ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1780
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 30, 2024, 05:01:14 PM |
|
ExplanationChartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
|
|
|
|
Spaceman1000$
|
|
May 30, 2024, 05:14:22 PM |
|
I think maybe because is near election season that is why the Biden team is bringing this approach in policy formulations, politicians always come up with strategies to help them win elections. President Biden knows the importance of the Bitcoin community, hence he has decided to come in with this approach.
|
|
|
|
Gachapin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1992
bitcoin retard
|
|
May 30, 2024, 05:14:33 PM |
|
Promises, promises. Anything to sway a couple extra votes. that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start... With mETH passing the howey test and getting an ETF approved anyways, we have seen that Blackrock / WS is moving the things, not Gensler ..imo
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2436
Merit: 4381
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
Everyone who ever merited this account should think twice about what they are doing with their lives, and know I will never really respect you. I mean I'll try, but it will be hard. Dammit merited twice over time…. But good to let us know if it’s an unhealthy account Yeah me too. If only there were a way to flag/tag an account with some sort of trust indicator we could look at to prevent such things. Me too. Once. He posted a beautiful haiku. It could have been AI-generated... Many thanks to nutildah & Hueristic for letting us know. I wonder what he did... Quite a few of us merited that haiku. Is it wrong to merit a bot if its AI produces something beautiful? That haiku was merit-worthy for sure. It's just that we merited the messenger (a merit whore, allegedly), not the poor AI that produced it. Fool me once...
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 3232
|
|
May 30, 2024, 05:35:44 PM |
|
Promises, promises. Anything to sway a couple extra votes. that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start... With mETH passing the howey test and getting an ETF approved anyways, we have seen that Blackrock / WS is moving the things, not Gensler ..imo That's right and I basically agree - but replacing that puppet would be a strong electoral signal about a "change of policy".
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1780
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 30, 2024, 06:01:17 PM |
|
ExplanationChartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
|
|
|
|
log2exp
|
Promises, promises. Anything to sway a couple extra votes. that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start... With mETH passing the howey test and getting an ETF approved anyways, we have seen that Blackrock / WS is moving the things, not Gensler ..imo Passing the Howey Test means the mETH will be qualified as a security, so that scammers like Vitalik will need to disclose the structures of the enterprise.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1780
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 30, 2024, 07:01:14 PM |
|
ExplanationChartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
|
|
|
|
Gachapin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1992
bitcoin retard
|
|
May 30, 2024, 07:59:59 PM |
|
Promises, promises. Anything to sway a couple extra votes. that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start... With mETH passing the howey test and getting an ETF approved anyways, we have seen that Blackrock / WS is moving the things, not Gensler ..imo Passing the Howey Test means the mETH will be qualified as a security, so that scammers like Vitalik will need to disclose the structures of the enterprise. ... actually that would have been the case, if Gensler was in charge ...or any sane person
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1780
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 30, 2024, 08:01:14 PM |
|
ExplanationChartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
|
|
|
|
Kavelj22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1487
🔃EN>>AR Translator🔃
|
|
May 30, 2024, 08:13:43 PM |
|
Maybe I am being a bit overly picky about the use of "Dr" or any need to agree to describing such status, even if some of the articles and even the judge had chosen to use such a title when describing CSW in ruling against him. Sometimes courts will go out of their way to make sure that they do not appear bias, which might partly explain the court's use of the Dr title for CSW. i am from an Arabic origin. In Arab culture, we use some qualities that seem highly appreciated, in order to belittle a person and perhaps despise him as well. It does not mean, for example, that we might say to someone, “How smart you are,” when the meaning is to mock his stupidity. I mean, I used the adjective “doctor” as a sarcasm and not because he really deserves that adjective. I hope the idea is clear now I wonder what the legal cassation arguments will be to invalidate the ruling after all the detailed evidence presented by the court. I also do not think that the defense team or the court overlooked or forgot any of the details. I do not understand why some people insist on clinging to allegations that have been proven false beyond a reasonable doubt.
Beyond a reasonable doubt is a criminal standard, and so far, these have not been criminal proceedings, so the standard is not as high.. The standard in this Craig Wright (CSW) would be clear and convincing or preponderance of the evidence or some variation that is not quite as high as the criminal standard. I can understand this to some extent. But I cannot ignore that this fallacy that Dr. Wright worked to market for years has made him a global figure, and even trusted in many circles. These allegations made him one of the richest people in crypto, and there are still those who are willing to risk their savings because they believe these allegations. It is true that everything Dr. Wright did may not rise to the level of a perfect crime, but its consequences were disastrous for many people as well. There is a moral responsibility in any case.
|
|
|
|
criptoevangelista
Sr. Member
Online
Activity: 322
Merit: 595
In ₿ we trust
|
|
May 30, 2024, 08:57:23 PM |
|
Why is there so much noise here? i don't understand.
Because when you're not posting AI nonsense, you're just copy/pasting stuff from Twitter or news articles. Say something from your own brain and heart instead of out of the desire to accumulate merits. I'm certain you have at least 1 other account on this forum as you focus solely on exploiting the generosity of the loose merit givers here. We don't need more bots, we need original thinkers. game over
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1780
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 30, 2024, 09:01:17 PM |
|
ExplanationChartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4186
Merit: 8194
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
May 30, 2024, 09:29:38 PM |
|
Trump Guilty 34 for 34
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 5113
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
Maybe I am being a bit overly picky about the use of "Dr" or any need to agree to describing such status, even if some of the articles and even the judge had chosen to use such a title when describing CSW in ruling against him. Sometimes courts will go out of their way to make sure that they do not appear bias, which might partly explain the court's use of the Dr title for CSW. i am from an Arabic origin. In Arab culture, we use some qualities that seem highly appreciated, in order to belittle a person and perhaps despise him as well. It does not mean, for example, that we might say to someone, “How smart you are,” when the meaning is to mock his stupidity. I mean, I used the adjective “doctor” as a sarcasm and not because he really deserves that adjective. I hope the idea is clear now In order to point out that we are emphasizing a piece of garbage or unearned title we will put them in Quotes as JJG did here.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2639
|
|
May 30, 2024, 09:47:22 PM |
|
Trump Guilty 34 for 34
Lol what a Banana Republic. And Angela Rayner did nuffin' wrong and it's not a problem for Ukraine to hit Russian targets with US weapons (basically WW3)... And 320 million dollars for a Gaza aid pier that fell into the sea. The headlines this week are beyond a joke. -------- Back down to earth: Mad Max Furiosa was pretty good! 8/10.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 12546
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
May 30, 2024, 10:00:20 PM |
|
Furiosa
Been saying
✅
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1780
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 30, 2024, 10:01:14 PM |
|
ExplanationChartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2639
|
|
May 30, 2024, 10:09:10 PM |
|
Furiosa
Been saying
✅
I'll see it again in 4DX probably. First 4DX since Maverick which was excellent.
|
|
|
|
|