spinnycat
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2017, 11:01:25 AM |
|
10 days till the announcement...oh no now alot closer, until the Cream announcement! Excited. And terribly impatient go Cream go!
|
Be proud Istri, I'm trying Btc: 16P9EwMg6TZmpPDNUvuViMEZfE9f3fpAbV
|
|
|
pshemek
|
|
October 20, 2017, 01:07:06 PM |
|
announcement hmm i must have missed something here, but anyway looking forward to hear what it is.
|
|
|
|
Vitala
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2017, 09:04:59 PM |
|
I tried to compile it, but I took this error: darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&) darksend.cpp:978:29: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ in initialization bool* pfMissingInputs = false; I found the same error with a solve, made the same (changed ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ in 2 files), and then I received this message: darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&) darksend.cpp:977:71: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ for argument '4' to 'bool AcceptableInputs(CTxMemPool&, const CTransaction&, bool, bool*)' if(!AcceptableInputs(mempool,txCollateral, false, pfMissingInputs )){ Should I continue changing ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ or is it wrong way?
|
|
|
|
CREAMteam (OP)
|
|
October 20, 2017, 10:42:03 PM |
|
I tried to compile it, but I took this error: darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&) darksend.cpp:978:29: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ in initialization bool* pfMissingInputs = false; I found the same error with a solve, made the same (changed ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ in 2 files), and then I received this message: darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&) darksend.cpp:977:71: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ for argument '4' to 'bool AcceptableInputs(CTxMemPool&, const CTransaction&, bool, bool*)' if(!AcceptableInputs(mempool,txCollateral, false, pfMissingInputs )){ Should I continue changing ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ or is it wrong way? Try with this another test2 version: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTta3poenV0ejllNjg
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
October 21, 2017, 05:33:22 AM |
|
I tried to compile it, but I took this error: darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&) darksend.cpp:978:29: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ in initialization bool* pfMissingInputs = false; I found the same error with a solve, made the same (changed ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ in 2 files), and then I received this message: darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&) darksend.cpp:977:71: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ for argument '4' to 'bool AcceptableInputs(CTxMemPool&, const CTransaction&, bool, bool*)' if(!AcceptableInputs(mempool,txCollateral, false, pfMissingInputs )){ Should I continue changing ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ or is it wrong way? Try with this another test2 version: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTta3poenV0ejllNjghehehe ... this looks like you are using an os ( like we are ) that uses gcc6x or gcc7x - which uses different syntax to compile ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
jota17
|
|
October 21, 2017, 11:08:44 PM |
|
10 days till the announcement...oh no now alot closer, until the Cream announcement! Excited. And terribly impatient go Cream go! What announcement?
|
|
|
|
spinnycat
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2017, 11:22:42 PM |
|
10 days till the announcement...oh no now alot closer, until the Cream announcement! Excited. And terribly impatient go Cream go! What announcement? hi jota17, thats just it, I dont know. The dev posted previously about an announcement that would occur after the bitcoin fork regarding I believe (tell me if im wrong dev!) their blackjack room and also the partnership they have with the technology firm and cream products. The dev's post if you click back, is in this thread.
|
Be proud Istri, I'm trying Btc: 16P9EwMg6TZmpPDNUvuViMEZfE9f3fpAbV
|
|
|
allthebitandbobs
|
|
October 22, 2017, 12:23:02 PM |
|
sold all my cream coin for a profit whoop whoop .Good buy to shitty staking
|
|
|
|
Vitala
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
October 22, 2017, 02:30:39 PM |
|
In this version I receive errors like /usr/bin/ld: librevolvercoin_common.a(librevolvercoin_common_a-blake.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC I tried to write string in makefile.unix , but it didn't help, error is the same
|
|
|
|
CREAMteam (OP)
|
|
October 22, 2017, 11:19:07 PM |
|
In this version I receive errors like /usr/bin/ld: librevolvercoin_common.a(librevolvercoin_common_a-blake.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC I tried to write string in makefile.unix , but it didn't help, error is the same This looks like cross-compiling problem. It seems it can't compile on 64bit machine that runs ubuntu. However, you can try to change makefile.unix file - line 99 to: xCXXFLAGS=-O2 $(EXT_OPTIONS) -pthread -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter \ And try again
|
|
|
|
|
AltsBoom
|
|
October 23, 2017, 05:55:21 PM |
|
Neat update, never heard of bitscreener but it seems to breakdown the coins accurately. A coinmarketcap competitor with a bit more technical analysis in it's charts
|
|
|
|
|
CREAMteam (OP)
|
|
October 26, 2017, 01:06:26 AM |
|
halloween twitter campaign tommorow, along with news about Creamcoin progress, stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
mitch8128
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
October 26, 2017, 10:44:45 AM |
|
would like to participate in campaign but unfortunately i don't have twitter
|
|
|
|
cryptozone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
October 26, 2017, 12:33:24 PM |
|
Great job team. Halloween is coming
|
|
|
|
mitch8128
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
October 26, 2017, 01:55:01 PM |
|
g'day @creamteam i just have a question about the masternodes, specifically the payouts. so, every transaction of 0.4 shows up as a random number, anywhere between 200 and 100,000, and the reward frequency seems to vary allot. so here is my question, are the masternode payouts related to transactions made by users? for example if my masternode processes a transaction by a user do i then receive a reward, making it so that the more transactions happening equals more frequent payouts? i would really like an answer to this as it is very hard to find this info online. thanks guys and im super keen for the upcoming news!
|
|
|
|
CREAMteam (OP)
|
|
October 26, 2017, 02:54:51 PM |
|
Masternode payouts are not related to transactions made by users. Masternode payout is 20% of total staking reward. Reward frequency seems to vary because number of global masternodes online vary. To get more frequent reward, you need to raise as many masternods as you can. By doing that you make stable income. Or you can just use normal staking , without MN, that also gives good reward, although diff is very high now.
|
|
|
|
|
Vitala
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
October 26, 2017, 07:54:26 PM |
|
This looks like cross-compiling problem. It seems it can't compile on 64bit machine that runs ubuntu. However, you can try to change makefile.unix file - line 99 to: xCXXFLAGS=-O2 $(EXT_OPTIONS) -pthread -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter \ And try again That's strange, but this options didn't help. I received just the same error about -fPIC
|
|
|
|
|