Stevenrm87
|
|
June 04, 2013, 06:51:49 PM |
|
I'm sorry but this doesn't seem remotely like a fair launch to me. I was on different coins sometimes a whole day later than this one and had more coins in an hour than I do right now. I now have been throwing 1400 kH/s at this for 2 hours and a 1000 kH/s for an hour before that and have 58 coins to show for it, 5 of those being donated from some nice miner. Part of the fun of a new coin is finding blocks solo, I remember when I found 2 litecoin blocks in 2 days when everyone said it was not worth soloing a few months after it had launched and that was with a single 4890, lol. I know all my settings are correct as I mine all kinds of different coins and have different cgminer folders for each miner. Infact this is my settings except I turn the intensity up if I am not at the computer, my other 2 PCs are running at 18.
So you're saying a fair launch means get you a ton of coins? Fair launch means that tons of people get a small amount of coins. Which seems to be the case with this coin. Dude, did you skip the wallet pic with over 5K in it? YOu hating this coin so much that u changed your default pic to it?
|
Selling fully funded Titan BTC Physical Bitcoins, Gold and SIlver - BTC Physical Bitcoins BTC PM if interested.
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 07:05:11 PM |
|
sorry i havn't had a chance to connect you your pool yet. i will try to do it later tonight.... for those of you whom are going ot try i suggest making a new pool folder so you don't have to worry about deleting data folder. and for simple upgrade just run the new pool on the same port as your current pool so you wont lose connection for your miners. edit: i updated my source www.github.com/novaspirit/p2poolFunny thing is I almost used xsync as the domain name as I own that for other stuff What do you think of the SPREAD value? I'm not opposed to changing it. dgc.xpool.net as found 12 blocks so far today. Two appear to be orphans. If SPREAD=30 would reduce that I'm all for it but everything appears to be running so well from both the server and client(miner) side with SPREAD=90. I think SPREAD=30 came from an early post in this tread where someone had a sample network.py setting. It was a copy of the settings for franko as he missed changing a few parts from franko (it said franko in parts).
|
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 07:31:22 PM |
|
p2pool\networks.py SPREAD=90, # blocks IDENTIFIER='7696CFD6441FB537'.decode('hex'), PREFIX='4C2530B5ED0E1EB5'.decode('hex'), P2P_PORT=23396, WORKER_PORT=8810
I can see that the published P2Pool code in post #1 has alternate values for the following :- p2pool/network.py SPREAD=72, # blocks IDENTIFIER='a5aed03050126d6d'.decode('hex'), PREFIX='b6c0601991aa19a3'.decode('hex'), P2P_PORT=25396, WORKER_PORT=25397,
Would you be able to let us know why you chose those values? At least that way we can all come to a consensus P2Pool. I chose SPREAD=90 since from research on the forum I found that this is suppose to be based on the block target time of the altcoin. bitcoin SPREAD=3 block every 600 seconds Baseline litecoin SPREAD=12 block every 150 seconds 600/150=4 4x3=12 bbqcoin SPREAD=30 block every 60 seconds 600/60=10 10x3=30 digitalcoin SPREAD=90 block every 20 seconds 600/20=30 30x3=90 Please correct me if this is wrong! IDENTIFIER, PREFIX and P2P_PORT are random but have to match from pool to pool to successfully connect. Again, got this from researching on the forum so please let me know if you find something to the contrary. Also, not sure if my values are valid since I just used random 19 digit numbers and converted them to hex. WORKER_PORT is the port miners will connect to. This can be unique for each pool. bitcoin SPREAD=3 block every 600 seconds Baseline litecoin SPREAD=12 block every 150 seconds 600/150=4 4x3=12 bbqcoin SPREAD=30 block every 60 seconds 600/60=10 10x3=30 digitalcoin SPREAD=90 block every 20 seconds 600/20=30 30x3=90 worldcoin SPREAD=120 block every 15 seconds 600/15=40 40x3=120 Added my spread setting for worldcoin. The guy who really knows this stuff is Narken as he has a release for a lot of altcoins: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198175
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin.Greece
|
|
June 04, 2013, 07:42:48 PM |
|
hi guys. i made a new pool for digital. the adress is http://mineallcoins.com:19327/static/ the fee is like 1% (in order to pay the deticated.) i would really love if you could give help here Nice pool dude ... Only 3% DOA and 1% fees .... I am jumping in ...
