Bitcoin Forum
March 13, 2026, 07:43:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All  (Read 27477 times)
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 03, 2025, 11:50:18 AM
 #481

Stake is aware about my posts in this thread:

As you can see, in their answer to their previous license issuer Antillephone, they even referred to this thread.

This thread is not active and Stunna has been inactive for a long time.

I regularly inform here about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack, so yes, this thread is definetely active.

Also, from time to time, some criminal and stupid little sickheads chime in here.


I'm not sure why they would mention this thread.

They referred to a nonsense post made by @TwitchySeal

You need to ask them why they referred to a nonsense post made by @TwitchySeal


There is no possibility to get any help from this thread.

I regularly inform here about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack and don't look for help.

I will get compensated totally independent from Bitcointalk and don't need help here.


Not only that, Stunna did not hand over his work to anyone else who could handle things when he was not available.

As you can see, no one is handling the Stake and Primedice thread except one of their workers who daily bumps those threads.

@Symphonised forwards scam reports to Stake.


Stunna also promised to pay some BTC to whoever implement 2FA on the forum, which yet to be paid.

Promises made by criminals are usually empty!


So, it does not make sense why they would forward someone to this thread.

As they referred to a nonsense post made by @TwitchySeal in this thread, looks like @Symphonised forwarded the issue to Stake.
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 04, 2025, 11:35:39 AM
 #482

@alani123

Please explain to the community why you don't post screenshots of the first 50 bets of the day of March 17, 2022?
alani123
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1768


Condoras: Aθάνατoς


View Profile
April 04, 2025, 11:37:41 AM
 #483

Are you talking about your own bets? Because if yes, whatever man. You're free to upload them on your own. Do what you want.


███████▄▄███▄███▄
███▄▄████████▌██
▄█████████████▐██▌
██▄███████████▌█▌
███████▀██████▐▌█
██████████████▌▌▐
████████▄███████▐▐
█████████████████
███████████████▄██▄
██████████████▀▀▀
█████▀███▀▀▀

▄▄▄██████▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
███████████████████████████
███▌█████▀███▌█████▀▀███████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
███▌█████▄███▌█████▄███▐███████████████████▄
▐████████████▀███████▄██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▀
▐████████████▄██▄███████████▌█████████▄████▀
▐█████████▀█████████▌█████████████▄▄████▀
██████████▄███████████▐███▌██▄██████▀
██████████████▀███▐███▌██████████████████████
████▀██████▀▀█████████▌███▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▌
 
      P R E M I E R   B I T C O I N   C A S I N O   &   S P O R T S B O O K      

█▀▀









▀▀▀

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  98%  
RTP

 
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▀▀█









▀▀▀

█▀▀









▀▀▀

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

 HIGH 
ODDS

 
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▀▀█









▀▀▀
 
..PLAY NOW..
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 04, 2025, 11:50:22 AM
Last edit: April 06, 2025, 03:04:39 PM by BlackyJacky
 #484

Stake confirmed that my playing strategy was perfect and didn't cause the 4,6% experienced house edge.

In fact, they say it was variance.

If your criminal and stupid little sickhead claims otherwise, you have to prove it!

Despite of this, I am busy with your employer:

Betfury is still lying about its license!

https://ibb.co/3536SHMV

As of today, Betfury claims to operate under the 365/JAZ license, while this license already expired 7 months and 16 days ago!

Thanks to you, I will now inform the community daily about your shady employer Betfury.  Cheesy
andrew2406
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 04, 2025, 02:14:32 PM
 #485

Stake confirmed that my playing strategy was perfect and didn't cause the 4,6% experienced house edge.

Show proof of this.
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 05, 2025, 12:23:33 AM
 #486

Stake confirmed that my playing strategy was perfect and didn't cause the 4,6% experienced house edge.

Show proof of this.

Here it is:

Quote from: Stake legal department
The user has reached out to the complaints department more than 30 times for the same inquiry.

We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.

The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.

Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.

All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.

For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.

Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.

Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.

Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.

Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.

In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.


Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.

