we both made distinctions between "heard about" and "know about". 

I specifically wanted him to clarify because it was very odd to me that majority of electronics class students had not "heard" about bitcoin, when in fact everyone around me has indeed heard about it (and no, I don't imply they refused to buy it or whatever because they thought it's a scam). 

I tend to agree that many don't know about it (what it is).

That's all.

[realr0ach]

^Any completely artificial, Keynesian widget is a scam by default.  As are all 'currencies', as opposed to 'money' (physical commodities like gold and silver).  All currencies start at a value of zero and return there - there are no exceptions.  Such is the fate of cryptocurrency.  The only type of transaction that doesn't revolve around scams is barter.  

Humans attempted to utilize money to practice specialization of labor in lieu of barter.  If you view specialization of labor as a necessary evil, the closest thing to barter without being barter itself is the exchange of physical commodity money since physical commodities are barter relatively speaking.  Any extrapolation further than that is just flat out fraud or centrally planned, Keynesian neo-feudalism/communism/it's all the same thing.

Bitcoin does NOT remove any of those central planners of communism.  It has built-in middlemen, and those 'transaction validators' are designed to centralize under corporations who can afford massive R&D budgets and foundries like Samsung, Intel, Global Foundries, TSMC, etc.  Bitcoin is the same corporate fascism that already exists, except it's even worse than what exists now because Bitcoin is nothing more than a centralized govt tracking system where the gatekeepers (the tiny amount of transaction validators) will simply blacklist your funds and make them unspendable.  It's an exact replica of the Chinese social credit score system for it's endgame evolution.

[JayJuanGee]

the essence of the reality of the matter is that an overwhelming majority of people do not really know bitcoin beyond having had heard the name, so anyone making suggestions, including Traxo, that everyone knows about bitcoin is engaging in a kind of exaggeration that is not even close to our actual facts on the ground situation.

Do not put words in my mouth which I never spoke.  

I actually specifically said "heard about" it - as in heard the term "bitcoin".

My point still stands, and you are bat shit crazy if you actually believe that people know about bitcoin... which is the main relevant point.. 

Again, stop lying. I did not say that.

why the fuck else talk about it... you are merely trying to suggest that adoption is widespread, and it is not.. that is the relevant point.

.. so who cares whatever the fuck you actually said because your implications are clear, you are leaving a kind of implication that many people know about bitcoin and they do not.... so don't be getting conveniently caught in technical details about what you said when it is sufficiently clear that you are spouting out inaccuracies.. because the essence of what you are saying seems to be a purposefully misleading statement because it suggest inaccurate facts about adoption and/or opportunities for adoption, which is surely not even close to the case.   

Then we could say same about this quote: 

Pretty well everyone I know has heard of bitcoin.

But clearly we both made distinctions between "heard about" and "know about". 

I specifically wanted him to clarify because it was very odd to me that majority of electronics class students had not "heard" about bitcoin, when in fact everyone around me has indeed heard about it (and no, I don't imply they refused to buy it or whatever because they thought it's a scam). 

I tend to agree that many don't know about it (what it is).

That's all.

Perhaps based on your further explanation and clarification we largely agree about the difference between hearing about and knowing about.    Great to be making some progress here, perhaps.

[realr0ach]

JayJuanGee Post

[degxtra1]

How do you shave your llama sack?

Carefully and using a procedure I learnt from confirmed sources.

so proudhon, confirmed sources says no more cheaper than 11K for 1bitcoin.
Buy some gilettes, shave it properly and join the train  
it's last chance - speak to you @20K on 10th of July, this year

[bitserve]

This is fine. Confirmed.

[realr0ach]

Feels like this guy wrote this after reading my posts, but left out much of the more important, easily identifiable arguments as to not appear to be a direct plagiarism:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-26/one-crypto-skeptic-asks-bitcoin-diversion-natural-monetary-order

[HairyMaclairy]

You won't enjoy it

Can I ask you a personal question?

Sure, go for it.

Have you ever had sex with an ewe?

[Krubster]

Sure, go for it.

How do you shave your llama sack?

Carefully and using a procedure I learnt from confirmed sources.

Great to see you again! Your presence is the greatest indicator we're in a bull market. For you who doesn't know - Proudhon is the greatest bear-whale-troll there is, he's a f*cking legend.

[El duderino_]

The size and the speed of the rally was unsustainable and the size and the speed of the correction was even worse. But what something like that just does is it shakes out the weak hands and reminds people that there's risk. This is a healthy movement in something that's gone as far as it is. This is what has to happen. I think it could easily gather itself above the $10,000 level and resume what it was doing before.
Bitcoin Needs To Hold To Head Higher

One of my best friends experienced much laughs with him during the bear market, same laughing peeps where buying 11-12-13K he had to help them etc

Same people asked today should I sell, what do we have to do etc, read the texts with my own eyes, just to dumb to talk over
How F***ing retarded can a human be F***

Always doing the opposite as what one should do

[El duderino_]

F*** just realizing i'm maybe a true master my pricePOLL = 10,500-10,999

Only participate on the first two days Wooooooooow gogogo Micg

I hope I’m wrong

My vote is the same as yours, and almost always I am wrong, but this time, it looks like my odds could be pretty good... we have only slightly more than 24 hours before this one is confirmed, right?

Actually, I kind of agree with you in regards for a preference for UP, yet I just cannot get over NOT letting my preferences get in the way of what seems to be more likely which is that we have, at least, a bit more down from here in the short term.. even though we might have both up and down, so who knows if the upper $9ks will play out in about the next 24 critical ^tm hours?

Every next 24h hours are critical from the moment you write

[El duderino_]

Tend to agree with JJG.  

My vote is the same as yours, and almost always I am wrong

Why can I not give negative merits.

Cause you would mis use them probably

[El duderino_]

OT

Brightburn was awesome !!!!!!

I didn't think so, as it was just an inverse, complete replica copy of superman, almost to the point where you could predict what would happen next every second of the movie.  The entire movie was derivative in nature and couldn't stand on it's own two feet unless people already knew of the Superman story in the first place.  It was a cheap, Weird Al parody marketed as a serious movie - not exactly the definition of awesome.

Here you are just F***ed up dumb, everyone knows its an superman story gone wrong.... but I liked it cause 16+, I would hate it 12+, cause it just needed some gore scenes etc
We all know stuff is gonna be predictable in this kind of movie, but f*** it was just good for what is was intend to be....
I did like it a lot.

I know its wasn't Stalingrad or something....

[savetherainforest]

Tend to agree with JJG.  

My vote is the same as yours, and almost always I am wrong

Why can I not give negative merits.

Confirmed! ... R0ach is 100% a troll !!!

[degxtra1]

This is 9k repeating this time with 13k

1+