Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 10:05:18 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Restart of Quantumcoin (SUCCESSFULLY RELEASED)  (Read 11504 times)
Sondey10mg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 07:37:02 PM
 #61

Yes, best release I have seen since I joined the board begin of april

 *Image Removed*
 *Image Removed*
Sikon024
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 07:44:48 PM
 #62

Im getting 60/40 Acc to rejects on the pool. Anyone else?
tyrion70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 934
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 07:55:27 PM
 #63

Grr:

Code:
2013-06-06 21:52:31.282851 > exceptions.NameError: global name 'exp' is not defined

Apparently exp is not a valid python function..

@Sikon my stats from when I started the pool:
Code:
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  72.0C 4056RPM | 388.3K/359.8Kh/s | A:392 R:268 HW:0 U:  6.58/m I:19
 GPU 1:  72.0C  26%    | 169.8K/173.2Kh/s | A:109 R:193 HW:0 U:  1.83/m I:19
 GPU 2:  73.0C  69%    | 169.9K/173.2Kh/s | A:101 R:190 HW:0 U:  1.70/m I:19

I just reset my statistics to see how it's now. It usually takes p2pool some time to get the share diff at a good level. Have u got your scan and expiry time at 1?
Code:
[Q]ueue: 0
[S]cantime: 1
[E]xpiry: 1

EDIT:
My scan and exp setting were wrong to... lol

Anyways since reset it looks like this:
Code:
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  73.0C 3761RPM | 390.3K/343.8Kh/s | A: 12 R:  1 HW:0 U:  3.09/m I:19
 GPU 1:  73.0C  23%    | 182.5K/166.3Kh/s | A:  6 R:  3 HW:0 U:  1.54/m I:19
 GPU 2:  74.0C  60%    | 182.4K/166.3Kh/s | A:  6 R:  2 HW:0 U:  1.54/m I:19
Where most rejects seem to come from the fact that my cards sometimes find a share at the same time.

rabidwalrus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:08:40 PM
 #64

Im getting 60/40 Acc to rejects on the pool. Anyone else?

I'm getting about 10%
tyrion70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 934
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:11:10 PM
 #65

Just restarted the pool to implement the correct subsidy function..

Code:
Total block value: 10.438951
Smiley sounds a lot better..

for the record, this is the bitcoin/networks.py part involved:
Code:
def get_subsidy(bnTarget):
    import math
    return int(((0.2 * math.exp(bnTarget/ 250) / pow(bnTarget, -0.25)) * 50) * 1000000)

nets = dict(
    quantumcoin=math.Object(
        SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda target: get_subsidy(target),
    ),

Cheers

MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 08:12:19 PM
 #66

I like this coin and it's release Smiley

I only mined 3 blocks and I'm back on PXC but it was a fair launch Smiley
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:32:05 PM
 #67

agree with this, excellent launch.

Sikon024
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 09:36:07 PM
 #68

Grr:

Code:
2013-06-06 21:52:31.282851 > exceptions.NameError: global name 'exp' is not defined

Apparently exp is not a valid python function..

@Sikon my stats from when I started the pool:
Code:
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  72.0C 4056RPM | 388.3K/359.8Kh/s | A:392 R:268 HW:0 U:  6.58/m I:19
 GPU 1:  72.0C  26%    | 169.8K/173.2Kh/s | A:109 R:193 HW:0 U:  1.83/m I:19
 GPU 2:  73.0C  69%    | 169.9K/173.2Kh/s | A:101 R:190 HW:0 U:  1.70/m I:19

I just reset my statistics to see how it's now. It usually takes p2pool some time to get the share diff at a good level. Have u got your scan and expiry time at 1?
Code:
[Q]ueue: 0
[S]cantime: 1
[E]xpiry: 1

EDIT:
My scan and exp setting were wrong to... lol

Anyways since reset it looks like this:
Code:
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  73.0C 3761RPM | 390.3K/343.8Kh/s | A: 12 R:  1 HW:0 U:  3.09/m I:19
 GPU 1:  73.0C  23%    | 182.5K/166.3Kh/s | A:  6 R:  3 HW:0 U:  1.54/m I:19
 GPU 2:  74.0C  60%    | 182.4K/166.3Kh/s | A:  6 R:  2 HW:0 U:  1.54/m I:19
Where most rejects seem to come from the fact that my cards sometimes find a share at the same time.

Much better.  The getwork efficiency in CGwatcher is ugly but with a coin that changes this fast, ya gotta do whacha gotta do.

