aleksoo7 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
|
|
June 24, 2017, 07:58:30 AM |
|
jup Explorer down atm, try a restart/resync
resync?? I was told NO fork because blkindex.dat was destroyed or something like that Fair enough.. So I had a copy of the chain from yesterday.. and every synced fine until ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500 getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500 received block 000000413930d52b84c7 SetBestChain: new best=000000413930d52b84c7 height=177646 trust=285870772754377 date=06/24/17 06:03:44 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500 getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500 received block 0000006df406479624c2 SetBestChain: new best=0000006df406479624c2 height=177647 trust=285870772754378 date=06/24/17 06:04:00 SetBestChain: new best=0000001c68b05113cb5e height=177648 trust=285870772754379 date=06/24/17 06:04:24 SetBestChain: new best=00000038db37739036a4 height=177649 trust=285870772754380 date=06/24/17 06:05:38 SetBestChain: new best=00000039f6da994cfc7c height=177650 trust=285870772754381 date=06/24/17 06:06:02 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
Then checkBlock fails.. I think the chain is forked. received block de240e733b720a64d8f9 ERROR: CheckBlock() : bad block signature ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED Misbehaving: 5.3.240.233:2225 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
Have you seen the link to the fix updated some minutes ago! https://github.com/kalgecin/CACHeCoin/releases/tag/V5.4.1
|
|
|
|
MemberCount+1
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:04:01 AM |
|
same issue with the patch 06/24/17 08:03:02 CACHeCoin version 0.7.5-13-gbadd0fd-kal (2017-06-24 10:20:40 +0300) 06/24/17 08:03:02 Default data directory /root/.cachecoin 06/24/17 08:03:02 Used data directory /root/.cachecoin 06/24/17 08:03:02 dbenv.open LogDir=/root/.cachecoin/database ErrorFile=/root/.cachecoin/db.log 06/24/17 08:03:02 Final lk_max_locks is 537000, sufficient for (worst case) 11 blocks in a single transaction (up to a 5-deep reorganization) 06/24/17 08:03:02 Bound to [::]:2225 06/24/17 08:03:02 Bound to 0.0.0.0:2225 06/24/17 08:03:02 AddLocal(37.120.173.195:2225,6) 06/24/17 08:03:02 Loading block index... 06/24/17 08:03:04 LoadBlockIndex(): hashBestChain=74e6a61750262a7d8a0f height=177652 trust=285875312599413 date=06/24/17 07:43:01 06/24/17 08:03:04 LoadBlockIndex(): synchronized checkpoint 00000000214828a26dc5a8328f01daf6c0116af8ee9fb7be336485ba4c7a454b 06/24/17 08:03:04 Verifying last 666 blocks at level 1 06/24/17 08:03:04 ERROR: CBlock::ReadFromDisk() : GetHash() doesn't match index 06/24/17 08:03:04 ERROR: LoadBlockIndex() : block.ReadFromDisk failed 06/24/17 08:03:04 CACHeCoin: Error loading blkindex.dat 06/24/17 08:03:04 Flush(false) 06/24/17 08:03:04 blkindex.dat refcount=0 06/24/17 08:03:04 blkindex.dat checkpoint 06/24/17 08:03:04 blkindex.dat closed 06/24/17 08:03:04 DBFlush(false) ended 10ms 06/24/17 08:03:04 StopNode() 06/24/17 08:03:04 Flushed 0 addresses to peers.dat 1ms 06/24/17 08:03:04 Flush(true) 06/24/17 08:03:04 DBFlush(true) ended 0ms 06/24/17 08:03:04 CACHeCoin exited
my 5 nodes are down
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:07:43 AM |
|
in my opinion:
time to rollback to a position where the network was running smoothly..
then properly test the changes on TESTNET.
then, and only then roll out changes to the mainnet.
here is my blockhash's:
getblockhash 177649 00000038db37739036a4d670e840de224ad29355fa582da8330607134d9da83c
getblockhash 177650 00000039f6da994cfc7cce8d852a8ca9990abe0570d1a0c32360c0388b2ca091
getblockhash 177651 19032de520876de87aeaa4acc0ef367f53fbe87ec1a1eb6c3cdd07e7802022cf
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
aleksoo7 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:18:02 AM |
|
Please wait a bit. Kalgecin is fixing it.