It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
andrew2406
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2025, 01:56:40 AM
 #487

It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.

Where did they say you used perfect strategy and didn't cause the house edge variation?
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2025, 03:18:55 AM
 #488

It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.

Where did they say you used perfect strategy and didn't cause the house edge variation?

With not saying that my playing style caused the 4,6% experienced house edge, they confirmed that I used the perfect playing strategy.

Their explanation why I experienced a 4,6% house edge instead of the advertised 0,5% is variance:

Quote from: Stake legal department
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.

In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.


BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 08, 2025, 11:03:52 AM
 #489

IMO the calculation to get 3 x 4 of clubs in a series of five 4s should be:

(1/52) x (4/52) x (1/52) x (4/52) x (1/52) = 1 in 23.7 million

Stake has dealt hundreds of millions of hands and this sequence should happen multiple times.

A rare probability of a certain event isn't proof that the system is rigged!

When the probability of a certain event is 1 in 23.7 million, it already can happen after 100 hands.


It proves fairness of the shuffle, not fairness of game logic.

I haven't seen any proof that the cards are shuffled fair?

Also, a key question is why does Stake "shuffle" after every hand?

This way they know exactly which cards the player and the dealer gets and can shuffle for Stake convenient cards.

Whereas if Stake shuffles 1,000 cards upfront, they only know in the first hand which cards the player and the dealer will get.

So why don't they make it fair and shuffle 1,000 cards upfront?
Lejeiejeeoedbsn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 08, 2025, 04:25:45 PM
 #490

Do you believe in Fixed Matches ?
If you don't you wrong ....
@Albbossman telegram
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 10, 2025, 02:14:56 PM
 #491

Since March 2020!!! the Curacao Gaming Control Board (GCB) has been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector on behalf of the Minister of Finance.

On December 7, 2023, 45 months! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, I informed (with proof) the GCB about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and asked them to intervene.

6 months later and 51 months! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, they answered the following:

Quote
Dear Sir / Madam,

Thank you for your email.

Unfortunately, the Curaçao Gaming Control Board (GCB) is currently not able to handle your request.

The government of Curaçao is actively in the process of modernizing our gambling legislation and setting up our online gaming policies and procedures.

We expect to be of more help as soon as the new legislation enters into force, which we expect to be the case in the second half of 2024.

We kindly point out in advance that the GCB will not investigate all complaints. For example, the GCB does not have the authority to adjudicate disputes between the complainant and the accused party and to settle claims or award damages. Only if a complaint indicates a violation of the applicable regulations, the supervisory task of the GCB entails that this will be investigated further.

For the time being, we kindly suggest, that at all times you seek legal advice for any claims you may have vis-à-vis the license holder or other party or parties. We refer to the following page that contains a list of law firms established in Curacao that may be able to assist you:

http://www.dutchcaribbeanlegalportal.com/legal-contacts/law-firms?sid=102:Law-Firms-Curacao.

Sincerely,

Curaçao Gaming Control Board

55 months! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, they accepted a license application by Medium Rare N.V. / stake.com and even gave them a "Certificate of Operation" during the license application process, even though 10 months before I informed them (with proof) about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!

5 years! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, I sent the following email to the GCB:

Quote
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT: Medium Rare N.V. , stake.com in-house Black Jack system provably rigged!

We are deep into the first half of 2025 and meanwhile you even accepted a license application for Medium Rare N.V. / stake.com and even gave them a "Certificate of Operation", even though I informed you (with proof) already in December 2023 about their provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!"
 
Running a rigged in-house Black Jack system is a violation of the applicable regulations, so do your job and investigate!
 
 
Please confirm receipt of this email.

5 years and 1 month! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, they are not willing to investigate Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system, even though this is a violation of the applicable regulations!

The GCB is an authority and not a nameless venture like the 4 master-license holders were!
Dunamisx
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 1526
Merit: 607


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
April 10, 2025, 07:51:34 PM
 #492

Since 2 YEARS, 4 months and 1 week!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!

Until today, Stake's alleged "Legal Department" is not willing to compensate me, even though they are clearly at fault here!

