excelerator
Member
 Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 15, 2018, 12:20:46 AM |
|
@coins101 I was looking at the Helium leadership team at https://heliumchain.org/team/ and I don't see your profile as part of the leadership. What is your official capacity at Helium? I see the CCO is responsible for community so don't understand where you fit into the scheme of things (unless you're the CCO and I missed that). Perhaps you're the CMO as you're making new announcements? He is the co-founder / CTO I'm sure that's possible, but I can't establish that from any posts here at BTCTalk or anywhere. Even on the Helium site everyone on the leadership team has a "mouseover" bio but the "co-founder / CTO" so that role and background is mysterious in itself. Easy for coins101 to just re-state what you wrote. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
boomboom
|
|
October 15, 2018, 12:44:50 AM |
|
@coins101 I was looking at the Helium leadership team at https://heliumchain.org/team/ and I don't see your profile as part of the leadership. What is your official capacity at Helium? I see the CCO is responsible for community so don't understand where you fit into the scheme of things (unless you're the CCO and I missed that). Perhaps you're the CMO as you're making new announcements? He is the co-founder / CTO I'm sure that's possible, but I can't establish that from any posts here at BTCTalk or anywhere. Even on the Helium site everyone on the leadership team has a "mouseover" bio but the "co-founder / CTO" so that role and background is mysterious in itself. Easy for coins101 to just re-state what you wrote. coins101's involvement with helium is a mystery, wrapped in an enigma, rolled up in a sleeping bag sucking cones through a wizard bong, battered in a year long sickie, deep fried in a lazy Sunday afternoon on the couch. Best to consider him as someone from the past, and not rely on him for anything. If he delivers cool, but don't expect it, and don't expect any explanations. Helium did well without him. |
|
|
|
|
drays
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1073
|
|
October 15, 2018, 12:40:49 PM |
|
Did anyone try a one wallet MN setup, instead of Hot-cold (local-remote) wallet setup as described in the tutorial? I mean - try to run a masternode and control it using the one single hot wallet. That is a standard setup, which should be the simplest one... and it works on all other MN coins I have setup before. Yesterday I spent hours trying to make it work - to no avail. It just throws stupid errors, like "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009", or just "Not capable masternode: " - without error description. Gave up yesterday. Today moved the controlling part to the remote wallet - boom, it worked immediately. So I suppose there is either a bug in HLM MN implementation (as the single hot wallet setup works for other MN coins); or an intended security limitation - it this case it should be documented, and the daemon should throw some meaningful error message - like "Not capable masternode: only local-remote setup is supported." or something better... Just wanted to report this, in case if it's not widely known and discussed in slack/telegram/discord already  |
... this space is not for rent ... |
|
|
teela
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 22
|
|
October 15, 2018, 04:41:14 PM |
|
Did anyone try a one wallet MN setup, instead of Hot-cold (local-remote) wallet setup as described in the tutorial? I mean - try to run a masternode and control it using the one single hot wallet. That is a standard setup, which should be the simplest one... and it works on all other MN coins I have setup before. Yesterday I spent hours trying to make it work - to no avail. It just throws stupid errors, like "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009", or just "Not capable masternode: " - without error description. Gave up yesterday. Today moved the controlling part to the remote wallet - boom, it worked immediately. So I suppose there is either a bug in HLM MN implementation (as the single hot wallet setup works for other MN coins); or an intended security limitation - it this case it should be documented, and the daemon should throw some meaningful error message - like "Not capable masternode: only local-remote setup is supported." or something better... Just wanted to report this, in case if it's not widely known and discussed in slack/telegram/discord already I think this guide does that for windows machines: https://www.heliumlabs.org/v1.0/docs/masternode-setup-guide-windows-localIts a setup up for running multiple MNs on one local machine (afaict, never used this set up). I don't think there is anything that prevents you from running a hot node. Haven't been able to test it yet though. |
|
|
|
|
drays
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1073
|
|
October 15, 2018, 06:02:08 PM |
|
Did anyone try a one wallet MN setup, instead of Hot-cold (local-remote) wallet setup as described in the tutorial? I mean - try to run a masternode and control it using the one single hot wallet. That is a standard setup, which should be the simplest one... and it works on all other MN coins I have setup before. Yesterday I spent hours trying to make it work - to no avail. It just throws stupid errors, like "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009", or just "Not capable masternode: " - without error description. Gave up yesterday. Today moved the controlling part to the remote wallet - boom, it worked immediately. So I suppose there is either a bug in HLM MN implementation (as the single hot wallet setup works for other MN coins); or an intended security limitation - it this case it should be documented, and the daemon should throw some meaningful error message - like "Not capable masternode: only local-remote setup is supported." or something better... Just wanted to report this, in case if it's not widely known and discussed in slack/telegram/discord already I think this guide does that for windows machines: https://www.heliumlabs.org/v1.0/docs/masternode-setup-guide-windows-localIts a setup up for running multiple MNs on one local machine (afaict, never used this set up). I don't think there is anything that prevents you from running a hot node. Haven't been able to test it yet though. That setup uses dedicated controller wallet (albeit local), so it is different. I was using Linux, and. most importantly, I was trying to use a single wallet (single datadir etc) both as MN itself, and as controller. That setup could be interesting for smaller holders only, but well... smaller holders are the most important user category for real decentralization, so having this setup working is important too, IMHO. |
... this space is not for rent ... |
|
|
RzeroD
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 272
Merit: 107
Paranoid In Chief
|
|
October 15, 2018, 06:21:00 PM |
|