|
Get a VPN - Protect yourself
|
|
|
baritus (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
|
June 04, 2013, 08:05:34 PM |
|
napoleon, I've added the pool to the main list. There is an important discussion happening about what P2pool settings should be the DGC standard. You can read the previous posts to get an idea.
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
Sikon024
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2013, 08:39:18 PM |
|
Anybody know what happened to the turbocoin pool? Its been down for several days and I never got to cash out.
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 04, 2013, 08:40:24 PM |
|
Does anyone know the location of a working block explorer? The only one I know of ( http://dgc.p2pool.nl/chain/Digitalcoins) has been down for over a day now...
|
|
|
|
akabane
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
June 04, 2013, 09:02:42 PM |
|
About P2Pool, I also think that increasing the spread value might reduce orphan shares between p2pool nodes. We have to test with at least two nodes connected to make conclusion. My first try with a spread value of 72 has reduced them but I am sure we can do better. Maybe 90 is the right one.
I will update my git repository and my p2pool with it so that we can test.
|
|
|
|
napoleon2121
|
|
June 04, 2013, 09:16:10 PM |
|
hi guys. i made a new pool for digital. the adress is http://mineallcoins.com:19327/static/ the fee is like 1% (in order to pay the deticated.) i would really love if you could give help here Nice pool dude ... Only 3% DOA and 1% fees .... I am jumping in ... tnk youuu
|
|
|
|
baritus (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
|
June 04, 2013, 09:18:00 PM |
|
2500 post! Also, DGC is doing very well at cryptsy.com, so make sure to check it.
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 09:24:11 PM |
|
2500 post! Also, DGC is doing very well at cryptsy.com, so make sure to check it.
Thanks for all the support baritus!
|
|
|
|
baritus (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
|
June 04, 2013, 09:25:10 PM |
|
2500 post! Also, DGC is doing very well at cryptsy.com, so make sure to check it.
Thanks for all the support baritus! Anything for my community.
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
akabane
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
June 04, 2013, 09:34:20 PM |
|
Update on p2pool testing : spread 90 is definitely not a good value, it give too much reject.
|
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 10:06:21 PM |
|
Update on p2pool testing : spread 90 is definitely not a good value, it give too much reject.
Did you try creating a new pool folder as x3maniac suggested?
|
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 10:12:03 PM |
|
..or maybe run in a separate instance in a different folder as to not interfere with your current miners?
|
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 10:20:21 PM |
|
Screenshot of my miner with 0.49% rejects:
|
|
|
|
saber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2013, 10:45:10 PM |
|
Intensity 13 and mashing out ~700 Kh/s !? What video card are you running? Getting around 4.56% rejections on nearmiss's pool Its either my configuration or the pool.
|
|
|
|
erk
|
|
June 04, 2013, 10:46:36 PM |
|
Can we get DGC onto BTC-e?
|
|
|
|
jbmiller10
|
|
June 04, 2013, 10:46:45 PM |
|
Screenshot of my miner with 0.49% rejects: Intensity 13 and mashing out ~700 Kh/s !? What video card are you running? Getting around 4.56% rejections on nearmiss's pool Its either my configuration or the pool. I'm getting 1-2% on nearmiss's pool. May want to play around with your config...
|
|
|
|
krasnyoktyabr
|
|
June 04, 2013, 10:50:56 PM |
|
Intensity 13 and mashing out ~700 Kh/s !? What video card are you running? Getting around 4.56% rejections on nearmiss's pool Its either my configuration or the pool. They must be 7970s. I've heard they only work optimally at I 13.
|
|
|
|
|