[ANN][ICO] Wanchain - Connecting blockchains to exchange value

[Noruka]

i been waiting to buy this coin for awhile. It does suck that the few i bought of delta can't be swapped. I hear the CEO bullshit ass excuse about keeping it fair, but if that was the intention then why did they utilize ETH token in the first place. Especially knowing the ease of transferring the token to a decentralized exchange.  They could have created a placeholder token on their platform that couldn't be accessed till the new wanchain coin is available and swapped.

No disrespect, but it was pretty much stated from the jump that EDelta tokens were no good.  Even if a placehodler token is made, there will always be some work around that scammers will try to make to sell the rights to that and people will lose their shirts that way.  Eth tokens weren't the problem, its the mentality of scammers and swindlers that is the problem, and as long as they can think up elaborate schemes people will get got.  It just so happens it was via EDelta this time.

No disrespect but i invested in Tezo and Exscudo and they all have placeholders and i don't see the scam involved if you buy someone's acct and they sign over the email associated to that acct to you. You will not lose the Tezo and Exscudo that you bought.

 However, utilizing ETH token and blaming individuals that decide to sell their token early on a decentralized exchange( which they facilitated by using ETH token) and then blaming the buyer who might not have known about any prior statement is utter bullshit. And why the fuck wasn't the token locked if that was the issue.

 Also, am not sure how selling a token you paid for during ICO on a decentralized exchange ( b/c it was made available for you to sell) makes you a scammer/swindler.

I think it makes you a scammer if you sold tokens because anyone who was in the ico was told lots of times that you should not buy or sell the tokens as they won't be swapped for wan coins later on. Unfortunately people who weren't in the ico and who bought them on ED may not have known this, so yes you are right, the tokens should have been locked to avoid any confusion.

I understand your position but they have always been very open about their approach so this should usually minimize the drama tbh!

If this drama is true it should have been avoided. Letting people purchase anything worthless on EhterD. is a very bad move. If they want to rescue the project they should present a rescue plan.

[simongoat]

i been waiting to buy this coin for awhile. It does suck that the few i bought of delta can't be swapped. I hear the CEO bullshit ass excuse about keeping it fair, but if that was the intention then why did they utilize ETH token in the first place. Especially knowing the ease of transferring the token to a decentralized exchange.  They could have created a placeholder token on their platform that couldn't be accessed till the new wanchain coin is available and swapped.

No disrespect, but it was pretty much stated from the jump that EDelta tokens were no good.  Even if a placehodler token is made, there will always be some work around that scammers will try to make to sell the rights to that and people will lose their shirts that way.  Eth tokens weren't the problem, its the mentality of scammers and swindlers that is the problem, and as long as they can think up elaborate schemes people will get got.  It just so happens it was via EDelta this time.

No disrespect but i invested in Tezo and Exscudo and they all have placeholders and i don't see the scam involved if you buy someone's acct and they sign over the email associated to that acct to you. You will not lose the Tezo and Exscudo that you bought.

 However, utilizing ETH token and blaming individuals that decide to sell their token early on a decentralized exchange( which they facilitated by using ETH token) and then blaming the buyer who might not have known about any prior statement is utter bullshit. And why the fuck wasn't the token locked if that was the issue.

 Also, am not sure how selling a token you paid for during ICO on a decentralized exchange ( b/c it was made available for you to sell) makes you a scammer/swindler.

I think it makes you a scammer if you sold tokens because anyone who was in the ico was told lots of times that you should not buy or sell the tokens as they won't be swapped for wan coins later on. Unfortunately people who weren't in the ico and who bought them on ED may not have known this, so yes you are right, the tokens should have been locked to avoid any confusion.

I understand your position but they have always been very open about their approach so this should usually minimize the drama tbh!

If this drama is true it should have been avoided. Letting people purchase anything worthless on EhterD. is a very bad move. If they want to rescue the project they should present a rescue plan.

Tokens should have been locked really. Some ICO's do that, it would have avoided any confusion.

[ZeroFiat]

Is there any OTC thread for $WAN? Cheers & thanks

Guess the answer is NO then... hmm 🤔🤔

[kacakkipri]

It might have been better to have the same tactic as the icon project. in the bull market, they could carry their tokens to the market as erc20 and then swap them.

In my opinion, it could have been a stronger rise in this way.

[Noruka]

i been waiting to buy this coin for awhile. It does suck that the few i bought of delta can't be swapped. I hear the CEO bullshit ass excuse about keeping it fair, but if that was the intention then why did they utilize ETH token in the first place. Especially knowing the ease of transferring the token to a decentralized exchange.  They could have created a placeholder token on their platform that couldn't be accessed till the new wanchain coin is available and swapped.

