Evolution is a hoax

[BADecker]

^^^ I know. That's all you have left.

If evolution were scientific, you might have some evidence for it. But since it isn't scientific in its own right, all you have left to promote your evolution religion is, talk in the form of political science.

Why would anyone use political science? Because political science is the science of getting what you want through any means you can, honest or dishonest, true or false, right or wrong. But if you have no other way, then talk, talk, talk. Since evolution has no science of its own, all that's left for it is political science.

Why does God leave this opening for dishonest people? Because He is hoping that they will change and become truthful... find Jesus-salvation, and be saved. The destruction of the soul is no little matter. It's a loss that is dynamically felt in the way that God would feel if He were destroyed.

But, God won the fight against destruction. He won it in Jesus, with the hopes that people would win it as well. Continual talking against God - especially in the face of proof for God - is pushing one's self towards destruction.

So, I guess if you don't change, and continue to look to believe in things false, I will have been part of your greater destruction. Greater because if you had never heard of the proof that God exists, and had never had it explained to you, and simply lived a rather hum-drum evolution-faith life, rather than adamantly believing in a direction against God, your destruction would have been much less. But now that you directly fight God, when the time comes, He will directly fight you.

You still have time. Change while you can. Start by recognizing that evolution is a complete hoax.

Even Pope conceded that evolution and the Big Bang are real observable facts.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-declares-evolution-and-big-bang-theory-are-right-and-god-isnt-a-magician-with-a-magic-9822514.html

He just put a spin on it that God is behind it. LOL.

If you check through all the Papal Bulls over the whole time of the Catholic Church, you find that Popes are constantly changing their minds (or the Chrch's mind) about all kinds of things. A Pope is a person who has the right to maintain a religion of his choice for himself. And being the leader of a church, he does exactly that. This doesn't make what he says true.

Since you are stating the Pope's ideology, you must believe it to some extent. Still no proof for evolution. Only faith. Evolution is a religion.

Evolution is a hoax.

[af_newbie]

^^^ I know. That's all you have left.

If evolution were scientific, you might have some evidence for it. But since it isn't scientific in its own right, all you have left to promote your evolution religion is, talk in the form of political science.

Why would anyone use political science? Because political science is the science of getting what you want through any means you can, honest or dishonest, true or false, right or wrong. But if you have no other way, then talk, talk, talk. Since evolution has no science of its own, all that's left for it is political science.

Why does God leave this opening for dishonest people? Because He is hoping that they will change and become truthful... find Jesus-salvation, and be saved. The destruction of the soul is no little matter. It's a loss that is dynamically felt in the way that God would feel if He were destroyed.

But, God won the fight against destruction. He won it in Jesus, with the hopes that people would win it as well. Continual talking against God - especially in the face of proof for God - is pushing one's self towards destruction.

So, I guess if you don't change, and continue to look to believe in things false, I will have been part of your greater destruction. Greater because if you had never heard of the proof that God exists, and had never had it explained to you, and simply lived a rather hum-drum evolution-faith life, rather than adamantly believing in a direction against God, your destruction would have been much less. But now that you directly fight God, when the time comes, He will directly fight you.

You still have time. Change while you can. Start by recognizing that evolution is a complete hoax.

Even Pope conceded that evolution and the Big Bang are real observable facts.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-declares-evolution-and-big-bang-theory-are-right-and-god-isnt-a-magician-with-a-magic-9822514.html

He just put a spin on it that God is behind it. LOL.

If you check through all the Papal Bulls over the whole time of the Catholic Church, you find that Popes are constantly changing their minds (or the Chrch's mind) about all kinds of things. A Pope is a person who has the right to maintain a religion of his choice for himself. And being the leader of a church, he does exactly that. This doesn't make what he says true.

Since you are stating the Pope's ideology, you must believe it to some extent. Still no proof for evolution. Only faith. Evolution is a religion.

Evolution is a hoax.

Changing your mind based on reliable evidence is a sign of intelligence, IMHO.

In the case of Popes, they are CEOs and they need to react to the changing market conditions or risk further erosion of their revenues.

[BADecker]

Changing your mind based on reliable evidence is a sign of intelligence, IMHO.

In the case of Popes, they are CEOs and they need to react to the changing market conditions or risk further erosion of their revenues.

Still nor proof for evolution, or are you saying that you are changing your mind.

Evolution is a hoax.

