RichG
|
|
June 04, 2013, 03:36:51 AM |
|
Keep your private fantasies to yourself, moron.
No, you are!
No, you are, no you are, mommy, mommy, he is saying I am and he is, help mommy mommy. Retard! Go feed the pigs! Go f*** yourself. Stop insulting donators!
|
|
|
|
Tonko (OP)
|
|
June 04, 2013, 04:05:02 AM |
|
Go f*** yourself. Stop insulting donators!
Oh, we are a religious sect here, eh? THE DONATORS, what a bunch of big unselfish guys, everybody should bow to them! A retard like you would obviously bow to any construed, supposed *authority*.
|
|
|
|
Tonko (OP)
|
|
June 04, 2013, 04:10:14 AM |
|
Nice piece of introspection. There is hope for you.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
June 04, 2013, 04:26:24 AM |
|
Go f*** yourself. Stop insulting donators!
Oh, we are a religious sect here, eh? THE DONATORS, what a bunch of big unselfish guys, everybody should bow to them! A retard like you would obviously bow to any construed, supposed *authority*. You will respect my authority!
|
|
|
|
Tonko (OP)
|
|
June 04, 2013, 04:30:44 AM |
|
You will respect my authority!
Wanna go out?!
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
June 04, 2013, 04:55:52 AM |
|
You will respect my authority!
Wanna go out?! Sure. But you're paying, and be warned - I'm not a cheap date.
|
|
|
|
Tonko (OP)
|
|
June 04, 2013, 05:11:24 AM |
|
Sure. But you're paying, and be warned - I'm not a cheap date.
Umm..okay, I'll pas this one.
|
|
|
|
RichG
|
|
June 04, 2013, 06:17:09 AM |
|
I'm changing the thread topic:
/topic "[POLL] Should we ban Tonko?"
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
June 05, 2013, 11:25:35 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
|
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:04:38 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do.
|
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:08:17 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Well, the opinion of a sociopathic autistic boy-child doesn't really matter in my esteem.
|
|
|
|
mprep
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:10:50 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Well, the opinion of a sociopathic autistic boy-child doesn't really matter in my esteem. Now that's a burn.
|
|
|
|
jackjack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1260
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:14:49 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though)
|
Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2 Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:20:10 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) a) his reply(it hurts me very deeply ) b) he can't see that NAP is inconsistent, and refuses to accept that a state can be a good choice. Explaining it with his "fact" about states, with that it kills people who chooses not to behave in a certain way, and then failing to see that the NAP does the same.
|
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:27:09 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) a) his reply(it hurts me very deeply ) If I thought you were capable of feeling emotions, I might believe you. b) he can't see that NAP is inconsistent, and refuses to accept that a state can be a good choice. Explaining it with his "fact" about states, with that it kills people who chooses not to behave in a certain way, and then failing to see that the NAP does the same. The difference being that a State kills people who have done no harm to others, and a NAP-respecting person only kills people in defense.
|
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:30:24 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) a) his reply(it hurts me very deeply ) If I thought you were capable of feeling emotions, I might believe you. Great! now you don't even understand what lack of emphaty means. You just getting stupider and stupider... b) he can't see that NAP is inconsistent, and refuses to accept that a state can be a good choice. Explaining it with his "fact" about states, with that it kills people who chooses not to behave in a certain way, and then failing to see that the NAP does the same. The difference being that a State kills people who have done no harm to others, and a NAP-respecting person only kills people in defense. when they don't behave in a certain way, yes?
|
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:34:48 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) a) his reply(it hurts me very deeply ) If I thought you were capable of feeling emotions, I might believe you. Great! now you don't even understand what lack of emphaty means. You just getting stupider and stupider... What's emphaty? And if you were truly hurt by what I called you, may I suggest you do something to change those facts? I know you can't do much about being autistic, and your sociopathy is likewise genetic, but you could try and grow up a little. And any time you want to respond to this, you can: b) he can't see that NAP is inconsistent, and refuses to accept that a state can be a good choice. Explaining it with his "fact" about states, with that it kills people who chooses not to behave in a certain way, and then failing to see that the NAP does the same. The difference being that a State kills people who have done no harm to others, and a NAP-respecting person only kills people in defense.