Thank you!
Lhunephel (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 07, 2013, 10:20:40 AM
 #69

Added two checkpoints to the sources on GitHub.
Lhunephel (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 07, 2013, 10:24:44 AM
 #70

@tyrion70: Is your p2pool at http://qtc.p2pool.nl/stats/ not working? Can't see the last blocks and the statistics are also not working Sad
tyrion70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 934
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 07, 2013, 10:45:41 AM
 #71

@tyrion70: Is your p2pool at http://qtc.p2pool.nl/stats/ not working? Can't see the last blocks and the statistics are also not working Sad

Hmm seems to be working here:
Code:
393406	Fri Jun 07 2013 11:54:45 GMT+0200 (West-Europa (zomertijd))	758b727c83164ca2715e09b20c9874294ecc0412775858a5d5607124a629858a
393404 Fri Jun 07 2013 11:03:37 GMT+0200 (West-Europa (zomertijd)) 2c71bb685af85ca26234a7eb6703f818ae5d2797a175e19f69988e2194f43596
393403 Fri Jun 07 2013 10:38:29 GMT+0200 (West-Europa (zomertijd)) dcd92479021b5b7258c1887c0804484bf9612a7d01e38a25fa8a6d6a784b3156
393402 Fri Jun 07 2013 10:28:30 GMT+0200 (West-Europa (zomertijd)) 23ac3481742e9e0e4bfeb359d72cd5ba9dfb845279f48314987624c96731435c
393401 Fri Jun 07 2013 10:26:58 GMT+0200 (West-Europa (zomertijd)) 24a8db9c36a2efed8b833e8ee9d57c9879ff49f711e86ce04a90f581b5f6127d
393399 Fri Jun 07 2013 09:47:46 GMT+0200 (West-Europa (zomertijd)) 2cec2ffbbb0d63800802b20948637d03d0acc8ab694a87412d608ad12a6ecbd2
393398 Fri Jun 07 2013 09:41:39 GMT+0200 (West-Europa (zomertijd)) 7d0999ee80d028e82932e56cf2244d4a2d17d72e753206f97200b856b2ffe8a4

Tested it on my iPad and computer...

Lhunephel (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 07, 2013, 07:26:48 PM
 #72

Looks good now. I think I had some issues with my connection resulting in a broken statistics page.
Boxman90
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 07, 2013, 07:33:57 PM
 #73

Lol I had a fair amount of quantumcoins but then the dev says "Meh reboot". Sure. Is this one dead yet?

LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC   BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
tyrion70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 934
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 07, 2013, 07:42:02 PM
 #74

Looks good now. I think I had some issues with my connection resulting in a broken statistics page.

It's all XMLhttp.. It doesn't seem to work well on older browsers and buggy connections :d At work I can't read the stats very well either Sad

Lhunephel (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 07, 2013, 07:48:04 PM
 #75

Because the first release of QTC really failed I decided to try it with a clean restart. That's what just happened. And I think the block chain had a really good restart and is working like expected. The old block chain is dead. Fetch the latest sources from GitHub or download the latest Windows binary to join the new and active block chain.
Lhunephel (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 07, 2013, 07:50:22 PM
 #76

@tyrion70: But I think there's something wrong with the displayed retarget interval. The maximum retarget interval is 15. Also I think the target spacing is not 60 seconds at the moment. Have a look in the sources (quantumcoin/src/main.cpp), there are three methods calculating the retarget, target spacing and target timespan parameters. I think the p2pool code has to be modified like with the block values.
tyrion70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 934
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 07, 2013, 07:56:38 PM
 #77

@tyrion70: But I think there's something wrong with the displayed retarget interval. The maximum retarget interval is 15. Also I think the target spacing is not 60 seconds at the moment. Have a look in the sources (quantumcoin/src/main.cpp), there are three methods calculating the retarget, target spacing and target timespan parameters. I think the p2pool code has to be modified like with the block values.

You're right; I used the wrong spacing and interval params; same as with the subsidy.. But those values are really only used for statistic purposes. I'll take a look at them over the weekend.

Cheers

Lhunephel (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 08, 2013, 10:21:31 AM
 #78

At the moment the hash rate is too low for the block chain to work like expected Sad
Petr1fied
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 08, 2013, 02:22:02 PM
 #79

That probably goes to prove that although people say they want a fair release with a difficulty of 1.0 so that it's not an orphanfest they don't actually mean it. What they really want is to mine when it's very easy so they can find lots of blocks. They just don't want the orphans that go hand in hand with that.
ShowerFarts
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 08, 2013, 05:22:48 PM
 #80

I tried. I threw my modest 1000 Khash at it until the client would no longer sync. I did think it was weird near the end when I was finding all of the blocks and there were no new blocks detected on the network. RIP quantumcoin.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!