Evolution is a hoax

[BADecker]

Go visit the natural history museum and see the human lineage fossils for yourself.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/david-h-koch-hall-human-origins

10th St. & Constitution Ave. NW  Washington, D.C. 20560  Free admission. Open every day except  Dec. 25 from 10 AM to 5:30 PM

https://www.facebook.com/smithsonian.humanorigins/
 

All these fossils fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation far better than they fit ETE. There is no proof that ETE has anything to do with any fossils. In fact, it is just the opposite. There are many fossils that evolutionists acknowledge as having no source for their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

[af_newbie]

Go visit the natural history museum and see the human lineage fossils for yourself.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/david-h-koch-hall-human-origins

10th St. & Constitution Ave. NW  Washington, D.C. 20560  Free admission. Open every day except  Dec. 25 from 10 AM to 5:30 PM

https://www.facebook.com/smithsonian.humanorigins/
 

All these fossils fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation far better than they fit ETE. There is no proof that ETE has anything to do with any fossils. In fact, it is just the opposite. There are many fossils that evolutionists acknowledge as having no source for their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

That was fast. Did you examine them?

Which ones fit 'like-begets-like'? Can you list them?  LOL.

The evidence is there, you are just not willing to see it, instead, you reject it all because it invalidates your mythology.

[BADecker]

Go visit the natural history museum and see the human lineage fossils for yourself.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/david-h-koch-hall-human-origins

10th St. & Constitution Ave. NW  Washington, D.C. 20560  Free admission. Open every day except  Dec. 25 from 10 AM to 5:30 PM

https://www.facebook.com/smithsonian.humanorigins/
 

All these fossils fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation far better than they fit ETE. There is no proof that ETE has anything to do with any fossils. In fact, it is just the opposite. There are many fossils that evolutionists acknowledge as having no source for their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

That was fast. Did you examine them?

Which ones fit 'like-begets-like'? Can you list them?  LOL.

The evidence is there, you are just not willing to see it, instead, you reject it all because it invalidates your mythology.

It was fast, because I didn't have to examine them to know that there isn't any ETE.

The fact that horses have baby horses rather than baby cows or baby ducks, etc., shows like-begets-like.

Evolution is a hoax. No proof for it after a couple hundred years of looking with modern science. And the evidence, if it fits at all, it fits just barely, in science fiction style.

[af_newbie]

Go visit the natural history museum and see the human lineage fossils for yourself.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/david-h-koch-hall-human-origins

10th St. & Constitution Ave. NW  Washington, D.C. 20560  Free admission. Open every day except  Dec. 25 from 10 AM to 5:30 PM

https://www.facebook.com/smithsonian.humanorigins/
 

All these fossils fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation far better than they fit ETE. There is no proof that ETE has anything to do with any fossils. In fact, it is just the opposite. There are many fossils that evolutionists acknowledge as having no source for their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

That was fast. Did you examine them?

Which ones fit 'like-begets-like'? Can you list them?  LOL.

The evidence is there, you are just not willing to see it, instead, you reject it all because it invalidates your mythology.

It was fast, because I didn't have to examine them to know that there isn't any ETE.

The fact that horses have baby horses rather than baby cows or baby ducks, etc., shows like-begets-like.

Evolution is a hoax. No proof for it after a couple hundred years of looking with modern science. And the evidence, if it fits at all, it fits just barely, in science fiction style.

If you did not examine the evidence, then you are in no position to speak on the subject.

[BADecker]

Go visit the natural history museum and see the human lineage fossils for yourself.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/david-h-koch-hall-human-origins

10th St. & Constitution Ave. NW  Washington, D.C. 20560  Free admission. Open every day except  Dec. 25 from 10 AM to 5:30 PM

https://www.facebook.com/smithsonian.humanorigins/
 

All these fossils fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation far better than they fit ETE. There is no proof that ETE has anything to do with any fossils. In fact, it is just the opposite. There are many fossils that evolutionists acknowledge as having no source for their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

That was fast. Did you examine them?

Which ones fit 'like-begets-like'? Can you list them?  LOL.

The evidence is there, you are just not willing to see it, instead, you reject it all because it invalidates your mythology.

It was fast, because I didn't have to examine them to know that there isn't any ETE.

The fact that horses have baby horses rather than baby cows or baby ducks, etc., shows like-begets-like.

Evolution is a hoax. No proof for it after a couple hundred years of looking with modern science. And the evidence, if it fits at all, it fits just barely, in science fiction style.

If you did not examine the evidence, then you are in no position to speak on the subject.

But you see? I am in a position to post on the subject. How can you tell? Because you even respond to my posts that I post on the subject. Therefore I must have examined the evidence.

However, you can't seem to state the evidence yourself, in your own words. And you never respond to the point that there is proof.

Evolution is a hoax.

