BusyBeaverHP
|
|
August 18, 2014, 11:15:56 PM Last edit: August 18, 2014, 11:36:58 PM by BusyBeaverHP |
|
So I accidentally hit "MAX" today and this is what happened: https://i.imgur.com/re2PNEa.jpgThe good news is that I doubled my bet and rained the shit out of chat. The bad news is that everyone can see my bankroll now. ... Stunna: you should really create a secondary prompt to confirm max bets... Accidents might happen again. There is text on roll button says confirm bla bla. That is not enough ? Where do u look while u bet man ? Im so glad it ended up good for u ! Tnx for tip ! See yaa , have that crazy luck stick with u . Let me explain to you where I'm looking while betting, with one screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/ul00Gcn.jpgMultitasking is hard work! LOL u are worse than me http://prntscr.com/4dyhc6 You need a second screen! and it's tough being OCD
|
|
|
|
michael555
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
August 19, 2014, 01:44:38 AM |
|
Is it just me getting this with firefox? Something in the server broke! Please note that Mobile Site is not available yet.
|
|
|
|
Bit_Happy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
|
|
August 19, 2014, 03:12:29 AM |
|
PD3 "Bug" Report: In the latest Chrome browser PD3 with auto-bet has a "huge, limitless" memory leak. The longer you use auto-bet, the more memory gets used and people with older computers (possibly even any computer) will have their machine crawl towards "freezing up" unless you close Chrome and start over.
It is useable (on and off) for "a couple hours" but eventually will consume an insane amount of memory.
Will forward this on to our developer right now. I did run autobet once for whole night like 9-11h , and i did not have that problem, atleast i did not notice it . It made like 40k+ bets , and it busted .
And i don't have rly powerful pc.
A useful report should include some numbers: The computer has 2.0 G of actual memory and more (much slower "disk-based memory") available when needed, to avoid complete crashes. Just recently, I started playing PD3 with very close to 1.0 Gig of memory being used by all open programs; After only ~15 minutes of auto-bet, it is at ~1.53 G being used (not yet slowing down performance) Last night (after playing more) it was ~3.23 G (100% of actual memory and some on the disk), and that is the highest ever noticed on this machine. Note: It's very possible that something about my computer is "partially to blame", but other websites and programs never do this, so I called it a "bug", that's all.
|
|
|
|
dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
|
August 19, 2014, 03:32:56 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? What does random.org and MD5 hashing have to do with playing on PrimeDice?
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
michael555
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
August 19, 2014, 03:36:08 AM |
|
Website won't work on my updated chrome, firefox or safari?? :S
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
August 19, 2014, 03:44:38 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? What does random.org and MD5 hashing have to do with playing on PrimeDice? I think he uses MD5 to set a seed? I dont know.
|
|
|
|
BusyBeaverHP
|
|
August 19, 2014, 04:15:28 AM Last edit: August 19, 2014, 05:35:07 AM by BusyBeaverHP |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? What does random.org and MD5 hashing have to do with playing on PrimeDice? I'm glad you asked. Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently. I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world...
|
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
|
August 19, 2014, 04:17:36 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? What does random.org and MD5 hashing have to do with playing on PrimeDice? I'm glad you asked. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivation versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak is about 1 in 119, my actual strategy after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 215. I have a similar record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). So in the long run you expect to predict a pattern or is it just a part of your OCD?
|
|
|
|
BusyBeaverHP
|
|
August 19, 2014, 04:21:57 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? What does random.org and MD5 hashing have to do with playing on PrimeDice? I'm glad you asked. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivation versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak is about 1 in 119, my actual strategy after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 215. I have a similar record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). So in the long run you expect to predict a pattern or is it just a part of your OCD? I have a series of falsifiable hypotheses to be tested out. To me, it isn't about finding a winning strategy, after all, the house edge will fail any strategy in the long run, it is about finding the point of failure, and determine the risks vs reward in pursuing my betting pattern.
|
|
|
|
dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
|
August 19, 2014, 05:54:59 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? I'm glad you asked. Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently. I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world... So that's a "yes"? I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy. I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go.
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
nicemycoin
|
|
August 19, 2014, 06:29:19 AM |
|
where is the sig code for full member ?I have to update it now .
|
|
|
|
Holdaaja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 19, 2014, 06:30:10 AM |
|
where is the sig code for full member ?I have to update it now .
Full members are not allowed anymore. And this isn't signature thread... This is the right thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387.0And it says: Legendary member - 0.0013BTC Per constructive post Hero Member - 0.0012BTC Per constructive post Senior Member - 0.001BTC Per constructive post Lower members no longer allowed
|
|
|
|
Anastasio
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Whatever you do, take care of your shoes.
|
|
August 19, 2014, 06:40:10 AM |
|
I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go.
