Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[numanoid]

This is such a close game.

Why risking such a huge amount when you can win only 2.02x ? Chances on loosing/winning is 50/50. It is so easy to lose, when winning amount could be not so huge.

I don't understand with your words. He was bet with 0.7 btc on 2.02x multipler and won, do you want he betting on 1% win chance?
Chance 50/50 mean you can either win or lose in same chance, you also win higher than your bet at 2.02x when you lose on that bet, you would lose "0.7 btc only"

[TopTort777]

This is such a close game.

Why risking such a huge amount when you can win only 2.02x ? Chances on loosing/winning is 50/50. It is so easy to lose, when winning amount could be not so huge.

I don't understand with your words. He was bet with 0.7 btc on 2.02x multipler and won, do you want he betting on 1% win chance?
Chance 50/50 mean you can either win or lose in same chance, you also win higher than your bet at 2.02x when you lose on that bet, you would lose "0.7 btc only"

I was trying to say, that when a person gambles with such a huge amount, why play only with 2.02 multiplier. Come on, you are risking with a lot of money, go all-in, make it at least 4x. game.

Satisfaction of winning 24k when you bet 8k, is greater than winning 8k when you bet 8k 

[panjul07]

This is such a close game.

Why risking such a huge amount when you can win only 2.02x ? Chances on loosing/winning is 50/50. It is so easy to lose, when winning amount could be not so huge.

I don't understand with your words. He was bet with 0.7 btc on 2.02x multipler and won, do you want he betting on 1% win chance?
Chance 50/50 mean you can either win or lose in same chance, you also win higher than your bet at 2.02x when you lose on that bet, you would lose "0.7 btc only"

I was trying to say, that when a person gambles with such a huge amount, why play only with 2.02 multiplier. Come on, you are risking with a lot of money, go all-in, make it at least 4x. game.

Satisfaction of winning 24k when you bet 8k, is greater than winning 8k when you bet 8k 

Every single gambler has their own target or preferences on what to bet. In this case he choose 2.02 because logically it is safer than higher multiplier, the main purpose is to double the bet. If he choose higher multiplier means that risk is higher. If you think that risking a lot of money should be used to hunt multiplier to get more profit then why don't you say to make it the max multiplier that he can do? Yeah, winning 24k is obviously greater than 8k but it applies for those who are ready with the higher risk. If someone cant take the risk then it is always better to use lower multiplier for small profit as targeted.

[Symphonized]

VIDEO POKER CHALLENGE | https://forum.stake.com/topic/24876-%F0%9F%8F%86-01-btc-the-gladiator-garyvideo-poker-challenge/

👑 3 Video Poker bets in a row
💰 EASY WIN

Click the link above now and share in a HUGE prize pool

[7788bitcoin]

I was trying to say, that when a person gambles with such a huge amount, why play only with 2.02 multiplier. Come on, you are risking with a lot of money, go all-in, make it at least 4x. game.

Satisfaction of winning 24k when you bet 8k, is greater than winning 8k when you bet 8k  

I am not sure what you are trying to say here, so are you telling that if you are rolling with huge amount of money you need to go for bigger risks and hence you can win the maximum benefit . Hope you have seen the roll and it was 51.13 and it was a really close call even for 2.02 X and you are suggest he would have gone for 4 X. I really doubt you ever played dice to evaluate things like this  , there is 9999 X too in dice why don't you try that for a change .

[Symphonized]

PLINKO CHALLENGE | https://forum.stake.com/topic/24885-%F0%9F%8F%86-01-btc-garys-birthday-hangoverplinko-challenge/

⚽ Premier League Plinko Challenge
🔽🔽 Two huge multipliers

Win now!

[imstillthebest]

I was trying to say, that when a person gambles with such a huge amount, why play only with 2.02 multiplier. Come on, you are risking with a lot of money, go all-in, make it at least 4x. game.

Satisfaction of winning 24k when you bet 8k, is greater than winning 8k when you bet 8k  

I am not sure what you are trying to say here, so are you telling that if you are rolling with huge amount of money you need to go for bigger risks and hence you can win the maximum benefit .

yes thats also what i understand by reading on what he said  . he really got a point about risking too much but based on my experience i often see smaller bets and making it for higher multiplier versus higher bets and making it with lower multipliers  and me as a gambler i do also prefer lower multipliers because the win more sure   . before i forgot , id like to say belated happy birthday to stake and thanks for that generous bonus you gave  .

[BTCevo]

This is such a close game.

