EcoGEM_Club
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 123
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2018, 12:42:17 AM |
|
Is there a chance to mine on 2-core laptop cpu?))
Could someone please PM me a link for the best speed miner?
|
|
|
|
StoneSoup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 225
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2018, 12:53:56 AM |
|
Tried running the wallet miner on 2 computers. left overnight and not a single tiniest fraction earned on either computer. Yes, I did the debug stuff. How to get a return (any return) from this?
If you're doing solo mining it's luck waiting for a block. If you want more consistent earnings try the pool. So if I use pool on page 80 with the software linked to there, I should see some results? Seems a bit pointless having it in the wallet tho. I would suggest: 1. Make it easier to access in the wallet - shouldn't need to access via debug console. 2. Make it so you can easily connect to a pool from the wallet (maybe have a few pools in there to choose from) 3. Don't put out a document telling how to use the wallet for mining without making it abundantly clear that you will be waiting for a long time for a lucky block. Hopefully these things are in the works. great future ahead if they do this I think.
|
|
|
|
erdnapa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 1
|
|
February 26, 2018, 01:33:59 AM |
|
Tried running the wallet miner on 2 computers. left overnight and not a single tiniest fraction earned on either computer. Yes, I did the debug stuff. How to get a return (any return) from this?
If you're doing solo mining it's luck waiting for a block. If you want more consistent earnings try the pool. So if I use pool on page 80 with the software linked to there, I should see some results? Seems a bit pointless having it in the wallet tho. I would suggest: 1. Make it easier to access in the wallet - shouldn't need to access via debug console. 2. Make it so you can easily connect to a pool from the wallet (maybe have a few pools in there to choose from) 3. Don't put out a document telling how to use the wallet for mining without making it abundantly clear that you will be waiting for a long time for a lucky block. Hopefully these things are in the works. great future ahead if they do this I think. Nope, the cpuminer+pool is NOT run through the wallet. Just like any regular mining program that uses a pool. If you wan to solo-mine: then use the miner built into the wallet. Solo-mining is still possible if you have a decent CPU.
|
|
|
|
Couiz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2018, 05:57:26 AM |
|
Someone should quote this post on first page, this will really help miner who want to mining but hesitate because no pool
anyway this miner slower or better than wallet miner?? thank you
I'd also like to know if the miner is faster than the wallet miner I have in average 20kh/s in wallet and 23-24 kh/s with external . I confirm this, extarnal miner is around 10% faster for me too so better use it instead the wallet one. Its HPS might be faster but would love to know if you are finding more blocks as a result. Personally, I've seen a jump in the number of blocks found by my wallet miners overnight. No HPS increase on Linux with the precompiled binary. Also roughly same blocks (after ~8h). A bit of caution: couldn't compile miner from github sources on Ubuntu 16.04. Release source code only contains empty readme file. https://github.com/BeastPool/cpuminer-argon2d link for source , I'll update release source aswell, didn't know it's empty.
|
|
|
|
erdnapa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 1
|
|
February 26, 2018, 03:23:04 PM |
|
Thanks for that! I got it to compile with regular repo code - however, about 15% SLOWER than wallet miner and your precompiled binary. Changing algo options (-mno-sha etc.) didn't change anything, always ~46kH/s (precompiled & wallet do 53-55) on a Ryzen 1700. What compile options did you use?
|
|
|
|
Couiz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2018, 04:43:26 PM |
|
Thanks for that! I got it to compile with regular repo code - however, about 15% SLOWER than wallet miner and your precompiled binary. Changing algo options (-mno-sha etc.) didn't change anything, always ~46kH/s (precompiled & wallet do 53-55) on a Ryzen 1700. What compile options did you use? Check winbuild-cross.sh file. Which version of mingw/gcc did you use?
|
|
|
|
|
erdnapa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 1
|
|
February 27, 2018, 02:45:25 AM |
|
Thanks for that! I got it to compile with regular repo code - however, about 15% SLOWER than wallet miner and your precompiled binary. Changing algo options (-mno-sha etc.) didn't change anything, always ~46kH/s (precompiled & wallet do 53-55) on a Ryzen 1700. What compile options did you use? Check winbuild-cross.sh file. Which version of mingw/gcc did you use? Thank you! gcc-5.4 Its a Ryzen thing! Quite a story: the issue seems to be that GCC (esp. 5.4) is not optimized fro Ryzen at all. Compiling with your -march=corei7-avx gives me exactly the same speed as your compiled binary. Doing a -march=native results in the 15% decrease in speed. The often recommended -march=bdver4 doesn't help at all, same speed decrease. I installed GCC 6.3 to compile with -march=znver1 on Ubuntu, however that leads to segfaults. Went to my Gentoo box to compile with GCC 6.4, finally setting CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS -std=gnu++11 -fpermissive -march=znver1 -DFOUR_WAY" gives the same speed as with -march=corei7-avx....but no increase! So -march=corei7-avx seems to be the best thing for Ryzen CPUs.
