mrankin
|
|
March 07, 2018, 04:54:11 AM |
|
There are currently no plans nor any discussion within the team of re-branding Credits. There is discussion within the wider community which is fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and things may change down the track, however for now Credits is staying as Credits.
|
|
|
|
Gehacktesmacher
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
March 07, 2018, 10:39:06 PM |
|
Nice One, thx for that. Mining will be more efficient now ;-)
|
|
|
|
StoneSoup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 225
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2018, 02:43:11 AM |
|
Lets find out, I have created a straw poll. Please go to : https://www.strawpoll.me/15223680To vote. This should give an idea if the name is holding this coin back.
|
|
|
|
24Kilo
|
|
March 08, 2018, 02:49:58 AM |
|
there are only 2 people voted ,i voted no ,because we are the first project named CRDS and POW mode ,not ICO . i guessyou voted yes .need more people to vote
|
|
|
|
|
wixord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2018, 11:21:59 AM |
|
how come now there are 2 credits ? any fix for this?
|
|
|
|
skrtel37
|
|
March 08, 2018, 11:27:31 AM |
|
how come now there are 2 credits ? any fix for this?
ingore this problem ,one is pow mode ,the other is ico project just erc20 tokens ,not really coins . so they are clear
|
|
|
|
StoneSoup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 225
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2018, 10:50:29 PM |
|
there are only 2 people voted ,i voted no ,because we are the first project named CRDS and POW mode ,not ICO . i guessyou voted yes .need more people to vote We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
|
|
|
|
erdnapa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 1
|
|
March 09, 2018, 01:57:02 AM |
|
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias.
|
|
|
|
skrtel37
|
|
March 09, 2018, 04:08:48 AM |
|
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option
|
|
|
|
coinswebid
|
|
March 09, 2018, 03:47:16 PM |
|
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,, maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds
|
|
|
|
sylph93
|
|
March 10, 2018, 05:04:31 AM |
|
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,, maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds Now the result is 6:4. Rebrand takes the lead. Rebrand should be taken into consideration in early stage. It will help get rid of some confusion between fork and token.
|
|
|
|
esprit577
|
|
March 10, 2018, 05:14:39 AM |
|
I have some 2680V2 CPU. I can't find the pool with thread on home page. Is it the wallet SOLO mode?
|
|
|
|
Casper171
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2018, 12:22:06 PM |
|
How about listing on a new exchange ? It is becoming worthless. Please do something devs.
|
|
|
|
NetZero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2018, 10:26:23 PM |
|
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,, maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds Agreed. CRDS needs to get out there. Can we get some updated signatures? I'd love to use one.
|
|
|
|
mrankin
|
|
March 12, 2018, 03:29:15 AM |
|
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,, maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds Agreed. CRDS needs to get out there. Can we get some updated signatures? I'd love to use one. The latest signatures can be found in the last Bounty Thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2488650
|
|
|
|
sud
|
|
March 12, 2018, 07:33:43 AM |
|
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,, maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds Agreed. CRDS needs to get out there. Can we get some updated signatures? I'd love to use one. The latest signatures can be found in the last Bounty Thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2488650Thanks for the link. Looking at this thread seems like CRDS bounty wasn't so popular, so maybe it would be a good idea to make a new one so more users can participate. On the plus side, bounty hunters probably get some nice rewards since there wasn't so much participants.
|
|
|
|
ntoken
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
March 12, 2018, 10:33:36 AM |
|
Someone should quote this post on first page, this will really help miner who want to mining but hesitate because no pool
anyway this miner slower or better than wallet miner?? thank you
I'd also like to know if the miner is faster than the wallet miner I have in average 20kh/s in wallet and 23-24 kh/s with external . Nice work. I switched some miners to this pool, and the hash algo increated indeed. Much better than local wallet.
|
|
|
|
Paddy321
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
March 12, 2018, 05:09:41 PM |
|
Block Explorer seems to be down?
|
|
|
|
mrankin
|
|
March 12, 2018, 09:29:25 PM |
|
Block Explorer seems to be down?
Yes it's an issue with Iquidus Explorer which requires an outdated/old version of MongoDB to run. The database credentials keep getting corrupted for no apparent reason and I have to rebuild the database from scratch after re-adding the credentials to it. The rebuild is underway now BTW.
|
|
|
|
|