Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[gnode]

Yeah, I just got my account at stamp double secret verified!

[criptix]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

why wouldn't u just buy btc and withdraw? wtf  

huobi looks like something is happening

[N12]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

Don't give the thieving government a single cent, they'll only waste it on even more stupid regulations. Convert your $2 to BTC and withdraw IMO. And tell us whether that actually works.

That is, if Bitstamp allows doing a $2 transaction. Not sure on that.

[adamstgBit]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

Don't give the thieving government a single cent, they'll only waste it on even more stupid regulations. Convert your $2 to BTC and withdraw IMO. And tell us whether that actually works.

That is, if Bitstamp allows doing a $2 transaction. Not sure on that.

seriously!

market buy with that 2$  NOW and withdraw like a pro.

[adamstgBit]

someone said it use to be you had to be verified to withdraw even bitcoin, but not anymore ( i guess they wanted to cover their ass while the laws we're clear )

in any case its probably a lot easier to send in some fake ID to get verified at stamps and withdraw bitcoin then it is to fake a bank account and withdraw fiat.

Good point. BTC is the criminal's first choice in either case.

BTW, what if a lot of the downwards pressure has come from stolen MtGox coins being sold off? If that was the case, wouldn't it cease now?

at least on stamps..
there have been other selling pressure that have stop like the TAX deadline thing, or alibaba IPO.
lots of bear around
price is low
time is now

[N12]

Always keep in mind, WhatsApp, a mobile chat program, was bought by Facebook for the sum of 22 billion dollars.

Bitcoin market cap is currently 5 billion dollars.

Which one would you rather HODL?

[MoreFun]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

Don't give the thieving government a single cent, they'll only waste it on even more stupid regulations. Convert your $2 to BTC and withdraw IMO. And tell us whether that actually works.

That is, if Bitstamp allows doing a $2 transaction. Not sure on that.

seriously!

market buy with that 2$  NOW and withdraw like a pro.

There is a $5 minimum limit on orders at stamp.

[N12]

Thanks China, the Bitstamp criminals are in for a green awakening. Keep up the pressure and soon all criminal funds will be converted to BTC. It's like a short squeeze.

[BrewCrewFan]

Always keep in mind, WhatsApp, a mobile chat program, was bought by Facebook for the sum of 22 billion dollars.

Bitcoin market cap is currently 5 billion dollars.

Which one would you rather HODL?

Well that is a simple answer for me, BTC, then again i totally hate spybook so... mhhh

[adamstgBit]

everyone stfu the daily candle is about to solidify

and
there
it
goes

384. TodayIsABarndNewDay

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[dannyspk]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

Don't give the thieving government a single cent, they'll only waste it on even more stupid regulations. Convert your $2 to BTC and withdraw IMO. And tell us whether that actually works.

That is, if Bitstamp allows doing a $2 transaction. Not sure on that.

seriously!

market buy with that 2$  NOW and withdraw like a pro.

There is a $5 minimum limit on orders at stamp.

Exactly. I can't be bothered. Might as well leave them there.

[adamstgBit]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

Don't give the thieving government a single cent, they'll only waste it on even more stupid regulations. Convert your $2 to BTC and withdraw IMO. And tell us whether that actually works.

That is, if Bitstamp allows doing a $2 transaction. Not sure on that.

seriously!

market buy with that 2$  NOW and withdraw like a pro.

There is a $5 minimum limit on orders at stamp.

Exactly. I can't be bothered. Might as well leave them there.

then send 5$ of bitcoin sell it then buy 7$ of bitcoin back
 

[xcrabber]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

Don't give the thieving government a single cent, they'll only waste it on even more stupid regulations. Convert your $2 to BTC and withdraw IMO. And tell us whether that actually works.

That is, if Bitstamp allows doing a $2 transaction. Not sure on that.

seriously!

market buy with that 2$  NOW and withdraw like a pro.

There is a $5 minimum limit on orders at stamp.

Just deposit $3-$4 of bitcoin sell than do a $6 buy to get you $2 out.   hehehe

EDIT    Adam beat me to it.

[octaft]

snip

Simply put, you don't understand what you are talking about (and I knew immediately when you asked me to name names, despite the fact that is completely irrelevant to your own argument), are totally misapplying the fallacy, and are throwing me under the bus for your ignorance while calling me names. Why the hell should I cooperate with that, especially considering you did not cooperate with me by clarifying your position so I didn't have to read between the lines to figure out how ridiculous your argument is?

