j4rd4
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2017, 07:04:40 PM |
|
For the card nVidia GM107GLM [Quadro M1000M] the 1.1 version is actually slower than previous 1.0: 4,1 MH/s > 3,8 MH/s (for the same intensity 22).
|
|
|
|
sharkspoon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2017, 07:34:22 PM |
|
Just one strange thing : on a 6x1070 rig, GPU0 is around 18MH/s, while GPU1-5 are hashing at 26MH/s. Any idea ?
|
|
|
|
dittie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2017, 07:45:20 PM |
|
why CUDA7.5 instead of 8.0? I got a big request from nvOC users, Ubuntu 16.04-based, all I could get out-of-the-box for this OC was CUDA 7.5. I'm quite busy (and seems that I'll be busy for a long time) with current tasks from my primary work, I just filled a big community request and got back to my primary tasks. Maybe I'll update it once more when receive feedback from my tester, another version is ready to deploy, but needs testing. Thank you for understanding. Thank a lot your released 1.1 version works great in my nvOC. Got a 30% boost out of it! Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
July 30, 2017, 07:53:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
July 30, 2017, 08:11:28 PM |
|
Just one strange thing : on a 6x1070 rig, GPU0 is around 18MH/s, while GPU1-5 are hashing at 26MH/s. Any idea ? hashrate may drop due to GPU resourses are spent to GUI of your remote control. Have the same hashrate decreasing on the first GPU with othe algos? Or it's only with Skunk?
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
|
|
|
|
Dashez
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2017, 08:39:42 PM |
|
What's the total supply of Signatum? Inflation is high as fuck it seems.
|
|
|
|
brubic
|
|
July 30, 2017, 08:48:28 PM |
|
Does someone have a problem like that? Not synchronized by the network. Write 0-1 active connect
I was helped to delete the folder %USERPROFILE%\AppData\Roaming\Signatum, except the file wallet.dat, , it must be saved. Other ways did not help
|
|
|
|
parker423
|
|
July 30, 2017, 08:50:55 PM |
|
How much would i get with this mod?
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
July 30, 2017, 08:54:11 PM |
|
DUDE FUCK OFF .. Do not download this miner.. its all viruses and other shit
Mods please ban this member @SSDNOW from BTC all together
|
|
|
|
brubic
|
|
July 30, 2017, 08:59:25 PM |
|
about a week left before the block halving...
((30000-17563)*2)/60/24 = 17.2 days
|
|
|
|
|
gurumeditation
|
|
July 30, 2017, 09:05:06 PM |
|
about a week left before the block halving...
((30000-17563)*2)/60/24 = 17.2 days Actually block time seems to be 1 min, not 2.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
July 30, 2017, 09:07:21 PM |
|
DUDE FUCK OFF .. Do not download this miner.. its all viruses and other shit
Mods please ban this member @SSDNOW from BTC all together I AGREE TOTALLY-- There is more than one poster passing around possibly modified versions of sp_'s sp1, sp2, and sp3 skunk mods. If you don't receive it from sp_, it is likely a bad file. That said, there was another troll posting messages to scam other miners' bitcoin in a "group buy". Haven't seen his messages for a while... hope he is under the bus for good. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
|
|
lucifercipher
|
|
July 30, 2017, 09:18:15 PM |
|
Only download miner from official git or sp_ directly. Do not attempt any other miner . You might end up losing your SIGT.
|
|
|
|
anonfgc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2017, 09:21:22 PM |
|
NICE PROJECT. good code. had problems with a weird chainparams but i worked through it. cya soon!
|
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
July 30, 2017, 09:30:18 PM |
|
I agree. Palgin's miner seems legit. I am using it and I dont see anything silly on supernova and I dont see any random process on my PC too
|
|
|
|
|