Why risking such a huge amount when you can win only 2.02x ? Chances on loosing/winning is 50/50. It is so easy to lose, when winning amount could be not so huge.

For some big money staked it is good enough just to win only 2x but when you have only small bet, I think multiplier and luck will play in a role. Because even if you win with 2.02x, you will only get tiny amount. That is why 2.02x for some big amount is really enjoyable instead of betting small amount. Anyway, I do not think that it is 50/50 chance here, the chance is even below 50 because of the 2.02x multiplier so yes, he is really lucky to win this huge

[adaseb]

What that guy is asking doesn't make much sense in my opinion. Sure you can win 2x as much when you put lower odds but your chances of losing your money is also increased by 2x.

No whale is going to deposit 10 BTC and bet on 9900x when its most likely going to be a sure loss. Sure its possible somewhere within 10000 rolls but it doesn't make sense to roll such a large amount when the outcome is going to be most likely negative.

This would be like Warren Buffet putting all his money into 1 penny stock. Sure he would be ultra rich if that penny stock was successful but most likely it would just be a loss.

[Haunebu]

I was trying to say, that when a person gambles with such a huge amount, why play only with 2.02 multiplier. Come on, you are risking with a lot of money, go all-in, make it at least 4x. game.

You do realize that the house edge is a critical factor here, don't you? Winning with a x2.02 multiplier itself is a big deal and its easy to make these statements when your money is not on the line here.

Satisfaction of winning 24k when you bet 8k, is greater than winning 8k when you bet 8k 

Hilarious. Lets change this up. Compare the satisfaction of winning $8K after betting $8K to losing $8K when trying to win a bigger amount with higher risk involved. Any amount of profit is profit at the end of the day.

[TopTort777]

I was trying to say, that when a person gambles with such a huge amount, why play only with 2.02 multiplier. Come on, you are risking with a lot of money, go all-in, make it at least 4x. game.

Satisfaction of winning 24k when you bet 8k, is greater than winning 8k when you bet 8k  

I was trying to say, that when a person gambles with such a huge amount, why play only with 2.02 multiplier. Come on, you are risking with a lot of money, go all-in, make it at least 4x. game.

You do realize that the house edge is a critical factor here, don't you? Winning with a x2.02 multiplier itself is a big deal and its easy to make these statements when your money is not on the line here.

Satisfaction of winning 24k when you bet 8k, is greater than winning 8k when you bet 8k 

Hilarious. Lets change this up. Compare the satisfaction of winning $8K after betting $8K to losing $8K when trying to win a bigger amount with higher risk involved. Any amount of profit is profit at the end of the day.

This is such a close game.

Why risking such a huge amount when you can win only 2.02x ? Chances on loosing/winning is 50/50. It is so easy to lose, when winning amount could be not so huge.

For some big money staked it is good enough just to win only 2x but when you have only small bet, I think multiplier and luck will play in a role. Because even if you win with 2.02x, you will only get tiny amount. That is why 2.02x for some big amount is really enjoyable instead of betting small amount. Anyway, I do not think that it is 50/50 chance here, the chance is even below 50 because of the 2.02x multiplier so yes, he is really lucky to win this huge

Damn guys, you really attacked me with your comments like pride of lions 

I will rephrase my idea. If I will earn enough to make a 8k bet, I will be less disappointed if I lose when betting with 4x multiplier. Because I could have won a lot, but have lost.

Any amount of profit is profit at the end of the day.

With that kind of idea, I could brag with 1 ripple bet, winning another 1 ripple coin    Because "Any amount of profit is profit at the end of the day."

P.S. Sorry for my bad English, as it is not my native tongue.

[Cent21]

Is there a way to search for a bet if i have the bet id?

I'm looking for a way to see the game results for a specified number of bet id. I know i can see the last 50 clicking on bet list but what if the bet is older?

[Avirunes]

Is there a way to search for a bet if i have the bet id?

I'm looking for a way to see the game results for a specified number of bet id. I know i can see the last 50 clicking on bet list but what if the bet is older?

Don't know if there is any specific search section for this but I think you can search a bet by typing in chat section. Type "Bet:[You_bet_ID_Here]" and post it. Click the link that will be posted in the chat.

Also replace [You_bet_ID_Here] with your Bet ID.

[Haunebu]

With that kind of idea, I could brag with 1 ripple bet, winning another 1 ripple coin    Because "Any amount of profit is profit at the end of the day."

P.S. Sorry for my bad English, as it is not my native tongue.

