Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[1714246883]

1714246883

[1714246883]

1714246883

[1714246883]

1714246883

[xhomerx10]

LOL. Craig Wright fired from nChain.

The world is beginning to heal.

~snipped for brevity

~snipped for brevity

You don't expect that he Craig Wright should be sacked just like that without evidence shown to back the claim for manipulation. Even if the board will take action they'll have to kick start based on provided evidence and not just accusations.

Am no fan of Craig W. but if am to neutral be this is just like a press statement of someone making known to the public about his resignation from his position.

 I also noticed last night that Craig Wright's picture with the designation "Chief Science Officer" was missing today in the early morning hours.



↑ that's a screen cap from a few minutes ago

↓ that's image of Craig that was there for a few years up until late March or early April of this year



until it was replaced by this ↓ image in late April/Ealy May of this year


 I believe that image of Craig Wright remained there until yesterday when it was removed.  Now it could be that he's simply updating his picture to something photoshopped to make him look even younger and we've caught him at a bad time or maybe it's all a ruse to get some media attention but I know that he "just wants to be left alone!"...so it's strange that after all these years, his image is no longer there.  That alone doesn't constitute proof of sacking but we know Christen stepped down (in a scorched earth kinda way) and his image plus the many references to him on the nChain site were removed posthaste.   Craig claims he hasn't gone anywhere via twitter although he has gone because he no longer holds an official role at nChain by his own admission:



NB: Thanks WayBackMachine
NB: Sorry if I ruined anyone's breakfast/lunch with those image.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[AlcoHoDL]

[...]



[...]

Thanks for this. So, it does look like he's no longer officially linked to nChain. Good riddance!

[fillippone]

Too much, buddy  


EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

Post a buddychart only if price moves more than 1% either direction since last post. Else wait another 60 minutes and check again.

Code:

import ccxt
import time

# Initialize the exchange
exchange = ccxt.binance()  # You can replace 'binance' with your preferred exchange

# Function to get current Bitcoin price
def get_bitcoin_price():
    ticker = exchange.fetch_ticker('BTC/USDT')
    return ticker['last']

# Function to make a post
def make_post(price_change):
    # Replace this with your actual post logic
    print(f"Bitcoin price changed by {price_change}%")

# Main loop
while True:
    try:
        # Get the current price
        current_price = get_bitcoin_price()

        # Check if there was a 1% change from the last post
        if 'last_price' in locals() and abs(current_price - last_price) / last_price > 0.01:
            make_post(abs(current_price - last_price) / last_price * 100)

        # Update last_price
        last_price = current_price

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An error occurred: {e}")

    # Wait for 60 minutes
    time.sleep(60 * 60)

This would also make @philipma1957 happy.

[vapourminer]

Too much, buddy 


EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

Post a buddychart only if price moves more than 1% either direction since last post. Else wait another 60 minutes and check again.

[code snipped]

This would also make @philipma1957 happy.

buddy brainwashing
buddy getting handicap
buddy going woke?

this cannot be so
and that carbon based life form
phil sure is pushy


#haiku

[Biodom]

Too much, buddy  


EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

Yes, I am seconding this.. but measure in %%, not $$: for example, at least 1% in an hour ($267 currently).
Any smaller number is wholly irrelevant, imho.

EDIT sorry, I did not check the @fillippone post made 20 min earlier 

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[JimboToronto]

I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

I'd recommend omitting the silly price numbers completely and just posting the charts. Chart Buddy is not about the price. It's all about the order book and walls at Bitstamp (originally MtGox).

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Biodom]

large/small unit paradoxes:

currently btc is considered to be too big and sats are too small:

$100 is currently 0.0037 btc, but 370370 sats, both numbers being kind of awkward, psychologically.
I am not trying to argue for microbitcoin or bits, not at all.
However, IF we will proceed to higher numbers, sats will look more attractive than measuring in btc:

at $270K/btc, $100 would be 0.00037 btc (people will make error inputting zeroes, imho) and 37037 sats (or 370.37 sats/$, getting close to the yen value).
at $2.7mil/btc, $100 would be 0.000037btc (even more mistakes and "fat" fingers) and 3700.37 sats (or 37 sats/$, which is on the money for using these units for regular payments).

TL;DR Sometime soon, we would need to promote sats more heavily as a preferred term of unit measurement.

[eXPHorizon]

Lmfao these retarded Bljatcoiners in our Country paid several K € just to make an AD about bljatcoin and craptocoins. Saying just buy 1k just 1k almost saying PLEASE 😂😂It is the sign that all of it is failing. Thank god very few are so retarded to buy.

We actualy know what true and safe investment is as we our people learned about this shit years before Bljatcoins went live as similar trash caused big financial problems in the country.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[JayJuanGee]

Too much, buddy  
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

The buddy posts a chart on hourly basis and if none of us make a post then we'll see buddy only. I also believe that limiting buddy is somewhat good for the WO thread. I believe buddy should post charts when price pumps a lot or dips a lot and other than that it would make 1 post in 4 hours if the price doesn't change a lot.