|
|
|
|
Biomech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
|
|
June 06, 2013, 10:03:53 PM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) a) his reply(it hurts me very deeply ) If I thought you were capable of feeling emotions, I might believe you. Great! now you don't even understand what lack of emphaty means. You just getting stupider and stupider... b) he can't see that NAP is inconsistent, and refuses to accept that a state can be a good choice. Explaining it with his "fact" about states, with that it kills people who chooses not to behave in a certain way, and then failing to see that the NAP does the same. The difference being that a State kills people who have done no harm to others, and a NAP-respecting person only kills people in defense. when they don't behave in a certain way, yes? No. when they DO behave in a certain way. As in aggression against me. If it's you or it's me, it's you. OTOH, if you leave me alone or respect my self, space and property, I'll never deliberately give you offense. Now contrast that to the state which will cage you and/or kill you simply over some words on a page written by somebody with no ideas that didn't come from "above" and who fears change and loves power.
|
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
|
June 07, 2013, 10:54:40 AM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) a) his reply(it hurts me very deeply ) If I thought you were capable of feeling emotions, I might believe you. Great! now you don't even understand what lack of emphaty means. You just getting stupider and stupider... b) he can't see that NAP is inconsistent, and refuses to accept that a state can be a good choice. Explaining it with his "fact" about states, with that it kills people who chooses not to behave in a certain way, and then failing to see that the NAP does the same. The difference being that a State kills people who have done no harm to others, and a NAP-respecting person only kills people in defense. when they don't behave in a certain way, yes? No. when they DO behave in a certain way. As in aggression against me. If it's you or it's me, it's you. OTOH, if you leave me alone or respect my self, space and property, I'll never deliberately give you offense. Now contrast that to the state which will cage you and/or kill you simply over some words on a page written by somebody with no ideas that didn't come from "above" and who fears change and loves power. if it offends me, that you say that i can't commit an aggression against you, you have commited an aggression against me.
|
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
Biomech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
|
|
June 07, 2013, 11:56:15 AM |
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) a) his reply(it hurts me very deeply ) If I thought you were capable of feeling emotions, I might believe you. Great! now you don't even understand what lack of emphaty means. You just getting stupider and stupider... b) he can't see that NAP is inconsistent, and refuses to accept that a state can be a good choice. Explaining it with his "fact" about states, with that it kills people who chooses not to behave in a certain way, and then failing to see that the NAP does the same. The difference being that a State kills people who have done no harm to others, and a NAP-respecting person only kills people in defense. when they don't behave in a certain way, yes? No. when they DO behave in a certain way. As in aggression against me. If it's you or it's me, it's you. OTOH, if you leave me alone or respect my self, space and property, I'll never deliberately give you offense. Now contrast that to the state which will cage you and/or kill you simply over some words on a page written by somebody with no ideas that didn't come from "above" and who fears change and loves power. if it offends me, that you say that i can't commit an aggression against you, you have commited an aggression against me. No. It doesn't. It offends you. Speech in public has no bearing on your actions, save what you make of it. Thoughts are not evil in themselves, and the transmission of them is how people are naturally equipped to interact. Aggression is ACTION, not speech. Me, I prefer a layered approach to the NAP as a practical matter. In straight truth, while my philosophy is as above, I also hate killing. So I would, if you were attacking me, try to first control the situation. It would not be my GOAL to kill you, if I could dissuade you instead. And were I unable to dissuade you but gain the upper hand, I would disable you preferentially to killing you. If, OTOH, you get in my face and call me a cocksucker, I'll either say something back or walk away. No HARM done, only ruffled feathers. And harm is the crux of the argument. An it harm no one, do what thou wilt. That old rede is a good moral compass, as opposed to Mr. Crowley's counter "do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law". Anarchists generally choose the former, though with more modern formal language. States ALWAYS choose the latter, because the only check on their actions is how many people they can misdirect.
|
|
|
|
|