Your english is absolutely fine. You are clearly from a minority who think that betting with big multipliers and higher risk is better than betting with smaller multipliers and low risk which is why many including me disagree with you.

The best multiplier in my opinion is anything close to x2 odds(Not too low or high from 2.0). Honestly, I would be happy that I earned any amount of profit since gamblers lose almost always majority of the time. ROI is what matters at the end of the day.

[panjul07]

Is there a way to search for a bet if i have the bet id?

I'm looking for a way to see the game results for a specified number of bet id. I know i can see the last 50 clicking on bet list but what if the bet is older?

Don't know if there is any specific search section for this but I think you can search a bet by typing in chat section. Type "Bet:[You_bet_ID_Here]" and post it. Click the link that will be posted in the chat.

Also replace [You_bet_ID_Here] with your Bet ID.

Yeah posting it the chatbox is the fastest way to check betID although there is also bet history as well as bet archive which is the place for all of our bet but it will take too long time to search it.
@Cent21, click on your username the find "transactions", click it and you will see Bets and Bet Archive for very old bets. Bet Archive let you to download your bets based on the date you play, the type of the file is json.

[justdimin]

I think if you are risking too much money on contrary you should play with higher odds of winning, like if you can do you should go for 1.

1 instead of 2.02 because you are risking way too much already and there is no point of risking it even more, if you do x4 there is a bigger chance of losing all of it and we don't know how rich that person is, maybe he has 10+ million dollars, then yeah he wouldn't mind but maybe he has like 50 thousand dollars total and betting 8 thousand of it, in which case he should not make those type of bets but there are gambling addicts so lets assume they do, the clearest choice would be the high odds of winning so you can at least not lose your money (not even focus on how much you would win, it is more about how you are not losing) but that is my thought of course, everyone has their own.

[Symphonized]

How did you go on the weekend in the Stake Fantasy Premier League?

Remember it is not too late to join, and prizes are given away every single week!
See details here: https://forum.stake.com/topic/24436-20192020-fantasy-premier-league-giveaway/

Let us know your score below, and like if you're apart of the Stake league!





There's a $1000 race starting in 10 minutes!
Are you ready? 🏁

[Symphonized]

It's been nearly a month since the launch of our newest game 🚀🚀
What's your favourite part about the game?

Chuck us a like if you've seen Gary pop up on Crash recently 😉

[dark08]

I think if you are risking too much money on contrary you should play with higher odds of winning, like if you can do you should go for 1.

1 instead of 2.02 because you are risking way too much already and there is no point of risking it even more, if you do x4 there is a bigger chance of losing all of it and we don't know how rich that person is, maybe he has 10+ million dollars, then yeah he wouldn't mind but maybe he has like 50 thousand dollars total and betting 8 thousand of it, in which case he should not make those type of bets but there are gambling addicts so lets assume they do, the clearest choice would be the high odds of winning so you can at least not lose your money (not even focus on how much you would win, it is more about how you are not losing) but that is my thought of course, everyone has their own.

I'm also thinking as the same as you mentioned above this person is rich to make that bet, everytime I checked stake there so many lucky person to make a huge profit I made some strategy but in the end its resulting to lose my fund maybe I will try some strategy again in some games.

[adaseb]

I think if you are risking too much money on contrary you should play with higher odds of winning, like if you can do you should go for 1.

1 instead of 2.02 because you are risking way too much already and there is no point of risking it even more, if you do x4 there is a bigger chance of losing all of it and we don't know how rich that person is, maybe he has 10+ million dollars, then yeah he wouldn't mind but maybe he has like 50 thousand dollars total and betting 8 thousand of it, in which case he should not make those type of bets but there are gambling addicts so lets assume they do, the clearest choice would be the high odds of winning so you can at least not lose your money (not even focus on how much you would win, it is more about how you are not losing) but that is my thought of course, everyone has their own.

This isn't always an effective strategy. Sure you can go and bet with a 90-10 odds of winning but what happens when somewhere in the first 5 rolls you end up with a loser, then you lost basically 10x of your base bet. Since the bets are completely indepedant statistically, I don't think the higher or lower the odds make a difference unless you are betting 1 BTC and are using the 9900x bet odds.

Gambling addicts aren't the people who bet a large BTC amount or people who bet with higher odds. Most gambling addicts basically bet small amounts like $50 or $100 or so and they usually try and go for the quickest wins and that is generally betting on 50/50. However due to greed, even if they win a large amount they usually end up betting it all until they end up losing everything. A whale is different because they got lots of money and greed and fear isnt a factor in their bets.