Russia is the most aggressive country

[gostop]

You have just found one, and one is better than Russia in aggression. That is the United States, this is the way to snatch wealth. In fact, the world itself is a country, but interests lead to division. The Russian economy is very bad now.

[1715159478]

1715159478

[1715159478]

1715159478

[1715159478]

1715159478

[1715159478]

1715159478

[1715159478]

1715159478

[omegasoldier]

I believe that the above applies only to the policies that are led by the heads of state.
But in no case, it is not necessary to transfer this negative attitude to the inhabitants of Russia, ordinary people. Believe me, they themselves have always been the victims of their rulers.
This is very sad. Now in Russia, too, not everyone agrees with the foreign policy of the authorities. Therefore, it is not necessary to transfer the negative to the whole nation. It is necessary to treat people humanly, despite the policy.

I share the same thoughts. Common people are not involved in the state decision making, and people at power aren`t always peaceful and ready to find compromises. This is evident in all superpowers, the USA and Russia always compete. I think it won`t be that long until China joins this confrontation considering its development rate.
I just cite one example: remember the World Cup 2018 in Russia, remember how hospitable people were despite all the propaganda and stereotypes about Russia being hostile. I think it`s really important for all of us to pay less attention to what politicians do and focus on common people - not all of us are susceptible to the state propaganda.

[Alik Bahshi]

The Americans were again surprised by the technological breakthrough in space exploration by the successful launch of the super-heavy Falcon rocket, the accelerating units of which landed safely on their engines and can be reused. Rocket "Falcon" is designed for tourists who want to fly in space and visit the moon. And what does Putin brag about? And the fact that Russia has created the latest weapons - various missiles with hypersonic speed, which can easily deliver nuclear warheads to any point on earth. The Evil Empire cannot produce anything else, the acre of murder weapons.

[KingScorpio]

Alik Bakhshi

Russia is the most aggressive country

    Following the Second World War, Russia is the only country that has seized foreign territories and even the whole state. Neither the United States, nor the United Kingdom, nor Canada, as a winner country, unlike Russia, did not acquire a meter of foreign land, but Russia seized vast territories:
 - 10% of the territory of Finland, and this is almost the territory of Switzerland,
 - annexed part of Germany (East Prussia),
 - three states Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia joined the USSR,
 - the huge territories of Poland were torn away in favor of the USSR,
 - annexed part of Romania (Bessarabia),
 - Tyva was annexed (in 1944),
 - part of the territory of Japan (Southern Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands) has been annexed.

  It should be noted that these territorial acquisitions of Moscow lie on the conscience of the American President Roosevelt, who completely trusted Uncle Joe, in spite of Churchill's warnings. But America had a colossal opportunity to stop the insatiability of Stalin. I am sure that if it were not for America, and the Russians had the first to have an atomic bomb, they would not fail to take advantage of this circumstance, and the world would be different today.

   At the end of the 20th century, before the collapse of the Evil Empire, when its economy was already breathing deeply, Moscow attempted to seize another country - Afghanistan. However, this time the Russians ran into a people that belonged to their freedom, as to a shrine and, despite their enormous superiority, the Russians suffered a shameful defeat (1).
    But what is surprising is that even after the partial collapse of the empire, Russia has not lost its predatory nature, which is well illustrated by the attack on Georgia and Ukraine. And again, through the fault of America, which did not take advantage of the situation to complete the disintegration of the evil Empire, the West today has problems with its revanchism. Not understanding President Bush Jr., what is Russia and the Russian people (2) with its imperial worldview in a compartment with Great Russian chauvinism (3), allowed Putin's "friend" to pour in Chechnya blood and suppress the shoots of Yeltsin's democracy. And Obama, too intelligent for this case, slipped Russia's attack on Ukraine, although it was clear on all grounds that Ukraine could not avoid military aggression from Russia. In the article Whose Crimea (4) I predicted in 2006 the inevitability of the implementation of the Kremlin's military plans for Ukraine. Moreover, two months before Russia's invasion of Crimea, in an article (5) I wrote that it will take place after the Winter Olympics in Sochi. Obama not only did not dare to contradict Putin's tricks, although America on the Budapest Memorandum was the guarantor of Ukraine's security, but also refused to help Ukraine in arming.
    The West does not want to take seriously the revanchist aspirations of Putin, as it once let Hitler revanchism, which in the end could lead to a big war, for Putin will not definitely stop in Ukraine.

