RoadStress
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
 |
July 19, 2013, 08:24:35 PM |
|
ActiveMining: Reaches Its Goal to Fund The NRE to Create the Worlds Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip SPRINGFIELD, MO, - July 19, 2013 - Active Mining (AM) and Virtual Mining Corporation (VMC) are announcing today that they have reached their funding goal to provide funds for the NRE required by eASIC. VMC is in the process of creating the "World's Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip" the Fast-Hash-One 28nm 16 GH/s chip. The Fast-Hash-One machines starts at 256 GH/s with a retail price of $3,999 or $15.62 per GH/s also making it the price leader in the market place. The Fast-Hash-One series of bitcoin mining machines are "The Gold Standard Of Bitcoin Mining Machines"™ Plese don't lie to your customers. You won't have the world's fastest bitcoin mining chip at 16GH/s. I really hate this corporate marketing stuff. Considering that KnC will have a chip capable of 100GH/s you just can't advertise your chip the way you do. Everyone is a "market leader" and has "fastest chip". Let's just cut the crap and make good products and they will sell themselves after that. Edit: I mean BFL advertise themselves as being "a market leader in microprocessor design" (paid announcement here: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/6/prweb9611889.htm) and look how miserable they failed. Don't make the same mistake as them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
redbeans2012
|
|
July 19, 2013, 08:57:21 PM |
|
ActiveMining: Reaches Its Goal to Fund The NRE to Create the Worlds Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip SPRINGFIELD, MO, - July 19, 2013 - Active Mining (AM) and Virtual Mining Corporation (VMC) are announcing today that they have reached their funding goal to provide funds for the NRE required by eASIC. VMC is in the process of creating the "World's Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip" the Fast-Hash-One 28nm 16 GH/s chip. The Fast-Hash-One machines starts at 256 GH/s with a retail price of $3,999 or $15.62 per GH/s also making it the price leader in the market place. The Fast-Hash-One series of bitcoin mining machines are "The Gold Standard Of Bitcoin Mining Machines"™ Plese don't lie to your customers. You won't have the world's fastest bitcoin mining chip at 16GH/s. I really hate this corporate marketing stuff. Considering that KnC will have a chip capable of 100GH/s you just can't advertise your chip the way you do. Everyone is a "market leader" and has "fastest chip". Let's just cut the crap and make good products and they will sell themselves after that. Edit: I mean BFL advertise themselves as being "a market leader in microprocessor design" (paid announcement here: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/6/prweb9611889.htm) and look how miserable they failed. Don't make the same mistake as them. 100 Gh/s per CHIP? |
|
|
|
|
sunniestsolomin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
July 19, 2013, 09:49:30 PM |
|
ActiveMining: Reaches Its Goal to Fund The NRE to Create the Worlds Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip SPRINGFIELD, MO, - July 19, 2013 - Active Mining (AM) and Virtual Mining Corporation (VMC) are announcing today that they have reached their funding goal to provide funds for the NRE required by eASIC. VMC is in the process of creating the "World's Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip" the Fast-Hash-One 28nm 16 GH/s chip. The Fast-Hash-One machines starts at 256 GH/s with a retail price of $3,999 or $15.62 per GH/s also making it the price leader in the market place. The Fast-Hash-One series of bitcoin mining machines are "The Gold Standard Of Bitcoin Mining Machines"™ Plese don't lie to your customers. You won't have the world's fastest bitcoin mining chip at 16GH/s. I really hate this corporate marketing stuff. Considering that KnC will have a chip capable of 100GH/s you just can't advertise your chip the way you do. Everyone is a "market leader" and has "fastest chip". Let's just cut the crap and make good products and they will sell themselves after that. Edit: I mean BFL advertise themselves as being "a market leader in microprocessor design" (paid announcement here: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/6/prweb9611889.htm) and look how miserable they failed. Don't make the same mistake as them. Dude, you don't know what your talking about. They are saying PER CHIP. KNCMiner's MODULES are 100GHs, NOT PER CHIP. |
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 19, 2013, 09:50:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
July 19, 2013, 10:48:29 PM |
|
Dude, you don't know what your talking about. They are saying PER CHIP. KNCMiner's MODULES are 100GHs, NOT PER CHIP.
Looks like they'll be 4 chips per module. So 25 GH/s. Still faster than VMC. |
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
sunniestsolomin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
July 19, 2013, 11:12:18 PM |
|
Dude, you don't know what your talking about. They are saying PER CHIP. KNCMiner's MODULES are 100GHs, NOT PER CHIP.
Looks like they'll be 4 chips per module. So 25 GH/s. Still faster than VMC. It says 48 chips in the Jupiter. 400/48 = 8.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
kslaughter (OP)
|
|
July 19, 2013, 11:25:29 PM |
|
In their specifications (which I have stored on my computer somewhere) their chip is listed at 10 GH/s, that is what I used to compare our chip to their chip. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinorama
|
|
July 19, 2013, 11:32:00 PM |
|
Their chip is 100 Gh/s, this has been common knowledge for a month now...
|
Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful  BTC Address ---> 1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp |
|
|
|
noah tall
|
|
July 19, 2013, 11:54:16 PM |
|
Their chip is 100 Gh/s, this has been common knowledge for a month now...
