Evolution is a hoax

[robbylove]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything . 

The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.

The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.

Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.

The theory of Evolution is based on the faith of the missing link, which is still missing, but real enough to make Evolution a true science, not a religion, created on something no one can see or prove...

[1715214231]

1715214231

[1715214231]

1715214231

[1715214231]

1715214231

[1715214231]

1715214231

[Astargath]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything . 

The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.

The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.

Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.

''without a time machine to go back there to get samples.'' And yet you think it's perfectly ok to claim god and jesus existed and were down here thousands of years ago even though there is 0 proof of it?

[Malsetid]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

I do not believe in this theory.
I do not think it's true.
But if we assume it may be because it is an incomplete hypothesis
We may be other monkeys.
All of this species has evolved to humans

If you base it on the argument of why are there still monkeys today, then it should also apply to why aren't there any new species being created out of nothing? Curiously, it seems that we don't have any new magically created being out of someone's abdomen. If you compare the two versions of how we came to be, there seems to be no actual proof that we all came from the same parent. And that makes our entire race incestous if ever right?

[Rinso]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

I do not believe in this theory.
I do not think it's true.
But if we assume it may be because it is an incomplete hypothesis
We may be other monkeys.
All of this species has evolved to humans

no way monkey has evolved to human. if you know about DNA n you see it, you can see different by human and monkey

[azkielt]

no way monkey has evolved to human. if you know about DNA n you see it, you can see different by human and monkey

Almost all people who know DNA as biologists, botanists and more agree with evolution.

[Astargath]

no way monkey has evolved to human. if you know about DNA n you see it, you can see different by human and monkey

Almost all people who know DNA as biologists, botanists and more agree with evolution.

Exactly lmao, I don't understand why these people say that. DNA has been used to prove evolution for decades, it almost seems like these people don't bother reading about evolution at all.

[BADecker]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything . 

The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.

The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.

Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.

''without a time machine to go back there to get samples.'' And yet you think it's perfectly ok to claim god and jesus existed and were down here thousands of years ago even though there is 0 proof of it?

I don't think that at all. But since this is an evolution thread, shouldn't you be talking about evolution here? Whether or not you believe or understand things of the Bible, isn't it about time that you understand that...

Evolution is a hoax!

[Astargath]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything . 

The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.

The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.

Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.

''without a time machine to go back there to get samples.'' And yet you think it's perfectly ok to claim god and jesus existed and were down here thousands of years ago even though there is 0 proof of it?

I don't think that at all. But since this is an evolution thread, shouldn't you be talking about evolution here? Whether or not you believe or understand things of the Bible, isn't it about time that you understand that...

Evolution is a hoax!

Well since you ignore when you are proven wrong like last time about ''Note that it is not known that virtually all scientists accept evolution from a standpoint of close examination. ''

You literally provided 0 evidence for your claim, I provided a ton of different studies and polls showing the huge acceptance by the scientific community when it comes to evolution, in fact not only scientists but a lot of religious people accept evolution, more than half in some cases and notable figures like the Pope and more.

[BADecker]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything .  

The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.

The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.

Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.

''without a time machine to go back there to get samples.'' And yet you think it's perfectly ok to claim god and jesus existed and were down here thousands of years ago even though there is 0 proof of it?

I don't think that at all. But since this is an evolution thread, shouldn't you be talking about evolution here? Whether or not you believe or understand things of the Bible, isn't it about time that you understand that...

Evolution is a hoax!

Well since you ignore when you are proven wrong like last time about ''Note that it is not known that virtually all scientists accept evolution from a standpoint of close examination. ''

You literally provided 0 evidence for your claim, I provided a ton of different studies and polls showing the huge acceptance by the scientific community when it comes to evolution, in fact not only scientists but a lot of religious people accept evolution, more than half in some cases and notable figures like the Pope and more.

The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.

In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.

But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?

[Astargath]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything .  

The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.

The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.

Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.

''without a time machine to go back there to get samples.'' And yet you think it's perfectly ok to claim god and jesus existed and were down here thousands of years ago even though there is 0 proof of it?

I don't think that at all. But since this is an evolution thread, shouldn't you be talking about evolution here? Whether or not you believe or understand things of the Bible, isn't it about time that you understand that...

Evolution is a hoax!

Well since you ignore when you are proven wrong like last time about ''Note that it is not known that virtually all scientists accept evolution from a standpoint of close examination. ''

You literally provided 0 evidence for your claim, I provided a ton of different studies and polls showing the huge acceptance by the scientific community when it comes to evolution, in fact not only scientists but a lot of religious people accept evolution, more than half in some cases and notable figures like the Pope and more.

