Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[El duderino_]

I have heard you admit, on several occasions, that you did not buy enough..

Any man who claims he bought enough is a liar

Those who knows BTC from 2016-2017 and claiming not bought enough with the cash they hold or could have available.... they are not BTC worthy....

I remember many occasions, for example an uncle of me... BTC pumps to 1400-1600-ish and he said if it drops back to 900-ish then I’m gonna buy (thinking he was to late @1400-1600)

Of-course the price did drop to those 900’s maybe bit lower cannot remember exactly ....

But naturally he didn’t bought...  those aren’t BTC worthy cause they fail to understand the fundamentals and the UP potential, they also only see $-€ marks and nothing else...

This one is lucky he did bought around 3500-ish ....

[serveria.com]

OMG how cool is this? Want one... xhomer, puuuuleeeeeaaaazzz... 

[serveria.com]

Got a new Synology DS420+ and plugged in the old drives. Booted it up and puckered my asshole and was greeted with a "Do you wish to migrate your data" dialogue. You bet my fucking ass I do! Clicked yes and 10 minutes later all back up and running with the same settings and all!

I absolutely love Synology products, and their Hybrid RAID setup. Use two of their boxes (DS415+ & DS1511+) on my network and can't recommend them highly enough. For Direct Attached Storage arrays on my Mac, can't to wrong with Promise Technology products IMO.

Promise. That's the manufacturer name i was searching my memories for, almost drove me mad.
THX!

xhomerx10 !!!
i officially and kindly apply for an "alternative original" of this hookers&blow-hat for $50k+ levels 
If you're ok with (t)hat 

Dammit, I'm ready to wear it NOW... 

[OutOfMemory]

Got a new Synology DS420+ and plugged in the old drives. Booted it up and puckered my asshole and was greeted with a "Do you wish to migrate your data" dialogue. You bet my fucking ass I do! Clicked yes and 10 minutes later all back up and running with the same settings and all!

I absolutely love Synology products, and their Hybrid RAID setup. Use two of their boxes (DS415+ & DS1511+) on my network and can't recommend them highly enough. For Direct Attached Storage arrays on my Mac, can't to wrong with Promise Technology products IMO.

Promise. That's the manufacturer name i was searching my memories for, almost drove me mad.
THX!

xhomerx10 !!!
i officially and kindly apply for an "alternative original" of this hookers&blow-hat for $50k+ levels 
If you're ok with (t)hat 

Dammit, I'm ready to wear it NOW... 

No problem, i want literally "HOOKERS & BLOW" on it. So it would be an evolution of this hat

[julian071]

No news but good summary: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/30/bitcoin-surges-record-28500-quadrupling-value-dollar

[AlcoHoDL]

our AI Overlords are now fully mobile

Boston Dynamics-Do you love me?

Thanks for this!

I can't get enough of it. I just can't help but stand in awe of this amazing achievement. Just imagine what they'll be able to do in 10, 20 years.

[d_eddie]

our AI Overlords are now fully mobile

Boston Dynamics-Do you love me?

Holy fuck. Based on that, I think we will have will have humanoid robots in our homes by 2030.  

A buddy has a robot mower for his lawn.  And it’s starting to make sense to replace our lawn guy with a robot...

"holy fuck" was also the first thing that came into my mind watching this. how long will it take for those things to stop you at some intersection and ask for drivers license and some sats? 

scary creatures. when we will meet them in real life i bet them are not dancing for us. it will be other way around... 

I am scared. I, too, have read the Asimov short stories as a kid. The Three Laws are a good idea but a practical impossibility because of the way they are coded. Consider a robocop that fines you. That is damaging a human. Do the Laws only cover physical harm? What if the fined human chooses to destroy the robot? It should succumb voluntarily. Will it or...? Will they code anti-burglar/anti-vandal response into the robots? How far can they go? Is a pregnant woman the same as a gang of thugs? Can a gang of thugs acquire relative immunity by hiring a pregnant woman as a robofront?

[600watt]

our AI Overlords are now fully mobile

Boston Dynamics-Do you love me?

Thanks for this!

