Bitcoin Forum
November 02, 2024, 10:32:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Bitfury is looking for alpha-testers of first chips! FREE MONEY HERE!  (Read 176723 times)
gingernuts
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 05, 2013, 10:02:50 PM
 #761

I can't help wondering though, has anyone had success with fewer, larger caps? From what I can see, all the grounds are on the centre pad, all the pins on 3-sides are commoned internally to VDD, then split out to dozens of tiny caps, via'ed down to the ground plane. Does this have some inductance or ESR benefit, are the caps just cheaper, or is this just a design that works, so why mess with it?

More little caps in parallel have lower inductance than a few big ones. Maybe 15 caps is overkill, but it works, so why mess with it ?

I could try mounting fewer, but the problem is that if it doesn't work properly, I'd have to hand solder the rest, which is a terrible job.

Fair enough!

Cheers.
ssi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
September 05, 2013, 10:10:35 PM
 #762




Thanks for the info...

I've already got 100 of these boards being fabbed, but I'll take all this into consideration for the next iteration Smiley
Are you going to sell the things?


Assuming they work, and assuming I can get the heat out of them, and assuming I can get chips, yes Smiley


If you're interested in bare boards for DIY, lemme know in pm

18xEDfc7y1Nzm2kmLvwYq56xwwEz4Fdh6
Gomeler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 697
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 05:45:33 AM
 #763

This is my first attempt at a single-chip schematic. No joke, I was more or less copying the c-scape design for their initial test PCB. Electrically I think this is all correct? I'm going with the same decoupling capacitor values* that were mentioned in a post by intron.



I couldn't figure out how to add a ground pad for the 5GHash chip but in the PCB design phase I'm going to have a copper net  underneath the chip with vias to the ground plane for heatsinking and ground purposes.

I plan on using a 4-pin female molex connector to provide ground/VDD/IOVDD and a 8-pin header for the various I/O pins. After I layout this I'll have a second PCB with dc-dc converters to provide IOVDD and VDD. That same PCB will have the level-shifter to shift the spi signal voltages between the Raspberry Pi and 5GHash voltages.

My goal is to dip my toes into this to see if I enjoy it. So far I do but I haven't had to debug anything yet  Grin I'd like to chain 2 of these together and then build a 2 or 4 chip PCB using the lessons learned from this project.


*- I found a couple very interesting PDFs on calculating the decoupling capacitance and the resulting inductance. Still educating myself on this so I decided to go with values that have been proven to work.
intron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 427
Merit: 251


- electronics design|embedded software|verilog -


View Profile
September 06, 2013, 08:15:34 AM
 #764

This is my first attempt at a single-chip schematic. No joke, I was more or less copying the c-scape design for their initial test PCB. Electrically I think this is all correct? I'm going with the same decoupling capacitor values* that were mentioned in a post by intron.

Looks fine. Toch?

intron
cscape
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 08:19:44 AM
 #765

Maybe add a solder jumper from INCLK to GND.

As far as calculating bypass caps, to do a proper job you need to know the layout of the board and the exact specifications of the capacitor. As they say: "ain't nobody got time for that!"

Happy with your c-scape product ? Consider a tip: 16X2FWVRz6UzPWsu4WjKBMJatR7UvyKzcy
ssi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 02:07:15 PM
 #766

Maybe add a solder jumper from INCLK to GND.

As far as calculating bypass caps, to do a proper job you need to know the layout of the board and the exact specifications of the capacitor. As they say: "ain't nobody got time for that!"


Or, just overkill the hell out of it Smiley

18xEDfc7y1Nzm2kmLvwYq56xwwEz4Fdh6
cscape
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 02:11:25 PM
 #767

Right. You can't have too much overkill.

Happy with your c-scape product ? Consider a tip: 16X2FWVRz6UzPWsu4WjKBMJatR7UvyKzcy
LaserHorse
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 02:29:25 PM
 #768

since we're on the topic - I'm assume switching to 0603 size caps doesn't pose a problem, correct?
After hand soldering 150 0402 caps, I'm ready to not ever do that again   Wink

PiMiner - control & monitor your miners with Raspberry Pi   •   BTC: 1AV5JekeEVET5u2jTsLDMRsTtagrBnNTBR
cscape
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 02:33:20 PM
 #769

0603 size has a somewhat higher inductance, so it may not perform as well as 0402. Whether that's significant, I don't know.

Soldering 0402 has one advantage though: after you pick and place 10000 of them, suddenly 0603 seem as huge as bricks.

Happy with your c-scape product ? Consider a tip: 16X2FWVRz6UzPWsu4WjKBMJatR7UvyKzcy
LaserHorse
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 02:39:44 PM
 #770

0603 size has a somewhat higher inductance, so it may not perform as well as 0402. Whether that's significant, I don't know.

