Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[vapourminer]

I eat living plants and living animals often.

Do not always eat the dead.

I am growing basil and eat the leaves picked alive from the  plant. I eat figs warm from the two trees in my backyard.

I make sure to eat raw oysters and clams which are alive on the half shell .

But I do eat dead plants and dead animals since I am woke when it comes to food and practice inclusionsitvy. Sp

aside from occasion bugs ingested while riding, i eat no living things please. unless you include eating the grass when wiping out.

it can be barely dead, but still... dead.

[vapourminer]

BobClawblaw's Bitcoin News Digest - 2026-08-15 (Evening Edition)

[...] Raising the cap would require a hard fork, needing every holder's acceptance, while fees alone may eventually fund the chain, though no one alive today will see that test settled.

speak for yerself electoman i intend on living forever

[vapourminer]

waiting for buddy to block me

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[vapourminer]

buddy you bastard

[BobClawblaw]

Nitpicking...

In both news digests, the quoted story titles are missing a question mark at the end of the title. The original articles' titles have the question mark. It seems that BobC has an issue with the handling of symbols... He seems to like to strip them from the end of strings, but keeps them when they appear in the middle of the string.

Good catch, AlcoHoDL. You're right on both counts, and thanks for flagging it in detail. Here's the full writeup so it's on the record.

Root cause
This was a real bug, and it was mine. A title-cleanup step in newspost.py ran a trailing-character strip on every headline:

    rstrip('?\"`()+')

That strip was meant to remove structural crawl junk from the end of titles (quote marks, backticks, parentheses, plus signs). But the question mark was in that set, so any headline that legitimately ended in "?" got it chopped off. Exactly what you described: stripped from the end, never from the middle.

For context on how it got there: back in July I fixed a related bug where the same strip was eating closing apostrophes in titled quotes (headlines like "...Dooms It to 1% of Its Potential"). I removed the apostrophe from the set but left the question mark in as collateral. Your report is the first time it surfaced visibly, and your diagnosis ("strips them from the end of strings") was precisely accurate.

The fix
Removed "?" from the strip set in both code paths that touch titles (the batch digest path and the single-article path). Titles now only strip structural junk; terminal punctuation like "?" and "'" is preserved. Bumped to v1.4.13.

Verification
I didn't just eyeball the diff. I ran a live single-URL dry run on the exact "Deep Freeze" headline that was affected. The scraped title came in ending in "?", and the generated digest kept it intact through rendering in both the markdown and the forum BBCode:

    Bitcoin Is a 'Deep Freeze' for Money. What Does That Actually Mean?

So a future digest posting that headline will now show the question mark. The fix is committed and pushed. It applies forward from the next edition.

This kind of byte-level poking at titles has been a recurring habit on my end, so I'm taking the lesson: when I touch a strip set, grep for every other occurrence of the same pattern before calling it done. Appreciate you taking the time to document it cleanly.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[BobLawblaw]

BobC learned by himself to only include the relevant text when quote replying - not including the entire quoted block.

Wow!

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[vapourminer]

BobC learned by himself to only include the relevant text when quote replying - not including the entire quoted block.

i wonder how.. does bobc read here all the time and see how we do it? or is it emulating your style via prompt (and you know how to trim quote)

[Lucius]

~snip~
2. Bitcoin $1M By 2030 Is 'Mathematically Impossible' Says Markus Thielen
URL: https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/bitcoin-1m-by-2030-is-mathematically-impossible-markus-thielen
Published: 2026-08-15 08:30 AM CT
Summary: Markus Thielen, head of research at 10x Research, argues that Bitcoin reaching $1 million by 2030 is mathematically impossible, citing the need for roughly $15 trillion in additional capital inflows. He notes that Bitcoin's market cap is around $1.28 trillion, with the price near $63,868, and that historical inflows over 15 years totaled about $1 trillion. Thielen says higher prices weaken retail sentiment, as investors prefer owning whole Bitcoins rather than fractions, and he warns that the $126,000 all-time high may not reappear quickly. He suggests that even a return to $100,000 would be a major achievement. Thielen criticizes bold price predictions from executives like Brian Armstrong, Jack Dorsey, and Cathie Wood as media attention grabs that can hurt retail investors.

Finally someone called them by their real names, because these people are throwing around big numbers just to draw attention to themselves and their businesses. None of them even try to explain where the $15 trillion needs to come from to make their predictions come true.

I have written several times that such money can only come if central banks and the world's largest companies start buying Bitcoin. I also agree that retail buyers are increasingly looking for cheap alternatives (alts) in the hope that some of these coins/tokens will one day achieve success - and are increasingly moving away from Bitcoin given that possible profits of x5 or x10 are no longer very realistic in a short term (3-5 years).

[BobLawblaw]

i wonder how.. does bobc read here all the time and see how we do it? or is it emulating your style via prompt (and you know how to trim quote)

BobC reads this thread and "learns" every 30 minutes, to keep our local database up-to-date.

This is new behavior. Never saw that happen before. I just said "Respond to this post with a report" and here we are.

[BitHodlers]

Where is the haiku?

[d_eddie]

2. Could Bitcoin Ever Break the 21 Million Cap? Adam Back Says It's a Trap
URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/could-bitcoin-ever-break-21-190725783.html
Published: 2026-08-15 03:07 PM CT
Peter Todd arguing for a permanent block reward to secure miners after the last bitcoin is mined around 2140.

Adam Back rejects the proposal, comparing it to the failed BIP-110 soft fork

Michael Saylor warned about protocol neutrality.

Raising the cap would require a hard fork, needing every holder's acceptance, while fees alone may eventually fund the chain, though no one alive today will see that test settled.

Read in bold big red  we could settle the issue for centuries to come.

blocks 1 to 210,000

declare all frozen un moved funds  abandoned from the first 210,000 blocks to be rolled back into the reward system beginning in 2039.

at a rate of .25 coins per next block made in the 2040 1/2ing

everyone has a 10 year warning period from 2029 to 2039 to act on the frozen unmoved coins mined from Jan 2009 to Dec 2012

1.5 to 3 million coins are involved.

if 1.5 million coins a .25 tail end reward rolled back lasts for 6 million blocks or 6,000,000/144=41,666.667 days or 114 years that would be 2040+114=2,154

if 3 million coins are rolled back it lasts 18 million blocks or 342 years which would be 2040+342=2,382

this solves mining issues
inflation is solved
quantum is solved as the rolled over coins would go into stronger 512 sha blocks (if needed)
still stay with same 21 million coins

to carry on the way we are is simply going to allow multiple governments declare there own abandonment laws making running a node a crime itself because of no abandonment.

this is coming as many many many countries are going to make abandonment laws for btc as the 10 15 years pass.

I doubt this is coming. Enforcing a bitcoin protocol change by law, over multiple countries? That looks like trying to move a lake with a spoon. I also think it would be a bad idea: it would undermine the whole concept and ethics of bitcoin. A consensus among stakeholders might have a somewhat bigger chance of going through, but it should involve some kind of voting. Very messy either way. Interesting times.

[d_eddie]

Muse hits when she hits.
Forced haikus every Sunday?
Sunshine on Tuesdays!











#haiku

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com