Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:27:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 32758 32759 32760 32761 32762 32763 32764 32765 32766 32767 32768 32769 32770 32771 32772 32773 32774 32775 32776 32777 32778 32779 32780 32781 32782 32783 32784 32785 32786 32787 32788 32789 32790 32791 32792 32793 32794 32795 32796 32797 32798 32799 32800 32801 32802 32803 32804 32805 32806 32807 [32808] 32809 32810 32811 32812 32813 32814 32815 32816 32817 32818 32819 32820 32821 32822 32823 32824 32825 32826 32827 32828 32829 32830 32831 32832 32833 32834 32835 32836 32837 32838 32839 32840 32841 32842 32843 32844 32845 32846 32847 32848 32849 32850 32851 32852 32853 32854 32855 32856 32857 32858 ... 33304 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26368637 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844



View Profile
December 18, 2023, 02:54:48 AM

Mow says: a million
weeks after ETF release
a party so soon?


#haiku
1714246077
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714246077

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714246077
Reply with quote  #2

1714246077
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714246077
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714246077

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714246077
Reply with quote  #2

1714246077
Report to moderator
1714246077
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714246077

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714246077
Reply with quote  #2

1714246077
Report to moderator
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:01:18 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Gachapin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1840


bitcoin retard


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:03:29 AM

Mow says: a million
weeks after ETF release
a party so soon?


#haiku


that would be so nice
but I just can't believe it
but then.. it's bitcoin
Gachapin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1840


bitcoin retard


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:04:41 AM

place your bets. will 40 k hold..
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 2895



View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:10:40 AM

Floating in limbo
Moving coin is expensive
End of 23












#haiku
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 2895



View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:11:27 AM
Merited by Gachapin (1)

place your bets. will 40 k hold..

It won't.
Gachapin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1840


bitcoin retard


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:16:56 AM

place your bets. will 40 k hold..

It won't.

chart looks quite dumpy
hisslyness
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 1692



View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:17:30 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

https://mempool.space/block/000000000000000000008ed27e5d18709c450b78367df4bfbf37dd7b9a1fb6ec

Fees are more than block rewards! mempool cost is crazy at the moment!

Is this a way to artificially suppress the price…

Apologies if my previous post unintentionally steered into 'shitcoinery' and miner conspiracy theories. I was simply contemplating the ripple effects of a bloated mempool and skyrocketing fees.

While the overall creation of new Bitcoin remains unchanged, what does shift is the movement of existing bitcoins. Particularly, when these transactions involve groups necessitating liquidation for operational costs, one can't help but ponder the potential impact on the price.

On the surface, the addition of 6.5 extra Bitcoins per block, or 936 Bitcoins daily, may not seem monumental. However, when you convert that to a daily liquidation or profit-taking scenario, we're talking about roughly $38,000,000 USD per day.

P.S.: Work has been exceptionally demanding lately, and I'm aware some have responded to my earlier post. Regrettably, I haven't had the time to follow up. Appreciate your understanding!
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844



View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:23:24 AM

Jeff Bezos and others are talking about 1 tril humans living in the Solar system (mostly on O'Neill cylindrical colonies, depicted in the "Intrastellar" movie):

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jeff-bezos-plays-down-ai-dangers-and-says-a-trillion-humans-could-live-in-huge-cylindrical-space-stations-78058437

My question is: what would be the longest distance of such colony to Earth (or maybe between different colonies) to still maintain a common bitcoin ledger?
I am not exactly sure how nodes "decide" which miner was the first to the block.
For example if one miner is on The Moon, which is 1.28 sec away by the light pulse: would that miner always lag and, therefore, not able to claim a block?
Or, is there a 'compensation' mechanism that would take the 1.28 sec delay into the account (in case of a Moon miner)?
Of course 1.28 sec is much less than 10min between blocks, so theoretically, this still can be sorted IF there is a mechanism to compensate for that 1.28 sec delay due to the speed of light transmission limit.

I also found this description (https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/84412/how-does-a-node-decide-whether-a-block-is-valid):
Quote
This is also true in a tie. If two blocks are mined by different miners at the same time, each participant assumes that the first block they received is the valid one, and they continue the Proof-of-Work process from this valid block. The next miner to create a valid block ends the tie by creating the longer chain, and any miner who was working on a block other than the one referred to in the new block's header will discard the work they have done so far on the shorter chain, and continue working on the longer chain.

The problem is with the term "at the same" time, imho. Relative to what?