Soldering 0402 has one advantage though: after you pick and place 10000 of them, suddenly 0603 seem as huge as bricks.

indeed - i can now do 1206 with my feet!

thnx, will read up a bit on package characteristics.

PiMiner - control & monitor your miners with Raspberry Pi   •   BTC: 1AV5JekeEVET5u2jTsLDMRsTtagrBnNTBR
ssi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 03:05:11 PM
 #771

since we're on the topic - I'm assume switching to 0603 size caps doesn't pose a problem, correct?
After hand soldering 150 0402 caps, I'm ready to not ever do that again   Wink

I used all 0603, and they're fine.  My supply planes are nice and quiet.

18xEDfc7y1Nzm2kmLvwYq56xwwEz4Fdh6
Gomeler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 697
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 04:11:54 PM
 #772

Glad to hear I didn't screw up completely. Going to spend tomorrow morning placing/routing the PCB with the goal of submitting it to OSHPark for a run next week. Will report back once I have the gerber files.

This is my first attempt at a single-chip schematic. No joke, I was more or less copying the c-scape design for their initial test PCB. Electrically I think this is all correct? I'm going with the same decoupling capacitor values* that were mentioned in a post by intron.

Looks fine. Toch?

intron

What is Toch? Didn't see anything like that mentioned in the chip pinout, not sure if I'm missing something for the SPI connections?

Maybe add a solder jumper from INCLK to GND.

As far as calculating bypass caps, to do a proper job you need to know the layout of the board and the exact specifications of the capacitor. As they say: "ain't nobody got time for that!"

Excellent point for the INCLK pin. I don't see myself driving the chip with an external clock source so I'll pull it to ground.

since we're on the topic - I'm assume switching to 0603 size caps doesn't pose a problem, correct?
After hand soldering 150 0402 caps, I'm ready to not ever do that again   Wink

I used all 0603, and they're fine.  My supply planes are nice and quiet.

I didn't fancy placing those tiny 0402 capacitors. Since I'm just doing a cheap OSHPark run of 3 boards, I hopefully won't lose too much if I run into issues.
cscape
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 05:14:07 PM
 #773

What is Toch? Didn't see anything like that mentioned in the chip pinout, not sure if I'm missing something for the SPI connections?
"Toch?" is Dutch for "Right?"


Happy with your c-scape product ? Consider a tip: 16X2FWVRz6UzPWsu4WjKBMJatR7UvyKzcy
Gomeler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 697
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 05:36:40 PM
 #774

What is Toch? Didn't see anything like that mentioned in the chip pinout, not sure if I'm missing something for the SPI connections?
"Toch?" is Dutch for "Right?"



Oh, thanks for the translation. I barely have a handle on English and it is my first language  Embarrassed
Tyger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 141
Merit: 102



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 07:38:43 PM
 #775

sounds like someone from The Netherlands, not?
of Belg kan natuurlijk ook.
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2013, 08:35:10 PM
 #776

Project NanoFury moving along too:



I can hardly wait to get my hands on the boards Smiley
(ignore the somewhat iffy looking parts - I haven't figured out the proper 3d models yet)

By the way - speaking of filter capacitors: I figured 3 on each side should probably work just fine ... I guess I'll find out if it really does.

bigbeninlondon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 06, 2013, 09:03:35 PM
 #777

Project NanoFury moving along too:



I can hardly wait to get my hands on the boards Smiley
(ignore the somewhat iffy looking parts - I haven't figured out the proper 3d models yet)

By the way - speaking of filter capacitors: I figured 3 on each side should probably work just fine ... I guess I'll find out if it really does.

Do you have a thread following this development?  I'd like to follow.
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2013, 09:20:18 PM
 #778

Project NanoFury moving along too:



I can hardly wait to get my hands on the boards Smiley
(ignore the somewhat iffy looking parts - I haven't figured out the proper 3d models yet)

By the way - speaking of filter capacitors: I figured 3 on each side should probably work just fine ... I guess I'll find out if it really does.

Do you have a thread following this development?  I'd like to follow.

Not yet ... I guess I should do that Smiley

gingernuts
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 07, 2013, 08:58:02 AM
 #779

So is there any advantage to mounting all the caps to the backside of the board so that a heatsink can be bolted down to the topside of those chips, or does the centre pad provide enough heat transfer through the board to make PCB back-side cooling better?
cscape
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 07, 2013, 10:16:23 AM
 #780

So is there any advantage to mounting all the caps to the backside of the board so that a heatsink can be bolted down to the topside of those chips, or does the centre pad provide enough heat transfer through the board to make PCB back-side cooling better?
These chips are designed to dissipate heat through the ground pad and to the bottom of the board. In practice, cooling the board works well enough.


Happy with your c-scape product ? Consider a tip: 16X2FWVRz6UzPWsu4WjKBMJatR7UvyKzcy
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!