Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[BTCaesar]

OT: Just for reference...since I did not have any side effect and after my second pfizer shot the shoulder was not even sore, I decided to check for Ab at Labcorp (self-directed, so it cost $10 out of pocket). The result shows >250 u/ml with more than 0.8 u/ml considered positive for Ab.
I am posting this for those who did not have any (or minimal) side effects.
As you can see, there is no correlation.

EDIT: COIN is trading, currently at around $400

Hello Biodom,
i got my first shot 2,5 days ago... since then there is no side effect. The doc took the injection quickly out and my arm did bleed very hard. He forgot to put a piece of cotton or any similar silly things just after taking the injection out. I was a bit worried and asked him whether the liquid went out by blood as well? He tried to comfort and convince me but i was not satisfied at all.
The next shot is by the end of May. So, you made a decision to check but do not understand anything with levels such as >250u/ml and 0.8 u/ml... Do you mean that the vaccine does not work out?

re levels...nah.
The purpose of any vaccine is to elicit the production of antibodies against the target, in this case antibodies against COVID's spike protein.
Labcorp (with the input of CDC, I am sure) decided that to be positive for antibodies you need to have above 0.8u/ml (u=units, but they don't say what units signify, so it is arbitrary, probably some numerical value, like mkg/ml, ng/ml or something like that).
My results show the level of antibodies which is about 300X of what is considered to be positive.
I guess this means that the antibody level is high post-vaccination (in this particular case).
This test cannot predict protection.
EDIT: you have to wait 3-4 wks after the SECOND shot (in a two-shot regimen like Pfizer or Moderna) to ascertain your max Ab level.
Not a medical advice, of course, I am not an MD.

Thanks for your reply and clarification. It helped me a lot to understand right now. 

[Sayeds56]

Simply amazing.

[sirazimuth]

a few pseudo-intellectual snarky replies because hey, its Friday night and I've had a couple.... love you bros  (nohomo)

....

Oh it's proudhon, he's been doing this a long long time..

Ya think?

>

woof woof  AWOOOOOO

ftfy

snip.. the usual gembitz weeeee  spam

scrolled by  (I dont use the ignore button )...

snip ...words

tldr...what else is new?

....

awesome (laser eyes) post, as per usual.

.....

The infamous "alt season". Bitcoin's drop in Market Capitalization happened in 2017 too: people jump into alts hoping to get more Bitcoins. And when they start selling, Bitcoin goes up in market share as well as in fiat value. I expect the same again: Bitcoin remains quite stable in value while alts are growing, and in a few months Bitcoin will absorb all that value.

/so far my wishes and expectations

nailed it

First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll  

Howdy stranger. Rumor has it, you are the mod of this historic mega thread, amirite?

.....

Dude!... my favorite WOber (nohomo)

....

I promise not bug you about that equation anymore.

....

yo fellow senior citizen miner bro... ^5.

GO BITCOIN

[Arriemoller]

Seems like $60k is acting support, $70k next?

According to my calculations we are going to skip both $70k and $80k like nothing as soon as we cross $69,420.. End station would be around $94,300 for a small correction to $87,500 and that'll be the lowest we go until 2022.

I remain slightly skeptical.

[BitcoinBunny]

[shahzadafzal]

“Bitcoin doesn’t care what you write about it. Bitcoin is unstoppable,” Gladstein.

[shahzadafzal]

First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll 

Heyyyyy

Go ahead... we are waiting...

[sirazimuth]

Apparently, this Peter Schiff bitcoin hater character is trying to save face. But he's just digging his hole
deeper (the one he's been digging for, oh idk... past 5 years or so?) and it's not gonna end well.
Dude I get it, you don't like bitcoin. So just keep your pseudo "gold guru" yapping mouth shut about it.
That way there, you wont look like a total moron when it hits 100k.
Because you don't know diddly squat about it. You don't even know how to set up and safeguard a bitcoin wallet ffs...


off topic  hot off press

https://soundcloud.com/sirazimuth/i-was-thinking6

[heslo]

First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll 

Heyyyyy

Go ahead... we are waiting...

All this power and I don't know what to do with it... hmm... Let's try this...

How long until 70k

1 week
1 month
1 year
or the top is in math and science confirms it

[philipma1957]

First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll 

Heyyyyy

Go ahead... we are waiting...

