for f.. sake....either it cycles or it grows, not both.
Sorry to break the news to you.
The world is not so simple.
This time, it happens to be "both."
Oil cycles and it is below 2008 level.
Bitcoin no isn't oil.
That's a typical commodity behavior.
Want the same future for bitcoin?
I will grant you that bitcoin seems to be a kind of a commodity, yet have you observed some kind of a non-physicality feature of bitcoin.
"Magical" 30mil "controlling" 100bil daily trade?
Oh, my!
OG sold...f-k them, they should have sold 100% so we can began anew without preordained (in their minds) cycles.
Seems to me that it is better to take these "stories" with a decently large grain of salt.
67K in 2026 vs 68K in 2021 is pathetic...no growth really.
You know what is pathetic?
Your spin.
Playing with 200wma does not help anyone as everyone (except a few) look at spot to buy/sell/evaluate.
Does anyone who was buying gold was looking at 200wma? Of course, not.
Perhaps the 200WMA works better in bitcoin based on it still be such a goddamned new asset (and new asset class), so there are some struggles to figure out how to use the various tools involving various network effects (such as
the seven outlined by Trace Mayer).... which justifies both treating an early stage growing asset from a quite mature (and potentially dying) asset class.
No wonder retail is gone...don't bash retail...they have a nose for it and "made" bitcoin what it is.
Cyclists basically drove retail away.
Sure. Retail is gone, until they are not.
I am thinking that it is probably not healthy to fight dee cornz, including some level of irrationality that exists within all markets, not limited to bitcoin.
I mostly disagree, not surprisingly.
To me, this "cycle" is a test.
By plunging vs booming stock market and gold, bitcoin is putting itself in the "niche" status.
At 1.35
2 tril, not many people (relatively speaking) would care, really.
It is quite possible that E. Warren and Gensler et al meddling in 2020-2024 killed the momentum.
Taxation of tx maybe was one of the underlying causes.
I don't know, but bitcoin seem to lose it's mojo.
If stablecoins (which are inherently stupid, btw) would be anointed as the"kings" of transactions and gold would look like an cryptographically unbreakable store of value (because it is physical, not digital), what would be the space for bitcoin to grow in?
The "digital gold" concept could be under assault since everything "digital" might be a suspect in the era of AI agent swarms.
Interestingly, both bitcoin and Software stocks peaked at exactly the same time and software was devastated often to the same degree (SaaS, ADBE, PLTR, even MSFT to a degree).
So, basically, market decided that bitcoin=software (which it is, in a way, but only initially).
Again, this had nothing to do with cycles as software companies decline shows.