No disrespect, but it was pretty much stated from the jump that EDelta tokens were no good.  Even if a placehodler token is made, there will always be some work around that scammers will try to make to sell the rights to that and people will lose their shirts that way.  Eth tokens weren't the problem, its the mentality of scammers and swindlers that is the problem, and as long as they can think up elaborate schemes people will get got.  It just so happens it was via EDelta this time.

No disrespect but i invested in Tezo and Exscudo and they all have placeholders and i don't see the scam involved if you buy someone's acct and they sign over the email associated to that acct to you. You will not lose the Tezo and Exscudo that you bought.

 However, utilizing ETH token and blaming individuals that decide to sell their token early on a decentralized exchange( which they facilitated by using ETH token) and then blaming the buyer who might not have known about any prior statement is utter bullshit. And why the fuck wasn't the token locked if that was the issue.

 Also, am not sure how selling a token you paid for during ICO on a decentralized exchange ( b/c it was made available for you to sell) makes you a scammer/swindler.

I think it makes you a scammer if you sold tokens because anyone who was in the ico was told lots of times that you should not buy or sell the tokens as they won't be swapped for wan coins later on. Unfortunately people who weren't in the ico and who bought them on ED may not have known this, so yes you are right, the tokens should have been locked to avoid any confusion.

I understand your position but they have always been very open about their approach so this should usually minimize the drama tbh!

If this drama is true it should have been avoided. Letting people purchase anything worthless on EhterD. is a very bad move. If they want to rescue the project they should present a rescue plan.

Tokens should have been locked really. Some ICO's do that, it would have avoided any confusion.

It is a rat move and nothing else. If people with less knowledge are automatically put at a disadvantage this project will go nowhere. You can't exploit the fact that those who didn't have a clue are going to be ripped off.

[angel55]

i been waiting to buy this coin for awhile. It does suck that the few i bought of delta can't be swapped. I hear the CEO bullshit ass excuse about keeping it fair, but if that was the intention then why did they utilize ETH token in the first place. Especially knowing the ease of transferring the token to a decentralized exchange.  They could have created a placeholder token on their platform that couldn't be accessed till the new wanchain coin is available and swapped.

No disrespect, but it was pretty much stated from the jump that EDelta tokens were no good.  Even if a placehodler token is made, there will always be some work around that scammers will try to make to sell the rights to that and people will lose their shirts that way.  Eth tokens weren't the problem, its the mentality of scammers and swindlers that is the problem, and as long as they can think up elaborate schemes people will get got.  It just so happens it was via EDelta this time.

No disrespect but i invested in Tezo and Exscudo and they all have placeholders and i don't see the scam involved if you buy someone's acct and they sign over the email associated to that acct to you. You will not lose the Tezo and Exscudo that you bought.

 However, utilizing ETH token and blaming individuals that decide to sell their token early on a decentralized exchange( which they facilitated by using ETH token) and then blaming the buyer who might not have known about any prior statement is utter bullshit. And why the fuck wasn't the token locked if that was the issue.

 Also, am not sure how selling a token you paid for during ICO on a decentralized exchange ( b/c it was made available for you to sell) makes you a scammer/swindler.

I think it makes you a scammer if you sold tokens because anyone who was in the ico was told lots of times that you should not buy or sell the tokens as they won't be swapped for wan coins later on. Unfortunately people who weren't in the ico and who bought them on ED may not have known this, so yes you are right, the tokens should have been locked to avoid any confusion.

I understand your position but they have always been very open about their approach so this should usually minimize the drama tbh!

If this drama is true it should have been avoided. Letting people purchase anything worthless on EhterD. is a very bad move. If they want to rescue the project they should present a rescue plan.

Tokens should have been locked really. Some ICO's do that, it would have avoided any confusion.

It is a rat move and nothing else. If people with less knowledge are automatically put at a disadvantage this project will go nowhere. You can't exploit the fact that those who didn't have a clue are going to be ripped off.

I agree its a scummy thing to do,  They should honor the tokens bought on etherdelta or innocent people who didn't know anything or going to lose their money.

[l3pox]

are there estimated dates for WAN listing on exchanges already?
in which exchanges you plan to be lsited?

[Bthegreat]

WhenChain ?

[Noruka]

i been waiting to buy this coin for awhile. It does suck that the few i bought of delta can't be swapped. I hear the CEO bullshit ass excuse about keeping it fair, but if that was the intention then why did they utilize ETH token in the first place. Especially knowing the ease of transferring the token to a decentralized exchange.  They could have created a placeholder token on their platform that couldn't be accessed till the new wanchain coin is available and swapped.

