dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 07:28:05 PM |
|
99.3 and 99.1 to slush's via proxy, otherwise about 97 to getawork btcguild
|
|
|
|
drlatino999
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 07:36:22 PM |
|
99.3 and 99.1 to slush's via proxy, otherwise about 97 to getawork btcguild
Maybe I'm doing something wrong; anything look glaringly "oops" here? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FDeKW8iH.png&t=665&c=533CJzKNRx9sfQ)
|
Sappers clear the way
|
|
|
desired_username
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 07:37:59 PM |
|
desired, which pool are you on?
i'm on slush.
|
|
|
|
Noitev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 07:49:26 PM |
|
99.3 and 99.1 to slush's via proxy, otherwise about 97 to getawork btcguild
Maybe I'm doing something wrong; anything look glaringly "oops" here? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FDeKW8iH.png&t=665&c=533CJzKNRx9sfQ) When I start mine, it always starts with really low efficiency, I'd wait 30 minutes a few hours. it went up to about 97% for me Ive been mining at bitparking and my backup is guild.
|
|
|
|
drlatino999
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 08:26:24 PM |
|
99.3 and 99.1 to slush's via proxy, otherwise about 97 to getawork btcguild
Maybe I'm doing something wrong; anything look glaringly "oops" here? https://i.imgur.com/DeKW8iH.pngWhen I start mine, it always starts with really low efficiency, I'd wait 30 minutes a few hours. it went up to about 97% for me Ive been mining at bitparking and my backup is guild. Tried a different location for the stratum proxy on the physical network, now I'm pulling 12.2 gh/s with 97%. Here's how it was before: -> Miner - Router - Switch - Server with proxies Now with a 7% increase: -> Miner - Router - Proxy Server Thanks for taking the time to look at the problem. I'm sure something else will pop up though, it always does ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
Sappers clear the way
|
|
|
desired_username
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 08:38:18 PM |
|
99.3 and 99.1 to slush's via proxy, otherwise about 97 to getawork btcguild
Maybe I'm doing something wrong; anything look glaringly "oops" here? https://i.imgur.com/DeKW8iH.pngWhen I start mine, it always starts with really low efficiency, I'd wait 30 minutes a few hours. it went up to about 97% for me Ive been mining at bitparking and my backup is guild. Tried a different location for the stratum proxy on the physical network, now I'm pulling 12.2 gh/s with 97%. Here's how it was before: -> Miner - Router - Switch - Server with proxies Now with a 7% increase: -> Miner - Router - Proxy Server Thanks for taking the time to look at the problem. I'm sure something else will pop up though, it always does ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) What switch do you have? If it's a basic, cheap one then it's very likely that it cannot keep up with multiple ports used at the same time. As with other tech stuff, the lower end devices are usually not suitable for 24/7 use or high load.
|
|
|
|
drlatino999
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 08:57:01 PM |
|
What switch do you have?
If it's a basic, cheap one then it's very likely that it cannot keep up with multiple ports used at the same time.
As with other tech stuff, the lower end devices are usually not suitable for 24/7 use or high load.
DLink DGS 2208. I've already ordered a replacement, HP Procurve 1810-8G v2. The D-Link works fine for saturating the gigabit link to my NAS, but it seems it can't keep up with the stratum protocol.
|
Sappers clear the way
|
|
|
desired_username
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 09:21:37 PM |
|
What switch do you have?
If it's a basic, cheap one then it's very likely that it cannot keep up with multiple ports used at the same time.
As with other tech stuff, the lower end devices are usually not suitable for 24/7 use or high load.