14.03.17.

whats the difference between seizing and annexing countries, or replacing the banking cartels with one aligned to you?

the answer is = Zero the usa, takes over the financial systems of countries thats basically the same. for the leaderships that constantly cant create long term gains, the usa.

russia acts geographically different

[KingScorpio]

The Americans were again surprised by the technological breakthrough in space exploration by the successful launch of the super-heavy Falcon rocket, the accelerating units of which landed safely on their engines and can be reused. Rocket "Falcon" is designed for tourists who want to fly in space and visit the moon. And what does Putin brag about? And the fact that Russia has created the latest weapons - various missiles with hypersonic speed, which can easily deliver nuclear warheads to any point on earth. The Evil Empire cannot produce anything else, the acre of murder weapons.

you dont want a serious discussion here, you are either stupid or an agenda driven propagandists nothing else.

[Alik Bahshi]

The Americans were again surprised by the technological breakthrough in space exploration by the successful launch of the super-heavy Falcon rocket, the accelerating units of which landed safely on their engines and can be reused. Rocket "Falcon" is designed for tourists who want to fly in space and visit the moon. And what does Putin brag about? And the fact that Russia has created the latest weapons - various missiles with hypersonic speed, which can easily deliver nuclear warheads to any point on earth. The Evil Empire cannot produce anything else, the acre of murder weapons.

you dont want a serious discussion here, you are either stupid or an agenda driven propagandists nothing else.

And why do not you like the agenda? What's wrong with the rocket "Falcon" successfully launched? Or do you not like the fact that the Falcon is a rocket for tourists, and Putin’s hypersonic rockets for murder?

[KingScorpio]

The Americans were again surprised by the technological breakthrough in space exploration by the successful launch of the super-heavy Falcon rocket, the accelerating units of which landed safely on their engines and can be reused. Rocket "Falcon" is designed for tourists who want to fly in space and visit the moon. And what does Putin brag about? And the fact that Russia has created the latest weapons - various missiles with hypersonic speed, which can easily deliver nuclear warheads to any point on earth. The Evil Empire cannot produce anything else, the acre of murder weapons.

you dont want a serious discussion here, you are either stupid or an agenda driven propagandists nothing else.

And why do not you like the agenda? What's wrong with the rocket "Falcon" successfully launched? Or do you not like the fact that the Falcon is a rocket for tourists, and Putin’s hypersonic rockets for murder?

a highly armed russia is a guarantee for the stability development and advancement of the societies in east asia, south asia and the middle east.

besides it was russia that was the enemy of lybias destruction not the us that bombed lybia for petrodollar security gain.

russia should start using its orthodox mission to be able to integrate and foreingers better into its economy. so russia grows better and faster again simily like the gulf states in the middle east.

russians themselves dont like their weapons, after all they crushed the soviet union because of the too many weapons. but their government knows that those are necessary. to achieve foreign policy goal and protect economic supply lines.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I think that despite all the assertions that are given of Russia, the fact of having troops in Venezuela, supposedly protecting it from the United States, is a total act of provocation, because Russia has no interest that the people of the people of Venezuela are well, but protect the interests of continuing to exploit a country rich in gold, precious metals and oil in exchange for giving security to a dictator who is at their mercy. It's like paying and giving yourself the change.

[Alik Bahshi]

The Americans were again surprised by the technological breakthrough in space exploration by the successful launch of the super-heavy Falcon rocket, the accelerating units of which landed safely on their engines and can be reused. Rocket "Falcon" is designed for tourists who want to fly in space and visit the moon. And what does Putin brag about? And the fact that Russia has created the latest weapons - various missiles with hypersonic speed, which can easily deliver nuclear warheads to any point on earth. The Evil Empire cannot produce anything else, the acre of murder weapons.

you dont want a serious discussion here, you are either stupid or an agenda driven propagandists nothing else.

And why do not you like the agenda? What's wrong with the rocket "Falcon" successfully launched? Or do you not like the fact that the Falcon is a rocket for tourists, and Putin’s hypersonic rockets for murder?

a highly armed russia is a guarantee for the stability development and advancement of the societies in east asia, south asia and the middle east.

besides it was russia that was the enemy of lybias destruction not the us that bombed lybia for petrodollar security gain.

russia should start using its orthodox mission to be able to integrate and foreingers better into its economy. so russia grows better and faster again simily like the gulf states in the middle east.

russians themselves dont like their weapons, after all they crushed the soviet union because of the too many weapons. but their government knows that those are necessary. to achieve foreign policy goal and protect economic supply lines.