[af_newbie]

Changing your mind based on reliable evidence is a sign of intelligence, IMHO.

In the case of Popes, they are CEOs and they need to react to the changing market conditions or risk further erosion of their revenues.

Still nor proof for evolution, or are you saying that you are changing your mind.

Evolution is a hoax.

Of course.  All the time, that is why I am a humanist, atheist and freethinker.

[BADecker]

Changing your mind based on reliable evidence is a sign of intelligence, IMHO.

In the case of Popes, they are CEOs and they need to react to the changing market conditions or risk further erosion of their revenues.

Still nor proof for evolution, or are you saying that you are changing your mind.

Evolution is a hoax.

Of course.  All the time, that is why I am a humanist, atheist and freethinker.

Free thinking doesn't produce any orderly results. Freedom to walk on a railroad track when the train is coming, isn't really freedom at all. Step out of your self-induced ignorance into full realization and knowledge.


9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False

Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. The same process of selective breeding is done with flowers, fruits, and vegetables.


Sadly Darwin's great effort was based on MEMEs of the nineteenth century drawn upon a small fraction of the data available to us now.   Needless to say, specific examples are now available that show just how crude the Theory itself happens to be.

Let me make all this a lot clearer.  We are third tier matter entities fabricated and progressively improved upon by second tier matter spirit bodies that in fact provide the life of our third tier matter bodies.  Real creation and evolution actually happens in this matrix like world that floods our Galaxy and is still specific to local need.   That really means that a life form can be transitioned to a new life form  by choice from the second Tier using constructs having orders of magnitude greater information density.

All such transition is directed by choices made by your own spirit body and surely in consensus with the whole biome of spirit bodies.  This is obviously gradual because those changes have to be bred out through a sufficient population to become self sustaining.

T[h]row away the old propaganda as it keeps you in ignorance and confuses spirit and science both.


This article will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one..

The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is still called a theory, instead of a law. The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process.

[af_newbie]

Changing your mind based on reliable evidence is a sign of intelligence, IMHO.

In the case of Popes, they are CEOs and they need to react to the changing market conditions or risk further erosion of their revenues.

Still nor proof for evolution, or are you saying that you are changing your mind.

Evolution is a hoax.

Of course.  All the time, that is why I am a humanist, atheist and freethinker.

Free thinking doesn't produce any orderly results. Freedom to walk on a railroad track when the train is coming, isn't really freedom at all. Step out of your self-induced ignorance into full realization and knowledge.


9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False

Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. The same process of selective breeding is done with flowers, fruits, and vegetables.


Sadly Darwin's great effort was based on MEMEs of the nineteenth century drawn upon a small fraction of the data available to us now.   Needless to say, specific examples are now available that show just how crude the Theory itself happens to be.

Let me make all this a lot clearer.  We are third tier matter entities fabricated and progressively improved upon by second tier matter spirit bodies that in fact provide the life of our third tier matter bodies.  Real creation and evolution actually happens in this matrix like world that floods our Galaxy and is still specific to local need.   That really means that a life form can be transitioned to a new life form  by choice from the second Tier using constructs having orders of magnitude greater information density.

All such transition is directed by choices made by your own spirit body and surely in consensus with the whole biome of spirit bodies.  This is obviously gradual because those changes have to be bred out through a sufficient population to become self sustaining.

T[h]row away the old propaganda as it keeps you in ignorance and confuses spirit and science both.


This article will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one..

The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is still called a theory, instead of a law. The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process.

These are not proofs, these are claims made by someone who does not understand how life on Earth evolved.

[BADecker]

Free thinking doesn't produce any orderly results. Freedom to walk on a railroad track when the train is coming, isn't really freedom at all. Step out of your self-induced ignorance into full realization and knowledge.


9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False

Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. The same process of selective breeding is done with flowers, fruits, and vegetables.


Sadly Darwin's great effort was based on MEMEs of the nineteenth century drawn upon a small fraction of the data available to us now.   Needless to say, specific examples are now available that show just how crude the Theory itself happens to be.

Let me make all this a lot clearer.  We are third tier matter entities fabricated and progressively improved upon by second tier matter spirit bodies that in fact provide the life of our third tier matter bodies.  Real creation and evolution actually happens in this matrix like world that floods our Galaxy and is still specific to local need.   That really means that a life form can be transitioned to a new life form  by choice from the second Tier using constructs having orders of magnitude greater information density.

