Flunder707
|
|
May 10, 2017, 05:33:10 AM |
|
This project rocks. At least better than pascalcoin
At least Pascal was mineable. Let the developer have time to work on this and lets see what happens. A lot of people seem to be behind it, and it looks like a great idea. Could be the next Dash. First Python coin. It just needs time to evolve and become what we want it to be. why next Dash? There is nothing innovative. Changing a programming language is not innovative. At least if it was going to be a community coin would have a fair launch but this one was one of the worst coin launches ever. Well said. The only people defending it right now are probably the few that at some prior knowledge of how to mine or make it work on their own. Nothing fair about that.
|
|
|
|
CoinManiac1
|
|
May 10, 2017, 06:00:40 AM |
|
This project rocks. At least better than pascalcoin
At least Pascal was mineable. Let the developer have time to work on this and lets see what happens. A lot of people seem to be behind it, and it looks like a great idea. Could be the next Dash. First Python coin. It just needs time to evolve and become what we want it to be. why next Dash? There is nothing innovative. Changing a programming language is not innovative. At least if it was going to be a community coin would have a fair launch but this one was one of the worst coin launches ever. Well said. The only people defending it right now are probably the few that at some prior knowledge of how to mine or make it work on their own. Nothing fair about that. Because you were late to the party. No issues, head to some other coin. Stop worrying about Bismuth
|
|
|
|
CoinManiac1
|
|
May 10, 2017, 06:02:54 AM |
|
The people complaining here about Bismuth not being a fair launch.. Was Bitcoin, Dash a fair launch. Answer this
|
|
|
|
raetsch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
|
|
May 10, 2017, 06:54:13 AM |
|
just for documentation: had to resync after mandatory update: 2017-05-10 08:48:52,090 WARNING digest_block(1002) Block 90209 valid and saved from 78.28.250.81 first block 2017-05-10 08:49:33,703 WARNING digest_block(1002) Block 90470 valid and saved from 78.28.250.81 synched
|
|
|
|
blg42598
|
|
May 10, 2017, 07:16:26 AM |
|
How can I save a backup of my wallet on Windows? Where can I find the wallet file? Also is there a gpu miner?
|
|
|
|
mistercashking
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1044
Merit: 1050
@MRCASHKING
|
|
May 10, 2017, 07:18:27 AM Last edit: May 10, 2017, 08:27:52 AM by mistercashking |
|
How can I save a backup of my wallet on Windows? Where can I find the wallet file? Also is there a gpu miner?
In bismuth folder backup privkey.der and pubkey.der files. Dont think there is a gpu miner yet. Most of us are renting servers/vps (quite expensive) because a normal i7 computer not fast enough to find blocks anymore. Join their slack if you need help. Much faster. OTC Trading thread is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1898984.0
|
|
|
|
tamara163
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1027
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 10, 2017, 11:28:36 AM |
|
so is there a chance to find at least one block per day on i7 CPU-8 threads 3.4 GHz in turbo boost ?
|
|
|
|
onetwo12
|
|
May 10, 2017, 04:50:25 PM |
|
hard to mine?
|
|
|
|
max2000irc
|
|
May 10, 2017, 05:30:09 PM |
|
imho , is very hard to mine right now , there people mining with hundreds of cores and still get a few blocks per day.
Hopefully there will be a pool soon .
Thanks
|
|
|
|
raetsch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
|
|
May 10, 2017, 06:15:20 PM |
|
so is there a chance to find at least one block per day on i7 CPU-8 threads 3.4 GHz in turbo boost ?
Honestly? Seems not the case, i doubled the mining cores, let's if it takes me somewhere.
|
|
|
|
tr8kr
|
|
May 10, 2017, 09:34:33 PM |
|
Someone on slack was telling that with 100 core he got about 1 block by 10h. Assuming that with 100 CPU you find 1 block every 10h we can extrapole to see what number of CPU you need to find 1 in a hour (1000) lol that's big ! 9:27 If you watch the explorer for the best miner actually on 1 hour this miner have found 32 block then can we conclude he is using 32000 core ?
|
|
|
|
bspus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2165
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 10, 2017, 09:36:41 PM |
|
I have some coins from early mining. They are in the blockchain included with the new release so I know they made it through.
