Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 02:56:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 [161] 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ckpool.org CLOSED  (Read 162568 times)
alb97
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 20, 2020, 10:41:58 AM
 #3201

i am happy to be part of this minning pool for about 7 months i hope a good result i have hope
3Lu45sNiXdReroWXiDCAQtybMLcv514bv5
1715137009
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137009

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137009
Reply with quote  #2

1715137009
Report to moderator
1715137009
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137009

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137009
Reply with quote  #2

1715137009
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715137009
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137009

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137009
Reply with quote  #2

1715137009
Report to moderator
1715137009
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137009

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137009
Reply with quote  #2

1715137009
Report to moderator
1715137009
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137009

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137009
Reply with quote  #2

1715137009
Report to moderator
CoolGuyyyy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 03, 2020, 03:41:26 AM
 #3202

Pointed about 2PH your way ckpool! Maybe it will help whom ever gets that 3.5 reward Smiley Good luck! Smiley
pavesi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 12


View Profile
February 04, 2020, 03:57:13 AM
 #3203

Pointed about 2PH your way ckpool! Maybe it will help whom ever gets that 3.5 reward Smiley Good luck! Smiley

Awesome!  Here's hoping for block tuesday!
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
February 04, 2020, 04:00:41 AM
 #3204

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Artemis3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1563


CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2020, 02:42:00 PM
 #3205

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

I think about 100 PH would do the magic. One wonders how so many EHs remain in some other pools despite losing so much in pool fees. Perhaps things will improve once large mining becomes unprofitable (especially in China).

Or, maybe you just need to pay someone to do a Chinese and Russian translation of the site?

██████
███████
███████
████████
BRAIINS OS+|AUTOTUNING
MINING FIRMWARE
|
Increase hashrate on your Bitcoin ASICs,
improve efficiency as much as 25%, and
get 0% pool fees on Braiins Pool
vickersja
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 34

To be the man, you gotta beat the man...... WOOOOO


View Profile
February 05, 2020, 02:52:51 PM
Last edit: February 05, 2020, 07:20:12 PM by vickersja
 #3206

That's my question.  I read through every post of this thread and the glory days of finding 2 blocks in a day.  Why would so many people leave this pool for another when they are losing money with them?

Earn Bitcoin with Lolli:  https://lolli.com/share/FbdPrN6jTu
Link credit card for in-store shopping or use browser extension for online shopping
DordOfLarkness
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 05, 2020, 10:14:22 PM
 #3207

I think I've been on for a year now or so.  Happy to do so.  Hoping more folks see the light. Smiley Smiley
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2020, 10:46:04 PM
 #3208

That's my question.  I read through every post of this thread and the glory days of finding 2 blocks in a day.  Why would so many people leave this pool for another when they are losing money with them?
Most people are obsessed with regular payments, and truth be told if a pool goes a long time without finding a block and the difficulty keeps rising, then you are losing money on that pool, even if it has no fee. Pools need to be above a minimum size to be feasible, and this pool has fallen below that size. Once it's below a certain size, more and more people leave it. Conversely when a pool is above a certain size, more and more people join it. It's a vicious cycle that once you're beyond the event horizon there's nothing you can do. Advertising and getting in early and fancy features are the only thing that attract miners when establishing a base, and this pool has none of those. It missed its chance of becoming big a long time ago, and it's not likely to ever recover now. I'm keeping it running as a service to the community now, but I don't have much hope for its future.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
pavesi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 12


View Profile
February 06, 2020, 03:20:19 PM
 #3209

That's my question.  I read through every post of this thread and the glory days of finding 2 blocks in a day.  Why would so many people leave this pool for another when they are losing money with them?
Most people are obsessed with regular payments, and truth be told if a pool goes a long time without finding a block and the difficulty keeps rising, then you are losing money on that pool, even if it has no fee. Pools need to be above a minimum size to be feasible, and this pool has fallen below that size. Once it's below a certain size, more and more people leave it. Conversely when a pool is above a certain size, more and more people join it. It's a vicious cycle that once you're beyond the event horizon there's nothing you can do. Advertising and getting in early and fancy features are the only thing that attract miners when establishing a base, and this pool has none of those. It missed its chance of becoming big a long time ago, and it's not likely to ever recover now. I'm keeping it running as a service to the community now, but I don't have much hope for its future.


Luck and having some mfg's point their testing/burn-in miners here would help a lot also.
Artemis3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1563


CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang


View Profile WWW
February 06, 2020, 11:44:55 PM
 #3210

Luck and having some mfg's point their testing/burn-in miners here would help a lot also.

It doesn't help when the largest manufacturer operates their own pool AND pre-configures their miners to use it... But i think things might change later.

██████
███████
███████
████████
BRAIINS OS+|AUTOTUNING
MINING FIRMWARE
|
Increase hashrate on your Bitcoin ASICs,
improve efficiency as much as 25%, and
get 0% pool fees on Braiins Pool
evade_57
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 11


View Profile
February 07, 2020, 04:38:07 AM
Merited by frodocooper (2)
 #3211

Luck and having some mfg's point their testing/burn-in miners here would help a lot also.

 But i think things might change later.

Counting on it!

ck, really appreciate your service to the community!   Smiley
y_virtual
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 377
Merit: 251

Note to self: it's not you doing it, it's us.


