[ANN] a new coin based on Litecoin - CHNCoin

[infernoman]

Could somebody with an active node please post his blockheight and eventually peers?
Mine is 1142448 right now, but coinplorer is on 1139060, so it seems I am on a fork.

Thanks.

Current blockheight 1153033

addnode=198.27.97.172
addnode=195.154.223.134:49942
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106

[psycodad]

Could somebody with an active node please post his blockheight and eventually peers?
Mine is 1142448 right now, but coinplorer is on 1139060, so it seems I am on a fork.

Thanks.

Current blockheight 1153033

addnode=198.27.97.172
addnode=195.154.223.134:49942
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106

Thank you infernoman, much appreciated. However I meanwhile gave up, mainly because I only know of Cryptsy as CNC exchange and obviously nothing comes out there anymore.

[Mad_Max]

Cryptsy and BTER still work with CNC:

https://bter.com/trade/cnc_cny

https://bter.com/trade/cnc_cny

[MaGNeT]

Cryptsy and BTER still work with CNC:

https://bter.com/trade/cnc_cny

https://bter.com/trade/cnc_cny

Great to see it's doing well

[cryptofarmer]

Could somebody with an active node please post his blockheight and eventually peers?
Mine is 1142448 right now, but coinplorer is on 1139060, so it seems I am on a fork.

Thanks.

Current blockheight 1153033

addnode=198.27.97.172
addnode=195.154.223.134:49942
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106

I'm also having trouble syncing chn wallet. With your nodes provided And resynced from block 1 I'm stuck on 1211479 and 0 connections....

[psycodad]

Could somebody with an active node please post his blockheight and eventually peers?
Mine is 1142448 right now, but coinplorer is on 1139060, so it seems I am on a fork.

Thanks.

Current blockheight 1153033

addnode=198.27.97.172
addnode=195.154.223.134:49942
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106

I'm also having trouble syncing chn wallet. With your nodes provided And resynced from block 1 I'm stuck on 1211479 and 0 connections....

You might want to try these:

Code:

addnode=46.4.106.217:30390
addnode=148.251.19.213:15444
addnode=192.99.8.126:52559
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106
addnode=192.99.13.67:33378

Current blockheight here: 1252479

HTH

[cryptofarmer]

Could somebody with an active node please post his blockheight and eventually peers?
Mine is 1142448 right now, but coinplorer is on 1139060, so it seems I am on a fork.

Thanks.

Current blockheight 1153033

addnode=198.27.97.172
addnode=195.154.223.134:49942
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106

I'm also having trouble syncing chn wallet. With your nodes provided And resynced from block 1 I'm stuck on 1211479 and 0 connections....

You might want to try these:

Code:

addnode=46.4.106.217:30390
addnode=148.251.19.213:15444
addnode=192.99.8.126:52559
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106
addnode=192.99.13.67:33378

Current blockheight here: 1252479

HTH

Unfortunatly with these nodes I get 0 connections, and not even 1 block..

[psycodad]

Could somebody with an active node please post his blockheight and eventually peers?
Mine is 1142448 right now, but coinplorer is on 1139060, so it seems I am on a fork.

Thanks.

Current blockheight 1153033

addnode=198.27.97.172
addnode=195.154.223.134:49942
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106

I'm also having trouble syncing chn wallet. With your nodes provided And resynced from block 1 I'm stuck on 1211479 and 0 connections....

You might want to try these:

Code:

addnode=46.4.106.217:30390
addnode=148.251.19.213:15444
addnode=192.99.8.126:52559
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106
addnode=192.99.13.67:33378

Current blockheight here: 1252479

HTH

Unfortunatly with these nodes I get 0 connections, and not even 1 block..

I see, the only one of above nodes that seems to accept incoming connections is the one you can't reach anyway: 70.163.93.56:8106

Try this one, eventually that gets you a bit further, make sure you give it enough time get a few connections:

addnode=157.161.128.62:8106

HTH

[cryptofarmer]

Could somebody with an active node please post his blockheight and eventually peers?
Mine is 1142448 right now, but coinplorer is on 1139060, so it seems I am on a fork.

Thanks.