They are in two separate wallets, from mining on two separate machines. I got the keys and they work with the new release.
The problem is, I have tried twice (on different wallet version releases where I reinstall) to send from one to the other, I failed both times.
The transaction remains unconfirmed. With the new wallet release, it's like it never happened.
Also I don't know how to set fees, which might be the reason. The gui really has almost no functionality.
|
|
|
|
max2000irc
|
|
May 10, 2017, 09:52:13 PM |
|
Someone on slack was telling that with 100 core he got about 1 block by 10h. Assuming that with 100 CPU you find 1 block every 10h we can extrapole to see what number of CPU you need to find 1 in a hour (1000) lol that's big ! 9:27 If you watch the explorer for the best miner actually on 1 hour this miner have found 32 block then can we conclude he is using 32000 core ?
I think you got it wrong someone wrote that on a 32 core server he get one block validated in 10 hours but a lot more orphaned . I have the same problem with not getting validated all blocks I find on my node. But still managed to get some. Thanks
|
|
|
|
piebeyb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1038
|
|
May 10, 2017, 09:57:31 PM |
|
Unfortunately I am really interested in the concept of this project just still not get an explanation of how to get the rewards in the mines properly
|
|
|
|
max2000irc
|
|
May 10, 2017, 10:07:38 PM |
|
Unfortunately I am really interested in the concept of this project just still not get an explanation of how to get the rewards in the mines properly Hopefully there will be a pool soon and then we can mine and also see the hashrate etc
|
|
|
|
tr8kr
|
|
May 10, 2017, 11:35:59 PM |
|
Someone on slack was telling that with 100 core he got about 1 block by 10h. Assuming that with 100 CPU you find 1 block every 10h we can extrapole to see what number of CPU you need to find 1 in a hour (1000) lol that's big ! 9:27 If you watch the explorer for the best miner actually on 1 hour this miner have found 32 block then can we conclude he is using 32000 core ?
I think you got it wrong someone wrote that on a 32 core server he get one block validated in 10 hours but a lot more orphaned . I have the same problem with not getting validated all blocks I find on my node. But still managed to get some. Thanks Check in the #mining channel he was speaking of 100 core thats not my word but if you tell me that you got 10 block in 24h with 32 core do the math for 32 in 1 hours
|
|
|
|
forzendiablo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
|
|
May 11, 2017, 01:45:53 AM |
|
interesting coin i will have a look on this.
|
yolo
|
|
|
MickGhee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
Fucker of "the system"
|
|
May 11, 2017, 03:02:13 AM |
|
I have some coins from early mining. They are in the blockchain included with the new release so I know they made it through.
They are in two separate wallets, from mining on two separate machines. I got the keys and they work with the new release.
The problem is, I have tried twice (on different wallet version releases where I reinstall) to send from one to the other, I failed both times.
The transaction remains unconfirmed. With the new wallet release, it's like it never happened.
Also I don't know how to set fees, which might be the reason. The gui really has almost no functionality.
me too i have 104 coins stuck\
|
Last night, while you were sleeping. I fucked the system!
|
|
|
primeval
|
|
May 11, 2017, 03:44:14 AM |
|
Seeing tons of these -
Check 1: A part of the block is invalid, rejected: Difficulty requirement not satisfied for block 91608 from 107.170.69.85
|
|
|
|
mistercashking
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1044
Merit: 1050
@MRCASHKING
|
|
May 11, 2017, 03:47:21 AM |
|
Seeing tons of these -
Check 1: A part of the block is invalid, rejected: Difficulty requirement not satisfied for block 91608 from 107.170.69.85
thats normal.
|
|
|
|
|