Bitcoin Forum
September 08, 2025, 07:52:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 9073 9074 9075 9076 9077 9078 9079 9080 9081 9082 9083 9084 9085 9086 9087 9088 9089 9090 9091 9092 9093 9094 9095 9096 9097 9098 9099 9100 9101 9102 9103 9104 9105 9106 9107 9108 9109 9110 9111 9112 9113 9114 9115 9116 9117 9118 9119 9120 9121 9122 [9123] 9124 9125 9126 9127 9128 9129 9130 9131 9132 9133 9134 9135 9136 9137 9138 9139 9140 9141 9142 9143 9144 9145 9146 9147 9148 9149 9150 9151 9152 9153 9154 9155 9156 9157 9158 9159 9160 9161 9162 9163 9164 9165 9166 9167 9168 9169 9170 9171 9172 9173 ... 34897 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26837169 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12849


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:27:43 PM

snip

I'm snipping you for the benefit of those who have you ignored.

Perfect excuse for obfuscating, is white knighting...   You are getting to be more and more ridiculous....


So you completely miss my point, put words in my mouth (without telling me what they are), make assumptions based on those words, then proceed to get angry when I look at you funny and go "huh?"

Yes, divert... You are the one that made the initial assertion, so why don't you back it up rather than pointing the finger at me?



Your problem is you're making a distinction between bear trolls and bull trolls, when they're all just trolls.

I was NOT making any assertion, you were.  So go ahead and back it up, rather than attempting to get me to back up a supposed assertion that I never made.



Now I personally don't mind trolls, but I do find it a bit hypocritical that you never see anyone crying for bans in response to a bull-troll. If you want to avoid being hypocritical, you either are willing to ban all trolls, or none of them (which is my preferred approach).

O.k. There you go again, assuming that beartrolls and bulltrolls are equivalent, yet you provide no names or examples of bull trolls.  You are engaging in a distracting strawman type argument to assert the supposed existence of a problem, without any proof beyond your mere assertion, and then you propose some kind of fair solution.

This whole conversation seems to be a distraction and without any there, there.



Just in case I did not make this clear, there is no comparison because it's apples and apples, apples being trolls. With that in mind, how, exactly, does what you are arguing apply?

I'm NOT arguing anything, I am just asking you to back up your meaningless, groundless and conclusory claims.


By the way, calling me names in no way strengthens your argument.

What name did I call you and when was this?  I asserted that your various arguments are meaningless, ridiculess, baseless, diversionary, logically fallacious, etc etc... and I continuously asked for you to support them. That is NOT calling names, but just putting your arguments into various categories and attempting to get some kind of meaningful response, but to date you have failed and/or refused to provide any kind of meaningful and substantive response for your various assertions that bulltrolls are the same as beartrolls or and that they supposedly equally exist in this thread and whatever other preposterous assertions you seem to be making.



Walsoraj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Ultranode


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:29:38 PM

http://www.coindesk.com/bitstamp-unverified-accounts-risk-government-seizure-28-days/

 Shocked Shocked Shocked

More reasons to not send fiat to Stamp...
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12849


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:31:53 PM

snip

I'm snipping you for the benefit of those who have you ignored.

So you completely miss my point, put words in my mouth (without telling me what they are), make assumptions based on those words, then proceed to get angry when I look at you funny and go "huh?"

Your problem is you're making a distinction between bear trolls and bull trolls, when they're all just trolls. Now I personally don't mind trolls, but I do find it a bit hypocritical that you never see anyone crying for bans in response to a bull-troll. If you want to avoid being hypocritical, you either are willing to ban all trolls, or none of them (which is my preferred approach).

Just in case I did not make this clear, there is no comparison because it's apples and apples, apples being trolls. With that in mind, how, exactly, does what you are arguing apply?

By the way, calling me names in no way strengthens your argument.




1.000.000 $ per BTC


(lets see if the post gets deleted)

 Grin

+1  

Prepare yourself to: CUT YOUR GOOSES and YOUR MOOSES and YOUR CABOOSES LOOSES!!!!!!!!!!!!   Buy, Buy, BUY!!!!