DLink DGS 2208. I've already ordered a replacement, HP Procurve 1810-8G v2. The D-Link works fine for saturating the gigabit link to my NAS, but it seems it can't keep up with the stratum protocol. I have a procurve 1400 and it works fine. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Caesium
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 10, 2013, 10:56:48 PM |
|
friedcat, could I possibly pick you brains for a moment please? I'm trying to automate reconfiguring these blades by POSTing up a webform generated programmatically, but I must be mucking something up, because the changes aren't taking effect. I've noticed that on a successful submit from my browser, I get code "631" in the return string, and when trying to do it programatically I get "148" - what do these mean and any quick tips about what I might be doing wrong here.. Example request I send up: POST /Upload_Data HTTP/1.1 Accept: */* User-Agent: Ruby Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Host: 192.168.0.125:8000 Content-Length: 65 MPRT=8343%2C8342&USPA=rfcpool.asic4%3A1234%2CCaesium_asic4%3A1234
In this example I only sent user/pass and ports since that's all I wanted to change, but the same happens if I set any/all combinations of fields as far as I can tell.. Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Caesium
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2013, 10:15:34 AM |
|
Think I found it. It requires the entire HTTP POST in one packet, I noticed it was sending the "rebooting" response right after the first packet. It also seemed to require having the "update=Update/Restart" field in otherwise it only updated some settings but not others, but it seems to be working now.
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2013, 05:57:45 PM |
|
Batch 3 went up at 2.30am for me so couldn't get any ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I think it should have been another auction, not 'whoever'stimezonefitsgetsthem'.
|
|
|
|
Caesium
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2013, 06:02:52 PM |
|
Probably would have been if the forum could cope with it. This one was such a mess towards the end I suspect they didn't want a repeat showing?
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2013, 06:04:08 PM |
|
They could have used an offsite version, or even closed offers. But at the least, advertise it in advance ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2013, 06:04:20 PM |
|
Probably would have been if the forum could cope with it. This one was such a mess towards the end I suspect they didn't want a repeat showing?
Yeah, that's true. Friedcat figured that this would work better, although I'm more partial towards a Dutch-style auction. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2013, 11:13:53 PM |
|
![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) found my first block!
|
|
|
|
lightbox
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2013, 06:14:46 AM |
|
Figured I should post some pics of my setup too. The rack cost me about $10 to make (CPVC), everything from RONA.
snip
best rack in this tread but in my experience having blowers blowing air directly on heat-sink is must. Especially if room is hot and blade run on HIGH clock. Thanks! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
lenny_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2013, 05:29:02 PM |
|
What's your efficiency guys? My 2 units are getting exactly 178 and 179 diff shares per minute, after many hours of uptime. I am cooling them with 2x2 Arctic Cooling F12 120mm fans. No problems with overheating or power at all, absolutely stable since fitted:)
|
|
|
|
Caesium
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2013, 05:41:38 PM |
|
this is the output of a little script I wrote to get all the interesting data into one place..
1: 12949 MH/s 240824/ 243858 176.95/min 98.75% 4s up 022h 40:58 2: 12986 MH/s 241489/ 243866 177.45/min 99.02% 4s up 022h 40:53 3: 12886 MH/s 218411/ 222339 176.08/min 98.23% 4s up 020h 40:24 4: 12790 MH/s 14848/ 15200 174.79/min 97.69% 4s up 001h 24:56
That's fairly atypical for me, maybe a little lower than normal, I've seen anything up to 178 shares/minute.
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2013, 06:42:09 PM |
|
this is the output of a little script I wrote to get all the interesting data into one place..
1: 12949 MH/s 240824/ 243858 176.95/min 98.75% 4s up 022h 40:58 2: 12986 MH/s 241489/ 243866 177.45/min 99.02% 4s up 022h 40:53 3: 12886 MH/s 218411/ 222339 176.08/min 98.23% 4s up 020h 40:24 4: 12790 MH/s 14848/ 15200 174.79/min 97.69% 4s up 001h 24:56
That's fairly atypical for me, maybe a little lower than normal, I've seen anything up to 178 shares/minute.
Hitting 13000 exactly, 178 exactly. You might want to try moving your stratum proxy about, or testing 2 different proxies on 2 computers etc. Does look like your 4 is maxing out current arrangement.
|
|
|
|
Caesium
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2013, 07:53:32 PM |
|
You got me wondering, so I tried moving the proxy of 4:
4: 12553 MH/s 3794/ 3936 171.80/min 96.39% 3s up 000h 22:05
seems even worse after 22 minutes. It was on a Linux HP Microserver previously, thats on a Windows box with a bit more power - maybe Windows just sucks at this sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
|