No disrespect, but it was pretty much stated from the jump that EDelta tokens were no good.  Even if a placehodler token is made, there will always be some work around that scammers will try to make to sell the rights to that and people will lose their shirts that way.  Eth tokens weren't the problem, its the mentality of scammers and swindlers that is the problem, and as long as they can think up elaborate schemes people will get got.  It just so happens it was via EDelta this time.

No disrespect but i invested in Tezo and Exscudo and they all have placeholders and i don't see the scam involved if you buy someone's acct and they sign over the email associated to that acct to you. You will not lose the Tezo and Exscudo that you bought.

 However, utilizing ETH token and blaming individuals that decide to sell their token early on a decentralized exchange( which they facilitated by using ETH token) and then blaming the buyer who might not have known about any prior statement is utter bullshit. And why the fuck wasn't the token locked if that was the issue.

 Also, am not sure how selling a token you paid for during ICO on a decentralized exchange ( b/c it was made available for you to sell) makes you a scammer/swindler.

I think it makes you a scammer if you sold tokens because anyone who was in the ico was told lots of times that you should not buy or sell the tokens as they won't be swapped for wan coins later on. Unfortunately people who weren't in the ico and who bought them on ED may not have known this, so yes you are right, the tokens should have been locked to avoid any confusion.

I understand your position but they have always been very open about their approach so this should usually minimize the drama tbh!

If this drama is true it should have been avoided. Letting people purchase anything worthless on EhterD. is a very bad move. If they want to rescue the project they should present a rescue plan.

Tokens should have been locked really. Some ICO's do that, it would have avoided any confusion.

It is a rat move and nothing else. If people with less knowledge are automatically put at a disadvantage this project will go nowhere. You can't exploit the fact that those who didn't have a clue are going to be ripped off.

I agree its a scummy thing to do,  They should honor the tokens bought on etherdelta or innocent people who didn't know anything or going to lose their money.

Definitely a difficult situation now that doesn't shed a good light on Wanchain. The crypto community will talk about this issue if they talk about Wanchain... It should really be solved as fairly as possible.

[simongoat]

WhenChain ?

ha ha exactly

[BLAST2MARS]

are there estimated dates for WAN listing on exchanges already?
in which exchanges you plan to be lsited?

I think the hype on this coin is already dead. I've heard that those people shifted to Fusion. Their promises of  that they will list on this date or that date just makes all their supporters disappointed and lose interest in the project.

[wind111]

There are many similar projects as Wanchain, what is make your project different than others?

[xtyling]

There are many similar projects as Wanchain, what is make your project different than others?

No project is similar to Wanchain. Wanchain can be a copy of ETH code base. Then why reinvent the wheel ? Wanchain adds up unique features such as privacy smart contract. POS on ETH. Cross chain.

So excited!

[ciro1]

are there estimated dates for WAN listing on exchanges already?
in which exchanges you plan to be lsited?

I think the hype on this coin is already dead. I've heard that those people shifted to Fusion. Their promises of  that they will list on this date or that date just makes all their supporters disappointed and lose interest in the project.

You don't know what you are talking about if you think WANCHAIN is all about issuing coins and list on exchange for people to ride senseless waves. Wanchain is about rebuilding the finance. What is the use of market if the said purpose isn't realised? I believe they are using this whole time to fine-tune the platform and this is going to be the first project with perfectly working platform before trading start.

[z0n0]

Wanchain indeed is pronounced "w(h)enchain".
At least one coin with name that makes sense. 

[stupid_seb]

Wanchain indeed is pronounced "w(h)enchain".
At least one coin with name that makes sense. 

 I love it!

I like the concept of WAN. It's a bold statement.
I also just saw this coin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3084150
I think it's worth having a look if it's true. Indirect competitor to WAN.

[ciro1]

Wanchain indeed is pronounced "w(h)enchain".
At least one coin with name that makes sense. 

 I love it!

I like the concept of WAN. It's a bold statement.
I also just saw this coin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3084150
I think it's worth having a look if it's true. Indirect competitor to WAN.

Would have been good if you just posted the coin name instead of a link, wouldn't it?

[RodneyGrillery]

Feels like a lot of the hype that Wanchain built up in anticipation of an exchange listing is slowly deteriorating.  I like Wanchain just like most people in here, but from a pure investment standpoint, if Wanchain comes out priced fairly high I don't see the incentive to immediately invest in that over some of these other OBVIOUS market deals.  

I mean the only incentive I have is the idea that hype would cause a nice size pump, but in a market that is slowly bouncing downward that is really risky.  If it comes out priced too high, I wouldn't be shocked if Wanchain pulled a Zilliqa.  Zilliqa hit exchanges and has pretty much tanked slowly but surely ever since, it never had one of those patent crypto pump and dumps, just a dump.

[amacar1]

LATEST 87.54% _ 09-Mar-2018.

[idioma1]

Tell me about your project in a nutshell