List of ongoing scams

[tmbp]

Point proven

You do not act with minimal respect towards me why should I even respect you enough to dedicate minutes of my life reading your posts? Just seems like childish egoism to me.

A point was proven that you are a teenager, or at least posses the mentality of one.

[DiamondCardz]

Thanks for the list

Don't listen to his list, it's just him making bias accusations with no proof. -.-

[ssaCEO]

Weird how Ripple's not on the list  

edit: In all seriousness though, accusations w/o solid evidence are bad news. I appreciate being removed from suspicion here, but I think if someone's going to point fingers there should be formal, serious evidence...not just maybes or could-be's. If someone comes to my house and I can't find my phone the next day, I don't write internet threads about how they might have stolen it. That's kind of jumping the gun. Same with these websites... basically there's evidence they're scammers or there isn't, in which case you shouldn't accuse them of shit.

[DiamondCardz]

Weird how Ripple's not on the list 

It is. For being a "pyramid scheme". Funny. It might be a con, but it's not a pyramid scheme, lol.

[ssaCEO]

Weird how Ripple's not on the list  

It is. For being a "pyramid scheme". Funny. It might be a con, but it's not a pyramid scheme, lol.

What's funny is that it totally is a pyramid scheme, but that's really for another thread  
[ed] it isn't a classic pyramid MLM scheme. But... yeah this is really better saved for another thread completely rather than bumping this one.

[tmbp]

Weird how Ripple's not on the list  

edit: In all seriousness though, accusations w/o solid evidence are bad news. I appreciate being removed from suspicion here, but I think if someone's going to point fingers there should be formal, serious evidence...not just maybes or could-be's. If someone comes to my house and I can't find my phone the next day, I don't write internet threads about how they might have stolen it. That's kind of jumping the gun. Same with these websites... basically there's evidence they're scammers or there isn't, in which case you shouldn't accuse them of shit.

Say I leave my phone on the bed in my bedroom and invite 3 old friends over to the living room, after they leave I find out the phone was stolen, the next day when I politely ask every one of them separately whether they had entered my bedroom one says no while providing positive proof and the other two blatantly refuse to answer.

I think in this situation it would be appropriate to mark the two friends that refused as high chance scammers/thieves. Which is exactly what I'm doing in this thread with Bitcoin services, they can stop it anytime they want if they provide positive proof, but they won't, and they can't, because they are guilty.

[ssaCEO]

Weird how Ripple's not on the list  

edit: In all seriousness though, accusations w/o solid evidence are bad news. I appreciate being removed from suspicion here, but I think if someone's going to point fingers there should be formal, serious evidence...not just maybes or could-be's. If someone comes to my house and I can't find my phone the next day, I don't write internet threads about how they might have stolen it. That's kind of jumping the gun. Same with these websites... basically there's evidence they're scammers or there isn't, in which case you shouldn't accuse them of shit.

Say I leave my phone on the bed in my bedroom and invite 3 old friends over to the living room, after they leave I find out the phone was stolen, the next day when I politely ask every one of them separately whether they had entered my bedroom one says no while providing positive proof and the other two blatantly refuse to answer.

I think in this situation it would be appropriate to mark the two friends that refused as high chance scammers/thieves. Which is exactly what I'm doing in this thread with Bitcoin services, they can stop it anytime they want if they provide positive proof, but they won't, and they can't, because they are guilty.

Just saying, like, what if you do accuse them and later on you find your phone? Or what if you accuse them both, and then it turns out the guy who said "no" actually had his girlfriend over and she took it, so he was telling you the truth? Basically it's just not cool to accuse people unless you know for a fact that they did something. I mean if you played at one of these places and got ripped off then I completely understand you raging about it. But I don't get how you can call them scammers if you haven't tried them or don't have definite proof.

[tmbp]

Weird how Ripple's not on the list  

edit: In all seriousness though, accusations w/o solid evidence are bad news. I appreciate being removed from suspicion here, but I think if someone's going to point fingers there should be formal, serious evidence...not just maybes or could-be's. If someone comes to my house and I can't find my phone the next day, I don't write internet threads about how they might have stolen it. That's kind of jumping the gun. Same with these websites... basically there's evidence they're scammers or there isn't, in which case you shouldn't accuse them of shit.

Say I leave my phone on the bed in my bedroom and invite 3 old friends over to the living room, after they leave I find out the phone was stolen, the next day when I politely ask every one of them separately whether they had entered my bedroom one says no while providing positive proof and the other two blatantly refuse to answer.

I think in this situation it would be appropriate to mark the two friends that refused as high chance scammers/thieves. Which is exactly what I'm doing in this thread with Bitcoin services, they can stop it anytime they want if they provide positive proof, but they won't, and they can't, because they are guilty.