Like to share that she finally went the right way for me. Gotta give Stunna a +1 for his understanding. You guys can put me in the "happy hour miracle club" now. Turned a 10k satoshi bet into .99 on a single roll. Feelings were good that night, estatic I can finally celebrate properly. Now only if I was home, and not on vacation...
|
|
|
|
BusyBeaverHP
|
|
August 19, 2014, 06:47:14 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? I'm glad you asked. Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently. I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world... So that's a "yes"? I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy. I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go. The same craziness that launched us into space and then invent magical internet money, oh yes... that kind of crazy I actually have a powerpoint spelling out all the ifs and thens of my betting procedure that I share with real-life friends. With data recording the outcome of my betting procedure, I'm prodding at the low-tiered losing streaks and seeing how frequently they show up versus the mathematical expectation. Let's say that in 100,000 rolls, I'm supposed to find 800-900 7+ streak failures, and in my experiment, I only find 400-500. If the number holds up to the current trends, that is a significant advantage because that smaller failure platform means fewer numbers of higher-tiered failures can be supported on top of that, and from there, I can recalculate my wager based on observed risks. Now once I've collected enough data, I should be able to use something like the Student's t-test to determine how significantly different it is from the normal distribution of a null control dataset. It will be published free of charge after I have retired from this gambling thingy. It's data-driven, and it'll be awesome...
|
|
|
|
Stunna (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
|
|
August 19, 2014, 09:04:32 AM |
|
So I accidentally hit "MAX" today and this is what happened: https://i.imgur.com/re2PNEa.jpgThe good news is that I doubled my bet and rained the shit out of chat. The bad news is that everyone can see my bankroll now. ... Stunna: you should really create a secondary prompt to confirm max bets... Accidents might happen again. There is text on roll button says confirm bla bla. That is not enough ? Where do u look while u bet man ? Im so glad it ended up good for u ! Tnx for tip ! See yaa , have that crazy luck stick with u . Let me explain to you where I'm looking while betting, with one screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/ul00Gcn.jpgMultitasking is hard work! This would make me dizzy to look at over a long period of time. Tons of issues are slowly being resolved, we're working through everything we can.
|
|
|
|
broolstoryco
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
Enemy of the State
|
|
August 19, 2014, 09:59:36 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? I'm glad you asked. Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently. I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world... So that's a "yes"? I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy. I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go. The same craziness that launched us into space and then invent magical internet money, oh yes... that kind of crazy I actually have a powerpoint spelling out all the ifs and thens of my betting procedure that I share with real-life friends. With data recording the outcome of my betting procedure, I'm prodding at the low-tiered losing streaks and seeing how frequently they show up versus the mathematical expectation. Let's say that in 100,000 rolls, I'm supposed to find 800-900 7+ streak failures, and in my experiment, I only find 400-500. If the number holds up to the current trends, that is a significant advantage because that smaller failure platform means fewer numbers of higher-tiered failures can be supported on top of that, and from there, I can recalculate my wager based on observed risks. Now once I've collected enough data, I should be able to use something like the Student's t-test to determine how significantly different it is from the normal distribution of a null control dataset. It will be published free of charge after I have retired from this gambling thingy. It's data-driven, and it'll be awesome... You are an idiot. Go take some Coursera intro to stats course and stop spewing bullshit mixed with math 'buzzwords'.
|
|
|
|
MICRO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1037
CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com
|
|
August 19, 2014, 10:09:34 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? I'm glad you asked. Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently. I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world... So that's a "yes"? I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy. I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go. Lol i would say , definitely yes ! . I don't think that any of that has any effect. Few days ago zsmo managed to turn 1 btc into 69 btc and then lose it all in 5 bets , he did not have strategy at all , just random betting on 2x and bunch of RLY lucky all ins . Then couple of max bets , and bye bye. He managed to wager 2200+ btc in just like 30 mins with only 1btc .
|
|
|
|
waterpile
|
|
August 19, 2014, 11:20:01 AM |
|
Website won't work on my updated chrome, firefox or safari?? :S
did you try clearing your cache?
|
|
|
|
BitsBitsBits
|
|
August 19, 2014, 11:24:08 AM |
|
Are you some kind of a crazy person? I'm glad you asked. Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls. I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy. Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently. I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world... So that's a "yes"? I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy. I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go. Lol i would say , definitely yes ! . I don't think that any of that has any effect. Few days ago zsmo managed to turn 1 btc into 69 btc and then lose it all in 5 bets , he did not have strategy at all , just random betting on 2x and bunch of RLY lucky all ins . Then couple of max bets , and bye bye. He managed to wager 2200+ btc in just like 30 mins with only 1btc . Dang, i didn't even know that he played like that, I saw him on the leaderboards and was astounded by the amount wagered he/she already had. PD had been up for like a day or two at that time, lol.
|
|
|
|
nicemycoin
|
|
August 19, 2014, 01:57:30 PM |
|
Stunna,will you pay me the posts from 7.17-8.17?
|
|
|
|
|