In any case, if this cannot be counteracted, then only the O'Neill structures that are closer than Moon to earth could participate, but I doubt that they could be allowed in such a close proximity because of a possibility of those structures colliding with Earth (if they would be built so close).
Gachapin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1840


bitcoin retard


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 03:32:08 AM

Jeff Bezos and others are talking about 1 tril humans living in the Solar system (mostly on O'Neill cylindrical colonies, depicted in the "Intrastellar" movie):

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jeff-bezos-plays-down-ai-dangers-and-says-a-trillion-humans-could-live-in-huge-cylindrical-space-stations-78058437

My question is: what would be the longest distance of such colony to Earth (or maybe between different colonies) to still maintain a common bitcoin ledger?
I am not exactly sure how nodes "decide" which miner was the first to the block.
For example if one miner is on The Moon, which is 1.28 sec away by the light pulse: would that miner always lag and, therefore, not able to claim a block?
Or, is there a 'compensation' mechanism that would take the 1.28 sec delay into the account (in case of a Moon miner)?
Of course 1.28 sec is much less than 10min between blocks, so theoretically, this still can be sorted IF there is a mechanism to compensate for that 1.28 sec delay due to the speed of light transmission limit.

I also found this description (https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/84412/how-does-a-node-decide-whether-a-block-is-valid):
Quote
This is also true in a tie. If two blocks are mined by different miners at the same time, each participant assumes that the first block they received is the valid one, and they continue the Proof-of-Work process from this valid block. The next miner to create a valid block ends the tie by creating the longer chain, and any miner who was working on a block other than the one referred to in the new block's header will discard the work they have done so far on the shorter chain, and continue working on the longer chain.

The problem is with the term "at the same" time, imho. Relative to what?

In any case, if this cannot be counteracted, then only the O'Neill structures that are closer than Moon to earth could participate, but I doubt that they could be allowed in such a close proximity because of a possibility of those structures colliding with Earth (if they would be built so close).


Not the answer your asked for.  But I think at that time we might have something like entangled quantum (instant) communication without any delay.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3150
Merit: 4309


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 04:00:04 AM
Last edit: December 18, 2023, 04:29:51 AM by jojo69
Merited by Biodom (2)

Jeff Bezos and others are talking about 1 tril humans living in the Solar system (mostly on O'Neill cylindrical colonies, depicted in the "Intrastellar" movie):

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jeff-bezos-plays-down-ai-dangers-and-says-a-trillion-humans-could-live-in-huge-cylindrical-space-stations-78058437

My question is: what would be the longest distance of such colony to Earth (or maybe between different colonies) to still maintain a common bitcoin ledger?
I am not exactly sure how nodes "decide" which miner was the first to the block.
For example if one miner is on The Moon, which is 1.28 sec away by the light pulse: would that miner always lag and, therefore, not able to claim a block?
Or, is there a 'compensation' mechanism that would take the 1.28 sec delay into the account (in case of a Moon miner)?
Of course 1.28 sec is much less than 10min between blocks, so theoretically, this still can be sorted IF there is a mechanism to compensate for that 1.28 sec delay due to the speed of light transmission limit.

I also found this description (https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/84412/how-does-a-node-decide-whether-a-block-is-valid):
Quote
This is also true in a tie. If two blocks are mined by different miners at the same time, each participant assumes that the first block they received is the valid one, and they continue the Proof-of-Work process from this valid block. The next miner to create a valid block ends the tie by creating the longer chain, and any miner who was working on a block other than the one referred to in the new block's header will discard the work they have done so far on the shorter chain, and continue working on the longer chain.

The problem is with the term "at the same" time, imho. Relative to what?

In any case, if this cannot be counteracted, then only the O'Neill structures that are closer than Moon to earth could participate, but I doubt that they could be allowed in such a close proximity because of a possibility of those structures colliding with Earth (if they would be built so close).


https://unchained.com/blog/law-of-hash-horizons/



Quote
The Muskcoin Revolution of 2140

In our view, Clark is partially right.  Earth will remain the dominant bitcoin mining planet.  But one day Martians will stage a revolution in support of their own token: Muskcoin.  If they succeed, then Mars will become the dominant Muskcoin mining planet.  The Muskcoin Revolution of 2140 will become a template for other colonies of Earth to follow, just like the American Revolution of 1776 was in its age.
Why Martians will want Muskcoin

    Transaction without settlement is tyranny.

– Martian revolutionary slogan, 2138



Quote
After the revolution, everyone will understand that successful human colonies near locations with abundant natural resources that are able to attract settlers and build industry will launch their own blockchains once they have sufficient political will and hashrate.  Indeed, becoming a peer in the Solchain network will become the definition of what it means to be a successful colony.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 04:01:14 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Zwei
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 487
Merit: 536


All I need's a win.


