[ANN] STRAKS - A POW/Masternode Cryptocurrency focused on e-commerce utility

[Eulersheep]

Change the rules during the game ... Investors beware of these guys.

What rules did they change? They never clarified the details of the swap. Sig price rose purely due to speculation, not the devs fault that people were speculating. This is what needed to be done for ensure the integrity of the STRAKS network (imagine the horror of all of the coins from sig swap being dumped). Not sure why people think the devs owe signatum investors anything, they're just trying to help them out a little.

[1715020850]

1715020850

[1715020850]

1715020850

[1715020850]

1715020850

[1715020850]

1715020850

[1715020850]

1715020850

[Eulersheep]

6 years for a swap, it's awful long for a crypto currency.
Why did this information appear only now ? Many people bought your signatum. Once again, the developers deceived their community.
Now in the discord from the developers only mockery, disgusting.

If you bought signatum before the details were clarified that's your fault... why gamble on speculation?

[vitos_i]

[/quote]

What rules did they change? They never clarified the details of the swap. Sig price rose purely due to speculation, not the devs fault that people were speculating. This is what needed to be done for ensure the integrity of the STRAKS network (imagine the horror of all of the coins from sig swap being dumped). Not sure why people think the devs owe signatum investors anything, they're just trying to help them out a little.
[/quote]

I fully support your opinion

[bel123]

such swap is good for coin and maybe also for signatum if the price of signatum and strak will be high... then you can sell sigt or change to strak. No need to hate this coin (it doesn't help anybody) - you can stay with signatum if you want

Now is time for hard work (devs) because now we have only words... they should organize exchanges asap (cryptopia, bittrex) for straks.


ps. they should change from 6 years to 2 years - then it will be good change for everybody. If they are smart- they will hear the community.... Masternodes also 50k is too hardcore - should be 5k coins and make secure nodes like zencash to secure and decentralise coin.

[natan069]

How can we know when we will receive the coins?

It will be in smal quantities every month?

[barssib]

6 years for a swap, it's awful long for a crypto currency.
Why did this information appear only now ? Many people bought your signatum. Once again, the developers deceived their community.
Now in the discord from the developers only mockery, disgusting.

If you bought signatum before the details were clarified that's your fault... why gamble on speculation?

All pre-mine remains with developers for a long time, and this is very dangerous.  I will not put a penny into this project.  And now their 5% turns to 25 ... When you know that the market will be 20-30 million coins is one thing, and when they can be sold at any time, it's quite another matter.  Let them then look for a way to block 35,000,000 coins.  You speak as a miner, your goal is instant profit.

[lupanar]

Join Altminer guys altminer.ne

ccminer -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:4533 -u wallet -p c=STAK

[play]

6 years for a swap, it's awful long for a crypto currency.
Why did this information appear only now ? Many people bought your signatum. Once again, the developers deceived their community.
Now in the discord from the developers only mockery, disgusting.

If you bought signatum before the details were clarified that's your fault... why gamble on speculation?

All pre-mine remains with developers for a long time, and this is very dangerous.  I will not put a penny into this project.  And now their 5% turns to 25 ... When you know that the market will be 20-30 million coins is one thing, and when they can be sold at any time, it's quite another matter.  Let them then look for a way to block 35,000,000 coins.  You speak as a miner, your goal is instant profit.

A solution could be that those funds are controlled by a multi signature wallet where people who provide escrow service on this forum are involved.

[relayd]

It's kind of funny that I think signatum would of have done well if some of the developers did not betray the community in exchange for a quick dollar and PoS was delayed, or instead a hybrid PoS/PoW existed for years. Because oddly enough what attracted many of us originally to signatum was the no premine, no dev fees and the whole it was something new and maybe had some different things happening. However while the first part of no fees and no premine was true, it was nothing really that special just a different hash algorithm and some random changes.

I think straks messed up for having fees and premine first off all, second of all the whole swap thing seems like guess work. You really need some economist or market analyst to figure out the market, you can't rely on polls or community. Because the people who voted probably held signatum and were only interested in a pump. Also the reward was probably too low at 10 coins.

I guess time will tell what happens next.

It's probably possible to take the tech we have in cryptocurrency and make a successful long-term altcoin that would compliment bitcoin and the rest of the big players. It just seems to me people get too greedy or don't focus enough time to research the correct parameters & settings and to introduce some innovative new twist or purpose for a new coin. Or perhaps it's too saturated of a market and impossible to achieve such a dream.

Regardless, best of luck.

[Crypto_Punk]

hey guys what am i missing here? heres what im getting and my .bat

[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2v2' algorithm.
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4533: Connection refused
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds

______________________

ccminer-x64-75.exe -a lyra2v2 -o http://127.0.0.1:4533 -u ustraks -p ********

[relayd]

hey guys what am i missing here? heres what im getting and my .bat

[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2v2' algorithm.
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4533: Connection refused
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds

______________________

ccminer-x64-75.exe -a lyra2v2 -o http://127.0.0.1:4533 -u ustraks -p ********

Yeah you need to connect to a pool not a local ip address.   Or are you trying to solo mine and have a server running for this? Because that's probably a waste.