If it's not broke, don't fix it.

Too much, buddy  

EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

Post a buddychart only if price moves more than 1% either direction since last post. Else wait another 60 minutes and check again.

Code:

import ccxt
import time

# Initialize the exchange
exchange = ccxt.binance()  # You can replace 'binance' with your preferred exchange

# Function to get current Bitcoin price
def get_bitcoin_price():
    ticker = exchange.fetch_ticker('BTC/USDT')
    return ticker['last']

# Function to make a post
def make_post(price_change):
    # Replace this with your actual post logic
    print(f"Bitcoin price changed by {price_change}%")

# Main loop
while True:
    try:
        # Get the current price
        current_price = get_bitcoin_price()

        # Check if there was a 1% change from the last post
        if 'last_price' in locals() and abs(current_price - last_price) / last_price > 0.01:
            make_post(abs(current_price - last_price) / last_price * 100)

        # Update last_price
        last_price = current_price

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An error occurred: {e}")

    # Wait for 60 minutes
    time.sleep(60 * 60)

This would also make @philipma1957 happy.

Wow!!!!   That's not bad.  I might have to retract my above "not broken don't fix" statement... but why?  So that I am not called a wiffle-waffler?

Too much, buddy  

EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

Post a buddychart only if price moves more than 1% either direction since last post. Else wait another 60 minutes and check again.

[code snipped]
This would also make @philipma1957 happy.

buddy brainwashing
buddy getting handicap
buddy going woke?

this cannot be so
and that carbon based life form
phil sure is pushy

#haiku

That's a good point.  Maybe I should go back to my earlier stance about buddy not being broke?

Too much, buddy  

EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

Yes, I am seconding this.. but measure in %%, not $$: for example, at least 1% in an hour ($267 currently).
Any smaller number is wholly irrelevant, imho.

Seems like I read that before.

I must ask my lil selfie:  "Lil selfie, am I going through deja vu?"

I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

I'd recommend omitting the silly price numbers completely and just posting the charts. Chart Buddy is not about the price. It's all about the order book and walls at Bitstamp (originally MtGox).

Not going to lie.

Mind blown.

[JayJuanGee]

...so it's strange that after all these years, his image is no longer there.  That alone doesn't constitute proof of sacking but we know Christen stepped down (in a scorched earth kinda way) and his image plus the many references to him on the nChain site were removed posthaste.   Craig claims he hasn't gone anywhere via twitter although he has gone because he no longer holds an official role at nChain by his own admission:

I hate to be posting too much about shitcoins, but it seems that "we" are not really violating any WO rules since "we" are posting mostly to bash (i.e. sling mud at) BcashSV...

We cannot necessarily rely on posts staying available on self-moderated threads, so here is a fairly long post from cryptodevil from a few hours ago.

Breaking...

nChain CEO quits and calls Craig out for being a liar and a fraud and most definitely not Satoshi
https://twitter.com/CryptoDevil/status/1707906429661651437

Calvin Ayre emails Craig and tells him he is out and is pulling the plug on funding the hopeless legal cases Craig has been dragging innocent people into:
https://twitter.com/CryptoDevil/status/1708085903451652335

Full text part 1
wonder who sent this email
and who it was sent to. It was forwarded to me by someone Headline was as follows;
“My last direct communication on this issue. Please read carefully.” Dated 23 September. Judge by yourself please:
As I sit here I am on a beach in Southern Spain.  I have a good life.  I have every intention of keeping it this way.   Right now the only negative in my life is your litigation disaster (and getting old but that one I cannot fix).  I will accept your explanation that you did not actually threaten me so the following is the situation we find ourselves in.
 
I have been operating under the assumption that you and Ramona have the keys and that you were simply pretending not to have them as part of some strategy that you have trapped yourself in.  But now that we are looking at a situation where continuing to deny you have them ruins your life and damages your supporters, I am forced to make a tough decision.  It no longer matters if you have the keys or not as it is my opinion based on advice from Zafar and others that you cannot win the COPA trial if you do not sign at Harvard so I have no choice in what I have to do.
 
This of course will also mean that you lose all the other cases (other than maybe the token theft case…but to me losing COPA even puts this at risk) as COPA will set precedent that you are not Satoshi in law.   All IP other than nChain patents will disappear.  This means that you  are not going to be able to get a court to declare that you own any tokens either.  We have also verified that there is no complete paper trail evidencing the trust owning any tokens.  This after nearly a year of Zurich reviewing all the evidence you have. This means you cannot repay me the money you owe me for all the litigation to date.  This means every cent spent on your cases is me pissing away my kids inheritance.   If you have the keys, your best play is to now use them.  Going to jail for perjury but having the entire world accept you are a flawed Satoshi is infinitely better than losing this case and only being considered likely to be a flawed Satoshi after your death by historians as no other realistic person is ever found.  However, its my opinion that once the world accepts you are a flawed Satoshi, everything changes and all of this just goes away.  I can make it all go away in fact.  There is zero reason to continue to pretend you do not have the keys if you really have them.  Side bonus is that using the keys in this way, combined with verdict in Florida will likely be a accepted replacement for proper paper work for financial institutions.
 