Current blockheight 1153033

addnode=198.27.97.172
addnode=195.154.223.134:49942
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106

I'm also having trouble syncing chn wallet. With your nodes provided And resynced from block 1 I'm stuck on 1211479 and 0 connections....

You might want to try these:

Code:

addnode=46.4.106.217:30390
addnode=148.251.19.213:15444
addnode=192.99.8.126:52559
addnode=70.163.93.56:8106
addnode=192.99.13.67:33378

Current blockheight here: 1252479

HTH

Unfortunatly with these nodes I get 0 connections, and not even 1 block..

I see, the only one of above nodes that seems to accept incoming connections is the one you can't reach anyway: 70.163.93.56:8106

Try this one, eventually that gets you a bit further, make sure you give it enough time get a few connections:

addnode=157.161.128.62:8106

HTH

Thanks, I've added the node, I Let you know how it goes

[cryptofarmer]

Still no luck with syncing the wallet With all nodes from below, 0 connections no blocks after a full night.. 

[Mad_Max]

If any problem with sync - best way to solve is allow/open incoming connection for client (and allow in router / firewall too) for port 8106.
Look here also: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=192243.msg11595807#msg11595807

I see right now 16 peers online but only 3 connections from my client to others. And 13 peers connect to my computer (only incoming connections, can not connect to them)

Here 3 CNC peers with open ports currently online:

"addr" : "70.163.93.56:8106",
"addr" : "95.24.21.112:8106",
"addr" : "81.89.56.170:8106",

[cryptofarmer]

If any problem with sync - best way to solve is allow/open incoming connection for client (and allow in router / firewall too) for port 8106.
Look here also: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=192243.msg11595807#msg11595807

I see right now 16 peers online but only 3 connections from my client to others. And 13 peers connect to my computer (only incoming connections, can not connect to them)

Here 3 CNC peers with open ports currently online:

"addr" : "70.163.93.56:8106",
"addr" : "95.24.21.112:8106",
"addr" : "81.89.56.170:8106",

Do I have the correct daemon version? I've compiled wallet from github source 0.6.4 with you're given nodes it still won't sync.
With forwading port 8106 I get a lot of connections though.

    "version" : 60400,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 0,
    "connections" : 14,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1452864089,
    "keypoolsize" : 103,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""

[psycodad]

Do I have the correct daemon version? I've compiled wallet from github source 0.6.4 with you're given nodes it still won't sync.
With forwading port 8106 I get a lot of connections though.

    "version" : 60400,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 0,
    "connections" : 14,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1452864089,
    "keypoolsize" : 103,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""

This is my getinfo:

Code:

{
    "version" : 60500,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : x,
    "blocks" : 1253832,
    "connections" : 10,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 29.50168637,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1442398565,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

If memory serves right I compiled this from github in OP.

[cryptofarmer]

Well the Source on Github says 0.6.4 Latest commit 0edcafa  on 9 Jul 2013
Don't know where to get 60500...
Wallet is now syncing, hopefuly it will get fully synced
I let you know, anyway thank you! !

This is my getinfo:

Code:

{
    "version" : 60500,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : x,
    "blocks" : 1253832,
    "connections" : 10,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 29.50168637,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1442398565,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

If memory serves right I compiled this from github in OP.


[/quote]

[psycodad]

Well the Source on Github says 0.6.4 Latest commit 0edcafa  on 9 Jul 2013
Don't know where to get 60500...
Wallet is now syncing, hopefuly it will get fully synced
I let you know, anyway thank you! !

Hmm... sorry for misleading you, will unsubscribe to this thread now..
We are hanging out in the old thread as it seems, check this one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322488.0

That's where I got my 60500. Bet that source solves some of your problems 

[psycodad]

New thread (and current source):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322488.0

P.S.: Not involved with CNC, but got misled myself again.

[PeterTheGrape]

Still a lot cheaper than its peak but starting to look good.



BTER seems to be recovering nicely and is even starting to demand Chinese government kyc paper 

[Digitalbitcoin]

Is there any future for CNC ?

I checked on BTER price is too low. If have any future then have to take chance with investment on CNC. Its still minable cryptocurrency.

Still website and other information links are down. Even no social media activities.