First thing is that you're making an accusation on the wrong thread, its either you make it on the stake.com dedicated announcement thread or you can go to the scam accusation board and lay your complain, but from what you have been saying since, i cant find any proof over what you allegedly said happened, lastly, you're talking about compensation, that they should compensate you, why not win the case first before demanding for that.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2025, 11:16:14 AM
 #493

Since 2 YEARS, 4 months and 1 week!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!

Until today, Stake's alleged "Legal Department" is not willing to compensate me, even though they are clearly at fault here!

First thing is that you're making an accusation on the wrong thread, its either you make it on the stake.com dedicated announcement thread or you can go to the scam accusation board and lay your complain,

Is there a scam information board?

I don't accuse Stake, I inform about their provably rigged in-house Black Jack!


but from what you have been saying since, i cant find any proof over what you allegedly said happened,

Is it my fault if your brain isn't working properly and you are not able to see the proof?


lastly, you're talking about compensation, that they should compensate you, why not win the case first before demanding for that.

The case is already won!  Cheesy
Jayzfrost
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 14, 2025, 09:32:37 PM
 #494

Scam report on Stake.com which made me miss out on 10-20k Worth of bonuses (1m Wagered, 94kUSD Lost)


To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to formally reiterate and escalate my complaint regarding the unjustified restriction of my account, unfair denial of bonuses, and mishandling of my appeals on Stake.com, under the username JayzFrost and registered email nicolybarte1999@gmail.com.

Key Issues:

1. Improper Restriction with No Due Process
My account was abruptly placed in withdrawal-only mode on August 26, 2022, following a single emotional message made under distress and immediately walked back. Despite my prompt apology and clarification, Stake disabled my access entirely and never allowed a proper appeal. There was no transparent process, no fair hearing, and no formal communication to resolve the misunderstanding.

I tried multiple times to regain access and explain myself between 2022 and 2023, but Stake ignored these efforts. My account was only reinstated after more than a year — but by then, all my VIP bonuses had long expired. This timing strongly suggests a deliberate setup to block my access just long enough for my bonuses to expire, then re-enable the account once Stake no longer had to fulfill those obligations.

2. Proof That Restriction Was Not for "Protection"
After the restriction, I created a second account (August 22, 2022) using the same credentials and verified documents. I wagered over $1 million USD and received weekly and monthly bonuses for months.

Stake only restricted that second account after I voluntarily disclosed it — not because they detected any risk or breach. Even more telling, I later created a third account (NicoHugo2024) which was allowed to remain fully active until just today, only being placed into withdrawal-only mode after I mentioned it to support.

If Stake truly believed I was at risk, why did they:

Allow multiple accounts using the same KYC, email domains, and crypto wallets?

Grant ongoing bonuses and enable gambling across those accounts?

Only take action after I disclosed the accounts myself?

The existence and long-term activity of my second and third accounts proves your restriction was never about protecting me. It was about obstructing bonus payouts on the main account while continuing to profit off my wagering activity.

3. Breach of Terms and Irresponsible Enforcement
Stake is now citing Section 4.9 of the Terms of Service (no multiple accounts) to dismiss my complaint. Yet:

I would never have needed to create a second account if my first one was not unfairly locked.

Stake accepted my KYC repeatedly, never flagged the duplication, and allowed large wagering volumes.

Their enforcement is inconsistent: the second account was restricted only after disclosure, and the third one was live until this very day.

If your system was able to verify my identity, how did these accounts go unnoticed unless it served Stake’s interest to allow them?

4. Wrongful Bonus Denial
Bonuses I earned prior to restriction (weekly/monthly for Aug–Oct 2022) were based on:

My VIP level

Wagered volume

Historical rewards received (e.g., weekly bonuses exceeding $4,900 USD)

Stake falsely claims these bonuses were expired or void due to self-exclusion. Yet:

I never submitted any formal self-exclusion request

You restricted my account, not me

Your terms state bonuses are not revoked retroactively for actions the player did not initiate

Additionally, after a year of restriction, I regained access but received weekly bonuses worth less than $1 USD, despite maintaining VIP status. This is both punitive and insulting.

