annapotpot
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 330
Merit: 1
|
|
April 05, 2018, 07:38:20 PM |
|
ASICs (miners that havent updated their miners are sure to have spotted that something has changed by now) Well, that was what I would think also. But my pool is not one of the biggest and it's flushed with bad shares from my miners. I put a warning on my homepage and announced it in the discord channel, but nothing... Well right now I only know of 2 gpu miners that supports SUMO. srbminer and xmr-stak. Do you know of any other gpu miner?
|
|
|
|
rodyw
|
|
April 05, 2018, 07:49:57 PM |
|
ASICs (miners that havent updated their miners are sure to have spotted that something has changed by now) Well, that was what I would think also. But my pool is not one of the biggest and it's flushed with bad shares from my miners. I put a warning on my homepage and announced it in the discord channel, but nothing... Well right now I only know of 2 gpu miners that supports SUMO. srbminer and xmr-stak. Do you know of any other gpu miner? Check this great thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2126975.0 created by @Mattthev. At this point I am only facing system reboots within an hour with both SRBMiner and XMR-STAK on my AMD RX580 Rig. I really like SGMiner GM, but it doesn't support CN Heavy
|
|
|
|
Marvell2
|
|
April 05, 2018, 08:03:55 PM |
|
what cpu miner to use for this algo
|
|
|
|
Marvell2
|
|
April 05, 2018, 11:37:44 PM |
|
ASICs (miners that havent updated their miners are sure to have spotted that something has changed by now) Well, that was what I would think also. But my pool is not one of the biggest and it's flushed with bad shares from my miners. I put a warning on my homepage and announced it in the discord channel, but nothing... Well right now I only know of 2 gpu miners that supports SUMO. srbminer and xmr-stak. Do you know of any other gpu miner? I dont think xmr stack is updated
|
|
|
|
NChink
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 03:59:51 AM |
|
ASICs (miners that havent updated their miners are sure to have spotted that something has changed by now) Well, that was what I would think also. But my pool is not one of the biggest and it's flushed with bad shares from my miners. I put a warning on my homepage and announced it in the discord channel, but nothing... Well right now I only know of 2 gpu miners that supports SUMO. srbminer and xmr-stak. Do you know of any other gpu miner? I dont think xmr stack is updated Haven't had issues with xmr-stack at all - I'm currently on 2.4.2, but I still have a handful of rigs on 2.4.1. These are all Radeon rigs.
|
|
|
|
Germining
|
|
April 06, 2018, 04:07:10 AM |
|
I dont think xmr stack is updated
Of course it is!
|
|
|
|
Marvell2
|
|
April 06, 2018, 04:12:33 AM |
|
I dont think xmr stack is updated
Of course it is! I think i meant cast XMR
|
|
|
|
|
dtr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 06:29:04 AM |
|
Of course the second. First one probably not updated properly.
|
|
|
|
anjanner3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 06:59:07 AM |
|
Of course the second. First one probably not updated properly. thanks men
|
|
|
|
garantie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 07:56:19 AM |
|
I was wondering, how the change from cryptonight "normal" to "heavy" algorithm has influenced the hashing power of different mining hardware. Therefore I made simple hashrate "study" for my 3 (small) systems - if anybody is interested --> http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.htmlCurious about other hardware experiences / figures ... and possibly about improvement of my settings BR garantie
|
|
|
|
rodyw
|
|
April 06, 2018, 08:52:03 AM |
|
Well, I hate to say it, but it seems I can't mine this new CN Heavy algorithm properly. I was using SGMinerGM without much problems getting 4500H/sec out of my 5 AMD RX580's, but now it is horrible. XMR Stak gives me 3300H/sec, SRBminer 3800H/sec, but both miners will crash/get stuck/reboot within two hours. Tuning the miners with intensity etc only make it worse. I can accept the loss in hashrate, but not all these problems.
|
|
|
|
Bhaal1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 09:22:25 AM |
|
I was wondering, how the change from cryptonight "normal" to "heavy" algorithm has influenced the hashing power of different mining hardware. Therefore I made simple hashrate "study" for my 3 (small) systems - if anybody is interested --> http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.htmlCurious about other hardware experiences / figures ... and possibly about improvement of my settings BR garantie I see the same problems (with xmr stak)...I hope cast xmr will be updated soon.
|
|
|
|
Alejandur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 09:40:11 AM |
|
I guess the lower hash rate is because cryptonight-heavy is more difficult to solve than cryptonight-"normal". But it's not a problem because everybody has lost hash power. We need to get used to the new algo and not compare it with the old hash rate. Sorry for my English.
|
|
|
|
garantie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 09:51:14 AM |
|
I know this and also don't worry about it, but to get used with new hashrates, comparison makes sense for me.
|
|
|
|
wtfpdf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 09:53:55 AM |
|
I was wondering, how the change from cryptonight "normal" to "heavy" algorithm has influenced the hashing power of different mining hardware. Therefore I made simple hashrate "study" for my 3 (small) systems - if anybody is interested --> http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.htmlCurious about other hardware experiences / figures ... and possibly about improvement of my settings BR garantie I see the same problems (with xmr stak)...I hope cast xmr will be updated soon. cast-xmr will not help with your problem. CN-Heavy doubled it's memory requirements, so now you see only ±50% of your old Cryptonote hashrate. It's not a bug, it's a feature.
|
|
|
|
sabercrypto
Member
Offline
Activity: 181
Merit: 10
|
|
April 06, 2018, 09:55:54 AM |
|
rx580 1000hash before now in heavy cryptonight it is 680. is this normal?
|
|
|
|
Bhaal1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 10:35:11 AM |
|
I was wondering, how the change from cryptonight "normal" to "heavy" algorithm has influenced the hashing power of different mining hardware. Therefore I made simple hashrate "study" for my 3 (small) systems - if anybody is interested --> http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.htmlCurious about other hardware experiences / figures ... and possibly about improvement of my settings BR garantie I see the same problems (with xmr stak)...I hope cast xmr will be updated soon. cast-xmr will not help with your problem. CN-Heavy doubled it's memory requirements, so now you see only ±50% of your old Cryptonote hashrate. It's not a bug, it's a feature. Is it that simple?Or are there ways to improve?
|
|
|
|
m42orion
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2018, 10:52:48 AM |
|
rx580 1000hash before now in heavy cryptonight it is 680. is this normal?
I think that is ok ... I tested my rx550s cards .... before had about 470-480H/s now after some tweaks i got about 330-340 .. :-) today i will be testing RX 570-4GB .. i will write some info soon
|
|
|
|
|
|