The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.

In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.

But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?

What's important here is that you never admit when you are wrong. You claimed most scientists do not accept evolution and yet you have been shown to be wrong but you never admitted it. This shows an inability to admit when you are wrong, if you can't admit you are wrong on that, you will not admit you are wrong on anything.

''How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines.'' Well... Let's see..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230201/
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/09/health/eyebrows-hominin-human-evolution/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29040024/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/signs-evolution-action/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/human-evolution-101/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100901-science-animals-evolution-australia-lizard-skink-live-birth-eggs/

Are those headlines what I'm seeing there? Heh, guess you are proven wrong again?

[BADecker]

The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.

In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.

But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?

What's important here is that you never admit when you are wrong. You claimed most scientists do not accept evolution and yet you have been shown to be wrong but you never admitted it. This shows an inability to admit when you are wrong, if you can't admit you are wrong on that, you will not admit you are wrong on anything.

''How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines.'' Well... Let's see..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230201/
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/09/health/eyebrows-hominin-human-evolution/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29040024/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/signs-evolution-action/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/human-evolution-101/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100901-science-animals-evolution-australia-lizard-skink-live-birth-eggs/

Are those headlines what I'm seeing there? Heh, guess you are proven wrong again?

Blasted headlines don't make something true. You can blast headlines about false things, and you can misinterpret the things that the headlines are blasting. Your post is meaningless.

[Astargath]

The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.

In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.

But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?

What's important here is that you never admit when you are wrong. You claimed most scientists do not accept evolution and yet you have been shown to be wrong but you never admitted it. This shows an inability to admit when you are wrong, if you can't admit you are wrong on that, you will not admit you are wrong on anything.

''How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines.'' Well... Let's see..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230201/
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/09/health/eyebrows-hominin-human-evolution/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29040024/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/signs-evolution-action/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/human-evolution-101/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100901-science-animals-evolution-australia-lizard-skink-live-birth-eggs/

Are those headlines what I'm seeing there? Heh, guess you are proven wrong again?

Blasted headlines don't make something true. You can blast headlines about false things, and you can misinterpret the things that the headlines are blasting. Your post is meaningless.

So, of course again, you wont admit you failed. You said ''Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines''

I showed you the headlines, now you are changing your argument, you are like a kid, NO I DIDN'T SAY THAT, headlines are meaningless, then why did you use it as an argument before?

[BADecker]

The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.

In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.

But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?

What's important here is that you never admit when you are wrong. You claimed most scientists do not accept evolution and yet you have been shown to be wrong but you never admitted it. This shows an inability to admit when you are wrong, if you can't admit you are wrong on that, you will not admit you are wrong on anything.

''How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines.'' Well... Let's see..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230201/
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/09/health/eyebrows-hominin-human-evolution/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29040024/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/signs-evolution-action/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/human-evolution-101/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100901-science-animals-evolution-australia-lizard-skink-live-birth-eggs/

Are those headlines what I'm seeing there? Heh, guess you are proven wrong again?

Blasted headlines don't make something true. You can blast headlines about false things, and you can misinterpret the things that the headlines are blasting. Your post is meaningless.

So, of course again, you wont admit you failed. You said ''Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines''

I showed you the headlines, now you are changing your argument, you are like a kid, NO I DIDN'T SAY THAT, headlines are meaningless, then why did you use it as an argument before?

Are you so naive as to think that something like headlines is what makes a thing factual? If this kind of thinking pervades your whole life, how in the world do you even exist?

[BADecker]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg50544365#msg50544365

^^^ Again, this stuff is only called evolution. It doesn't fit all of evolution theory. I mean, that's what we are talking about, right? Or are we twisting something that can't be proven into a form of semantics just so that we can say the evolution existed all along?

If we want to change evolution theory so that we can call this stuff evolution without making a mistake, let's do it. But let's be clear about it, so that people know that the theory has changed.

[Astargath]

The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.

In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.

But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?

What's important here is that you never admit when you are wrong. You claimed most scientists do not accept evolution and yet you have been shown to be wrong but you never admitted it. This shows an inability to admit when you are wrong, if you can't admit you are wrong on that, you will not admit you are wrong on anything.

''How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines.'' Well... Let's see..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230201/
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/09/health/eyebrows-hominin-human-evolution/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29040024/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/signs-evolution-action/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/human-evolution-101/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100901-science-animals-evolution-australia-lizard-skink-live-birth-eggs/

Are those headlines what I'm seeing there? Heh, guess you are proven wrong again?