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:21:29 AM |
|
Please wait a bit. Kalgecin is fixing it.
my wallet is reporting synced: v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-kal getblockhash 177652 74e6a61750262a7d8a0ffcdba2d0528d3769eb06b64fd6ce71f3a8ecde387c08 received block 74e6a61750262a7d8a0f SetBestChain: new best=74e6a61750262a7d8a0f height=177652 trust=285875312599413 date=06/24/17 07:43:01 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED received getdata for: block 74e6a61750262a7d8a0f Flushing wallet.dat
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:28:38 AM |
|
New block:
getblockhash 177653 64a7f64145fb30a309f4040a0f3b59ecadea8c03c349d7bae8db3f4eed649473
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
MemberCount+1
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:30:28 AM |
|
New block:
getblockhash 177653 64a7f64145fb30a309f4040a0f3b59ecadea8c03c349d7bae8db3f4eed649473
Jop. Do you run the patch-version?
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:40:33 AM |
|
New block:
getblockhash 177653 64a7f64145fb30a309f4040a0f3b59ecadea8c03c349d7bae8db3f4eed649473
Jop. Do you run the patch-version? NO. I am running: v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-kal The exchange cryptopia is running: V5.3-42-g30a2321-kal I suggesting running a KNOWN good version of the code until the devs can prove good code on testnet edit: getblockhash 177654 fe0e42f80fb4a24b8fec4e798b229395d1f2fa4d7d94906e471ecea4f6769c72
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
MemberCount+1
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:47:00 AM |
|
I'm run the CACHeCoin version V5.3-42-g30a2321-kal (2017-06-18 19:25:29 +0300) Linux and Windows v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-kal and now sync done
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:50:17 AM |
|
I'm run the CACHeCoin version V5.3-42-g30a2321-kal (2017-06-18 19:25:29 +0300) Linux and Windows v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-kal and now sync done
getblockhash 177655 e2dcdb35ca18cd6c8eacef65267bffd93ed3c27308c4354e49977f3a50f737ea
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:58:54 AM |
|
It seams some are still on the wrong chain. received block d77283663e89316561c2 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED I am on the same chain as the exchange.. that is the right chain!! AFAIK you cannot change the POW algo without a fork.. but I am not a crypto DEV so I am not sure. (someone else chime in here) anyone who is a miner right now should be mining solo ... I think the CACHeCoin version V5.3-42-g30a2321-kal (2017-06-18 19:25:29 +0300) Linux and Windows v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-kal will still support the scrypt-jane, but I am not sure... I will start a solo miner and try. edit:.. i think it is working: first is solo, second is swith to a pool yacminer version 3.5.0-yac2 - Started: [2017-06-24 05:00:03] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):66.00 (avg):96.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m WU:0.00/m FB:0 ST: 5 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 0 GF: 0 RF: 0 Connected to 127.0.0.1 diff 323 NF 18 without LP as user jimbit Block: cd6c8eacef65267b... Diff:323 Started: [05:00:02] Best share: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit GPU 0: 69.0C 1039RPM | 32.00/ 32.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m T:1 rI: 400 GPU 1: 75.0C 268RPM | 33.00/ 32.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m T:1 rI: 400 GPU 2: 75.0C 4473RPM | 32.00/ 32.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m T:1 rI: 400
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2017-06-24 05:00:01] Started yacminer 3.5.0-yac2 [2017-06-24 05:00:01] Loaded configuration file yac.conf [2017-06-24 05:00:02] Probing for an alive pool [2017-06-24 05:00:02] Network diff set to 323 [2017-06-24 05:00:02] Block change for http://127.0.0.1:2224 detection via str tum+tcp://ikarus.ageleis.de:3003 stratum [2017-06-24 05:00:03] Pool 2 difficulty changed to 0.100000 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 0: selecting lookup gap of 4 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 0: selecting buffer_size of 1856 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 0: bufsize for thread @ 1856MB based on buffer-size [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 1: selecting lookup gap of 4 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 1: selecting buffer_size of 1856 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 1: bufsize for thread @ 1856MB based on buffer-size [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 2: selecting lookup gap of 4 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 2: selecting buffer_size of 1856 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 2: bufsize for thread @ 1856MB based on buffer-size [2017-06-24 05:00:07] Pool 1 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid [2017-06-24 05:00:08] API running in IP access mode on port 5028 (44972)