Did anyone try a one wallet MN setup, instead of Hot-cold (local-remote) wallet setup as described in the tutorial? I mean - try to run a masternode and control it using the one single hot wallet. That is a standard setup, which should be the simplest one... and it works on all other MN coins I have setup before. Yesterday I spent hours trying to make it work - to no avail. It just throws stupid errors, like "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009", or just "Not capable masternode: " - without error description. Gave up yesterday. Today moved the controlling part to the remote wallet - boom, it worked immediately. So I suppose there is either a bug in HLM MN implementation (as the single hot wallet setup works for other MN coins); or an intended security limitation - it this case it should be documented, and the daemon should throw some meaningful error message - like "Not capable masternode: only local-remote setup is supported." or something better... Just wanted to report this, in case if it's not widely known and discussed in slack/telegram/discord already I think this guide does that for windows machines: https://www.heliumlabs.org/v1.0/docs/masternode-setup-guide-windows-localIts a setup up for running multiple MNs on one local machine (afaict, never used this set up). I don't think there is anything that prevents you from running a hot node. Haven't been able to test it yet though. That setup uses dedicated controller wallet (albeit local), so it is different. I was using Linux, and. most importantly, I was trying to use a single wallet (single datadir etc) both as MN itself, and as controller. That setup could be interesting for smaller holders only, but well... smaller holders are the most important user category for real decentralization, so having this setup working is important too, IMHO. Do you have a static public IP? |
|
|
|
|
MadaraAvenger
Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
|
|
October 15, 2018, 06:33:15 PM |
|
More and more decentralized projects are coming into cryptos but it's good to see that the Helium made it with no obstacles and the work for the wallet is really amazing, you have good designers for sure.
|
|
|
|
drays
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1073
|
|
October 15, 2018, 06:46:29 PM |
|
Did anyone try a one wallet MN setup, instead of Hot-cold (local-remote) wallet setup as described in the tutorial? I mean - try to run a masternode and control it using the one single hot wallet. That is a standard setup, which should be the simplest one... and it works on all other MN coins I have setup before. Yesterday I spent hours trying to make it work - to no avail. It just throws stupid errors, like "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009", or just "Not capable masternode: " - without error description. Gave up yesterday. Today moved the controlling part to the remote wallet - boom, it worked immediately. So I suppose there is either a bug in HLM MN implementation (as the single hot wallet setup works for other MN coins); or an intended security limitation - it this case it should be documented, and the daemon should throw some meaningful error message - like "Not capable masternode: only local-remote setup is supported." or something better... Just wanted to report this, in case if it's not widely known and discussed in slack/telegram/discord already I think this guide does that for windows machines: https://www.heliumlabs.org/v1.0/docs/masternode-setup-guide-windows-localIts a setup up for running multiple MNs on one local machine (afaict, never used this set up). I don't think there is anything that prevents you from running a hot node. Haven't been able to test it yet though. That setup uses dedicated controller wallet (albeit local), so it is different. I was using Linux, and. most importantly, I was trying to use a single wallet (single datadir etc) both as MN itself, and as controller. That setup could be interesting for smaller holders only, but well... smaller holders are the most important user category for real decentralization, so having this setup working is important too, IMHO. Do you have a static public IP? Yes, sure, I was doing that on a Linux VPS on Vultr. The "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009" statement made me wonder the most, as I checked and was able to telnet to that port ("telnet x.x.x.x 9009" on my machine). |
... this space is not for rent ... |
|
|
DuzyGej
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
October 15, 2018, 07:27:41 PM |
|
currency without exchange When Cryptopia ? |
|
|
|
RzeroD
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 272
Merit: 107
Paranoid In Chief
|
|
October 15, 2018, 07:40:04 PM |
|
currency without exchange When Cryptopia ? I didn't know that CREX24 was not considered an exchange: https://crex24.com/exchange/HLM-BTC |
|
|
|
|
teela
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 22
|
|
October 15, 2018, 11:17:19 PM |
|
Did anyone try a one wallet MN setup, instead of Hot-cold (local-remote) wallet setup as described in the tutorial? I mean - try to run a masternode and control it using the one single hot wallet. That is a standard setup, which should be the simplest one... and it works on all other MN coins I have setup before. Yesterday I spent hours trying to make it work - to no avail. It just throws stupid errors, like "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009", or just "Not capable masternode: " - without error description. Gave up yesterday. Today moved the controlling part to the remote wallet - boom, it worked immediately. So I suppose there is either a bug in HLM MN implementation (as the single hot wallet setup works for other MN coins); or an intended security limitation - it this case it should be documented, and the daemon should throw some meaningful error message - like "Not capable masternode: only local-remote setup is supported." or something better... Just wanted to report this, in case if it's not widely known and discussed in slack/telegram/discord already I think this guide does that for windows machines: https://www.heliumlabs.org/v1.0/docs/masternode-setup-guide-windows-localIts a setup up for running multiple MNs on one local machine (afaict, never used this set up). I don't think there is anything that prevents you from running a hot node. Haven't been able to test it yet though. That setup uses dedicated controller wallet (albeit local), so it is different. I was using Linux, and. most importantly, I was trying to use a single wallet (single datadir etc) both as MN itself, and as controller. That setup could be interesting for smaller holders only, but well... smaller holders are the most important user category for real decentralization, so having this setup working is important too, IMHO. Do you have a static public IP? Yes, sure, I was doing that on a Linux VPS on Vultr. The "Not capable masternode: cannot connect to x.x.x.x:9009" statement made me wonder the most, as I checked and was able to telnet to that port ("telnet x.x.x.x 9009" on my machine). As said: nothing keeps you from running a hot node. And I haven't been able to check it. Soon as I can I'll tell you but then again: why run a hot node in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
drays
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1073
|
|
October 16, 2018, 12:25:02 PM
Last edit: October 16, 2018, 12:35:40 PM by drays |
|
How about you you write the fucking guide yourself instead of asking.