Russia seized another country and provided it with development and stability — this is the absurd finale of your words. All Eastern European countries have fled from the Russian guarantee of their stability and development.

[KingScorpio]

I think that despite all the assertions that are given of Russia, the fact of having troops in Venezuela, supposedly protecting it from the United States, is a total act of provocation, because Russia has no interest that the people of the people of Venezuela are well, but protect the interests of continuing to exploit a country rich in gold, precious metals and oil in exchange for giving security to a dictator who is at their mercy. It's like paying and giving yourself the change.

didnt the usa recently bombed back into stone age lybia in order to free it from ghadaffi in order to maintain their petrodollar imperialism? well russia seeked to prevent that.

how would you like it if superpowers regularily bombed back your society just in order to keep their countries money printing kapitalists the richest superrich of the world?

lybia would have survived and kept its 40 years developed infrastructure, if russia would have been stronger and more imperial.

[KingScorpio]

Russia seized another country and provided it with development and stability — this is the absurd finale of your words. All Eastern European countries have fled from the Russian guarantee of their stability and development.

they have fled and then lost a large portion of their labour population to uk, which no uk is losing due to brexit.

collapse of soviet union was no countries leaving, it was just opportunists taking over power (so called transformation winners)

but russia is comming back, just look at hungary, victor orban once took over power with western lobbist groups then he became an anti western anti liberalist opponent of the EU

[Alik Bahshi]

Russia seized another country and provided it with development and stability — this is the absurd finale of your words. All Eastern European countries have fled from the Russian guarantee of their stability and development.

they have fled and then lost a large portion of their labour population to uk, which no uk is losing due to brexit.

collapse of soviet union was no countries leaving, it was just opportunists taking over power (so called transformation winners)

but russia is comming back, just look at hungary, victor orban once took over power with western lobbist groups then he became an anti western anti liberalist opponent of the EU

Products manufactured in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe were technologically backward and therefore no one needed. In this connection factories were closed, and workers were forced to seek work in more developed countries. The reason is objective, it is impossible to produce, if it is not sold, it is the law of the economy. The economic backwardness of the countries of Eastern Europe is the power pressure of Russia with its principles of socialism. The economic recovery of these countries is gradually taking place and an example of this is Poland and the Czech Republic.
A good example is demonstrated by Azerbaijan, which, having become independent from Russia from a poor and backward country, has turned into a country with successful economic development.

[unocash]

And now we all wish the Soviets had taken all of Europe so we could have kept the Muslims and the Africans out of Europe.

[Branko]

Products manufactured in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe were technologically backward and therefore no one needed. In this connection factories were closed, and workers were forced to seek work in more developed countries. The reason is objective, it is impossible to produce, if it is not sold, it is the law of the economy. The economic backwardness of the countries of Eastern Europe is the power pressure of Russia with its principles of socialism. The economic recovery of these countries is gradually taking place and an example of this is Poland and the Czech Republic.
A good example is demonstrated by Azerbaijan, which, having become independent from Russia from a poor and backward country, has turned into a country with successful economic development.

Azerbaijan, land of Muslim terrorism?

https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/azerbaijan/terrorism

There were no terrorists in Azerbaijan when Russians kept peace and order there

[Daniel91]

I think that despite all the assertions that are given of Russia, the fact of having troops in Venezuela, supposedly protecting it from the United States, is a total act of provocation, because Russia has no interest that the people of the people of Venezuela are well, but protect the interests of continuing to exploit a country rich in gold, precious metals and oil in exchange for giving security to a dictator who is at their mercy. It's like paying and giving yourself the change.

In fact, America and Russia are very similar here.
They act in very similar way and protecting their political and economic interest around the world.
In the history Latin America usually way playing ground for America and Europe and Asia for Russia.
Great countries never allow small countries to run a completely independent policy.
Right now it seems that Venezuela is in conflict and one side wants to cooperate with America and other side with Russia.
It's battle for future influence and profit from oil.

[BestSSS]

I have a feeling that for the West and America rewritten the whole history and now in all textbooks and television Russia - the enemy number 1.
That everyone forgot about world war III? when Nazi Germany bombed the whole of Europe and only Russia was able to release all.
Forgot about Korea and America? forget Afghanistan?
God, what nonsense you're talking, Wake up and remember what happened before.
A single foot of earth over the past 100 years, Russia is not captured by the military, all the land that she inherited - the result of wrong policies of countries and referendums.
And all those who say that Russia is the aggressor No. 1 is just jealous of her vast territory!
Russia is a very good-natured country those who came to Russia for the world Cup just delighted and want to come here again.