Blasted headlines don't make something true. You can blast headlines about false things, and you can misinterpret the things that the headlines are blasting. Your post is meaningless.

So, of course again, you wont admit you failed. You said ''Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines''

I showed you the headlines, now you are changing your argument, you are like a kid, NO I DIDN'T SAY THAT, headlines are meaningless, then why did you use it as an argument before?

Are you so naive as to think that something like headlines is what makes a thing factual? If this kind of thinking pervades your whole life, how in the world do you even exist?

Sometimes I really do think you have some sort of memory problem, you are the one who used the argument, remember? I'm simply destroying you as usual, look, I made it big so you can see it.

[BADecker]

The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.

In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.

But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?

What's important here is that you never admit when you are wrong. You claimed most scientists do not accept evolution and yet you have been shown to be wrong but you never admitted it. This shows an inability to admit when you are wrong, if you can't admit you are wrong on that, you will not admit you are wrong on anything.

''How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines.'' Well... Let's see..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230201/
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/09/health/eyebrows-hominin-human-evolution/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29040024/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/signs-evolution-action/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/human-evolution-101/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100901-science-animals-evolution-australia-lizard-skink-live-birth-eggs/

Are those headlines what I'm seeing there? Heh, guess you are proven wrong again?

Blasted headlines don't make something true. You can blast headlines about false things, and you can misinterpret the things that the headlines are blasting. Your post is meaningless.

So, of course again, you wont admit you failed. You said ''Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines''

I showed you the headlines, now you are changing your argument, you are like a kid, NO I DIDN'T SAY THAT, headlines are meaningless, then why did you use it as an argument before?

Are you so naive as to think that something like headlines is what makes a thing factual? If this kind of thinking pervades your whole life, how in the world do you even exist?

Sometimes I really do think you have some sort of memory problem, you are the one who used the argument, remember? I'm simply destroying you as usual, look, I made it big so you can see it.

But more than likely you are showing your deviousness by your agreement with those headlines, through your unwillingness to clarify that no matter what they say, they still haven't proven evolution to exist. In fact, it's headlines like these that help prove that...

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

I'm not letting it go badecker. You have to admit you were proven wrong, otherwise it's pointless to debate with you if you never admit defeat. You said that scientists have no proof because ''OTHERWISE THEY WOULD HAVE'' blasted the proof all over the headlines. I showed you the headlines, therefore you were wrong, admit it, stop being a delusional prick.

[BADecker]

I'm not letting it go badecker. You have to admit you were proven wrong, otherwise it's pointless to debate with you if you never admit defeat. You said that scientists have no proof because ''OTHERWISE THEY WOULD HAVE'' blasted the proof all over the headlines. I showed you the headlines, therefore you were wrong, admit it, stop being a delusional prick.

Look. In the Book of Ester in the Bible, it talks about "the law of the Medes and Persians." This law was a very strong law. It said that when the king made an edict to which he affixed the seal from his signet ring, that edict could not be changed. This law is talked about in the book of Daniel, as well.

So, in Esther, when a Medes-and-Persians edict was made to kill all the Jews, how did they get around it? Not by changing the edict. They couldn't do that. It was against the law.

They did it by making another edict that was stronger and longer lasting. The second edict outlasted the first.

Why is this important to the whole universe? When God finally settled His physics laws in place, they couldn't be changed thereafter. Satan knew how this worked, so he tricked people into using the laws of physics in a wrong way so that they would die.

Because of what God is and does, even He couldn't change something (laws of physics) that He had put His strength into making. So He did something to go around it all, just like in Esther. God sent Jesus to take the punishment for all people. This means that God will-make/is-making a New Universe, with new physics, to take His people to. Why? Because this universe is being destroyed through the trick that Satan pulled that is actually destroying this universe.

This way God doesn't break the physics of this universe. But He gets the results that He wants... just like in Esther.

God has shown me the way around what you are doing. He showed me this, and I already showed it to you. It lies in the fact that headlines don't prove anything except that they exist.

I'm sure you are feeling a bit like Satan did when He found out that he had duped himself.

[Jexjatto]

I agree it's a hoax as well,

We were created by a super being and to me is a fact, there is no big bang theory of any sort.

[azkielt]

I agree it's a hoax as well,

We were created by a super being and to me is a fact, there is no big bang theory of any sort.

What is the connection between the big bang theory and evolution? Many of your religious friends agree with the Big Bang theory though they   said that it was designed by The Old Man.