Go register on suprnova if you want to try mining this coin, make a worker/password and then use something like:

cminer-x64.exe -i 18 -d 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://stak.suprnova.cc:7706 -u username.worker -p password --cpu-priority=3

ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 works fine for this.

[cryptomen101]

hey guys what am i missing here? heres what im getting and my .bat

[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2v2' algorithm.
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4533: Connection refused
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds

______________________

ccminer-x64-75.exe -a lyra2v2 -o http://127.0.0.1:4533 -u ustraks -p ********

Yeah you need to connect to a pool not a local ip address.   Or are you trying to solo mine and have a server running for this? Because that's probably a waste.

Go register on suprnova if you want to try mining this coin, make a worker/password and then use something like:

cminer-x64.exe -i 18 -d 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://stak.suprnova.cc:7706 -u username.worker -p password --cpu-priority=3

ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 works fine for this.

Good to see this working on somewhere... I was playing around it ..some issues sorted out .. I will try this now

[Crypto_Punk]

hey guys what am i missing here? heres what im getting and my .bat

[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-11-24 23:41:46] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2v2' algorithm.
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4533: Connection refused
[2017-11-24 23:41:47] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds

______________________

ccminer-x64-75.exe -a lyra2v2 -o http://127.0.0.1:4533 -u ustraks -p ********

Yeah you need to connect to a pool not a local ip address.   Or are you trying to solo mine and have a server running for this? Because that's probably a waste.

Go register on suprnova if you want to try mining this coin, make a worker/password and then use something like:

cminer-x64.exe -i 18 -d 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://stak.suprnova.cc:7706 -u username.worker -p password --cpu-priority=3

ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 works fine for this.

yeah i wanted to try solo, at least to learn how it works and if it wasnt worth it with this one maybe it would be with another coin in the future.

[relayd]

I don't think you would ever get a single block solo mining, currently despite people dropping off the global hash rate is at least 100,000 MH/s. If you are running a single GPU you will make what 25-50 MH/s? Each block reward is only 9.5 coins. Now let's assume the average is 1 block every minute. Pretty sure if you do the math you'll quickly see it's a waste. Not to mention even if you hit a single block by chance, you will only make 9.5 coins, which is probably not worth much anyways, considering the swap is counting 1 STRAK as 4 SIGT (Currently 1.3 cents per a SIGT).

[alexmingdr]

6 years for a swap, it's awful long for a crypto currency.
Why did this information appear only now ? Many people bought your signatum. Once again, the developers deceived their community.
Now in the discord from the developers only mockery, disgusting.

If you bought signatum before the details were clarified that's your fault... why gamble on speculation?

Do not blame the injured. I think It is very likely that all this was done premeditated for speculation. Here there were many messages that urged to buy signatum on exchanges and to earn on it. But nobody of the Straks team has stopped this and no tried to explain that it is not needful to do this

[tuanbct95]

6 years for a swap, it's awful long for a crypto currency.
Why did this information appear only now ? Many people bought your signatum. Once again, the developers deceived their community.
Now in the discord from the developers only mockery, disgusting.

If you bought signatum before the details were clarified that's your fault... why gamble on speculation?

Do not blame the injured. I think It is very likely that all this was done premeditated for speculation. Here there were many messages that urged to buy signatum on exchanges and to earn on it. But nobody of the Straks team has stopped this and no tried to explain that it is not needful to do this

Exactly right! Everyone have to be responsible for their own decisions, even if you get profits or lost your money. That's it. Please take care, read carefully, analyse the project in general, before investing into projects.

[nsummy]

I'm finally catching up on the last few days posts and this shit is golden!  I hate to take credit for debunking this scam, but it seems like my posts caused people to finally look into this scam.  Really the best part of this all are the people who defended this coin after my posts, and now they are suddenly silent after the terms of the coin swap have been changed.  I'm sure the devs made a killing on the SIGT run though!  And to add insult to injury, the swap information is still not in the announcement!  This is the first time I have ever seen github used as a a platform to announce coin information over a website or forum.  In the end though, I'm glad that the people mining this quickly saw the scam, and the idiots still holding sigt got fucked.  Trusting any venture that is related to sigt would be like buying a new currency created by Nicolas Maduro

[nsummy]

Developer stopped and abandoned SIGT 2.0, then created STARK. What is the purpose of that guy?

SIGT2.0 was temporary name of STRAKS . There was contest for coin name and STRAKS von the vote. So STRAKS is not "third" project.

oh really? I missed important information about the swap. If it is true, why developers has not mentioned about the swap from SIGT to STRAKS? thank you.

Its been here for weeks for all to see;  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2303471.0

Our mistake.  I guess in the future we need to follow every single announcement thread on bitcointalk to be sure there isn't a hidden coin swap in a new coin.  You are a joker

[iphmp159]

Re-read some threads on the topic and on the topic of Signatum 2.0, it gives me a sense of cheating by developers. All of the information they announced are extremely vague, and in-consistent over time. I have some Signatum and really tired with developers' activities.
If those ones are simply mistakes by lack of marketting experience, they should re-announce officially, transparently, again.

[allcryptominer]

That's it for me. Transfered my 100k sigt to yobit and sold it all with a loss. Never want to hear about either signatum or straks ever again. Same shit, with different name.