|
|
|
|
sycube
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 1
|
|
February 27, 2018, 08:38:55 AM |
|
We have made a few small changes to the website, check them out now: https://crds.co/
|
|
|
|
nagobinga
|
|
February 27, 2018, 09:25:02 AM |
|
with the xeon 4 core processor, it is possible that it will soon be supported by the siding ,, make it as soon as possible for the simplest timers as soon as possible.
|
|
|
|
J0HN3F1V3
|
|
February 27, 2018, 12:19:47 PM |
|
We have made a few small changes to the website, check them out now: https://crds.co/The site looks very good, great job
|
|
|
|
erdnapa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 1
|
|
February 27, 2018, 02:25:40 PM |
|
We have made a few small changes to the website, check them out now: https://crds.co/In the 'Select CPU' dropdown box Coffee Lake et al are listed as 'expected 2017', but they are out in the wild now. I'll also miss that price & marketcap info on the top of the site!
|
|
|
|
sycube
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 1
|
|
February 27, 2018, 02:34:55 PM |
|
We have made a few small changes to the website, check them out now: https://crds.co/In the 'Select CPU' dropdown box Coffee Lake et al are listed as 'expected 2017', but they are out in the wild now. I'll also miss that price & marketcap info on the top of the site! We will update the CPU dropdown menu as soon as the new wallet comes out. Also, we have integrated the plugin from CoinLib for the price and the market cap info: https://i.imgur.com/B07o9Rr.png
|
|
|
|
dasgardo87
|
|
February 28, 2018, 01:49:20 AM |
|
We have made a few small changes to the website, check them out now: https://crds.co/In the 'Select CPU' dropdown box Coffee Lake et al are listed as 'expected 2017', but they are out in the wild now. I'll also miss that price & marketcap info on the top of the site! We will update the CPU dropdown menu as soon as the new wallet comes out. Also, we have integrated the plugin from CoinLib for the price and the market cap info: https://i.imgur.com/B07o9Rr.pngHi i just read on website that a new reward split will be implemented Implement change #2 from Community Poll - the new emission, MN rewards to increase and PoW to decrease every 125,000 blocks (~6 months) so in summary , calculation on post one will be wrong ? do you have by any chance new calculation POW / POS mining reward split ?? thank you
|
|
|
|
papa4
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2018, 07:50:43 AM |
|
it will be 8/2 with next version of credits 1.2 in like 1 month
|
|
|
|
erdnapa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 1
|
|
February 28, 2018, 07:12:00 PM |
|
it will be 8/2 with next version of credits 1.2 in like 1 month
That would suck. Not sure what can be gained from that. Masternodes but no miners? Network hashrate has been going down for a while, a change to 8/2 would probably help speed that up.
|
|
|
|
sylph93
|
|
February 28, 2018, 11:46:45 PM |
|
Today I found all 3 my masternodes gone 'New start required' status. I checked other masternodes as well, they all gone same status.
I restart all my nodes again. I've never seen like this before. What's the problem?
|
|
|
|
sycube
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 1
|
|
March 01, 2018, 12:12:25 AM |
|
Today I found all 3 my masternodes gone 'New start required' status. I checked other masternodes as well, they all gone same status.
I restart all my nodes again. I've never seen like this before. What's the problem?
Do you still receive Masternode rewards?
|
|
|
|
sylph93
|
|
March 01, 2018, 12:28:39 AM |
|
Today I found all 3 my masternodes gone 'New start required' status. I checked other masternodes as well, they all gone same status.
I restart all my nodes again. I've never seen like this before. What's the problem?
Do you still receive Masternode rewards? I restarted my nodes an hour ago. I haven't received rewards yet. There are only couple of nodes enabled. Almost every node seems to be down yet.
|
|
|
|
sycube
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 1
|
|
March 01, 2018, 12:30:31 AM |
|
Today I found all 3 my masternodes gone 'New start required' status. I checked other masternodes as well, they all gone same status.
I restart all my nodes again. I've never seen like this before. What's the problem?
Do you still receive Masternode rewards? I restarted my nodes an hour ago. I haven't received rewards yet. There are only couple of nodes enabled. Almost every node seems to be down yet. Try asking in #support in the Discord or just re-install all your Masternodes.
|
|
|
|
|