View Profile
February 10, 2020, 04:50:38 PM
Merited by philipma1957 (1)
 #3212

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

BTW my recent observations on multiple pools reveal a completely different/opposite picture than the popular opinion goes. Looks like smaller pools with fewer competing miners improve the overall pool efficiency, I guess it could be due to small pools by design/usage "relieve" the inevitable technical bottlenecks any large pool has. Just an intuitive guess of mine.
vickersja
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 34

To be the man, you gotta beat the man...... WOOOOO


View Profile
February 10, 2020, 04:55:56 PM
 #3213

Your source does show that the last block found by CKPool (not solo) was 6 hours ago - if I am reading it correct.  However the btc.com block page shows the last block just shy of a year ago. 

Earn Bitcoin with Lolli:  https://lolli.com/share/FbdPrN6jTu
Link credit card for in-store shopping or use browser extension for online shopping
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7862


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
February 10, 2020, 05:15:22 PM
 #3214

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

BTW my recent observations on multiple pools reveal a completely different/opposite picture than the popular opinion goes. Looks like smaller pools with fewer competing miners improve the overall pool efficiency, I guess it could be due to small pools by design/usage "relieve" the inevitable technical bottlenecks any large pool has. Just an intuitive guess of mine.

certainly looks to be a reporting error on someones part.

blockchain.info has that block at unknown not ckpool

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
PassThePopcorn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 465
Merit: 309


View Profile
February 10, 2020, 05:30:29 PM
 #3215

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

BTW my recent observations on multiple pools reveal a completely different/opposite picture than the popular opinion goes. Looks like smaller pools with fewer competing miners improve the overall pool efficiency, I guess it could be due to small pools by design/usage "relieve" the inevitable technical bottlenecks any large pool has. Just an intuitive guess of mine.

certainly looks to be a reporting error on someones part.

blockchain.info has that block at unknown not ckpool
If you look at the "pool" that blockchain.com says found it, it is 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k which is also the top (#1) payout on ckpool. Not 100% on what it reports or who's account that is but it is a ckpool user at the very least.
TheYankeesWin!
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 300


View Profile
February 10, 2020, 06:59:10 PM
 #3216

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

BTW my recent observations on multiple pools reveal a completely different/opposite picture than the popular opinion goes. Looks like smaller pools with fewer competing miners improve the overall pool efficiency, I guess it could be due to small pools by design/usage "relieve" the inevitable technical bottlenecks any large pool has. Just an intuitive guess of mine.

certainly looks to be a reporting error on someones part.

blockchain.info has that block at unknown not ckpool
If you look at the "pool" that blockchain.com says found it, it is 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k which is also the top (#1) payout on ckpool. Not 100% on what it reports or who's account that is but it is a ckpool user at the very least.
I get this info

 https://www.blockchain.com/btc/block/00000000000000000007c7186fd29956197dc96222b8db62334d73054efc33fc

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3P8sR3K8wAk3bom7tqpr5VrzCz9TVYNTQd



that address you mention is here


https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k


does not show a block for 616785
PassThePopcorn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 465
Merit: 309


View Profile
February 10, 2020, 07:44:13 PM
 #3217

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

BTW my recent observations on multiple pools reveal a completely different/opposite picture than the popular opinion goes. Looks like smaller pools with fewer competing miners improve the overall pool efficiency, I guess it could be due to small pools by design/usage "relieve" the inevitable technical bottlenecks any large pool has. Just an intuitive guess of mine.

certainly looks to be a reporting error on someones part.

blockchain.info has that block at unknown not ckpool
If you look at the "pool" that blockchain.com says found it, it is 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k which is also the top (#1) payout on ckpool. Not 100% on what it reports or who's account that is but it is a ckpool user at the very least.
I get this info

 https://www.blockchain.com/btc/block/00000000000000000007c7186fd29956197dc96222b8db62334d73054efc33fc

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3P8sR3K8wAk3bom7tqpr5VrzCz9TVYNTQd



that address you mention is here


https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k


does not show a block for 616785
Hmm didn't know 616785 was one from ckpool, I just went to ckpool.org and clicked on the blocks found. When I reattempt now I get a different page that has the list of each block and not a redirect to btc.com/pools/ckpool like before. Kind of seems like a server error being thrown or something being changed.
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
February 10, 2020, 08:16:12 PM
 #3218

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...
Mining difficulty is now lightyears higher than it was back then, and the pool was bigger for periods during (the now defunct) halongmining burn in.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
evade_57
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 11


View Profile
February 12, 2020, 03:50:47 PM
 #3219

S17 rental added for 24 hours

Added to my awesome 1.2Ths daily hashing  Roll Eyes
DaCryptoRaccoon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1202
Merit: 582


OGRaccoon


View Profile
February 12, 2020, 06:22:08 PM
 #3220

How about a signature campaign or some advertising of the pool? 

Big respect to you CK for keeping it rolling for the community but it's a two way thing we should be getting out there spreading the word I for one won't mine on other pools never have I think a lot of us would be more than happy to try get some more people to the pool and signatures may help some what obviously on a voluntary system to show the support for your efforts CK.

Thoughts?

┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃   💎 Mine Solo with CKPool 💎    ┃
┃    ➤ Hit Blocks on Your Own!      ┃
┃ ███▓▓  ███▓▓  ███▓▓  ███▓▓┃
Pages: « 1 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 [161] 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!