All such transition is directed by choices made by your own spirit body and surely in consensus with the whole biome of spirit bodies.  This is obviously gradual because those changes have to be bred out through a sufficient population to become self sustaining.

T[h]row away the old propaganda as it keeps you in ignorance and confuses spirit and science both.


This article will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one..

The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is still called a theory, instead of a law. The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process.

These are not proofs, these are claims made by someone who does not understand how life on Earth evolved.

But there isn't anyone on Earth who could understand how life evolved, since evolution is against science.

[styca]

If evolution were scientific, you might have some evidence for it.

I'm interested in your opinion about the manatee flipper image I posted on the last page. Is that by itself not evidence that its ancestors once walked on land?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg53134470#msg53134470

Godwin's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving vestigial toenails approaches 1.

[BADecker]

If evolution were scientific, you might have some evidence for it.

I'm interested in your opinion about the manatee flipper image I posted on the last page. Is that by itself not evidence that its ancestors once walked on land?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg53134470#msg53134470

Godwin's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving vestigial toenails approaches 1.

All by itself it might be evidence for lots of things. Mostly it is evidence that there was something like a camera to take the picture, and all the electronics that make the picture visible.

Just the picture alone doesn't provide evidence for any more than existence. The further we go into the background for the animal that is portrayed by the picture, the more we see like-begets-like. But one can twist everything around a bit to make it appear that there is evidence for evolution in it. So, it is desire to see what wants to see as evidence... not what really is evidence.

[ritaconscience]

If evolution isn't true, how do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics? Do new genes just magically appear?

Why do we have so many different types of flu? Why is there a new strain every year?

[BADecker]

If evolution isn't true, how do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics? Do new genes just magically appear?

Why do we have so many different types of flu? Why is there a new strain every year?

If all you saw was the corner pocket of the pool table, you might ask how that ball got into the corner pocket. It's similar with all kinds of questions about biology and physics, and everything else.

Just because we don't know the cause and effect processes that cause bacteria to become resistant to diseases, certainly doesn't mean it's evolution. Why there are new strains of flu, has to do with adaptation and cause and effect, both of which are very complex operations.

Random has two basic meanings:
1. We don't know;
2. Pure spontaneity.
Evolution theory says that there has to be random. Which kind is it? The random of us not knowing, or something purely spontaneous in the universe? If it's us not knowing, then why say evolution has anything to do with it? Good guessing?

Everybody knows that there are tons of things that we don't know. But nobody has proof for even one spontaneous happening where something new just came about for no reason. In fact, pure spontaneity is something that doesn't even make sense in our universe.

Regarding your questions, let me add to them the question of all the forces that cause a leaf to sway in the breeze. We can't track even one molecule of air that hits the leaf. We may never be able to so track a molecule.

Your questions don't have answers because we aren't smart enough, or capable enough, yet. Evolution isn't an answer except to the ignorant. And the smart evolutionists know this.

Evolution is a hoax.




BONUS: Read more at the site.



Manuka honey found to eliminate deadly drug-resistant bacteria in cystic fibrosis (CF) infections

When modern medicine can’t solve a health issue, nature often comes to the rescue. Although many people believe that the latest cutting-edge medical developments surely must outperform anything that can be found in nature given the research and money that goes into development, studies like a recent one on cystic fibrosis patients prove that nature still has a valuable place in treating illnesses.

Researchers from Swansea University found that Manuka honey can help treat antimicrobial-resistant respiratory infections, especially the deadly kind that can strike people with cystic fibrosis.

One of the biggest problems that cystic fibrosis patients face are long-lasting respiratory infections. These infections are often deadly because they contain bacteria that resists antibiotics. Although lung transplants can sometimes help in these cases, it’s not a foolproof approach as there are lots of potential side effects and the possibility of re-infection.

For some patients, the type of bacteria infecting them can damage the lungs significantly and even prevent them from being lung transplant candidates. That’s why an effective way to kill these types of bacteria is so desperately needed.

Manuka honey has been shown to kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria in surface wounds, so the researchers decided to look into using it as an alternative to antibiotics in cystic fibrosis patients.

They treated grown bacterial infections in lung tissue from pigs with Manuka honey to see how well it performed. They compared it to the action of three antibiotics sometimes used for such infections: ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, and ceftazidime.