So either you are a moron for intentionally losing this case, or you are a moron for actually not having the keys…either way, I am not following you over the cliff…and I actually have concerns with Stefan even being a witness as I know what they will do to him for this.  My opinion in having watched this play out over the years is that its clear you are hopelessly bad at litigation.  The ONLY reason you won in Florida is the other side got greedy and tried to both steal your shit and ruin your reputation and this was conflicting agendas and so confused the jury.  The other side will not be making this mistake in London.
 
To me I am doing you and your supporters a favor…. I will cover this in CG as us still being sure you are Satoshi even as its clear that you were run over by the combined forces of Silicon Valley, US payments companies and the entire Crypto world. We will say that we believe you did forge some documents to replace ones you destroyed earlier to try to pretend you were not Satoshi.  We will say this is because your Asperger’s makes you not think and act like an adult.    You are like a super smart Teenager.   This is not how this would play out in the media if we spend toe to toe with COPA and they still win which is what is most likely…in addition to the massive waste of my kids wealth…
(To be continued below)

----------------
Full text part 2
Its clear that once you lose you will need me more than ever.  I will be the only one standing between your family and the soup kitchen.  At least at the moment,  depending on how self-destructive you get, I am not stopping my funding of the Association, the ecosystem or nChain and you, in fact this decision makes funding them a lot easier for me. From my perspective this decision improves everything now.  Your continuing to accept this funding is your acceptance that our existing deal is still valid and that you agree with me that my stopping funding a lost cause is not a violation on my side.  You are further agreeing that you personally will pay me back for all the money I have spent on your project even if the trust never gets any tokens.
 
I do not believe this case is fundable in any other way, I do not believe you will even be able to get a competent law firm to work with you on this as I expect all the lawyers to bail once they know I am out.  The analysis above will be done by everyone and they are coming to the same conclusion.  However, I will support any new funding options you can find if this is your wish just send the plan to Alain and I.    I do not expect this to happen however as you have made yourself just to toxic for this and your enemies have piled on in branding you as such…they are ever so gleeful with every round you pinch off into your own feet.  As I said above…I believe what I am doing is actually tough love, its definitely not meant to hurt you and it will actually help you looking at this from where I am sitting.  The lawyers all dropping you because you ran out of funding is the best case scenario that I can see if you cannot do a Harvard signing.
 
By the way…you lost both contempt of court cases.  Christen was the one that saved you and you are acting like you are too selfish and ignorant to even understand this.  I don’t believe you have even thanked anyone.  Both of these contempt’s would have been used against you in all other cases.
 
C……

So the only question remains...

Will Craig flee the UK before he's nabbed by law enforcement for extradition back to Australia to face justice for the millions he stole from the taxpayer in his fake-bitcoins-to-real-dollars cash rebate scam?

[OutOfMemory]

Too much, buddy  


EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.

The buddy posts a chart on hourly basis and if none of us make a post then we'll see buddy only. I also believe that limiting buddy is somewhat good for the WO thread. I believe buddy should post charts when price pumps a lot or dips a lot and other than that it would make 1 post in 4 hours if the price doesn't change a lot.

I was thinking more in the 10-25 Dollar range.

EDIT: 1% would be too much imo. 0,1% fits the purpose of getting rid of those flatline-charts in series, which my suggestion mainly was about.

[darkangel11]

Thanks for this. So, it does look like he's no longer officially linked to nChain. Good riddance!

He's never fired
He only resigns himself
Craig is never sacked

[OutOfMemory]

Thanks for this. So, it does look like he's no longer officially linked to nChain. Good riddance!

He's never fired
He only resigns himself
Craig is never sacked

Can you sack a sack?
Or make the sack break his neck?
Either way, it's fine.

[danadc]

These are the things I like, when we see that September is already over and we want to start a good October:



And the volumes that are registered are very good, can you imagine that this Sunday we can register a value of BITCOIN IN $30 thousand Dollars?



Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-price-best-september-since-2016

I like that the outlook can feel like that, because that emphasizes that the price of bitcoin will rise or it will very likely be achieved.

On the other hand I see that swiempree Bloomberg gets his dose of Fud:

As September comes to a close, Bitcoin is poised to end the quarter on a down note in its first quarterly decline this yea

Source:https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-ending-september-first-quarterly-144059568.html

With all this I am left with the positive, I see a good rise in BTC as more feasible.

[OgNasty]

The great battle for $27K is upon us. I think while looking at charts of the previous 4-years is reason to be excited now, one can’t ignore that there is typically one more big drop before the rocket launches. Do folks think that is in store for us again here? Could the new Antminer be the catalyst as Bitmain starts stacking BTC from orders?