Not sure I get what you mean. And looks like you didn't understand what I was telling. I am asking neither for a guide, nor for a help. Neither a new guide for running a single hot wallet is needed (or possible) for me to write, as it doesn't seem to work currently (unless someone re-tests this and reports to be working somehow). I just reported a possible issue with the MN implementation, which I found while trying to setup a hot MN wallet - just in case if this indeed a bug to be fixed, and just in case if it is interesting for developers and/or community. I do not insist on fixing this, neither am asking for your help or valuable advice, dear Mr. Mrrr (I am still a fan of your brilliant Haiku collection post, regardless of this particular outburst ). As said: nothing keeps you from running a hot node. And I haven't been able to check it. Soon as I can I'll tell you but then again: why run a hot node in the first place.
So better to tell - nothing but possible bugs Regarding the reason for running a hot node... well, that is one of the possible ways to run it, and it is the most resource-friendly way if you run just one node (as you keep just one copy of blockchain + save CPU some power), so I assume there could be users willing to run that way. As to me, I am currently running the controller wallet separately on different PC, as this is the working way. |
... this space is not for rent ... |
|
|
|
sud
|
|
October 16, 2018, 01:04:11 PM |
|
@drays @teela
Also doesn't running a cold wallet on VPS require another PC with hot wallet? Some people are unanble to run masternode in cold/hot wallet setup. It would be great if anyone can check if this problem is problem is common.
|
|
|
|
|
teela
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 22
|
|
October 16, 2018, 01:43:18 PM |
|
How about you you write the fucking guide yourself instead of asking.
Not sure I get what you mean. And looks like you didn't understand what I was telling. I am asking neither for a guide, nor for a help. Neither a new guide for running a single hot wallet is needed (or possible) for me to write, as it doesn't seem to work currently (unless someone re-tests this and reports to be working somehow). I just reported a possible issue with the MN implementation, which I found while trying to setup a hot MN wallet - just in case if this indeed a bug to be fixed, and just in case if it is interesting for developers and/or community. I do not insist on fixing this, neither am asking for your help or valuable advice, dear Mr. Mrrr (I am still a fan of your brilliant Haiku collection post, regardless of this particular outburst ). As said: nothing keeps you from running a hot node. And I haven't been able to check it. Soon as I can I'll tell you but then again: why run a hot node in the first place.
So better to tell - nothing but possible bugs Regarding the reason for running a hot node... well, that is one of the possible ways to run it, and it is the most resource-friendly way if you run just one node (as you keep just one copy of blockchain + save CPU some power), so I assume there could be users willing to run that way. As to me, I am currently running the controller wallet separately on different PC, as this is the working way. I've my coins on Cryptopia Soon as I can I'll test it. As said afaik there is nothing that prevents this set up. But there is only one way to find out |
|
|
|
|
DuzyGej
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
October 16, 2018, 06:26:14 PM |
|
I have 7834HLM stuck on Cryptopia. When Cryptopia start? |
|
|
|
RzeroD
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 272
Merit: 107
Paranoid In Chief
|
|
October 16, 2018, 07:00:14 PM |
|
I have 7834HLM stuck on Cryptopia. When Cryptopia start? When Cryptopia can, we can't do more |
|
|
|
|
PowerHemp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Ganja <3
|
|
October 16, 2018, 08:42:15 PM |
|
I have 7834HLM stuck on Cryptopia. When Cryptopia start? When Cryptopia can, we can't do more until cryptopia staked enough with our coins  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero1One0
|
|
October 17, 2018, 05:49:39 AM |
|
FINALLY!!! I'm excited to fire up my HLM masternode. Hopefully no withdrawal issues with Cryptopia.  KUDOS to the HELIUM team! |
|
|
|
|