[ritaconscience]

If evolution isn't true, how do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics? Do new genes just magically appear?

Why do we have so many different types of flu? Why is there a new strain every year?

If all you saw was the corner pocket of the pool table, you might ask how that ball got into the corner pocket. It's similar with all kinds of questions about biology and physics, and everything else.

Just because we don't know the cause and effect processes that cause bacteria to become resistant to diseases, certainly doesn't mean it's evolution. Why there are new strains of flu, has to do with adaptation and cause and effect, both of which are very complex operations.

Random has two basic meanings:
1. We don't know;
2. Pure spontaneity.
Evolution theory says that there has to be random. Which kind is it? The random of us not knowing, or something purely spontaneous in the universe? If it's us not knowing, then why say evolution has anything to do with it? Good guessing?

Everybody knows that there are tons of things that we don't know. But nobody has proof for even one spontaneous happening where something new just came about for no reason. In fact, pure spontaneity is something that doesn't even make sense in our universe.

Regarding your questions, let me add to them the question of all the forces that cause a leaf to sway in the breeze. We can't track even one molecule of air that hits the leaf. We may never be able to so track a molecule.

Your questions don't have answers because we aren't smart enough, or capable enough, yet. Evolution isn't an answer except to the ignorant. And the smart evolutionists know this.

Evolution is a hoax.




BONUS: Read more at the site.



Manuka honey found to eliminate deadly drug-resistant bacteria in cystic fibrosis (CF) infections

When modern medicine can’t solve a health issue, nature often comes to the rescue. Although many people believe that the latest cutting-edge medical developments surely must outperform anything that can be found in nature given the research and money that goes into development, studies like a recent one on cystic fibrosis patients prove that nature still has a valuable place in treating illnesses.

Researchers from Swansea University found that Manuka honey can help treat antimicrobial-resistant respiratory infections, especially the deadly kind that can strike people with cystic fibrosis.

One of the biggest problems that cystic fibrosis patients face are long-lasting respiratory infections. These infections are often deadly because they contain bacteria that resists antibiotics. Although lung transplants can sometimes help in these cases, it’s not a foolproof approach as there are lots of potential side effects and the possibility of re-infection.

For some patients, the type of bacteria infecting them can damage the lungs significantly and even prevent them from being lung transplant candidates. That’s why an effective way to kill these types of bacteria is so desperately needed.

Manuka honey has been shown to kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria in surface wounds, so the researchers decided to look into using it as an alternative to antibiotics in cystic fibrosis patients.

They treated grown bacterial infections in lung tissue from pigs with Manuka honey to see how well it performed. They compared it to the action of three antibiotics sometimes used for such infections: ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, and ceftazidime.

We actually do know the answer, and it's evolution.

When bacteria multiply, some of them get mutations. Most of them make the bacteria die (just like how genetic diseases and cancer, also caused by mutations, are bad for people), but considering that there are trillions of bacteria and that they reproduce literally every day, some of them are bound to get mutations that help them against antibiotics. When you use antibiotics, the normal bacteria all die, while some of the bacteria with "helpful" mutations survive. What's left is all the resistant bacteria, which quickly reproduce (that's why you have to take antibiotics even after you feel better). After that, you end up with mostly resistant bacteria. That's basically how evolution works.

I don't understand why this is hard for scientifically illiterate evolution deniers to understand. Humans have been causing evolution for quite a while, just look at corn before and after we started farming. How did we turn wolves into dogs? How did we turn horses into donkeys? Horses and donkeys (along with wolves and dogs) are different species now, they can reproduce, but the offspring is infertile (as they have different numbers of chromosomes), meaning that they effectively can't pass their genes on if they mate. See, humans were able to make different species through evolution, so evolution is real.

[notbatman]

^^^ Seriously, have you considered that you're gullible, you know being spoon fed plausible sounding stories?

Once species has never been shown to give birth to another. Adaptation to the environment certainly doesn't prove this nor are there any intermediate fossils to back up this claim.

Your entire paradigm of big bang to cheeky monkey is a farce and you're being played the fool.

[ritaconscience]

^^^ Seriously, have you considered that you're gullible, you know being spoon fed plausible sounding stories?

Once species has never been shown to give birth to another. Adaptation to the environment certainly doesn't prove this nor are there any intermediate fossils to back up this claim.

Your entire paradigm of big bang to cheeky monkey is a farce and you're being played the fool.