[Alik Bahshi]

Products manufactured in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe were technologically backward and therefore no one needed. In this connection factories were closed, and workers were forced to seek work in more developed countries. The reason is objective, it is impossible to produce, if it is not sold, it is the law of the economy. The economic backwardness of the countries of Eastern Europe is the power pressure of Russia with its principles of socialism. The economic recovery of these countries is gradually taking place and an example of this is Poland and the Czech Republic.
A good example is demonstrated by Azerbaijan, which, having become independent from Russia from a poor and backward country, has turned into a country with successful economic development.

Azerbaijan, land of Muslim terrorism?

https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/azerbaijan/terrorism

There were no terrorists in Azerbaijan when Russians kept peace and order there

In all Muslim countries of the former colonies of Russia there is no terrorism. It is the Russians who came up with the myth of terrorism, so that under this pretext they could bring in an army, supposedly to defend them against terrorism and retake them.
As for Azerbaijan, this country, having freed itself from Russia, is successfully developing and there is no Muslim terrorism there.

[Branko]

Products manufactured in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe were technologically backward and therefore no one needed. In this connection factories were closed, and workers were forced to seek work in more developed countries. The reason is objective, it is impossible to produce, if it is not sold, it is the law of the economy. The economic backwardness of the countries of Eastern Europe is the power pressure of Russia with its principles of socialism. The economic recovery of these countries is gradually taking place and an example of this is Poland and the Czech Republic.
A good example is demonstrated by Azerbaijan, which, having become independent from Russia from a poor and backward country, has turned into a country with successful economic development.

Azerbaijan, land of Muslim terrorism?

https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/azerbaijan/terrorism

There were no terrorists in Azerbaijan when Russians kept peace and order there

In all Muslim countries of the former colonies of Russia there is no terrorism. It is the Russians who came up with the myth of terrorism, so that under this pretext they could bring in an army, supposedly to defend them against terrorism and retake them.
As for Azerbaijan, this country, having freed itself from Russia, is successfully developing and there is no Muslim terrorism there.

Lol, I linked UK government page and you blame Russia for that...how cute
If your government want you to spread propaganda here, tell them to find someone smart

[KingScorpio]

Russia seized another country and provided it with development and stability — this is the absurd finale of your words. All Eastern European countries have fled from the Russian guarantee of their stability and development.

they have fled and then lost a large portion of their labour population to uk, which no uk is losing due to brexit.

collapse of soviet union was no countries leaving, it was just opportunists taking over power (so called transformation winners)

but russia is comming back, just look at hungary, victor orban once took over power with western lobbist groups then he became an anti western anti liberalist opponent of the EU

Products manufactured in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe were technologically backward and therefore no one needed. In this connection factories were closed, and workers were forced to seek work in more developed countries. The reason is objective, it is impossible to produce, if it is not sold, it is the law of the economy. The economic backwardness of the countries of Eastern Europe is the power pressure of Russia with its principles of socialism. The economic recovery of these countries is gradually taking place and an example of this is Poland and the Czech Republic.
A good example is demonstrated by Azerbaijan, which, having become independent from Russia from a poor and backward country, has turned into a country with successful economic development.

thats not true, actually

the west abused their sea trade blockade, besides, socialism is comming back worldwide, especially in the usa, so dont think the cold war is over.

[KingScorpio]

Products manufactured in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe were technologically backward and therefore no one needed. In this connection factories were closed, and workers were forced to seek work in more developed countries. The reason is objective, it is impossible to produce, if it is not sold, it is the law of the economy. The economic backwardness of the countries of Eastern Europe is the power pressure of Russia with its principles of socialism. The economic recovery of these countries is gradually taking place and an example of this is Poland and the Czech Republic.
A good example is demonstrated by Azerbaijan, which, having become independent from Russia from a poor and backward country, has turned into a country with successful economic development.

Azerbaijan, land of Muslim terrorism?

https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/azerbaijan/terrorism

There were no terrorists in Azerbaijan when Russians kept peace and order there

In all Muslim countries of the former colonies of Russia there is no terrorism. It is the Russians who came up with the myth of terrorism, so that under this pretext they could bring in an army, supposedly to defend them against terrorism and retake them.
As for Azerbaijan, this country, having freed itself from Russia, is successfully developing and there is no Muslim terrorism there.

Lol, I linked UK government page and you blame Russia for that...how cute
If your government want you to spread propaganda here, tell them to find someone smart

i also thought for a long time he is just a paid propaganda troll to spread anti russia hatred.