5. Failure to Address My Appeal Properly
Stake ignored my follow-ups for over a year, then sent dismissive, template responses when I finally reached support. My detailed replies — providing timeline breakdowns, legal references, and proof of inconsistency — were brushed aside.

When asked for clarification, your staff repeated phrases like:

“The bonuses have long expired”

This evades the issue: they expired because you blocked my access, not due to inactivity or any breach on my part.

6. Ongoing Regulatory and Legal Action
I have submitted formal complaints to:

Curaçao Gaming Control Board

Casinomeister (PAB)

ThePOGG.com

FairPlayBureau.com

GamblingGrumbles.com

Other watchdogs and forums

I am actively reaching out to:

Better Business Bureaus

Legal directories (including for gambling/consumer law internationally)

Crypto Gambling Foundation

MediumRare N.V. directly

I have preserved hundreds of pages of chat logs and email conversations as evidence. I am also being assisted by my fiancé, a certified lawyer, and we are preparing additional legal filings.

Resolution Demanded:

Compensation for missed bonuses (Aug–Sept 2022) based on VIP records: estimated $10,000–$20,000 USD

Written acknowledgement of mishandled restriction, inconsistent enforcement, and improper bonus denial

Clear explanation and updated policy for how “self-exclusion” and “restrictions” are applied

 This is not just about one player being mistreated. This is about a broader pattern of corporate irresponsibility, discriminatory enforcement, and selective denial of funds rightfully owed. I will continue to advocate for transparency and fairness, both publicly and through every formal avenue, until this matter is resolved. 

Final Remarks for stake. I gave them every opportunity to resolve this privately. But the more you avoid accountability, the stronger the public and regulatory case becomes.

I have been monitoring stake closely for over three years, collecting detailed proof of these inconsistencies. Perhaps it is fate that my fiancé is now almost a licensed attorney,  together, we will pursue this matter until full justice is served.

Sincerely,
Kim
nicolybarte1999@gmail.com
Stake Username: JayzFrost
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 15, 2025, 05:45:04 PM
 #495

Scam report on Stake.com which made me miss out on 10-20k Worth of bonuses (1m Wagered, 94kUSD Lost)

1 million wagered and 94,000 lost is a whoppy 9,4% experienced house edge plus rewards received!

What games did you play?
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 10, 2025, 11:21:48 AM
 #496

Since March 2020!!! the Curacao Gaming Control Board (GCB) has been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector on behalf of the Minister of Finance.

On December 7, 2023, 45 months! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, I informed (with proof) the GCB about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and asked them to intervene.

6 months later and 51 months! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, they answered the following:

Quote
Dear Sir / Madam,

Thank you for your email.

Unfortunately, the Curaçao Gaming Control Board (GCB) is currently not able to handle your request.

The government of Curaçao is actively in the process of modernizing our gambling legislation and setting up our online gaming policies and procedures.

We expect to be of more help as soon as the new legislation enters into force, which we expect to be the case in the second half of 2024.

We kindly point out in advance that the GCB will not investigate all complaints. For example, the GCB does not have the authority to adjudicate disputes between the complainant and the accused party and to settle claims or award damages. Only if a complaint indicates a violation of the applicable regulations, the supervisory task of the GCB entails that this will be investigated further.

For the time being, we kindly suggest, that at all times you seek legal advice for any claims you may have vis-à-vis the license holder or other party or parties. We refer to the following page that contains a list of law firms established in Curacao that may be able to assist you:

http://www.dutchcaribbeanlegalportal.com/legal-contacts/law-firms?sid=102:Law-Firms-Curacao.

Sincerely,

Curaçao Gaming Control Board

55 months! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, they accepted a license application by Medium Rare N.V. / stake.com and even gave them a "Certificate of Operation" during the license application process, even though 10 months before I informed them (with proof) about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!

5 years! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, I sent the following email to the GCB:

Quote
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT: Medium Rare N.V. , stake.com in-house Black Jack system provably rigged!