All this power and I don't know what to do with it... hmm... Let's try this...

How long until 70k

1 week
1 month
1 year
or the top is in math and science confirms it

1 Week

[DaRude]

...

Umm well yeah, if dodge continuously raises in value for over 12yrs vs BTC then i might concede that Dodge is eating BTC.

[sirazimuth]

W   T   F  ?
Jeeezusmuchwow!  Its up 517% 410% (lol) in past week... that's insane ridiculousness.
If bitcoin ever pumped 410% in one week I would dump it instantly because I'd know it's just another shitcoin.

[heslo]

W   T   F  ?
Jeeezusmuchwow!  Its up 517% in past week... that's insane ridiculousness.
If bitcoin ever pumped 517% in one week I would dump it instantly because I'd know it's just another shitcoin.

Pump and dump. A lot of people will make good money, even more will be left holding their bags

[JimboToronto]

Obviously the amazing rise of the value of serious altcoins is the result of institutional recognition that Bitcoin is outdated and has been superceded by more accessible coins like Doge.

Bitcoin is simply too expensive, so institutional investors are clearly following the lead of the savvy traders on Wall Street Bets, Twitter, Youtube, Reddit, etc., and putting their money into less expensive coins.

Bitcoin is old. Time to get rid of it.

[shahzadafzal]

W   T   F  ?
Jeeezusmuchwow!  Its up 517% 410% (lol) in past week... that's insane ridiculousness.
If bitcoin ever pumped 410% in one week I would dump it instantly because I'd know it's just another shitcoin.

Its up 517% 410%  324% (2 x lol) in past week...

[nanobtc]

Bring back Primecoin.

[Richy_T]

So my friend said I should sell all my Bitcoins and buy dogs...

[Kylapoiss]

Good morning WO bros, have an awesome Saturday!

[Wilhelm]

NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/

Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....

And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars 

the reasons for going to the moon are more than just stepping stone to mars, first there maybe some minerals there that are economic to mine, but that's still speculative, to be proven.

most importantly though China has made moves that looks like it is intending to take the "commanding heights" militarily on the moon, this is no shit serious.

we may see the moon, or lunar orbits, cis lunar orbits, earth-moon L1 Lagrange point or earth orbits become the next battlefield.

1. The moon isn’t a stepping stone to Mars. Going direct to Mars saves time money and resources.
2. The moon is geologically dead and mostly made of the same stuff as earth. If it was pure diamond or gold then I’d understand. I believe He3 to be the most interesting...

....

3. Yup it’s showing their big dick again by putting military presence on the moon 🌚

Well gravity says you are so very wrong.
Along with atmosphere or lack of it.

We could shuttle stuff to the moon

big a bigger boat with more fuel as gravity would allow for easier take off. Also moon would be used as a spinning sling shot to boost that rocket ship.

Finally the lack of or very thin atmosphere would along for less friction on take offs and landing.

So If you really want us to go to mars a large basecamp on the moon makes sense.

As for military on the moon the military has always sucked and will always suck.  But Leaders love the war games.

Physics says you are wrong... And many experts too...

Building in zero gravity is even easier, and you can build bigger. Why take off twice? Once from earth and once from the moon. Added complexity and risk isn't worth it.

Shuttling stuff into space costs $10000/kg from earth, so if you want to go to the moon (or mars) then you need to make everything there and only pack your necessities.
Having to supply a base camp on the moon is stupendously expensive.

On Mars you can literally make rocket fuel from the atmosphere. The moon you can't.
Mars has everything you need is you can get to it.

The earth has rotation and you don't see us slingshotting into space. It only saves some fuel if you take off from the equator. So that argument is moot.

If you thrust away from earth you might aswell thrust into the Mars gravity field instead of the moons gravity field.

[cygan]

Time for some FOMO to kick in?

With these images, are you trying to suggest that BTC is grandpa coin?   Your little diggs on bitcoin and your ongoing disgruntledness remains somewhat subliminal, no?

We have had 48k micros, 56k modems and you didn't get that these are 64k micros?

and we also had that at the time ... for the younger ones among us, this is a 5 1/4 inch disk
would actually make a very good coldwallet, wouldn't it?