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 04:02:07 AM

Not the answer your asked for.  But I think at that time we might have something like entangled quantum (instant) communication without any delay.

They are basically the same thing, but wormholes are much cooler.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10178


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 04:56:04 AM

.....That is an unstoppable method. ( I can not conceive of a fix for this) .....
[edited out]
Never said it was broken.  Said it is truly different this time.
Maybe I misunderstood, but ... there... I highlighted it for you... which sounds like another way of saying miners are ongoingly manipulating the bitcoin fees system in a kind of broken way.. and yeah, maybe you did not mean it like that.. but that's how I read your various astute-sounding "prognostications."   Tongue
yeah so sitting with a stack of btc and looking at an obvious issue that is being exploited as I type does not feel so good does it?

Remember somewhere around late 2022, you said that a guy with 100 BTC should sell his BTC or some kind of bullshit like that because it was not a good thing to be holding so many BTC... and it seems to me that right around 68 BTC puts a guy at default entry-level fuck you status, and surely even in the coming year or two, it may well end up playing out that less than 50 BTC puts a guy at default entry-level fuck you status (and that is referring to the 200-week moving average price and the seemingly likely future 200-week moving average price that continues to move up)..

To me, it seems good to be holding value in BTC, and yeah, it is likely better to have some other options so that you are not necessarily forced to spend BTC at a time that is anything but your own choosing, but even a guy with 100 BTC right now might choose to shave off 1% of his BTC holdings for the quarter (that is 4% for the year) (right around 1 BTC, and perhaps good for a quarter or two of living expenses, depending on his budget.. and yeah it may be a supplement income and may or may not be his primary income, and surely if he is nervous about if there might be times that he is able to spend his bitcoin directly, then he might just shave off larger amounts at a time.. those are personal choices and may or may not play out very well for a guy trying to figure out sustainability, but even if the guy with 100 BTC ONLY cashes out one month at a time, then maybe he would cash out 0.33 BTC (which is 0.33% - and also a 4% per year rate), and that still is $13.5K for the month, and I am even in recent times thinking that 6-10% might be acceptable and sustainable rates in bitcoin.. but surely we still have to be careful, and it is probably safer to stick with the more conservative withdrawal rates of 4%, but there might be some months that a guy might want to splurge and to live it up a bit more than his usual budget 4% per year or 0.33% per month.. not that longer term bitcoiners necessarily are not used to already living within their means.

Of course, the guy with 50 BTC would have half of a budget as compared with the guy with 100 BTC, and the guy with 50 is not quite at entry-level fuck you status, as the guy with 68 BTC would be just reaching entry level fuck you status.  So whether at any of those rates, if a guy is cashing out 0.33% of his BTC every month, and then if he might have to pay a $50 fee because he did not plan in advance, then I still doubt that it is that BIG of a deal, and there could be circumstances to cash out several months in advance or even a year in advance, and I see no reason to be worked up about whether you are able to use your BTC, merely because you might not feel it is affordable to be using your BTC for smaller transactions of perhaps less than $500 at a time.. unless maybe you were using lighting network or some other second layer solution.

If the largest pool can do what I am telling it looks like they are doing you are likely a bit defensive.

I take what you are saying with a grain of salt because even if I don't know a lot of technicals, I know that you are full of shit a lot of the time and you miss quite a few variables, including I saw some other posts in which you suggested that some miners would withdraw their hashrate, and then why aren't they doing it?  the hashrate continues to go up, and sure every once in a while there are empty blocks, but most of the blocks are full of transactions and it seems that the transactions paying the highest fees are getting processed first, and so how urgent is it for any of us to do our bitcoin transaction? is it a big transaction that I would do on chain or might I have lighting or some other second layer as an option.

Yeah, poor people might have to adjust their behaviors, and they might be in a bad situation if they have a bunch of UTXOs with values that are less than $500....and will these high fees clear or not.. In spite of your speculations of supposed manipulation, I have no reason to believe that fees are going to stay in the supra 100 sats per vbyte and higher range on an ongoing basis.. but let's see how long it lasts.

All I have heard is btc btc btc btc from you.

I am glad that you accept that we are in a BTC thread.. so you want to talk about shitcoins? or what?

and thats fine. I am simply saying.

oh? I am glad you are so accepting of talking about BTC in these here parts.

the method I speak of is pretty much something btc is not able to correct at this moment it time.

We need to take out some popcorn and watch the action.

Consider that the large mines have billions invested they found an angle and are playing with it.

We have not seen these dynamics.

