azmojo
|
|
October 18, 2017, 11:02:00 PM |
|
I think the last I saw ETH was limited to 20/second? Yours is so much faster because it doesn't have to be confirmed by a bunch of unrelated users right? It's just confirmed by the parties involved manually?
If only there was a technical paper describing the technology and how it worked that we could reference...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
bananafana
|
|
October 19, 2017, 02:35:11 PM |
|
Will you invite more advisors to your team?
|
|
|
|
celestio
|
|
October 19, 2017, 06:19:11 PM |
|
Is there a particular legal firm you have been going through?
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime" - Satoshi Nakamoto, June 17, 2010
|
|
|
BlitzandBitz
|
|
October 19, 2017, 07:07:10 PM |
|
I think the last I saw ETH was limited to 20/second? Yours is so much faster because it doesn't have to be confirmed by a bunch of unrelated users right? It's just confirmed by the parties involved manually?
If only there was a technical paper describing the technology and how it worked that we could reference... As well as someone here to confirm my interpretation of such a paper, perhaps someone who even wrote it??
|
|
|
|
2l84aa
Member
Offline
Activity: 185
Merit: 10
|
|
October 19, 2017, 07:37:29 PM |
|
Will you invite more advisors to your team?
Good question. Anyone you guys are trying to get on board?
|
|
|
|
BuyingFast
|
|
October 20, 2017, 08:00:57 AM |
|
I think the last I saw ETH was limited to 20/second? Yours is so much faster because it doesn't have to be confirmed by a bunch of unrelated users right? It's just confirmed by the parties involved manually?
If only there was a technical paper describing the technology and how it worked that we could reference... Must say that their technical white paper was explicit enough even for me to grasp what they're doing. And I'm far from tech-minded.
|
|
|
|
BuyingFast
|
|
October 20, 2017, 08:32:01 AM |
|
Can someone please clarify ?
When, DCL tokens are more like license to use the technology and this technology can scale to handle multiple transactions per second, As a investor, how the token price will appreciate ? Is it only, if the technology becomes very hot on the market and everyone wants to use this technology ? or is DCL only for people who wants to use this technology for their applications ?
Both of these should be reasons for token appreciation.
|
|
|
|
2l84aa
Member
Offline
Activity: 185
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2017, 06:59:02 PM |
|
Will you invite more advisors to your team?
Good question. Anyone you guys are trying to get on board? Anyone from Disledger around?
|
|
|
|
okspam
Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2017, 07:29:42 PM |
|
Still no chance of a bounty campaign?
|
|
|
|
bananafana
|
|
October 20, 2017, 08:04:51 PM |
|
They must be super busy.
|
|
|
|
Dipsomaniac
|
|
October 20, 2017, 08:17:55 PM |
|
Still no chance of a bounty campaign?
I think if they were going to have a bounty campaign they would have already done it.
|
|
|
|
BuyingFast
|
|
October 21, 2017, 12:31:58 AM |
|
Does this still count as distributed if each ledger is kept by only two sides? It's distributed to just two sides? I know each side can have as many pairs as he wants, but still...
|
|
|
|
BuyingFast
|
|
October 22, 2017, 12:21:49 PM |
|
crickets...
|
|
|
|
DisLedger (OP)
|
|
October 22, 2017, 02:49:05 PM |
|
Is there a particular legal firm you have been going through?
We used Debevoise & Plimpton for our token sale legal review, and Morrison & Foerster does our patents.
|
|
|
|
DisLedger (OP)
|
|
October 22, 2017, 02:53:09 PM |
|
Does this still count as distributed if each ledger is kept by only two sides? It's distributed to just two sides? I know each side can have as many pairs as he wants, but still...
Yes it is still distributed... the difference is it is not massively redundant like a blockchain. Think of DisLedger's distribution as a network of pairs of ledgers, instead of one ledger that is copied on every node. Every DisLedger node is unique as it only contains the data for its transactions.
|
|
|
|
DisLedger (OP)
|
|
October 22, 2017, 02:56:27 PM |
|
I think the last I saw ETH was limited to 20/second? Yours is so much faster because it doesn't have to be confirmed by a bunch of unrelated users right? It's just confirmed by the parties involved manually?
If only there was a technical paper describing the technology and how it worked that we could reference... Must say that their technical white paper was explicit enough even for me to grasp what they're doing. And I'm far from tech-minded. I'm glad the whitepaper was clear enough to understand. It's hard for us to know if we are over-explaining, or under-explaining the technology since we are so close to the topic. Happy to explain any of the concepts further, sorry it's been crazy with meetings over the last few days.
|
|
|
|
2l84aa
Member
Offline
Activity: 185
Merit: 10
|
|
October 22, 2017, 03:18:24 PM |
|
Do you guys plan to bring in anymore advisors?
|
|
|
|
DisLedger (OP)
|
|
October 22, 2017, 03:25:23 PM |
|
Do you guys plan to bring in anymore advisors?
Not during the token sale but there are some capital markets, payments and finance experts that we’d like to have onboard longterm.
|
|
|
|
bananafana
|
|
October 22, 2017, 03:35:20 PM |
|
Do you guys plan to bring in anymore advisors?
Not during the token sale but there are some capital markets, payments and finance experts that we’d like to have onboard longterm. Thanks for taking the time to come answer.
|
|
|
|
Dipsomaniac
|
|
October 22, 2017, 03:49:44 PM |
|
How are the advisors getting compensated?
|
|
|
|
|