Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed

[Cean]

Wow... I am speechless. Just get a life, idiots. Wannabe professors.


And let me guess: You are neg tagging these users HIGH RISK OF TRADING because they did plagiarism? What the fuck...

[1714095419]

1714095419

[ryzaadit]

Plagiarism + Ban Envasion

User : UrEspasito
Other Account :
Rummypandwar Banned!
ramanpandwar Banned!

Hi guys,
My Last post is about some tips of trading and now i am going to discuss about mistakes which we have to avoid during Trading.

1. Unrealistic profit expectation
Unrealistic profit expectation is the common problem for novice traders as they are speculating huge profits without financial calculation with proper tested strategy.

2. Misinterpreting risk
There are always risks in such type of trading as the market price is not centric to any party because the market forces allocate it. Most of the traders do not have calculative risk and strategies to control.

3. Untested trading plan
Most of the times, few traders fall trapped with lucrative trading schemes, which leads them to massive loss ultimately. Thus, you should be aware of the trading plan you choose, before implementing in the live account.

4. Believing rumors
There are some news flashes in the market, which is not real, and traders get trapped while taking entry or exit from the trade.

5. Unappropriated guidance/reference
A better mentor always generates a better result. However, if our reference or broker is not well equipped for the trading, then it may incur losses for you. Therefore, you must refer valid and genuine links only. Cryptocurrency trading needs to be carried out with great care as it may give excellent result and adversely, it may bring massive loss as well. Therefore, you need extensive research and analysis before placing any order in cryptocurrencies. Moreover, such type of trading concerns high security also. Thus, the thematic content of this blog generates trading tips along with assisting in eluding the general faults.

Please mention below guys if i missed any of important mistake which we have to avoid during Trading Crypto.

Don't here anyone share their personal opinions?
What's wrong if anyone newbie learn from this thread.?
On same topic don't we all have different opinions?

Archive : https://archive.vn/DytSo

Real Source : https://www.unicoindcx.com/blog/crypto-trading-tips-and-common-mistakes-to-avoid

He admitted by himself, the article topic was created by him :

Hey buddy this article is written by me which you said source ...
And if you don't like you don't have to discuss any thing on my thrrad you will go wherever you feels satisfied..
If you don't know author don't judge anyone else by your own ... I have alot of words to say but i don't have a time to waste.
Then it's better to stay away from my threads even for further.

The reality, the topic article was created from a company "Exchange UnicoinDCX", not a personal website. I give him times 2-3 days on the thread, to prove it the article author was belong to him by editing the article and put "POA" information of his account. Until now, he still can't do it so decide to bring this case on this thread.

Also, he have another account who has been banned:

Joined
link profile facebook : https://www.facebook.com/raman.pandwar
link profile INSTAGRAM : https://instagram.com/pandwaraman
username telegram : https://t.me/basitbaris

Week 3 ( 21/04- 27/04)

Facebook Link: https://www.facebook.com/raman.pandwar
Spreadsheet Number: 398
-snip-

#proof of authentication
Bitcointalk Username: ramanpandwar
Telegram username: @ramanp
Facebook profile link: https://m.facebook.com/raman.pandwar?ref=bookmarks
Twitter profile link: https://mobile.twitter.com/RPandwar

[Jawhead999]

User: Cimoy
Archived: http://archive.vn/wip/O9RTP

Copied :

Pengalaman sy sebagai trader pemula.. untuk ilmu teknikal trading hanya berpengaruh  sekitar 30% (angka ini berdasarkan pengalama pribadi) dan sisa nya lebih ke psikologis trader sendiri dan money manajemen. Psikologis disini dalam artian trader tidak terbawa emosi saat trading dan konsisten menjalankan trading plan yg sudah di buat sebelum trading. Sedangkan money manajemen lebih ke arah agar akun kita tidak mengalami force close (margin call dalam istilah Forex).

Original :

Pengalaman sy sebagai trader pemula.. untuk ilmu teknikal trading hanya berpengaruh  sekitar 30% (angka ini berdasarkan pengalama pribadi) dan sisa nya lebih ke psikologis trader sendiri dan money manajemen. Psikologis disini dalam artian trader tidak terbawa emosi saat trading dan konsisten menjalankan trading plan yg sudah di buat sebelum trading. Sedangkan money manajemen lebih ke arah agar akun kita tidak mengalami force close (margin call dalam istilah Forex).
-snip-

User : XenoFever
Archive : http://archive.vn/wip/HtWaR

Copied :

There are some people who are dreaming to become a professional gambler like Don Johnson who won $15.2 million playing blackjack, when asked to explain what his secret was, Johnson smiled and then he explained he needed only two things to beat the house: good skills and a plan. Having skills in every battle would be a great advantage but it won't work if you do not plan something, so it is a matter of combination between skills and plans.