Yes.. maybe they will continue to manipulate the BTC fees up, and only the rich will be able to transact on the BTC layer 1, and you are not the first person who has made these kinds of claims, so it is not like I am shocked by what you are saying and/or what we are seeing.   I get the sense that you are gloating rather than really wanting to talk about anything meaningful...and you are reading me as someone who is upset about high fees, as if it breaks my investment thesis or some other dumb and not-very-well specified conjectures about how I am supposedly wrong about something and you are right... and I don't even get why your wanting to be right is such a BIG deal for you.. It's not really that charming of a characteristic... but whatever, you do you.

driving fees up
I think this is what's currently holding back the Bitcoin rally.  The amount of transactions piling up in the mempool is indeed becoming a problem.  The average transaction today seems to be costing more than $50.  That's a lot of money to spend just to be able to spend money.  As a vendor who sells items that cost less than that for BTC I can tell you that there are indeed consequences in the Bitcoin economy when this happens.  It's typically something you see happen at the peak of cycles, so it's troublesome that outrageous fees are already hurting the blockchain.  Maybe someday people will break Bitcoin free from it's Blockstream chains and let it do what it was meant to.
Yeah or maybe we are entering a new era in mining ⛏️ and btc itself.

Should be very very very happy by June or not .

Meanwhile the mine is whaling this month will be our best since early 2022.

Yes, we know that miners are doing very well this month, and they also did quite well in 2021, so there is nothing wrong with that.  But I bet you are not doing as well as you would have done if you would have hung onto an extra 100 BTC at anytime between 2011 and 2015?  and you could have had done it quite easily, except you did not believe in holding BTC during that time, and you claim that you did not really start to believe in holding BTC since 2017.. but I even have my doubts about those kinds of claims since you probably could have been accumulating more BTC, but you have been bragging about buying so much extra mining equipment in the last few years, you don't stop with your bragging about buying mining equipment rather than just holding BTC if you really believed in holding BTC like you claim to have said was your conversion since 2017, supposedly.  I am not going to speculate how many BTC that you have but I doubt that it is even close to where it should be if you were really transformed into believing in BTC since 2017 as you supposedly claim to have had converted into a HODLer since then... I doubt it., which is likely part of the reason why you are still having to work into your late 60s rather than chilling out and just living off of passive income from your BTC (yes BTC can also supplement other income that you have). .. but whatever again, I am really not trying to be judgmental except when you get into this gloating kind of mood it is a bit irritating.. because sure, I am glad that miners are out there and doing those kinds of services.. and whether you really want to be doing it or not might be another story..

I don't think it is necessarily a good thing, even though you claim to like doing it... so to each their own.

place your bets. will 40 k hold..

I am getting the sense that it is greater than 50% that it will not hold, but I am not sure how far below $40k.. maybe I will just stick with my earlier assertion of don't wake me up between $35k and $55k, so getting into the upper $30ks will not surprise me.. but I might start to get excited if we start to get close to $35k, even though that is also not out of the question, since we started out this particular price rise from $27k in mid October, but really I cannot go there.. and let's just stick with thinking absent some unusual strange happenings that there is likely pretty decent support in the mid $30ks...and now that we are here - down to $40,783 in the last couple of hyours, the odds of going below $40k and even below $39k is greater than 50%.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 05:01:15 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 06:01:18 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
fillippone
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2142
Merit: 15399


Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2023, 06:49:05 AM
Last edit: December 18, 2023, 10:57:10 PM by fillippone
Merited by El duderino_ (10), ivomm (1), Negotiation (1)

Happy Birthday Hodl!

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 07:03:21 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
DirtyKeyboard
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 445


Fly free sweet Mango.


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 07:20:58 AM

ChartBuddy's 24 hour Wall Observation recap
..
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 18, 2023, 08:01:14 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Pages: « 1 ... 32758 32759 32760 32761 32762 32763 32764 32765 32766 32767 32768 32769 32770 32771 32772 32773 32774 32775 32776 32777 32778 32779 32780 32781 32782 32783 32784 32785 32786 32787 32788 32789 32790 32791 32792 32793 32794 32795 32796 32797 32798 32799 32800 32801 32802 32803 32804 32805 32806 32807 [32808] 32809 32810 32811 32812 32813 32814 32815 32816 32817 32818 32819 32820 32821 32822 32823 32824 32825 32826 32827 32828 32829 32830 32831 32832 32833 32834 32835 32836 32837 32838 32839 32840 32841 32842 32843 32844 32845 32846 32847 32848 32849 32850 32851 32852 32853 32854 32855 32856 32857 32858 ... 33304 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!