[af_newbie]

Go visit the natural history museum and see the human lineage fossils for yourself.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/david-h-koch-hall-human-origins

10th St. & Constitution Ave. NW  Washington, D.C. 20560  Free admission. Open every day except  Dec. 25 from 10 AM to 5:30 PM

https://www.facebook.com/smithsonian.humanorigins/
 

All these fossils fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation far better than they fit ETE. There is no proof that ETE has anything to do with any fossils. In fact, it is just the opposite. There are many fossils that evolutionists acknowledge as having no source for their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

That was fast. Did you examine them?

Which ones fit 'like-begets-like'? Can you list them?  LOL.

The evidence is there, you are just not willing to see it, instead, you reject it all because it invalidates your mythology.

It was fast, because I didn't have to examine them to know that there isn't any ETE.

The fact that horses have baby horses rather than baby cows or baby ducks, etc., shows like-begets-like.

Evolution is a hoax. No proof for it after a couple hundred years of looking with modern science. And the evidence, if it fits at all, it fits just barely, in science fiction style.

If you did not examine the evidence, then you are in no position to speak on the subject.

But you see? I am in a position to post on the subject. How can you tell? Because you even respond to my posts that I post on the subject. Therefore I must have examined the evidence.

However, you can't seem to state the evidence yourself, in your own words. And you never respond to the point that there is proof.

Evolution is a hoax.

I think you are retarded, that is what I think.

[BADecker]

I think you are retarded, that is what I think.

Lol! Simple folk don't recognize genius, even when it comes up and bites what they post.

 

[af_newbie]

I think you are retarded, that is what I think.

Lol! Simple folk don't recognize genius, even when it comes up and bites what they post.

 

Sure.  So you are not only delusional but also a megalomaniac.

Before you know it, you'll be God's prophet, LOL.

[BADecker]

I think you are retarded, that is what I think.

Lol! Simple folk don't recognize genius, even when it comes up and bites what they post.

 

Sure.  So you are not only delusional but also a megalomaniac.

Before you know it, you'll be God's prophet, LOL.

All Christians  are considered to be prophets, priests, and kings with regard to things in this life. Search on "all Christians are prophet priest and king." In my capacity as these, I can most definitely tell you that...

Evolution is a hoax. I don't even need the help of all the evolutionists who continually prove that ETE is a hoax, to help me.

[af_newbie]

I think you are retarded, that is what I think.

Lol! Simple folk don't recognize genius, even when it comes up and bites what they post.

 

Sure.  So you are not only delusional but also a megalomaniac.

Before you know it, you'll be God's prophet, LOL.

All Christians  are considered to be prophets, priests, and kings with regard to things in this life. Search on "all Christians are prophet priest and king." In my capacity as these, I can most definitely tell you that...

Evolution is a hoax. I don't even need the help of all the evolutionists who continually prove that ETE is a hoax, to help me.

Not much to be said here.  You just proved my earlier point.

Not all Christians are crazy lunatics, but you are an exception.

[styca]

cause and effect (C&E).
C&E, which exists all over the place, and throughout everything that we understand, suggests design rather than some form of pure random.

Pure random has to do with complete spontaneity. Simple random has to do with our ignorance and inability to track detailed C&E.

I understand. It's quite a fine distinction, but I'll have a go. 'Random' mutations occur and combine with natural selection to result in evolution. Sure, these are not totally random. There is (extremely complex) cause and effect that result in genes mutating in the way that they do. Perhaps it would also be possible to predict the universe as it is now with everything in it, starting with just the big bang, and armed with only physics and time.
Yes, 'random' mutations are all caused by something, some repair error in genetic code. And it's not random that some mutations end up being beneficial and some detrimental, it's just how it fits the environment.

This isn't evidence of some omnipotent creator though, it's just physics plus time. Push a ball and it will fall off the table. Cause and effect. We can prove why it happened. Doesn't mean that God did it.

Hate to quote my own post, but what's your response to this?
I still don't understand how you can accept the facts of evolution, but then deny it happens.

[notbatman]

Creationism and God is nonsensical within the big-bang heliocentric globe model that's powered by gravity. BADecker promotes and defends these unproven, falsifiable and quite honestly laughable theories tooth and nail, then turns around and claims there's a creator.

BADecker is being purposely hypocritical, it's a Jesuit mind trick to keep you trapped in a prison of your own mind. He's gatekeeping the truth by manipulating your perceptions of creationism, you think he's a fool thus reinforcing all the pseudo-scientific theories that deny God.

[styca]

BADecker is being purposely hypocritical, it's a Jesuit mind trick

No he's not, and no it's not. Different people have different opinions, that's all. It's not all tricks and conspiracies.

you think he's a fool

No. If you dismiss everyone you disagree with as a fool, then your own opinions never get challenged and become fixed.

I still don't understand though how someone can agree with every single aspect of evolution, but then say it's not evolution.

[BADecker]

Creationism and God is nonsensical within the big-bang heliocentric globe model that's powered by gravity.