Every successful professional gamblers treat gambling as a sport and like disciplined athletes, they don't let their emotions get the better of them. There will be bets you win and bets you lose. If you let the excitement or sadness get to you, you will end up making bad gambling decisions.

If you are going to ask any professional gamblers how do they survive at the tables. No matter how good you are, they will tell you this: it's inevitable that you will have a bad string of results Ir even a bad year so we should always accept that we can lose the game.

Gambling facts:
There are some gamblers who believe in superstition. Every time you watch or read something about gambling, the hero of the story goes on a winning streak as soon they bet on their lucky number, or keep a lucky clover close to their heart. If you think these things work, don't gamble. As you can read on this article that explains how to win at Blackjack every time you play, superstition has nothing to do with your success rate at the table.

Original :

When asked to explain what his secret was, Johnson smiled.
And then he explained he needed only two things to beat the house: good skills and a plan.

There will be bets you win and bets you lose. If you let the excitement or sadness get to you, you will end up making bad gambling decisions.

Superstition Will Damage You
For how obvious this might sound, an impressive number of gamblers let their decisions be swayed by superstition.

Every time you watch something about gambling, the hero of the story goes on a winning streak as soon they choose their lucky color, bet on their lucky number, or keep a lucky clover close to their heart. If you think these things work, don't gamble.

[HeRetiK]

User: hassancisse

Copy:

Blockchain technology explained

if this technology is so complex, why call it “blockchain?” At its most basic level, blockchain is literally just a chain of blocks, but not in the traditional sense of those words. When we say the words “block” and “chain” in this context, we are actually talking about digital information (the “block”) stored in a public database (the “chain”).

Original:

If this technology is so complex, why call it “blockchain?” At its most basic level, blockchain is literally just a chain of blocks, but not in the traditional sense of those words. When we say the words “block” and “chain” in this context, we are actually talking about digital information (the “block”) stored in a public database (the “chain”).

[Lauda]

What Happened: Using stolen content

Profile Link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5247767.0
Archived : http://archive.vn/yUYPG
Announced by : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881806
Archived : http://archive.vn/cpDsp

UBICOIN

SON OF YOUR FATHER BITCOIN

What is UBICOIN ?
Ubicoin is a cryptocurrency. It is a decentralized digital currency without a central bank or single administrator that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer ubicoin network without the need for intermediaries.
Transactions are verified by network nodes through cryptography and recorded in a public distributed ledger called a blockchain.
The ubicoin blockchain is a public ledger that records ubicoin transactions. It is implemented as a chain of blocks, each block containing a hash of the previous block up to the genesis block of the chain. A network of communicating nodes running bitcoin software maintains the blockchain. Transactions of the form payer X sends Y Ubicoins to payee Z are broadcast to this network using readily available software applications.

Decentralization
Ubicoin is decentralized.

• Ubicoin does not have a central authority.
• There is no central server; the Ubicoin network is peer-to-peer.
• There is no central storage; the Ubicoin ledger is distributed.
• The ledger is public; anybody can store it on their computer.
• There is no single administrator, the ledger is maintained by a network of equally privileged miners. Anybody can become a miner.
• The additions to the ledger are maintained through competition. Until a new block is added to the ledger, it is not known which miner will create the block.
• The issuance of Ubicoins is decentralized. They are issued as a reward for the creation of a new block.
• Anybody can create a new Ubicoin address (a Ubicoin counterpart of a bank account) without needing any approval.
• Anybody can send a transaction to the network without needing any approval; the network merely confirms that the transaction is legitimate.

Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency. It is a decentralized digital currency without a central bank or single administrator that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries.

Transactions are verified by network nodes through cryptography and recorded in a public distributed ledger called a blockchain. Bitcoin was invented in 2008 by an unknown person or group of people using the name Satoshi Nakamoto and started in 2009 when its source code was released as open-source software. Bitcoins are created as a reward for a process known as mining. They can be exchanged for other currencies, products, and services. Research produced by University of Cambridge estimates that in 2017, there were 2.9 to 5.8 million unique users using a cryptocurrency wallet, most of them using bitcoin.
-snip-

Blockchain
For broader coverage of this topic, see Blockchain.

