wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1136
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:06:56 AM |
|
I won't be closing my shorts anytime soon
i'm betting on 350$ in a couple of days, then maybe a crazy 20 0%+ bounce but maybe not followed by the real growth spurtI fixed that post for you
|
|
|
|
inca
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:09:09 AM |
|
Anyone know if coinfloor has sorted alternate uk banking arrangements?
|
|
|
|
grappa_barricata
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:11:21 AM |
|
I won't be closing my shorts anytime soon
i'm betting on 350$ in a couple of days, then maybe a crazy 20 0%+ bounce but maybe not followed by the real growth spurtI fixed that post for you , perhaps - everything is possible in the craziest market ever know to man
|
|
|
|
Wary
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:18:27 AM |
|
The exact annualised inflation rate jumps around every day, depending on how many bitcoins were mined in the last 24 hours.
It is around 10-14% currently, but will halve to around 5% at block height 420,000.
Say, 12%. It's not much, but unfortunately if works with "multiplicator": Since only about 20% of bitcoins are in circulation (the rest is on hodl), effect of new coins is 5 times stronger. I.e. this 12% inflation affects prices with the strength of 60% one. That is we need 60% annual user base growth just to maintain current price. not quite, a portion of the new coins will going directly into the "hodl" category so it is less than your 60% ... and it is not a 60% increase in total number of users but total new funds by users to maintain current price. I agree with both your corrections. Of course it is moneycount rather than headcount and we don't know which % of new coins is get sold (it can be even 0% at rally time). However, the major idea stays: "effective" inflation rate (and therefore required influx of new $) is several times more that the 12%.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 11188
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:20:30 AM |
|
going to the Moon is a choice we make Were stocking fuel for Mars, don't cha know? going to Mars is a suicide mission until they can have a space station around Mars edit: which i don't think the current world leadership is capable of the kind of long term planning that is required to achieve that... Either Moon or Mars are nearly equally unrealistic. Just because we saw the moon landing on TV does NOT mean that it actually happened.
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:29:09 AM |
|
To recreate the bug, you may have to have BFX open in one tab, then open the order book in a new tab.
You are right, I see another username and his balance flash in the top right panel for a second. Same here. I see the same user every time. His balance is 0. It could be something like a dummy username that serves as a placeholder in the HTML page, and is to be overwritten by the javascript after the page is loaded.
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:31:46 AM |
|
going to the Moon is a choice we make Were stocking fuel for Mars, don't cha know? going to Mars is a suicide mission until they can have a space station around Mars edit: which i don't think the current world leadership is capable of the kind of long term planning that is required to achieve that... Either Moon or Mars are nearly equally unrealistic. Just because we saw the moon landing on TV does NOT mean that it actually happened. http://www.wired.com/2014/09/nvidia-moon/
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:35:06 AM |
|
going to the Moon is a choice we make Were stocking fuel for Mars, don't cha know? going to Mars is a suicide mission until they can have a space station around Mars edit: which i don't think the current world leadership is capable of the kind of long term planning that is required to achieve that... Either Moon or Mars are nearly equally unrealistic. Just because we saw the moon landing on TV does NOT mean that it actually happened. http://www.wired.com/2014/09/nvidia-moon/Nice one, even though I'd love more to know what these chips will do on mining
|
|
|
|
yokosan
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:41:14 AM |
|
Totally agree. Back then Bitcoin felt like it could really die... But look at where we are today. The media is actually starting to take it seriously. There are tons of startups and an entire industry being forged. Lest we forget that the goal of a startup is pretty much to either IPO Facebook style or get acquired by a company such as Facebook. It is only a matter of time before Bitpay, Coinbase, or some other company gets aquired by a major player such as Facebook (evil!) or Paypal, Amazon, etc. Once the first acquisition takes place the floodgates will open. The competition will have no choice but to acquire a competing Bitcoin company for fear that they could be left behind in this new industry... My own prediction is that the first acquisition will come from (in order of likelyhood); 1. Paypal. 2. Rakuten. 3. Google. 4. Facebook. 5. Microsoft. As I said before... only one of these companies has to buy one Bitcoin startup and the others have to buy their own competing company by proxy (or start their own, which is more risky).
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:43:37 AM |
|
Facebook (evil!) or Paypal, Amazon, etc.