Creationism and God is NOT nonsensical. Consider:

The weight of one bacterium is 9.5 × 10^-13 g - https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/LouisSiu.shtml. That's so small of a weight that nobody can even come close to understanding it. But a 200 lb man weighs 90,718.47 g.

In other words, the size and of a microbe is so small, that there is no way a microbe could even begin to think with a mindset like that of a man. A microbe really can't think at all.

Now consider the vast size and weight of the universe compared with that of a man. The size of the universe is so much greater than that of a man, that there might be no limit to how much greater the universe is.

Why would anybody be so stupid as to rule out a God that is even greater than the universe, because He made it?

The microbe can't think regarding great and small, but the man can. Why can't the man even consider that there might be a Being that is as much greater than he is, as he is greater than a microbe?

[BADecker]

Not much to be said here.  You just proved my earlier point.

Not all Christians are crazy lunatics, but you are an exception.

Sounds like you simply have some kind of a grudge against me. Why are you so upset? Is it because I have essentially proven that ETE doesn't have a leg to stand on? And it wrecks your idea that you aren't religious, because you believe in something that doesn't really exist?

Look at my post above this one.

[notbatman]

Fuck off BADecker, your reply is out of context motherfucker; I deny gravity, the BB, the heliocentric model and, the globe NOT CREATIONISM!!!

This is what I'm talking about when I accuse you of dishonestly manipulating perceptions.

[af_newbie]

Not much to be said here.  You just proved my earlier point.

Not all Christians are crazy lunatics, but you are an exception.

Sounds like you simply have some kind of a grudge against me. Why are you so upset? Is it because I have essentially proven that ETE doesn't have a leg to stand on? And it wrecks your idea that you aren't religious because you believe in something that doesn't really exist?

Look at my post above this one.

Nothing against you personally.  You are not thinking independently, you have been indoctrinated to reject all scientific discoveries that contradict your favorite mythology.

I cannot stand people who reject science.  The scientific method is the best epistemic tool we have and to see people trivializing its usefulness just boils my blood.  People were tortured and killed because of it and the results it produced.

BTW, you have proved jack squat.  You need to learn quite a bit before you can attempt to even define what you are trying to prove.

http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/ptefiles/publications/scientific_epistemology.pdf

[BADecker]

Not much to be said here.  You just proved my earlier point.

Not all Christians are crazy lunatics, but you are an exception.

Sounds like you simply have some kind of a grudge against me. Why are you so upset? Is it because I have essentially proven that ETE doesn't have a leg to stand on? And it wrecks your idea that you aren't religious because you believe in something that doesn't really exist?

Look at my post above this one.

Nothing against you personally.  You are not thinking independently - What does that even mean?, you have been indoctrinated to reject all scientific discoveries that contradict your favorite mythology. - Quite the contrary. To be honest, one has to refute scientific discoveries which aren't scientific. ETE is one of them.

I cannot stand people who reject science.  The scientific method is the best epistemic tool we have and to see people trivializing its usefulness just boils my blood.  People were tortured and killed because of it and the results it produced. - No, the scientific method isn't the best. Revelation is better. The scientific method is based on revelation. It's the revelation of nature that reveals things to us when we use the scientific method. ETE simply hasn't been revealed. All that there is, is a bunch of people who SAY that ETE exists, when there is no proof for it, and the evidence fits things other than ETE better.

BTW, you have proved jack squat.  You need to learn quite a bit before you can attempt to even define what you are trying to prove.

http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/ptefiles/publications/scientific_epistemology.pdf

Fortunately, it isn't the simple publication of documents that makes up what is proof. The things published also have to be correct. Nobody is required to prove that ETE doesn't exist. All one has to show us that so-called proof is not proof, and destroys itself as proof. And that is exactly what I have been doing.

Proof for ETE would have to include tracking the DNA of millions of generations of millions of creatures over hundreds of thousands of years. We haven't tracked even one creature like this. In fact, it's beyond our ability to so track.

[BADecker]

Fuck off BADecker, your reply is out of context motherfucker; I deny gravity, the BB, the heliocentric model and, the globe NOT CREATIONISM!!!

This is what I'm talking about when I accuse you of dishonestly manipulating perceptions.

So your religion not only denies certain things, but it has a potty mouth, as well.

[af_newbie]

...
Fortunately, it isn't the simple publication of documents that makes up what is proof. The things published also have to be correct. Nobody is required to prove that ETE doesn't exist. All one has to show us that so-called proof is not proof, and destroys itself as proof. And that is exactly what I have been doing.

Proof for ETE would have to include tracking the DNA of millions of generations of millions of creatures over hundreds of thousands of years. We haven't tracked even one creature like this. In fact, it's beyond our ability to so track.

Not really.  But I understand why you demand it.

You don't need to disassemble and reverse engineer all cars that have ever existed to understand how a car works.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srC1au8ZiU4