The bitcoin blockchain is a public ledger that records bitcoin transactions. It is implemented as a chain of blocks, each block containing a hash of the previous block up to the genesis block[d] of the chain. A network of communicating nodes running bitcoin software maintains the blockchain. Transactions of the form payer X sends Y bitcoins to payee Z are broadcast to this network using readily available software applications.
-snip-

Decentralization
Bitcoin is decentralized:

Bitcoin does not have a central authority.
There is no central server; the bitcoin network is peer-to-peer.
There is no central storage; the bitcoin ledger is distributed.
The ledger is public; anybody can store it on their computer.
There is no single administrator; the ledger is maintained by a network of equally privileged miners.
Anybody can become a miner.
The additions to the ledger are maintained through competition. Until a new block is added to the ledger, it is not known which miner will create the block.
The issuance of bitcoins is decentralized. They are issued as a reward for the creation of a new block.
Anybody can create a new bitcoin address (a bitcoin counterpart of a bank account) without needing any approval.
Anybody can send a transaction to the network without needing any approval; the network merely confirms that the transaction is legitimate

Source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Blatant plagiarism from Wikipedia.

[chmod755]

Original thread:

Specifications:

• PoW: custom, prime gaps
• Block target time 2.5 minutes
• Block reward proportional to the current difficulty
• Block reward halving every 420000 (about 2 years)
• Cap: about 10 - 30 million GAP
• Difficulty adjusts every block and increases logarithmic (it will probably take years to get to 50)

Fair launch:

• Gapcoin was not designed to enrich the early adopters or the coin creators! The more people mine Gapcoin, the more coins per block will be produced. (Coin supply will increase logarithmic with the difficulty, this means it will grow in the beginning, but later, it won't change much.)
• There won't be any premine!
• To avoid instamine, the reward of the first 1152 blocks (about 48 hours) will increase quadratically to its absolute value: the current difficulty. Block reward will be 1/1152^2 * blockheight^2 * difficulty for the first 1152 blocks. This should guarantee that the difficulty is stable until the blocks yield a worthwhile amount of coins.
• Source code will be available before launch (excluding the PoW function), so everyone can setup their own environment, compile the software, and check if everything works.
• Windows and Linux binaries will be distributed in an encrypted container before launch, the password will be revealed at launch.

100% Copied Thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248243
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20200513203254/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248243

Announced by: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1977471

Specifications:

PoW/New algo: custom, prime gaps
Block target time 10 seconds
Block reward proportional to the current difficulty
Block reward halving every 420000
Cap: about 10 - 30 million coins
Difficulty adjusts every block and increases logarithmic (it will probably take years to get to 50)


StoneCoin was not designed to enrich the early adopters or the coin creators! The more people mine StoneCoin, the more coins per block will be produced. (Coin supply will increase logarithmic with the difficulty, this means it will grow in the beginning, but later, it won't change much.)
There won't be any premine!
To avoid instamine, the reward of the first 1152 blocks (about 48 hours) will increase quadratically to its absolute value: the current difficulty. Block reward will be 1/1152^2 * blockheight^2 * difficulty for the first 1152 blocks. This should guarantee that the difficulty is stable until the blocks yield a worthwhile amount of coins.
Source code will be available before launch (excluding the PoW function), so everyone can setup their own environment, compile the software, and check if everything works.

[acroman08]

saifulbdit91 plagiarized an article from Cointelegraph. the account is made in 2016 so I doubt he doesn't know forum rules(but there is still a chance)

plagiarized thread

A study published in December by Bitcoin (BTC) fund operator Grayscale showed that 43% of investors interested in Bitcoin are women — up from 13% last year — and this number is actively growing.

As global financial conditions tightened, many people began to invest in real estate, gold, and cryptocurrencies. Assuming that females tend to be more pessimistic than males about the global economy, their confidence in cryptocurrency could significantly increase in 2020. As such, many women found a safe haven in digital assets.

Meanwhile, for others, cryptocurrencies became a promising investment. Blockchain entrepreneur Nisa Amoils pointed to the attractive investment opportunities of the market as one of the main reasons behind the growing interest of women toward digital money, telling Cointelegraph:

Many trading platforms have already seen an increase in cryptocurrency demand. For example, in March, digital currency exchange Coinbase noted the surge of deposits made by U.S. residents in the amount of $1,200 — exactly the same size as the coronavirus stimulus checks issued by the United States government.