IF the chip sees the light of day, it might be 100Gh/s. |
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 19, 2013, 11:58:54 PM |
|
Dude, you don't know what your talking about. They are saying PER CHIP. KNCMiner's MODULES are 100GHs, NOT PER CHIP.
Looks like they'll be 4 chips per module. So 25 GH/s. Still faster than VMC. It says 48 chips in the Jupiter. 400/48 = 8.33 So you are saying that stuff said in "news-10" is better than stuff said in "news-22". Logic fail! Their chip is 100 Gh/s, this has been common knowledge for a month now...
IF the chip sees the light of day, it might be 100Gh/s. Ok if if. Keep your "ifs" to yourself. We can start the "if" game with VMC too so what's the use of your post? |
|
|
|
|
SOSLOVE868
|
|
July 20, 2013, 12:45:26 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
kslaughter (OP)
|
|
July 20, 2013, 02:07:26 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
We have had our RTL code tested for feasibility to run on eASIC's chip. The RTL code was found to be feasible and from the results we have an estimate of the speed of 16 GH/s and power of less than 12 watts per chip. |
|
|
|
|
|
SOSLOVE868
|
|
July 20, 2013, 02:10:23 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
We have had our RTL code tested for feasibility to run on eASIC's chip. The RTL code was found to be feasible and from the results we have an estimate of the speed of 16 GH/s and power of less than 12 watts per chip. So, if this code was simulated in computer, can you please upload a screenshot? most simulation are done with computer software, you should got the screenshot of the simulation. |
|
|
|
|
|
kslaughter (OP)
|
|
July 20, 2013, 02:15:23 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
We have had our RTL code tested for feasibility to run on eASIC's chip. The RTL code was found to be feasible and from the results we have an estimate of the speed of 16 GH/s and power of less than 12 watts per chip. So, if this code was simulated in computer, can you please upload a screenshot? I do not have a screenshot at this time. |
|
|
|
|
|
SOSLOVE868
|
|
July 20, 2013, 02:18:23 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
We have had our RTL code tested for feasibility to run on eASIC's chip. The RTL code was found to be feasible and from the results we have an estimate of the speed of 16 GH/s and power of less than 12 watts per chip. So, if this code was simulated in computer, can you please upload a screenshot? I do not have a screenshot at this time. Can you possibly get those screenshots uploaded within short time? otherwise, how can you make us believe that your result is real? |
|
|
|
|
|
kslaughter (OP)
|
|
July 20, 2013, 02:27:15 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
We have had our RTL code tested for feasibility to run on eASIC's chip. The RTL code was found to be feasible and from the results we have an estimate of the speed of 16 GH/s and power of less than 12 watts per chip. So, if this code was simulated in computer, can you please upload a screenshot? I do not have a screenshot at this time. Can you possibly get those screenshots uploaded within short time? otherwise, how can you make us believe that your result is real? Sure, as soon as I get something I can post. Some of what we are doing is still under an NDA, so that limits what I can say or post. In the next few weeks we will be moving forward with this project as we now have the funds to pay the NRE to eAsic. |
|
|
|
|
|
SOSLOVE868
|
|
July 20, 2013, 02:34:53 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
We have had our RTL code tested for feasibility to run on eASIC's chip. The RTL code was found to be feasible and from the results we have an estimate of the speed of 16 GH/s and power of less than 12 watts per chip. So, if this code was simulated in computer, can you please upload a screenshot? I do not have a screenshot at this time. Can you possibly get those screenshots uploaded within short time? otherwise, how can you make us believe that your result is real? Sure, as soon as I get something I can post. Some of what we are doing is still under an NDA, so that limits what I can say or post. In the next few weeks we will be moving forward with this project as we now have the funds to pay the NRE to eAsic. Sure ,it will be great to see anything news from you. I remember that you are building chips based on 28NM standard, Did you found anyone to producing them? |
|
|
|
|
|
kslaughter (OP)
|
|
July 20, 2013, 02:36:41 AM |
|
I heard that VMC had tested its chips? however, can you please upload some picture of the psychical chip and the screenshot of your test result and the snapshot of the laboratory which you used to testing and developing your chip.
Thank You ,if you can provides these pictures~~~
We have had our RTL code tested for feasibility to run on eASIC's chip. The RTL code was found to be feasible and from the results we have an estimate of the speed of 16 GH/s and power of less than 12 watts per chip. So, if this code was simulated in computer, can you please upload a screenshot? I do not have a screenshot at this time. Can you possibly get those screenshots uploaded within short time? otherwise, how can you make us believe that your result is real? Sure, as soon as I get something I can post. Some of what we are doing is still under an NDA, so that limits what I can say or post. In the next few weeks we will be moving forward with this project as we now have the funds to pay the NRE to eAsic. Sure ,it will be great to see anything news from you. I remember that you are building chips based on 28NM standard, Did you found anyone to producing them? Yes, we will have 28nm chips in a 12 week time frame after we approve our RTL code. |
|
|
|
|
|