Just saying, like, what if you do accuse them and later on you find your phone? Or what if you accuse them both, and then it turns out the guy who said "no" actually had his girlfriend over and she took it, so he was telling you the truth? Basically it's just not cool to accuse people unless you know for a fact that they did something. I mean if you played at one of these places and got ripped off then I completely understand you raging about it. But I don't get how you can call them scammers if you haven't tried them or don't have definite proof.

I am not listening them by being scams, I am listening them by the chance of them actually being scams, as their actions become more suspicious they go up the list to "Most likely a scam", if I had actually played at one of them and got ripped off then there would be no doubt left.

[dooglus]

Say I leave my phone on the bed in my bedroom and invite 3 old friends over to the living room, after they leave I find out the phone was stolen, the next day when I politely ask every one of them separately whether they had entered my bedroom one says no while providing positive proof and the other two blatantly refuse to answer.

I think in this situation it would be appropriate to mark the two friends that refused as high chance scammers/thieves. Which is exactly what I'm doing in this thread with Bitcoin services, they can stop it anytime they want if they provide positive proof, but they won't, and they can't, because they are guilty.

Two things:

1) It's very hard to prove you didn't do something.  Can you prove to me you've never murderer anyone?  Of course you can't.  How can your friend prove he didn't go into your bedroom?

2) You're labelling your other two friends as "high chance scammers/thieves".  Only one of them stole your phone, at most.  The other one is innocent.  That's a good analogy for what you're doing here.  Labelling innocent parties as "high chance scammers/thieves".

[Darktongue]

Hey I might act like a teenager.  But at least my morals are high enough to not bare false witness against innocent people.  I saidwhat I did to pprove a point and you fell right into the trap.  If you dish shit out you better be ready to take it. 

[tmbp]

Two things:

1) It's very hard to prove you didn't do something.  Can you prove to me you've never murderer anyone?  Of course you can't.  How can your friend prove he didn't go into your bedroom?

2) You're labelling your other two friends as "high chance scammers/thieves".  Only one of them stole your phone, at most.  The other one is innocent.  That's a good analogy for what you're doing here.  Labelling innocent parties as "high chance scammers/thieves".

They could have cooperated and did it together.

Plus it was incredibly easy for them to just say no we were not in the bedroom and provide an alibi. So when the conditions meet:
A) It is trivial to provide evidence.
B) The person will NOT provide evidence.

He is a high chance scammer/thief.

Hey I might act like a teenager.  But at least my morals are high enough to not bare false witness against innocent people.  I saidwhat I did to pprove a point and you fell right into the trap.  If you dish shit out you better be ready to take it.  

We all have the right to say whatever we want on a public forum, that is the beauty of free speech. Your reply did not belong in a civilized community/society, I think we all got a peek into the soul of Darktongue.

[Anenome5]

Do we in fact know conclusively that BFL is mining with their hardware?

[Zaih]

Your calling sites scammers due to the fact they can't prove their legitimacy in terms of volume (Well from what I've gathered).

Like Doog & me discussed on another thread, there is no way you can ever prove that the volume isn't faked. You may as well add every casino on your list (Along with the one your working for; Coinroll). Your wasting your time, and are yet to receive any positive feedback to your accusations. I suggest you stop wasting your time.

[Zaih]

Thanks for the list

Except for this guy, who is obviously just spamming his post count up though.

[Tywill]

Thanks for the list

Except for this guy, who is obviously just spamming his post count up though.

from the number of your posts I'd say you did your fair share at some point lol

[tmbp]

Your calling sites scammers due to the fact they can't prove their legitimacy in terms of volume (Well from what I've gathered).

Like Doog & me discussed on another thread, there is no way you can ever prove that the volume isn't faked. You may as well add every casino on your list (Along with the one your working for; Coinroll). Your wasting your time, and are yet to receive any positive feedback to your accusations. I suggest you stop wasting your time.

You assume I work for Coinroll just because Primedice is a knockoff of Coinroll and I added them?

[Matthew N. Wright]

Your calling sites scammers due to the fact they can't prove their legitimacy in terms of volume (Well from what I've gathered).

Like Doog & me discussed on another thread, there is no way you can ever prove that the volume isn't faked. You may as well add every casino on your list (Along with the one your working for; Coinroll). Your wasting your time, and are yet to receive any positive feedback to your accusations. I suggest you stop wasting your time.

You assume I work for Coinroll just because Primedice is a knockoff of Coinroll and I added them?

That was peculiar wording for someone not associated with CoinRoll.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

It's probably PrimeDice trying to make CoinRoll look bad by loosely implying that they are affiliated by them.

[Scrat Acorns]

I am not affiliated with tmbp in any way. I also think that PrimeDice is legit.

Just kidding. tmbp, I have sent you your keys to your new Malibu beach house and complimentary Ferrari. You can also have a Brazilian supermodel of your choosing. Your megayacht is currently being built as per our agreement.

Signed,
your employer.

[Operatr]

....tilling your own grave tmbp