At the same time, Bitcoin has doubled in value over the past two months, which, coupled with the recent halving event, has caused a stir around cryptocurrencies. Here, women have been just as competent as men. In particular, according to Grayscale, 49.8% of women predicted that Bitcoin’s limited emission would lead to its price growth in the future.

original article

it is widely believed that the cryptocurrency and blockchain sectors are almost exclusively male-dominated. However, a report released by CoinMarketCap on April 30 suggests otherwise. According to analysts, the number of women in the cryptocurrency industry increased by 43.24% in the first quarter of 2020.

Below is a breakdown of key factors that contributed to this record growth and why the numbers vary from region to region.

Women investing more in Bitcoin
A study published in December by Bitcoin (BTC) fund operator Grayscale showed that 43% of investors interested in Bitcoin are women — up from 13% last year — and this number is actively growing.

As global financial conditions tightened, many people began to invest in real estate, gold and cryptocurrencies. Assuming that females tend to be more pessimistic than males about the global economy, their confidence in cryptocurrency could significantly increase in 2020. As such, many women found a safe haven in digital assets.

Meanwhile, for others, cryptocurrencies became a promising investment. Blockchain entrepreneur Nisa Amoils pointed to the attractive investment opportunities of the market as one of the main reasons behind the growing interest of women toward digital money, telling Cointelegraph:

Many trading platforms have already seen an increase in cryptocurrency demand. For example, in March, digital currency exchange Coinbase noted the surge of deposits made by U.S. residents in the amount of $1,200 — exactly the same size as the coronavirus stimulus checks issued by the United States government.

At the same time, Bitcoin has doubled in value over the past two months, which, coupled with the recent halving event, has caused a stir around cryptocurrencies. Here, women have been just as competent as men. In particular, according to Grayscale, 49.8% of women predicted that Bitcoin’s limited emission would lead to its price growth in the future.

[FatFork]

<cut>

I haven't seen your report before but for the same reason I made a scam accusation against aishabinteali here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248269.0

Flag type 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1831

I hope at least a few DTs will look into it and support/oppose the flag.

[bullrun2024bro]

The user Vegeta1991 is spamming the German board and plagiarized the following without a source. He just copied and pasted the whole first passage of the article.

User: Vegeta1991

Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976285.msg54437835#msg54437835

Archiv: http://archive.is/DQDz2

Copy:

Im Moment ist es noch ganz legal möglich über den Shapeshift Trick Steuern zu sparen. Wie das funktioniert? Ganz einfach, Shapeshift ist ein Dienst, bei dem ihr eure Coins ohne Börse direkt tauschen könnt. Das Besondere ist, dass ihr bei Shapeshift nicht nur die üblichen Tradepairs habt, sondern quasi alle angebotenen Coins gegeneinander tauschen könnt. Coins, welche ihr sonst auf den Börsen nur gegen BTC oder ETH tauschen könntet, könnt ihr auf Shapeshift auch gegen andere Coins wechseln. Das hat für euch den Vorteil, dass ihr euren Wunschcoin gegen einen Coin, welchen ihr nicht halten wollt tauschen könnt und somit bei euren Hodl Coins keinen steuerpflichtigen Verkauf auslöst.
Das würde ja sonst zwangsweise passieren. Angenommen ihr habt BTC, ETH, DASH und XRP welche ihr über ein Jahr halten wollt, damit sie steuerfrei werden. Nun möchtet ihr aber vielleicht gerne auch noch ein paar PAY, ebenfalls zum Halten dazu kaufen. Und hier beginnt das Problem. Da ihr PAY nicht direkt gegen Euro kaufen könnt, sondern dafür BTC oder ETH braucht, müsstet ihr ja PAY mit euren BTC oder ETH kaufen und würdet somit bei diesen Coins einen steuerpflichtigen Verkauf auslösen. Via Shapeshift könnt ihr eben das umgehen. Dafür könntet ihr beispielsweise vorher ein paar Monero (XMR) bei Kraken direkt gegen Euro kaufen und diese dann via Shapeshift zu PAY tauschen. Somit bleiben eure anderen Coins unangetastet und wenn ihr direkt nach dem Monero Kauf die Coins umwandelt, sollte dieser Tausch steuerfrei sein, da kein Zugewinn entstanden ist. Die einzige Ausnahme wäre nur, wenn in diesem Beispiel Monero zwischen eurem Kauf und Tausch über Shapeshift merklich steigen würde, dann würde ein kleiner Gewinn entstehen, welcher dann natürlich wieder steuerpflichtig wäre. Das dürfte aber wohl deutlich weniger Steuerlast sein, als wenn ihr einen Hodl Coin verwenden müsstet.
Der Nachteil an der Sache sind die etwas höheren Gebühren als an der Börse. Der Shapeshift Kurs ist nicht immer ideal, aber in der Regel noch allemal günstiger als das was ihr sonst an Steuern zahlen müsstet.

