Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot!

[broolstoryco]

Are you some kind of a crazy person?

I'm glad you asked.

Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls.

I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy.

Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently.

I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world...

So that's a "yes"?  

I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy.

I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go.

The same craziness that launched us into space and then invent magical internet money, oh yes... that kind of crazy  

I actually have a powerpoint spelling out all the ifs and thens of my betting procedure that I share with real-life friends.

With data recording the outcome of my betting procedure, I'm prodding at the low-tiered losing streaks and seeing how frequently they show up versus the mathematical expectation. Let's say that in 100,000 rolls, I'm supposed to find 800-900 7+ streak failures, and in my experiment, I only find 400-500.

If the number holds up to the current trends, that is a significant advantage because that smaller failure platform means fewer numbers of higher-tiered failures can be supported on top of that, and from there, I can recalculate my wager based on observed risks.

Now once I've collected enough data, I should be able to use something like the Student's t-test to determine how significantly different it is from the normal distribution of a null control dataset. It will be published free of charge after I have retired from this gambling thingy.

It's data-driven, and it'll be awesome...  

You are an idiot. Go take some Coursera intro to stats course and stop spewing bullshit mixed with math 'buzzwords'.

[MICRO]

Are you some kind of a crazy person?

I'm glad you asked.

Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls.

I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy.

Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently.

I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world...

So that's a "yes"? 

I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy.

I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go.

Lol i would say , definitely yes ! .

I don't think that any of that has any effect.

Few days ago zsmo managed to turn 1 btc into 69 btc and then lose it all in 5 bets , he did not have strategy at all , just random betting on 2x and bunch of RLY lucky all ins . Then couple of max bets , and bye bye.

He managed to wager 2200+ btc in just like 30 mins with only 1btc .

[waterpile]

Website won't work on my updated chrome, firefox or safari?? :S

did you try clearing your cache?

[BitsBitsBits]

Are you some kind of a crazy person?

I'm glad you asked.

Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls.

I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy.

Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently.

I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world...

So that's a "yes"? 

I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy.

I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go.

Lol i would say , definitely yes ! .

I don't think that any of that has any effect.

Few days ago zsmo managed to turn 1 btc into 69 btc and then lose it all in 5 bets , he did not have strategy at all , just random betting on 2x and bunch of RLY lucky all ins . Then couple of max bets , and bye bye.

He managed to wager 2200+ btc in just like 30 mins with only 1btc .

Dang, i didn't even know that he played like that, I saw him on the leaderboards and was astounded by the amount wagered he/she already had. PD had been up for like a day or two at that time, lol.

[nicemycoin]

Stunna,will you pay me the posts from 7.17-8.17?

[MICRO]

Stunna,will you pay me the posts from 7.17-8.17?

This is a topic for sig campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387




Lol i just sent 0.015 btc tip to one of my refs, now everybody wants to be my ref Hahaha... LOL guys it doesn't work like that .
Joe made me 0.044 btc and i sent him only small part of that back . 

[marcell99]

Is that possible that the chat doesn't send message on firefox? On Chrome it works great but on firefox, not only not updating for minutes, but not sending messages either.

[Holdaaja]

Stunna,will you pay me the posts from 7.17-8.17?

This is a topic for sig campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387




Lol i just sent 0.015 btc tip to one of my refs, now everybody wants to be my ref Hahaha... LOL guys it doesn't work like that .
Joe made me 0.044 btc and i sent him only small part of that back .  

If it makes you profit why wouldn't you send part of the profit back to all your new refs?

But if you say it won't work like that for you, then....

Guys, that is exactly how it works with me! Sing up under my ref and I will tip 30% of my profits back to you!

30% back link: https://primedice.com/?ref=Holdaaja

[cHoCo]

hi i got a problem i can sent a message what to do?? let me know.

[Holdaaja]

hi i got a problem i can sent a message what to do?? let me know.

You are probably banned for spamming or begging etc.

[cHoCo]

hi i got a problem i can sent a message what to do?? let me know.

You are probably banned for spamming or begging etc.

no way i did not beg or spam there..

except there are some users who is saying tip me tip me i just ssay dont do that .. so i get banned ? lol

[Holdaaja]

hi i got a problem i can sent a message what to do?? let me know.

You are probably banned for spamming or begging etc.

no way i did not beg or spam there..

except there are some users who is saying tip me tip me i just ssay dont do that .. so i get banned ? lol

I don't think saying "don't beg" gets you banned.
Unless you spam it like all the time?
Might been mistake too, Micro can probably tell us the reason for (possible) ban.

[MICRO]

Stunna,will you pay me the posts from 7.17-8.17?

This is a topic for sig campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387




Lol i just sent 0.015 btc tip to one of my refs, now everybody wants to be my ref Hahaha... LOL guys it doesn't work like that .
Joe made me 0.044 btc and i sent him only small part of that back .  

If it makes you profit why wouldn't you send part of the profit back to all your new refs?

But if you say it won't work like that for you, then....

Guys, that is exactly how it works with me! Sing up under my ref and I will tip 30% of my profits back to you!

30% back link: https://primedice.com/?ref=Holdaaja

LOL , it doesn't work like that , i meant u can't just register under my ref and expect me to pay u LOL .
Ofc as u see when my refs make me profit i send them like idk depending how much they need , i would give them up to 80% back depending on how much they earned me.

But i won't get much refs , i hate to post ref links . I have ref link in my sig only .

[Holdaaja]

Stunna,will you pay me the posts from 7.17-8.17?