(lets see if the this post gets deleted?)


adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 10:32:22 PM


this is bulish as fuck!
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1011



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:35:20 PM

Indeed! Time to buy and withdraw!
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 10:36:45 PM


better tell my friend.
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1011



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:37:41 PM

What if the 30k bearwhale wasn't even verified? What's he going to do with all this useless Bitstamp IOU fiat? Shocked Shocked Shocked
octaft
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:37:56 PM

snip

You know you could have just said "well name names" and gotten about the same amount of information across as your enormous wall of text. You're the one making the assumption that your thing applies, so before you can apply it, why don't you explain how it does? Because you can't, because it doesn't.

Calling me a bunch of names while saying the same stupid shit over and over again doesn't make a good argument.
oda.krell
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:39:59 PM

Who of you guys didn't get properly verified?  Roll Eyes

There's the idealistic part of me in Bitcoin: to stick it to the man!

And then there's the part that likes to keep his money, and keep counterparty risk down. So, I for one welcome Bitstamp's anal probing rigid KYC procedure. Makes it less likely the place will go tits up from a legal crackdown, imo.
Walsoraj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Ultranode


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:42:07 PM


The panic buys may have already occurred. If that's the case and we can expect less new fiat entering Stamp, then...
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1011



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:44:02 PM

What if tomorrow there are <10k BTC in asks because the criminals and anarchists all withdrew?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12849


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:44:38 PM

What if the 30k bearwhale wasn't even verified? What's he going to do with all this useless Bitstamp IOU fiat? Shocked Shocked Shocked

Yeah, what if?   Shocked    Do those questions fit the definition of FUD or acceptable speculations?  inference upon inference upon inference?  OMG?   Tongue
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1011



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:45:14 PM

What if the 30k bearwhale wasn't even verified? What's he going to do with all this useless Bitstamp IOU fiat? Shocked Shocked Shocked

Yeah, what if?   Shocked    Do those questions fit the definition of FUD or acceptable speculations?  inference upon inference upon inference?  OMG?   Tongue
It's about time someone take it into his hands to combat the Shroomsy FUD by posting some good bullish FUD.
bassclef
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:47:40 PM

I remember that you had to get verified last year to even withdraw BTC. So older accounts of people who had money/BTC stuck there are at risk, which probably has been priced in already.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 10:48:11 PM

what if there is 10,000 unverified account each with and avg of 1000$ that need to be withdrawn in BTC  Grin
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 10:50:37 PM

also what if poeple see bitstamps as more trustworthy, get verified, and send some fait  Grin
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12849


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:51:21 PM

snip

You know you could have just said "well name names" and gotten about the same amount of information across as your enormous wall of text. You're the one making the assumption that your thing applies, so before you can apply it, why don't you explain how it does? Because you can't, because it doesn't.

Calling me a bunch of names while saying the same stupid shit over and over again doesn't make a good argument.

More non-response from Octaft, the illogical, diversionary and obscurity making troll.  I would find you amazing, if you weren't falling into a somewhat predictable MO, that I have already described in my previous posts (that you fail and/or refuse to quote), and through this additional post, you have provided additional evidence that you pretty much continued to live up to my earlier assertions and continue to refuse to back up your claims.. causing this interchange between us to devolve into meaningless dribble-drabble.
sidhujag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:51:43 PM

what if there is 10,000 unverified account each with and avg of 1000$ that need to be withdrawn in BTC  Grin

What if the ocean is not actually blue? What if racoons can fly? What if aligators ate their own babies?
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1011



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 10:52:27 PM

Is it just me or has this place become kind of incestuous, sort of like it was in 2012? Few people posting anymore.

It's like people have lost interest. Which of course makes Bitcoin a more interesting value proposition from a contrarian standpoint.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 10:53:09 PM

mandatory: Armageddon - The Launch
Pages: « 1 ... 9073 9074 9075 9076 9077 9078 9079 9080 9081 9082 9083 9084 9085 9086 9087 9088 9089 9090 9091 9092 9093 9094 9095 9096 9097 9098 9099 9100 9101 9102 9103 9104 9105 9106 9107 9108 9109 9110 9111 9112 9113 9114 9115 9116 9117 9118 9119 9120 9121 9122 [9123] 9124 9125 9126 9127 9128 9129 9130 9131 9132 9133 9134 9135 9136 9137 9138 9139 9140 9141 9142 9143 9144 9145 9146 9147 9148 9149 9150 9151 9152 9153 9154 9155 9156 9157 9158 9159 9160 9161 9162 9163 9164 9165 9166 9167 9168 9169 9170 9171 9172 9173 ... 34897 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!