Original Source: https://kryptobasis.de/die-5-haeufigsten-irrtuemer-zu-steuern-von-bitcoin-und-co-warum-im-schlimmsten-fall-sogar-die-privatinsolvenz-droht-und-2-einfache-regeln-einen-trick-um-das-zu-verhindern

Original Quote:

Im Moment ist es noch ganz legal möglich über den Shapeshift Trick Steuern zu sparen. Wie das funktioniert? Ganz einfach, Shapeshift ist ein Dienst, bei dem ihr eure Coins ohne Börse direkt tauschen könnt. Das Besondere ist, dass ihr bei Shapeshift nicht nur die üblichen Tradepairs habt, sondern quasi alle angebotenen Coins gegeneinander tauschen könnt. Coins, welche ihr sonst auf den Börsen nur gegen BTC oder ETH tauschen könntet, könnt ihr auf Shapeshift auch gegen andere Coins wechseln. Das hat für euch den Vorteil, dass ihr euren Wunschcoin gegen einen Coin, welchen ihr nicht halten wollt tauschen könnt und somit bei euren Hodl Coins keinen steuerpflichtigen Verkauf auslöst.
Das würde ja sonst zwangsweise passieren. Angenommen ihr habt BTC, ETH, DASH und XRP welche ihr über ein Jahr halten wollt, damit sie steuerfrei werden. Nun möchtet ihr aber vielleicht gerne auch noch ein paar PAY, ebenfalls zum Halten dazu kaufen. Und hier beginnt das Problem. Da ihr PAY nicht direkt gegen Euro kaufen könnt, sondern dafür BTC oder ETH braucht, müsstet ihr ja PAY mit euren BTC oder ETH kaufen und würdet somit bei diesen Coins einen steuerpflichtigen Verkauf auslösen. Via Shapeshift könnt ihr eben das umgehen. Dafür könntet ihr beispielsweise vorher ein paar Monero (XMR) bei Kraken direkt gegen Euro kaufen und diese dann via Shapeshift zu PAY tauschen. Somit bleiben eure anderen Coins unangetastet und wenn ihr direkt nach dem Monero Kauf die Coins umwandelt, sollte dieser Tausch steuerfrei sein, da kein Zugewinn entstanden ist. Die einzige Ausnahme wäre nur, wenn in diesem Beispiel Monero zwischen eurem Kauf und Tausch über Shapeshift merklich steigen würde, dann würde ein kleiner Gewinn entstehen, welcher dann natürlich wieder steuerpflichtig wäre. Das dürfte aber wohl deutlich weniger Steuerlast sein, als wenn ihr einen Hodl Coin verwenden müsstet.
Der Nachteil an der Sache sind die etwas höheren Gebühren als an der Börse. Der Shapeshift Kurs ist nicht immer ideal, aber in der Regel noch allemal günstiger als das was ihr sonst an Steuern zahlen müsstet.

[TryNinja]

Plagiarism case. User just copied same text from admin of other forum swiftcointalk.org

~snip~

I don't think that's the case here. This forum is just scraping BitcoinTalk's posts and posting there under their "administrator" account.

someone is scraping the posts and posting them there.

Yes, it's a known copy-cat site. Disregard any search matches with it.

[dkbit98]

I don't think that's the case here. This forum is just scraping BitcoinTalk's posts and posting there under their "administrator" account.

Thanks.
Deleted...there was something strange that is why I asked for confirmation.