Amazon is totally evil as well Bitcoin is totally evil as well!
|
|
|
|
findftp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1008
Delusional crypto obsessionist
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:43:49 AM |
|
going to the Moon is a choice we make Were stocking fuel for Mars, don't cha know? going to Mars is a suicide mission until they can have a space station around Mars edit: which i don't think the current world leadership is capable of the kind of long term planning that is required to achieve that... Either Moon or Mars are nearly equally unrealistic. Just because we saw the moon landing on TV does NOT mean that it actually happened. I finally agree with you Van allen belt makes space travel for humans impossible.
|
|
|
|
Lady_Cake
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:45:26 AM |
|
If the price of Bitcoins keeping lower my next buy will be at 300
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:46:05 AM |
|
Few hours left to get 370+ 360$+350+$ for your precious BTC.
|
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:49:20 AM |
|
Totally agree. Back then Bitcoin felt like it could really die... But look at where we are today. The media is actually starting to take it seriously. There are tons of startups and an entire industry being forged. Lest we forget that the goal of a startup is pretty much to either IPO Facebook style or get acquired by a company such as Facebook. It is only a matter of time before Bitpay, Coinbase, or some other company gets aquired by a major player such as Facebook (evil!) or Paypal, Amazon, etc. Once the first acquisition takes place the floodgates will open. The competition will have no choice but to acquire a competing Bitcoin company for fear that they could be left behind in this new industry... My own prediction is that the first acquisition will come from (in order of likelyhood); 1. Paypal. 2. Rakuten. 3. Google. 4. Facebook. 5. Microsoft. As I said before... only one of these companies has to buy one Bitcoin startup and the others have to buy their own competing company by proxy (or start their own, which is more risky). What we really need is people buying bitcoin for remitances- thats the frontier and future for bitcoin. Then we have billions coming into the system.
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:51:51 AM |
|
Totally agree. Back then Bitcoin felt like it could really die... But look at where we are today. The media is actually starting to take it seriously. There are tons of startups and an entire industry being forged. Lest we forget that the goal of a startup is pretty much to either IPO Facebook style or get acquired by a company such as Facebook. It is only a matter of time before Bitpay, Coinbase, or some other company gets aquired by a major player such as Facebook (evil!) or Paypal, Amazon, etc. Once the first acquisition takes place the floodgates will open. The competition will have no choice but to acquire a competing Bitcoin company for fear that they could be left behind in this new industry... My own prediction is that the first acquisition will come from (in order of likelyhood); 1. Paypal. 2. Rakuten. 3. Google. 4. Facebook. 5. Microsoft. As I said before... only one of these companies has to buy one Bitcoin startup and the others have to buy their own competing company by proxy (or start their own, which is more risky). What we really need is people buying bitcoin for remitances- thats the frontier and future for bitcoin. Then we have billions coming into the system. What i really need are a lot of bigger fools that are buying, to make be me become less of a bagholder. FTFY
|
|
|
|
grappa_barricata
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:56:22 AM |
|
Bitcoin is totally evil as well!
|
|
|
|
yokosan
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:58:26 AM |
|
http://coinatmradar.com/blog/bitcoin-atm-statistics-september-2014/More than 1 ATM per day is pretty cool... and it is likely to go up. Also the people that use these ATMs are a completely different market to those already using Bitcoin. I'm going to lowball these figures and lets say the ATMs costs $5,000 each. Over 1 year we get 365 new ATMs. They take a fee of 10% (it would be lower than this but im being pessimistic again) If it is a one way ATM they need to sell $50,000 of BTC just to break even. 365 * 50,000 = $18,250,000 of BTC buys required for one year of ATMs to break even if they keep popping up at this current rate (they won't...it will get faster).
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1820
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:01:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
prophetx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:01:35 AM |
|
going to the Moon is a choice we make Were stocking fuel for Mars, don't cha know? going to Mars is a suicide mission until they can have a space station around Mars edit: which i don't think the current world leadership is capable of the kind of long term planning that is required to achieve that... Either Moon or Mars are nearly equally unrealistic. Just because we saw the moon landing on TV does NOT mean that it actually happened. http://www.wired.com/2014/09/nvidia-moon/hah thanks Klee
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:02:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|