>Doesn't have any facts
>Instantly resorts to ad hominems

You do realize that changes happen slowly over thousands of years. Also, how did humans turn wolves into dogs and how did humans turn horses into donkeys if evolution doesn't work?

Also have you heard of Neanderthals?

[BADecker]

If evolution isn't true, how do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics? Do new genes just magically appear?

Why do we have so many different types of flu? Why is there a new strain every year?

If all you saw was the corner pocket of the pool table, you might ask how that ball got into the corner pocket. It's similar with all kinds of questions about biology and physics, and everything else.

Just because we don't know the cause and effect processes that cause bacteria to become resistant to diseases, certainly doesn't mean it's evolution. Why there are new strains of flu, has to do with adaptation and cause and effect, both of which are very complex operations.

Random has two basic meanings:
1. We don't know;
2. Pure spontaneity.
Evolution theory says that there has to be random. Which kind is it? The random of us not knowing, or something purely spontaneous in the universe? If it's us not knowing, then why say evolution has anything to do with it? Good guessing?

Everybody knows that there are tons of things that we don't know. But nobody has proof for even one spontaneous happening where something new just came about for no reason. In fact, pure spontaneity is something that doesn't even make sense in our universe.

Regarding your questions, let me add to them the question of all the forces that cause a leaf to sway in the breeze. We can't track even one molecule of air that hits the leaf. We may never be able to so track a molecule.

Your questions don't have answers because we aren't smart enough, or capable enough, yet. Evolution isn't an answer except to the ignorant. And the smart evolutionists know this.

Evolution is a hoax.




BONUS: Read more at the site.



Manuka honey found to eliminate deadly drug-resistant bacteria in cystic fibrosis (CF) infections

When modern medicine can’t solve a health issue, nature often comes to the rescue. Although many people believe that the latest cutting-edge medical developments surely must outperform anything that can be found in nature given the research and money that goes into development, studies like a recent one on cystic fibrosis patients prove that nature still has a valuable place in treating illnesses.

Researchers from Swansea University found that Manuka honey can help treat antimicrobial-resistant respiratory infections, especially the deadly kind that can strike people with cystic fibrosis.

One of the biggest problems that cystic fibrosis patients face are long-lasting respiratory infections. These infections are often deadly because they contain bacteria that resists antibiotics. Although lung transplants can sometimes help in these cases, it’s not a foolproof approach as there are lots of potential side effects and the possibility of re-infection.

For some patients, the type of bacteria infecting them can damage the lungs significantly and even prevent them from being lung transplant candidates. That’s why an effective way to kill these types of bacteria is so desperately needed.

Manuka honey has been shown to kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria in surface wounds, so the researchers decided to look into using it as an alternative to antibiotics in cystic fibrosis patients.

They treated grown bacterial infections in lung tissue from pigs with Manuka honey to see how well it performed. They compared it to the action of three antibiotics sometimes used for such infections: ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, and ceftazidime.

We actually do know the answer, and it's evolution.

When bacteria multiply, some of them get mutations. Most of them make the bacteria die (just like how genetic diseases and cancer, also caused by mutations, are bad for people), but considering that there are trillions of bacteria and that they reproduce literally every day, some of them are bound to get mutations that help them against antibiotics. When you use antibiotics, the normal bacteria all die, while some of the bacteria with "helpful" mutations survive. What's left is all the resistant bacteria, which quickly reproduce (that's why you have to take antibiotics even after you feel better). After that, you end up with mostly resistant bacteria. That's basically how evolution works.

I don't understand why this is hard for scientifically illiterate evolution deniers to understand. Humans have been causing evolution for quite a while, just look at corn before and after we started farming. How did we turn wolves into dogs? How did we turn horses into donkeys? Horses and donkeys (along with wolves and dogs) are different species now, they can reproduce, but the offspring is infertile (as they have different numbers of chromosomes), meaning that they effectively can't pass their genes on if they mate. See, humans were able to make different species through evolution, so evolution is real.

Except that you don't know that mutations and evolution have anything to do with each other. I don't understand why this is hard for scientifically illiterate evolutionists to understand. Oops! I do know why. They are scientifically illiterate.

Cause-and-effect shows us that the reason there are mutations is because innumerable molecules and energy waves bump into each other in precisely the exact way dictated by physics. This makes mutations to be programming, albeit very complex programming.