[richsoon]

Is there any future for CNC ?

I checked on BTER price is too low. If have any future then have to take chance with investment on CNC. Its still minable cryptocurrency.

Doesn't matter if its mineable, no one uses it so I would say there is no future.

[PeterTheGrape]

Is there any future for CNC ?

I checked on BTER price is too low. If have any future then have to take chance with investment on CNC. Its still minable cryptocurrency.

Doesn't matter if its mineable, no one uses it so I would say there is no future.

No body uses any cryptocurrency yet really. CHN coin had a lot of distribution into small wallets last time there was a block explorer I remember. It is likely to have some appeal just like any national coin, plus it was released first in Chinese, is an older coin, had no premine, was not made by an attention grabber, etc, all good things. Only negative is no current development. Anybody who can build wallets can step in and make this an expensive coin just by fixing the wallet and putting up an explorer.


Fairglu made an explorer for ChinaCoin at https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cnc/ so now there are two explorers.

The other one prohashing's explorer at https://prohashing.com/explorer/CHNcoin/

Some nodes
addnode=157.161.128.62
addnode=217.175.119.126
addnode=52.14.92.197
addnode=72.184.183.243
addnode=78.97.130.200
addnode=76.68.183.81
Prohashing's node for this coin is 98.115.147.74:8106


This is the first thread for this coin. The dev posted in Chinese and English then went underground. The second thread is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322488.0

The windows wallet on this thread 0.6.3 very clean for a wallet from that era https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/7c5ccff761407eb304fca4ead26639999134efe83218d03e4e8902d4b708b139/analysis/1497380089/

The windows wallet on the new thread likewise very clean https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/d939224b3c78c033c637b865685c1f444bbfd5e9c01dea6975e75f74cde14480/analysis/1497380187/

The old wallet synchs very raidly up to block 24,500 then seems to get stuck. The newer wallet 0.6.5 synchs pretty fast.

The largest wallet has 84% of coins and is almost certainly BTER's cold wallet https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cnc/address.dws?261864.htm

Assuming that is correct, then chn coin seems to have excellent distribution so far. Since so many coins are on the exchange they would be in the hands of Chinese speculators, which seems reasonable for a coin called China coin made by a Chinese person.

The next wallet has 6% and wallets #3 to #500 go from 1,490,132.8 to 1,332.8 .

BTER was hacked a few years ago and in my opinion handled the hack well, though a lot of people criticized the fact that they limited certain withdrawals. From what I can tell that exchange seems to be recovering well and if chn coin becomes popular it will probably become a major exchange again, though they have started doing some kind of Chinese aml form that might restrict westerners, I have not traded there in a long time and do not know if outsiders have to do that paperwork.

In the last 4 days the coin has passed its recent highs and is hitting 3 year highs. Today it is up again some. Looks like a good coin.

note
current supply is 171m, not the number on cmc. Current market cap according to cryptoid is 3.19m usd. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cnc/

Last visible website https://web.archive.org/web/20150112202810/http://chncoin.org:80/

Domain registration was updated April 2017 https://whois.domaintools.com/chncoin.org

The only nodes shown at cryptoid are 0.6.5 but at least one computer 58.51.197.208:8106 is using 0.6.4 from https://sourceforge.net/projects/chncoin/files/  and one poor soul using 0.6.3 at 176.159.125.118:8106 but probably they have been waiting several years for their wallets to synch 

Halving is every 4 years, which is better than most coins, and there was no premine, but it was released on the Chinese language thread 4 hours before the English thread, though the English thread has been much more active. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cnc/block.dws?83620ee23c8cdfc2b6c7d712baf583c855be05870a8b8ba41731077cacdc5258.htm

First halving is at 2,628,000 right now at 1,950,980

-

Maybe the most important observation about this coin, there seem to be a lot of small transactions, very steadily. Obviously that's a good thing, but what its significance is I can't figure out. One thing that occurs to me is that China is a country with a controlled internet, even more so than the United States and North Korea, so it is possible they have some infrastructure that is allowing a network of chncoin wallets within China that is not connected outside. There is currently only one peer listed in China at Cryptoid. Whatever the explanation, the ongoing steady number of small to medium transactions seems significant.