[bitcoinchan]

Username: Lauda
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872
Evidence

Post 1:

Your English levels are under those of a 5th grader. Consider taking a course, because you complicate things and usually make no sense.
I never said that SHA256 for a normal computer wasn't SHA128 for a quantum one. You didn't explain it because it can't be explained well i.e. what you said effectively makes no sense. A quantum computer can't beat SHA 256 (i.e. SHA 128). Actually if SHA gets broken the problem will be on a much larger scale where Bitcoin will be irrelevant (unless globally adopted). A lot of things use SHA, for example banks.

What I'm trying to say is:
For SHA256, it effectively becomes SHA128 to a Quantum computer. Now the question remains, can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer search through SHA256?
With out current technology and for the near future, we still can't build a real Quantum computer that can even begin to tackle this problem, let alone solve it.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160204084145/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026125.0

Shor's Algorithm applies to prime factorization, which SHA256 doesn't use.
What you're looking for to crack SHA256 is Grover's Algorithm. Basically under classical models of computation the optimal way to find a matching hash is to simply search through the entire space yielding O(n). Under Quantum Computing the optimal time is O(n^0.5), which means effectively you have halved the key-length.
For SHA256, it effectively becomes SHA128 to a Quantum computer. Now the question remains, can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer search through SHA256?
With our current technology and for the foreseeable future, we still cannot build a Quantum computer that can yet begin to tackle this problem, let alone solve it in a time within our lifespan. Thus SHA256 is considered "secure enough" for now.

http://web.archive.org/web/20190105172604/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=78693.0


Post 2:

I see no information about 128 bit keys being broken. Any information found on stackexchange has no guarantee to be correct. It confirms what I said. SHA can't be reversed; it has to be brute forced.
It clearly indicated that quantum computers are more powerful than the computers of today, which is logical. There is no information on there internet about this. You're talking out of a hat.
Yes 128 bit security is 18446744073709551616 times faster to bruteforce than 256 bit. This doesn't mean that it is vulnerable when used.
It's obvious that people are commenting without proper knowledge in quantum related technology. The computers are not nowhere near ready to do any complicated jobs.
The main challenge in a Qcomputer is to make sure that the qubits are entangled (if you're familiar with Schrödinger’s cat you will know what I'm talking about; look that up). The computer must stay in this state (for the cat - it can't be simultaneously dead or alive) long enough to perform calculations and get results. The ones that we have can keep the state for miliseconds or maybe a couple of seconds. That's not long enough to do something useful. To break encryption these computers must have 500-2000qubits. Existing quantum computers operate with 14 qubits at maximum.
I have not forgotten about D-wave though. The company D-Wave claims that it has produced a 512 qubit Qcomputer. That is not a real quantum computer because it uses quantum annealing effect and can't demonstrate full properties of one. It is basically set to do a few specific tasks and represents no danger to encryption.
To summarize: You're wrong. Existing implementations have not shown that they can beat 128bit encryption. They aren't even close. That's the current situation. I'm not saying that in 5 years we won't have better technology. We might operate with 1400 qubits or be stuck at 140. Nobody really knows.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160204084306/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026125.40

Quantum computers don’t reside on the desktop of every other teenage hacker wishing to eavesdrop on his classmates’ Facebook sessions for good reason. Creation of a full-scale quantum computer involves many engineering challenges that some specialists consider to be impossible to accomplish.
The main challenge is making sure qubits are entangled, because each quantum system tends to collapse into a classical state, lacking valuable undetermined properties. We can’t avoid mentioning the long-suffering Schrödinger’s cat here, which eventually can’t stay both dead and alive simultaneously – a quantum computer, however, must maintain this miraculous state for a long enough time to perform calculation and measure results. Modern prototypes can keep this state for milliseconds, and in some cases, a couple of seconds. The task becomes more and more complicated when the qubit count rises too. To break cryptosystems, computers must have 500-2000 qubits (depending on the algorithm and key length), but existing quantum computers operate with 14 qubits at maximum.
That is why today’s quantum computers are not usable for breaking your SSL certificate, but the situation may change in 5 years.
Against this background, Canadian company D-Wave brassily claims that it produces 512-qubit quantum computers. Moreover, these devices are available for sale. Many experts say that the D-Wave computer is not “real,” because it utilizes a quantum annealing effect and can’t demonstrate full properties of a quantum computer.

http://web.archive.org/web/20190507194853/https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/quantum-computers-and-the-end-of-security/2852/


Post 3:

Exactly how is spreading FUD related to retardation?
Fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) = is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information.
At least he is not spreading any FUD about Bitcoin. The altcoins matter no less. How about you take a look at OP? Those 2 threads in Bitcoin Discussion truly amazed me. 