Just look at corn before and after we started farming. We found that by adding a fish along with each kernel of corn, that the corn would grow better. Then we found that adding fertilizer worked in a similar way. It's all chemical reactions that flow according to the laws of physics in chemistry. There isn't any evolution theory evolution (ETE) involved at all.

Go ahead and turn a wolf into a dog or a horse into a donkey. Can we do this? It isn't evolution. Evolution has to do with nature doing it. You never saw nature turning a bunch of metal and sand and other elements into a car, did you? The idea that nature uses anything other than simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation to cause differences in plants and animals, has never been observed. Even the so-called evidences of ETE fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation better than they fit ETE. Your examples happen without ETE.

ETE says that there as to be randomness. As I indicated above, there can be only two forms of random:
1. Human ignorance about a process;
2. Pure spontaneity.
Pure spontaneity has never been proven anywhere. There really isn't any evidence for it. So, the randomness in ETE is really human ignorance. Why? Because we don't know the process.

Did you catch that? HUMAN IGNORANCE is the randomness in ETE. This means that humans don't know that there is any ETE at all. Again,why? Because of their ignorance.

Now, all this writing I am doing is just to show you that there isn't any ETE. If you want proof that there isn't any ETE, delve into this https://globalwarming-arclein.blogspot.com/2019/11/9-scientific-facts-prove-theory-of.html.

[notbatman]

^^^ Seriously, have you considered that you're gullible, you know being spoon fed plausible sounding stories?

Once species has never been shown to give birth to another. Adaptation to the environment certainly doesn't prove this nor are there any intermediate fossils to back up this claim.

Your entire paradigm of big bang to cheeky monkey is a farce and you're being played the fool.

>Doesn't have any facts
>Instantly resorts to ad hominems

You do realize that changes happen slowly over thousands of years. Also, how did humans turn wolves into dogs and how did humans turn horses into donkeys if evolution doesn't work?

Also have you heard of Neanderthals?

IIRC scientists recently decided that dogs aren't the direct ancestors of wolves, none-the-less they're still the same species and can breed effectively. As for donkeys they're definitely not breed from horses and are in fact a separate spices. Selective breeding can create variations of a species but you're never going to breed a dog into a cat, a rat or a bat.

You accuse us of not having facts yet what you're saying isn't even in line with what modern science pretends to know; you proclaim that creationists are "scientifically illiterate" yet your arguments betray your own illiteracy.

It has never been shown that one spices can become another simply by the process of environmental selection and adaptation. It's claimed that this occurs over long periods of time but there's no hard evidence to back it up and, in fact there's no hard evidence earth is older than 10,000 years.

The fact is you're being sold a story of creation that while seeming plausible on the surface is just not true. It's not that scientists are wrong, they're paid to lie and push whatever so-called facts their handlers give them. There's an agenda and an official narrative with malicious actors at play here.

The various species on earth including humans were engineered.

[BADecker]

Also have you heard of Neanderthals?

You haven heard that people can mentally change their DNA? Neanderthal skeletons are simply skeletons of very old people - like 400 or 500 years old - who had a different concept of life, making their DNA slightly different thereby.

[ritaconscience]

Also have you heard of Neanderthals?

You haven heard that people can mentally change their DNA? Neanderthal skeletons are simply skeletons of very old people - like 400 or 500 years old - who had a different concept of life, making their DNA slightly different thereby.

>He thinks neanderthals are 400 years old.

Do yourself a favor and don't have any kids.

[tamadzky]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

Because evolution is just a theory that has never been proven.

[BADecker]

Also have you heard of Neanderthals?

You haven heard that people can mentally change their DNA? Neanderthal skeletons are simply skeletons of very old people - like 400 or 500 years old - who had a different concept of life, making their DNA slightly different thereby.

>He thinks neanderthals are 400 years old.

Do yourself a favor and don't have any kids.

For the first 2,500 years after creation, people lived for almost 1,000 years. Certainly not all of them did. Certainly there were murders. Certainly some died at only 500 or 600 years.

After the Great Flood of Noah's day, people still lived for hundreds of years... some an easy 400 or 500. Long life like this gradually went down until it is what it is today. Some of the Neanderthal skeletons are simply people from a short time after the Great Flood, people who lived 400 or 500 years.

Search on "Jack Cuozzo Neanderthal," or go to http://www.jackcuozzo.com/.