I can't get enough of it. I just can't help but stand in awe of this amazing achievement. Just imagine what they'll be able to do in 10, 20 years.

they will be soldiers and cops. one of those enough to control a small town. imagine the battles. imagine the riots. scary as shit.

[Arriemoller]

our AI Overlords are now fully mobile

Boston Dynamics-Do you love me?

Holy fuck. Based on that, I think we will have will have humanoid robots in our homes by 2030.  

A buddy has a robot mower for his lawn.  And it’s starting to make sense to replace our lawn guy with a robot...

"holy fuck" was also the first thing that came into my mind watching this. how long will it take for those things to stop you at some intersection and ask for drivers license and some sats?  

scary creatures. when we will meet them in real life i bet them are not dancing for us. it will be other way around...  

I am scared. I, too, have read the Asimov short stories as a kid. The Three Laws are a good idea but a practical impossibility because of the way they are coded. Consider a robocop that fines you. That is damaging a human. Do the Laws only cover physical harm? What if the fined human chooses to destroy the robot? It should succumb voluntarily. Will it or...? Will they code anti-burglar/anti-vandal response into the robots? How far can they go? Is a pregnant woman the same as a gang of thugs? Can a gang of thugs acquire relative immunity by hiring a pregnant woman as a robofront?

I too like the "robot" novels, I haven't read them in a while, but if I remember correctly the Three (four) laws covers the robot's right to self defence.

Yep, googled and found them, law number three.

First Law
    A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
Second Law
    A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
Third Law
    A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

[d_eddie]

That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.

[Arriemoller]

I think that fourth law that R Daneel came up with all by himself (protect humanity) is a bit too PC for my taste but it works well in the books.

I have to reread those books. Isn't R Daneel the emperors gardener or something on Trantor?

[LFC_Bitcoin]

what? new ath? that can only mean one thing: let´s dump!   dumping bitcoin is a strategy that is used since it was traded for under $1. it has not worked then, it will never work.  

I suppose if you’re a big whale & can dump several thousand btc on the market to make the price dip $1,000 - $2,000 (then buy back MOAR at  the lower price) it’s a good idea.

The issue is, I imagine a few whales get burnt badly doing this as during a bull market the price might even go up as you’re dumping coins & you end up buying back at a loss.

For every few hundred mindrust’s, there is probably a whale getting similarly REKT.

[Globb0]

Directive 4 = Classified

[Arriemoller]

That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.

I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?

[AlcoHoDL]

our AI Overlords are now fully mobile

Boston Dynamics-Do you love me?

Thanks for this!

I can't get enough of it. I just can't help but stand in awe of this amazing achievement. Just imagine what they'll be able to do in 10, 20 years.

they will be soldiers and cops. one of those enough to control a small town. imagine the battles. imagine the riots. scary as shit.

As a scientist and engineer, I stand rapt in awe of the achievement. I do not judge its uses. It could be used for good or bad things. It's the humans who are at fault if they decide to use it for bad things. And they probably will. As humans do with everything.

[d_eddie]

That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.

I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?

First law. Women are humans too.

And the innocent fetus could be counted too, depending on point of view, advancement of pregnancy, and other parameters. Let's not go there now.

[serveria.com]

That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.

I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?

First law. Women are humans too.

And the innocent fetus could be counted too, depending on point of view, advancement of pregnancy, and other parameters. Let's not go there now.

That sounds like Roach! 

[JimboToronto]

Good morning Bitcoinland.

Back in the groove again. Another ATH ($28600 Stamp) and a nice little mini-correction to keep things honest... currently $27940USD/$35716CAD (Bitcoinaverage).

Its still not too late to hit $30k this year.
 
Go Bitcoin go.

Women are humans too.

Female lives matter.  

[d_eddie]

That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.

I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?

First law. Women are humans too.

And the innocent fetus could be counted too, depending on point of view, advancement of pregnancy, and other parameters. Let's not go there now.

That sounds like Roach! 

The regular print or the small one? 

BTW, I think the r0ach might be gone for good. It doesn't make me happy though.

[El duderino_]

28