http://web.archive.org/web/20160225063655/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=729053.140

People say all is fair in business - win at all costs. One strategy some competitors use is to confuse the buying/selling process through infusing fear, uncertainty, and doubt into the buying/selling decision.
FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information. FUD is a manifestation of the appeal to fear. (Wikipedia).

https://web.archive.org/web/20200520044610/https://www.ideateinc.com/blog/2013/08/fear-uncertainty-doubt-in-buying


Post 4:

Well this is actually an advanced view of the matter. This is what I expect from people who aren't from Bit-X and DaDice. You've written this very nicely. It is making them reject reasoning and critical thinking.
Religions such as Christianity are absurd. This is an objective opinion.  Just think about it. How would it be if you had never heard of any religion till you were grown up and actually though for yourself? If we take Christianity for an example; you believe in an invisible man who allegedly lived over 2000 years ago. He was killed by religious zealost and then he magically raised from the dead just after three days. In addition to that, they believe in other invisible being such as angels and demons. Meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever he can. The words 'whenever he can' have been specifically used because since he exists why should he save the little children from abuse and rape? 

http://web.archive.org/web/20160202021047/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.40

From an outside observer’s standpoint, Christianity is kind of absurd. Think about it. We believe in an invisible man who lived over 2,000 years ago in a series of backwater towns in the Middle East, was killed by some religious zealots, and then was magically raised from the dead three days later, after which he floated up into the sky and disappeared, thus becoming the invisible man we now believe in and pin all our hopes to. Oh, and on top of that, we believe in other invisible beings: angels and demons — who are all around us, helping and influencing us. Meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever He can. When put that way, even I think it sounds crazy.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200518082744/https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2015/02/06/a-conservative-christian-finally-admits-his-faith-makes-no-sense/


Post 5:

Is this supposed to be a real discussion or some troll thread? You can't really find scientific proof for something like this to not to exist. If there is no proof that it exists then it should be assumed that it does not.
What one can do is explain how the Bible and whole religion is messed. As an example take praying.
We pray sincerely, knowing that when God answers this prayer, it will glorify God and help millions of people in remarkable ways. What will happen when we pray? Nothing.
I'm not exactly sure from which part this is but I know that it exists "Ask and it will be given to you". If we all ask for cancer to be cured it definitely will. 

http://web.archive.org/web/20160205222449/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035211.0

What would happen if we get down on our knees and pray to God in this way: Dear God, almighty, all-powerful, all-loving creator of the universe, we pray to you to cure every case of cancer on this planet tonight. We pray in faith, knowing you will bless us as you describe in Matthew 7:7, Matthew 17:20, Matthew 21:21, Mark 11:24, John 14:12-14, Matthew 18:19 and James 5:15-16. In Jesus' name we pray, Amen.
We pray sincerely, knowing that when God answers this completely heartfelt, unselfish, non-materialistic prayer, it will glorify God and help millions of people in remarkable ways. Will anything happen? No. And the fact that nothing happens proves to us that God is imaginary. Here's why: Jesus makes specific promises in the Bible about how prayer is supposed to work. Jesus says in many different places that he and God will answer your prayers. The fact that those promises are untrue tells us that God is imaginary.

http://web.archive.org/web/20181017072746/https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/why-wont-god-heal-amputees.70716/page-32


Post 6:

This was not easy to understand for someone who's not native to English. People believe in something because they need to, hence hope exists. This doesn't affect it being true or not.
We used to think something(X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it's caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160205222449/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035211.0

Now. The number of times that a natural explanation of a phenomenon has been replaced by a supernatural or religious one? The number of times humankind has said,
“We used to think (X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it’s actually caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul”?

https://web.archive.org/web/20190331065516/https://the-orbit.net/greta/2008/09/15/the-ten-main-reasons-i-dont-believe-in-god/

[WhiteManWhite]

Great job @bitcoinchan!
Today I have finish 1 year when I couldn't have a signature. And Yes, I got banned for just 1 post. I will keep an eye on this event.

[Lauda]

Username: Lauda
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872

Thank you for reporting these. I must have unknowingly repeated and paraphrased text that I had previously read and remembered. It was not intentional. I am making explicitly marked corrections, with appropriate citation of sources, and links to the earliest available archived versions of my edited posts. I will not remove any posts, or try to hide anything.