This is a topic for sig campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387




Lol i just sent 0.015 btc tip to one of my refs, now everybody wants to be my ref Hahaha... LOL guys it doesn't work like that .
Joe made me 0.044 btc and i sent him only small part of that back .  

If it makes you profit why wouldn't you send part of the profit back to all your new refs?

But if you say it won't work like that for you, then....

Guys, that is exactly how it works with me! Sing up under my ref and I will tip 30% of my profits back to you!

30% back link: https://primedice.com/?ref=Holdaaja

LOL , it doesn't work like that , i meant u can't just register under my ref and expect me to pay u LOL .
Ofc as u see when my refs make me profit i send them like idk depending how much they need , i would give them up to 80% back depending on how much they earned me.

But i won't get much refs , i hate to post ref links . I have ref link in my sig only .

Actually you did post your ref link in this thread when PD3 came out
And you might not have much refs but you have got a lot commission from them.

I haven't got nearly as lucky as you:

[MICRO]

Stunna,will you pay me the posts from 7.17-8.17?

This is a topic for sig campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387




Lol i just sent 0.015 btc tip to one of my refs, now everybody wants to be my ref Hahaha... LOL guys it doesn't work like that .
Joe made me 0.044 btc and i sent him only small part of that back . 

If it makes you profit why wouldn't you send part of the profit back to all your new refs?

But if you say it won't work like that for you, then....

Guys, that is exactly how it works with me! Sing up under my ref and I will tip 30% of my profits back to you!

30% back link: https://primedice.com/?ref=Holdaaja

LOL , it doesn't work like that , i meant u can't just register under my ref and expect me to pay u LOL .
Ofc as u see when my refs make me profit i send them like idk depending how much they need , i would give them up to 80% back depending on how much they earned me.

But i won't get much refs , i hate to post ref links . I have ref link in my sig only .

Actually you did post your ref link in this thread when PD3 came out
And you might not have much refs but you have got a lot commission from them.

I haven't got nearly as lucky as you:

Yeah i did once . But that mostly doesn't work. .

My commission is updated now to 20% so should be fun to see how it will go in the next few days .

[Farmer17]

My commission is updated now to 20% so should be fun to see how it will go in the next few days .

Is the 20% applied only to your new future ref earning, or is it applied retrospectively to all your ref earning?

[MICRO]

My commission is updated now to 20% so should be fun to see how it will go in the next few days .

Is the 20% applied only to your new future ref earning, or is it applied retrospectively to all your ref earning?

Only to new earnings . I earned 0.34btc with 10% commission.

[Holdaaja]

My commission is updated now to 20% so should be fun to see how it will go in the next few days .

Is the 20% applied only to your new future ref earning, or is it applied retrospectively to all your ref earning?

Only to new earnings . I earned 0.34btc with 10% commission.

Do you know is it possible to get it to 20% even if I don't use it in my signature currently?

[Farmer17]

My commission is updated now to 20% so should be fun to see how it will go in the next few days .

Is the 20% applied only to your new future ref earning, or is it applied retrospectively to all your ref earning?

Only to new earnings . I earned 0.34btc with 10% commission.

I see, so You have got some big whale ref lol (at 10%, that 12 persons need to bet 375btc to generate 0.34btc ref earning for you). 

[BusyBeaverHP]

Are you some kind of a crazy person?

I'm glad you asked.

Random.org is a True Random Number Generator that I use under certain conditions as a Hi/Low decider to ensure that I don't have any cyclical betting patterns that may turn into a weakness under exposure to a large number of rolls.

I actually SHA-256 hash my seeds and truncate a part of it to fit into the PD3 client seed. Like I said in another thread: OCD about entropy.

Notice the Excel sheet, I keep record of the periodicity of 7+ streak failures to investigate my strategy with a series of value derivations versus the mathematical expectations. The mathematical expected odds of running into a 7+ streak failure given 49.5% odds is about 1 in 119, my strategy in practice after 20,000 rolls is about 1 in 220 currently.

I have a similar 20,000 roll record of PD2 that also reflected this trend (at 1 in 238, exactly 2x). One day when I have met my set BTC quota, I may just share the details my findings with the world...

So that's a "yes"?  

I recently turned 0.018 BTC into 1.444 BTC on prcdice using a stupid bunch of 49.5% and 45% martingales and a bunch of 90% all-ins. That's an increase of over 80 times. Then I turned it into 0 BTC using the same strategy.

I'm willing to share my findings with the world: It's just the way she goes; sometimes she goes, sometimes she doesn't go.

Lol i would say , definitely yes ! .

I don't think that any of that has any effect.

Few days ago zsmo managed to turn 1 btc into 69 btc and then lose it all in 5 bets , he did not have strategy at all , just random betting on 2x and bunch of RLY lucky all ins . Then couple of max bets , and bye bye.

He managed to wager 2200+ btc in just like 30 mins with only 1btc .

I intuitively think my betting method shouldn't have any effect on the statistics whatsoever, but both of my datasets across two different betting environments says otherwise. In science, we have falsifiable tests to dispel crackpot theories, and I'm going to test my crackpot theory

Suppose that I flip a coin 100 times, and it turned up heads 60 times, you could say with good confidence that it is within acceptable standard deviation of the norm.

Suppose that I flip a coin 40,000 times and it turned up heads 24,000 times, that is so many standard deviations out there that additional questions about underlying fundamentals need to be asked.

You can guess where I'm going with this.

As the last word, it seems like some people with angry-little-man syndrome is attacking me for putting my honest idea idea out there without considering the content of my dataset... I should be used to it as putting new ideas out there is considered threatening to those who do not think critically... much like Galileo and the Church.