yacminer version 3.5.0-yac2 - Started: [2017-06-24 05:00:03] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):83.00 (avg):98.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m WU:0.00/m FB:0 ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 9 GF: 0 RF: 0 Connected to ikarus.ageleis.de diff 0 NF 18 with stratum as user CRQCAzfgX7U1cf Block: cd6c8eacef65267b... Diff:323 Started: [05:00:02] Best share: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit GPU 0: 72.0C 1058RPM | 33.00/ 32.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m T:1 rI: 400 GPU 1: 69.0C 725RPM | 34.00/ 34.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m T:1 rI: 400 GPU 2: 71.0C 3927RPM | 33.00/ 32.00h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m T:1 rI: 400
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2017-06-24 05:00:01] Started yacminer 3.5.0-yac2 [2017-06-24 05:00:01] Loaded configuration file yac.conf [2017-06-24 05:00:02] Probing for an alive pool [2017-06-24 05:00:02] Network diff set to 323 [2017-06-24 05:00:02] Block change for http://127.0.0.1:2224 detection via stra um+tcp://ikarus.ageleis.de:3003 stratum [2017-06-24 05:00:03] Pool 2 difficulty changed to 0.100000 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 0: selecting lookup gap of 4 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 0: selecting buffer_size of 1856 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 0: bufsize for thread @ 1856MB based on buffer-size [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 1: selecting lookup gap of 4 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 1: selecting buffer_size of 1856 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 1: bufsize for thread @ 1856MB based on buffer-size [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 2: selecting lookup gap of 4 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 2: selecting buffer_size of 1856 [2017-06-24 05:00:03] GPU 2: bufsize for thread @ 1856MB based on buffer-size [2017-06-24 05:00:07] Pool 1 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid [2017-06-24 05:00:08] API running in IP access mode on port 5028 (44972) [2017-06-24 05:03:07] Switching to pool 2 stratum+tcp://ikarus.ageleis.de:3003
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
ljp7839008
|
|
June 24, 2017, 09:13:12 AM |
|
good to see it listed on coinXchange.
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2017, 09:18:34 AM |
|
Please wait a bit. Kalgecin is fixing it.
@aleksoo7 I am sorry if I have been too pushy about the versions and blockhash's, but the release of new code was not done in a smooth way. PLEASE if you going to do a release, and especially introduce a new POW do the following: - annouce the change (you did this.. sorta )
- provide details about the changes
- provide details about the new POW
- provide a new miner, or info how to get a miner for the new POW
- organize with the pools the changes upcomming
- thouroghly test the code on testnet
- release when everything is properly ready
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
killa-007
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2017, 11:28:40 AM |
|
we should get smth like claymore miner, those are very optimized, but he makes them only for big coins, one day though
|
|
|
|
humski
|
|
June 24, 2017, 01:17:45 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
aleksoo7 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
|
|
June 24, 2017, 01:33:30 PM |
|
Very good support on Cryptopia! Only yesterday I have passed them a new logo!
|
|
|
|
aleksoo7 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
|
|
June 24, 2017, 01:37:19 PM Last edit: June 24, 2017, 01:48:59 PM by aleksoo7 |
|
Referring to the bug during implementation of new POW I kindly ask you to revert back your wallets to V5.3 Windows QT Wallet V5.3: Windows V5.3
|
|
|
|
rdnkjdi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009
|
|
June 24, 2017, 01:55:26 PM |
|
Ah when did cache switch to partial PoS? Is there any good way to follow dev plans / progress?
|
|
|
|
aleksoo7 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
|
|
June 24, 2017, 02:03:49 PM |
|
Please wait a bit. Kalgecin is fixing it.
@aleksoo7 I am sorry if I have been too pushy about the versions and blockhash's, but the release of new code was not done in a smooth way. PLEASE if you going to do a release, and especially introduce a new POW do the following: - annouce the change (you did this.. sorta )
- provide details about the changes
- provide details about the new POW
- provide a new miner, or info how to get a miner for the new POW
- organize with the pools the changes upcomming
- thouroghly test the code on testnet
- release when everything is properly ready
Everything were tested on the testnet by developer. The problem rised by the old code when it was implemented in the real network. Our developer do the best to rewrite everything to the new Java code to avoid such a troubles anymore. Please temporary used wallet V5.3. Windows QT Wallet V5.3:
|
|
|
|
MemberCount+1
|
|
June 24, 2017, 02:05:00 PM |
|
that's too much for me now. confused and it's weekend, I'm out today. I do not work for nothing, sry this is bad. Ikarus paid out all rewards there is not pending blocks and only my reserve amount is in the wallet, but I do not know if everyone has got the rewards in the right wallet/chain.
|
|
|
|
|