Some of the sources provided by bitcoinchan were not correct. On researching my own posts, I found that: Source of text from Post 3 is actually Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt&oldid=621176634

FUD is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information.

Source of text from Post 4 is somebody named Darren Wilson (whose work I have not read). This is quoted within the page linked by bitcoinchan:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150423094426/http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/behind-the-lens/48176-atheists-are-right-that-christianity-sounds-absurd-but-i-believe-in-it

From an outside observer's standpoint, Christianity is kind of absurd.

Think about it. We believe in an invisible man who lived over 2,000 years ago in a series of backwater towns in the Middle East, was killed by some religious zealots, and then was magically raised from the dead three days later, after which he floated up into the sky and disappeared, thus becoming the invisible man we now believe in and pin all our hopes to. Oh, and on top of that, we believe in other invisible beings: angels and demons—who are all around us, helping and influencing us. Meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever He can.

For Post 5, bitcoinchan cited a post on another forum that apparently plagiarised this:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060421081519/http://godisimaginary.com/i1.htm

If you would like, gather a million faithful believers together into a prayer circle. Have them all pray together that God cures every case of cancer on the planet tomorrow. Pray sincerely, knowing that when God answers this completely heartfelt, unselfish, non-materialistic prayer, it will glorify God and help millions of people in remarkable ways.

Will it happen? Of course not. Your prayer will go unanswered, in direct defiance to Jesus' promises in the Bible. That is because God is imaginary.

I have not yet been able to verify the original authorship of this quote. It is the earliest example I can find.

Text from Post 6 was published in a book that I have not read: Greta Christina, Why Are You Atheists So Angry?: 99 Things That Piss Off the Godless (Pitchstone Publishing, 2012). Bitcoinchan cited something that appears to be her earlier blog, but I cannot verify this. The same text seems to be copied and pasted all over the Internet, often without attribution. I don't know where I saw it (or some of the other items here).

In no case did I knowingly copy anything.
You may not be aware of this, but I was banned several times for the infractions made during my earlier time on the forum. It was only through extensive private conversations with BadBear during or around my ban, who taught me the right way to behave on the forum, did things started to change. BadBear was one of the strictest mods on the forum (with many complaints from idiots to prove it). I appreciated BadBear's guidance that helped make me a good contributor to the community; and I have continually tried to improve since then.

These posts made in 2014-2015 were all long before theymos made me a moderator. The archives linked by bitcoinchan show me as "Staff", but Archive.org made those snapshots much later. I despise plagiarism, but appreciate your effort in helping me correct those posts.

Mind sharing why you deleted the first time you have posted this, and then replaced it with exactly the same post? The original post was #54465528, this is #54469714.

[peloso]

bla...bla...bla..

why lauda is still not banned?

[NotATether]

bla...bla...bla..

why lauda is still not banned?

Because she handled this incident in a constructive way? Unlike how some other people react when accused of the same.

Mind sharing why you deleted the first time you have posted this, and then replaced it with exactly the same post? The original post was #54465528, this is #54469714.

Maybe so that his report shows on the last page of the thread.

[peloso]

Because she handled this incident in a constructive way? Unlike how some other people react when accused of the same.



Maybe so that his report shows on the last page of the thread.

constructive way ?
oh yes) ass licking morons ( like you ) see constructive way on it
but for normal peoples this is a moron's shit

[WhiteManWhite]

bla...bla...bla..

why lauda is still not banned?

Because she handled this incident in a constructive way? Unlike how some other people react when accused of the same.

Mind sharing why you deleted the first time you have posted this, and then replaced it with exactly the same post? The original post was #54465528, this is #54469714.

Maybe so that his report shows on the last page of the thread.

I was banned for plagiarizing a much smaller number of characters. You can read this story from a year ago.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5146018

[akhjob]

@bitcoinchan You might possibly be an alt but it's really something to go after 26k+ posts and check for plagiarism. Outstanding effort.
But I wouldn't want Lauda to be banned for this reason, she has contributed a lot to the forum apart from these. I think a Signature ban would do.

[cabalism13]

Outstanding effort.

These only happens when you're too desperate to get revenge.
So as for the user who have been here and just created an alt to do that, it is indeed a success.
And now, we will be seeing some users who'll likely to celebrate when Lauda get's her punishment.
Just what will happen to the Cult?
Seems like the Cycling Club will take over LoL.