But you know what, I'm a glutton for punishment, so you want cooperation, here's your cooperation:

Correct way to apply the fallacy you referenced: Someone says "You don't like heroin? Well tylenol is a drug. If you want to get rid of heroin, you've got to get rid of tylenol."

Yes they are both drugs, but there is no logical connection to the level of damage one drug does over the other: people don't use tylenol to get high, and heroin causes significantly more damage. In order to agree with that statement, you need to make a whole lot of wild and incorrect assumptions about tylenol, namely that it will cause the same or close to the same amount of damage as heroin.

What I'm saying in light of that fallacy: Beartrolls and bulltrolls are both trolls. Trolls are trolls. If you want to complain about/ban some trolls, you've got to be willing to ban them all.

The only assumption being made is that both beartrolls and bulltrolls are trolls, which doesn't seem like that much of a leap of faith considering the word "troll" is in the name.

Your fallacy only applies when there is no clear connection, which means, as I have showcased as best I can, that it does not apply here. If you don't get it after all of that, well I just don't know what to tell you other than you are wrong.

Now if you want to argue whether bulltrolls exist or not, that's another issue. My point is simply that I did not commit the logical fallacy you are accusing me of, and if you truly understood that logical fallacy, you would know that.

It's definitely not the same thing. If I post highly speculative stuff that is bearish, usually I'll get insulted left and right. If I do it in bullish, noone will give a shit and some will approve.

Which is exactly my point. I don't care if people troll, but I do get annoyed by hypocrites that only want to focus on a specific subset of trolls.

[BrewCrewFan]

I got an email from Bitstamp earlier during the evening to get my account verified or they will seize it. I logged on Bitstamp after 7 months and I had $2 in it. I, hereby, allow Bitstamp to hand it over to whoever the fuck they will hand over to.

Don't give the thieving government a single cent, they'll only waste it on even more stupid regulations. Convert your $2 to BTC and withdraw IMO. And tell us whether that actually works.

That is, if Bitstamp allows doing a $2 transaction. Not sure on that.

seriously!

market buy with that 2$  NOW and withdraw like a pro.

There is a $5 minimum limit on orders at stamp.

Just deposit $3-$4 of bitcoin sell than do a $6 buy to get you $2 out.   hehehe

EDIT    Adam beat me to it.

Okay, now a question.

Now when I buy BTC, I usually do that via coinbase, but I was wondering, if I would transfer like 2 BTC to stamp, could I technically traded it and convert to dollars, and then have the dollars sitting in the base account to rebuy the BTC if I choose? As in no need to verify myself, and not link a bank account to trade so to say.

[hyphymikey]

Keep selling chunks of coins no matter the price or trend, the sooner you run out of coins the sooner we can moon without you.

[JayJuanGee]

I am NOT sure if I understand this situation sufficiently in layman's terms. 

Does the Bitstamp announcement mean that after 28 days, everyone participating with Bitstamp will have verified accounts? 

And before the 28 days are concluded, Bitstamp account holders can withdraw their funds from Bitstamp or do those accounts just get frozen (seized) in the event that the accounts do NOT get verified?  I was of the expectation that funds could NOT be withdrawn from non-verified Bitstamp accounts, is that not correct?

I don't know, it just sounds good. Facts aren't really important when it's perception that creates reality.



May or may not be bull FUD.

Who am I to say? 

I am just a regular Joe Blow (oh by the way, that's NOT my real name), and I just thought that if facts are easily verifiable, then we should attempt to incorporate those known facts into our speculation(s), when feasible.

In this case, I thought that there were limitations on unverified accounts to be able to withdraw (whether fiat or BTC); however, maybe there are ways around such and maybe they can withdraw small amounts?  I really don't know, but I thought someone would be able to describe those facts to be able to fit them into any speculation that we might make regarding the most recent announcement of the 28 days to verify your account or else. 

[JayJuanGee]

someone said it use to be you had to be verified to withdraw even bitcoin, but not anymore ( i guess they wanted to cover their ass while the laws we're clear )

in any case its probably a lot easier to send in some fake ID to get verified at stamps and withdraw bitcoin then it is to fake a bank account and withdraw fiat.

I would think that would NOT be that difficult to accomplish, and just to abandon Bitstamp and move over to BTC-e or some other exchange that seems to NOT have those same levels of KYC requirements

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

everyone stfu the daily candle is about to solidify

and
there
it
goes

384. TodayIsABarndNewDay

That candle sucked