What would make you invest in today's running ICOs?

[kryptqnick]

With so many daily ICOs launching, some people might be confused as to where they should invest.

What would make you invest in today's running ICOs?

Is it the Whitepaper?
Is it the Website design?
Is it the Project Team?
Is it the Product?

The product is probably the most important thing to me. If I find the idea genius then I'm likely to invest in the coin. For it's really hard to tell whether a team is good or bad. Most of them have some experience while not having something amazing already created as well. Website design is also very important, though, but then again, most ico websites are interactive and attractive. Yet I guess for now nothing will make me invest in an ICO, because as I see it even the greatest projects get dumped really hard nowadays.

[edward222]

I believe now it's a perfect time to invest in good ICOs.. what does it mean? A competent development team is the most important point. You should know very good who is behind the project, their past projects... people are the key point of successful ICO.

[SixOfFive]

All the four expects are important to me but i would like to arrange these in decreasing order from most important to less important....I hope it will help others to prioritize all these expects.
Product>Project Team>White paper>Website design

In this era of ICO's scams...Honest and experienced team is key to invest in any ICO. I personally feel if you want to earn good ROI, we should always invest in people.

[kaspabha]

Ccore is my favorite ico in this period. It is a Crypto Payment Platform that allows people based online services and stores without losing value on the exchange. Nice concept and good dev team behind it. Hope it will have a great future.

[lamadu3]

When some ICO appears all of these things that you have listed in your post should be considered. I’d better first find the information about the ICO team: look through their accounts in socials, find if they are on the cryptomarket for long. And Whitepaper is very important, too.

[Probablylikely]

In fact, all four are the key factors that I will look out for in  ICO investments. Most importantly, a good strong project team will produce greater success rate in their ICO. Therefore I will usually google search more information about the team, check out all of their social networking accounts to assess on their relevant knowledge and whether they have large network of related connections.  

[dunfida]

With so many daily ICOs launching, some people might be confused as to where they should invest.

What would make you invest in today's running ICOs?

Is it the Whitepaper?
Is it the Website design?
Is it the Project Team?
Is it the Product?

As of these days confusion would really be there because we do see there are lots of ICO as of now launching every now and then which would really add up the difficulty on selecting which one we should invest but as an investor we should really obliged ourselves to seek out the best possible good project which we do see that it do have the potential to grow for future years to come and should be avoided on those fly by night projects which are only good in the beginning but later on they vanished once they do already filled up their bags. Product? This is the main thing should be check first together with its whitepaper because on this you would really see if it do have future or just total garbage.

[Usui-Chan]

I invest mine at those who can reach their caps. They are the ones that you can actually tell that are going to be somewhat successful.

[mikyadel]

all of them but my most important one is the product/technology as team may come and go so the whitepaper

[Crypto-Freedom]

What makes an ICO for me is the following (not in any specific order)

1. Whitepaper well put together and complete with a breakdown of where the money will go even if they exceed their expected amount. E.g. if they got twice as much what do they do with the extra cash? Giving percentages is actually incorrect but having an expansion plan based on the extra funding is the way to go.
2. Clear thought out project that has a "market".
3. Team with experience in what they are selling or building.
4. GOOD customer / investor support.
5. Team engagement before, during and after ICO to keep investors and potential customers informed.
6. Clear timeline of growth and completion(if not ROI). Many projects appear stagnant after ICO's.
7. People who believe in their project and passionate about it.
8. A website that is functional and capable of dealing with the ICO capacity and future needs.
9. Being able to identify who is involved and a traceable history (e.g. through LinkedIn for previous projects / employers).
10. People who value their investors.

[cryptohunter]

1. metal illness
2. ignorance to the issues all ico issued tokens are going to face in the future even if they did produce anything with a real use case
3. ignorance to the fact most icos do not have and will not produce working functioning projects with real use cases.
4. ignorance to the fact icos are open to and most probable scams at the hands of the devs and insiders.
5. If i were tired of being wealthy and wanted to get rid of my btc

[Sasuke102001]

The development team of any project, the track record of the members of the development team. What is the project about, how unique their idea is because that is what attracts people. Website of the project because if they are legit the website won't try ticking people that is what is what is important.

[ryanben]

First, I will look at the development team, followed by the token information, next I will look at the project website interface and finally I will read the project white paper and thoroughly research the product, roadmap, technology and all the information that I can find. In the white paper they will summarize everything about the project, so I always spend 1-2 days to study all the information in the white paper of that project.

[Caesar-Giulius]

For me, the most important factors are the product, project team and white paper. I believe that an outstanding product is important to disrupt the existing market. White paper tell me about the whole project. The experience of project team is a plus benefit. I am fine with young or new faces in the crypto world as long as they are hardworking and able to deliver.

Website design is the least important but of course it must be able to resist attacks. Having a good website design is a plus point but not essential.

[rudox]

I will always invest in any ICO projects that has an end product and also with a performing team. I research to know if the project has a product attached to it. If if found any team member that i know who participated in any failed projects definitely i will go away. So for me product and strong /performing team is it.

[Blake_Last]

For me, the project team. All the other mentioned can be fabricated, including the white paper and product and make it appear legit. In fact, a good scammer can just hire people to make him a website, create a white paper and post a manufactured product and market it to people who are stupid enough to believe him. Nevertheless, if the project has a team that is transparent about themselves, in which you can cross-verify and examine, then that's a different story.

[asus09]

everything is very important to be a research and assessment. I think you should have knowledge and many sources of information about the ico you are trying to follow. will be very important if you always connect something, to prevent things that are not expected. and for your own chances of success.

[CryptoKranthi]

Everything.If a project is genuine then everything should be perfect.Product, whitepaper, and promising roadmap whatever

[xKARELx]

I use the branch of wealth, only it can help me to become a little richer by not investing in this business, although in the future I plan to do it! I hope I'm lucky

[jjoshua]

I invest if I like the goal of the project. The team and the feasible idea that they brought to us. I only choose the best ICO that I think will success.