We are deep into the first half of 2025 and meanwhile you even accepted a license application for Medium Rare N.V. / stake.com and even gave them a "Certificate of Operation", even though I informed you (with proof) already in December 2023 about their provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!"
 
Running a rigged in-house Black Jack system is a violation of the applicable regulations, so do your job and investigate!
 
 
Please confirm receipt of this email.

5 years and 2 months! after they have been tasked with the licensing for and supervision of the online gaming sector, they are not willing to investigate Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system, even though this is a violation of the applicable regulations!

The GCB is an authority and not a nameless venture like the 4 master-license holders were!
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2025, 06:59:49 PM
Last edit: May 20, 2025, 12:11:44 PM by BlackyJacky
 #497

Bad news for the attackers and nonsense hallucinators!  Cheesy

The Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA) just confirmed that I have a claim against Stake:

Quote from: CGA
Thank you for contacting the Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA).

Your message will be forwarded to the relevant department for review.

If further information is needed, we may reach out to you.

Please be aware that, in cases involving complaints related to gambling activities, the CGA does not have the authority to mediate disputes between players and gaming operators. As such, we do not handle complaints on an individual basis.

However, your complaint is valuable to us, as it may highlight potential breaches of the law by operators.

If such violations are identified, appropriate enforcement measures will be taken.

Please note that we cannot provide you with updates on the status of any ongoing investigations or actions.

If you wish to pursue your claim further, we recommend seeking legal counsel.

We appreciate your understanding.

Best regards,
BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2025, 01:42:29 PM
 #498

LOOKS LIKE STAKE HAS SERIOUS ISSUES WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNMENT BODIES!

Quote from: Stake compliance
Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for contacting the Compliance team at Stake.

We have received your email and will endeavor to respond to your inquiry as promptly as possible.

Important Message for all Law Enforcement and Government Bodies.

Going forward all official law enforcement inquiries, please be advised that we do not process these requests via this email inbox.

Kindly submit your request through our dedicated Government Law Enforcement Request System, which can be accessed here:

https://app.kodexglobal.com/stake/requests.

Any requests sent to this email address will not be processed from Thursday 8th of May, 2025.

Once we receive this information, we will promptly review your request and provide the requested documentation in accordance with applicable laws and regulations to legally and securely disclose any relevant information or take appropriate action on the account in question.

For all other compliance-related inquiries, we appreciate your patience and will provide a response, based on the relevance and urgency of your inquiry.

Please follow the link to begin your registration process and submit your request.

You will be able to receive the records through the portal and keep track of your cases.

If you have any issues signing up or logging in, please reach out to help@kodexglobal.com.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 10649


dogermint.com


View Profile WWW
July 05, 2025, 08:48:58 AM
 #499

The advertised house edge for Stake's in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means long-term I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

No, it does not mean that, and it has never meant that, especially as it applies to BlackJack. "House edge" does not equal % of losing bets, because some wins (Blackjacks, double-downs) count as 1 bet but pay more than 1 bet's worth of winnings. This has been explained to you dozens of times already but you continue to repeat the same incorrect assertions. Furthermore, the excerpt you quoted from Stake explains in detail why you will never receive any sort of compensation from them.

BlackyJacky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 603
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 06, 2025, 12:59:45 PM
 #500

@nutildah

You want to add content in regard to the house edge?

Then you first need to show that you are qualified!

You go to a brick and mortar casino with 1,000 USD and make 10 USD bets at a Black Jack table:

Example A)

After 100 bets made you leave the table with 980 USD

1) How many bets did you lose?

2) How much percentage is your experienced house edge?

Example B)

After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,020 USD

1) How many bets did you win?

2) How much percentage is your experienced player edge?

Example C)

After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,000 USD

1) How many bets did you lose or win?

2) How much percentage is your experienced house or player edge?


To answer my questions, please use the following format:

Example A)

1) ? bets

2) ? %

Example B)

1) ? bets

2) ? %

Example C)

1) ? bets

2) ? %
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!