Seriously you are going to harp on this James?
#1 They are using SPECTRE as the name period and that will not change, he took the time to explain their thinking and logic.
#2 Repeating over and over RED FLAG! Does not do anything for your post and seems juvenile at best.
#3 Do you not see the difference between the two projects which one has nothing to do with the other in any respect so it is a moot point and to rehash it = Retarded.
#4 Do you not get that SPECTRE is a functioning company/body that will have the means to defend itself in all respects if needed, though the owners are very nice and respectful and wish everybody to be happy in the crypto space, so there is no need for abusive banter towards them.
#5 They are trying to remove fraud and provide a "Fair Battle Ground" with no "Conflict of interest" for traders. You should support their efforts instead of abusing them because they use a name of like nature on the spectreproject.
In short, get over it! Everybody else has and move forward to support both projects if you like what they stand for and offer. BTW - GREEN FLAG!!!
SPECTRE (short for Speculative Tokenized Trading
Exchange)
tbh i don't see how SPECTRE could stand for that blablabla....how about STTE then?isn't it much better?
RED FLAG!
Hello,
Let us break down the etymology of the acronym we have used. Read the following phrase carefully:
SPECulative
Tokenised
TRading
Exchange. Please now focus on the bold letters. If you remove all other letters and bring them together and get rid of the redundant 'T', you get SPECTRE.
We understand you prefer 'STTE' as a name but phonetically it is not possible to pronounce it. But thanks for the kind feedback!
fair enought,but then you should use SPECTTRE instead of SPECTRE by your logic.....so....RED FLAG again!
btw,there is no 'if' , you just try to explain only with your way,i could say you can also remove the redundant "PEC" and "R" as well.
