Boelens
|
|
July 23, 2013, 02:59:51 AM |
|
So, why is the site unusable again?
No trouble here.
|
|
|
|
Mooshire
|
|
July 23, 2013, 03:08:45 AM |
|
So, why is the site unusable again?
No trouble here. It's been on and off for me for a while.
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 23, 2013, 05:41:21 AM |
|
So, why is the site unusable again?
No trouble here. it's up and running for me.
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 (OP)
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
July 23, 2013, 07:22:28 AM |
|
It's been on and off for me for a while.
That's odd, we haven't had any downtime recently. Message me when it happens again.
|
|
|
|
Mooshire
|
|
July 23, 2013, 01:53:30 PM |
|
It's been on and off for me for a while.
That's odd, we haven't had any downtime recently. Message me when it happens again. It's not like the site was unreachable, but I do get the occasional eternally loading balances.
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 (OP)
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
July 23, 2013, 11:53:15 PM |
|
It's been on and off for me for a while.
That's odd, we haven't had any downtime recently. Message me when it happens again. It's not like the site was unreachable, but I do get the occasional eternally loading balances. Pushed out a fix that should help with this issue. Please contact me when this happens and add a screenshot of your console (Ctrl+Shift+J on Chrome, Ctrl+Shift+K on Firefox). Thanks!
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 (OP)
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
July 24, 2013, 05:43:10 AM |
|
If you're using Chrome or another browser that supports desktop notifications, you'll see a new option to enable it under Transactions. You'll receive a notification when you make or receive a transaction, even if you're in another window. No downloads or browser extensions are needed.
|
|
|
|
bitcoindigi
|
|
July 24, 2013, 06:13:44 AM |
|
If you're using Chrome or another browser that supports desktop notifications, you'll see a new option to enable it under Transactions. You'll receive a notification when you make or receive a transaction, even if you're in another window. No downloads or browser extensions are needed.
that's really nice!
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 (OP)
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
July 24, 2013, 07:25:57 AM |
|
You know, Firefox is starting to feel like the old IE again..
|
|
|
|
Mooshire
|
|
July 24, 2013, 02:04:09 PM |
|
If you're using Chrome or another browser that supports desktop notifications, you'll see a new option to enable it under Transactions. You'll receive a notification when you make or receive a transaction, even if you're in another window. No downloads or browser extensions are needed.
I saw this and got really excited.
|
|
|
|
Mooshire
|
|
July 24, 2013, 09:05:54 PM |
|
TF, what do you think about a new feature for inputs? What if under the receive section had the option to generate a small vanity address. Like, no bigger than 4 characters. Something that would take a very minimal amount of computing power. People could be limited to how many they could generate per day/week/month. This would allow people to have vanity addresses without importing the private key, because as a shared wallet the coins are moved around and two people with the private key would not work. Tell me what you think about this. Also, maybe the option to delete or at least archive receiving addresses?
|
|
|
|
btcton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 25, 2013, 01:14:13 AM |
|
TF, what do you think about a new feature for inputs? What if under the receive section had the option to generate a small vanity address. Like, no bigger than 4 characters. Something that would take a very minimal amount of computing power. People could be limited to how many they could generate per day/week/month. This would allow people to have vanity addresses without importing the private key, because as a shared wallet the coins are moved around and two people with the private key would not work. Tell me what you think about this. Also, maybe the option to delete or at least archive receiving addresses?
There are already usernames.
|
The signature campaign posters adding useless redundant fluff to their posts to reach their minimum word count are lowering my IQ.
|
|
|
Mooshire
|
|
July 25, 2013, 01:45:59 AM |
|
TF, what do you think about a new feature for inputs? What if under the receive section had the option to generate a small vanity address. Like, no bigger than 4 characters. Something that would take a very minimal amount of computing power. People could be limited to how many they could generate per day/week/month. This would allow people to have vanity addresses without importing the private key, because as a shared wallet the coins are moved around and two people with the private key would not work. Tell me what you think about this. Also, maybe the option to delete or at least archive receiving addresses?
There are already usernames. Gah, I suppose so. Also TF, maybe you might want to add a check on the GPG fingerprint For instance, I put in my fingerprint, but before it activates GPG, it asks me to decrypt a message so it knows I will be able to do this to login.
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 (OP)
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
July 25, 2013, 10:20:08 AM |
|
TF, what do you think about a new feature for inputs? What if under the receive section had the option to generate a small vanity address. Like, no bigger than 4 characters. Something that would take a very minimal amount of computing power. People could be limited to how many they could generate per day/week/month. This would allow people to have vanity addresses without importing the private key, because as a shared wallet the coins are moved around and two people with the private key would not work. Tell me what you think about this. Also, maybe the option to delete or at least archive receiving addresses?
There are already usernames. Gah, I suppose so. Also TF, maybe you might want to add a check on the GPG fingerprint For instance, I put in my fingerprint, but before it activates GPG, it asks me to decrypt a message so it knows I will be able to do this to login. Good idea. GPG is supposed to be for advanced users only, but some safety proofing can't hurt.
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 (OP)
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
July 25, 2013, 05:21:36 PM |
|
If you haven't signed in for 14 days, we'll prompt you if you still have your recovery key with a fairly stern notice. This should reduce the "I never wrote my recovery key down!" incidents.
|
|
|
|
Mooshire
|
|
July 25, 2013, 08:12:04 PM |
|
I successfully uploaded my key to MIT's keyserver, but it's not taking my fingerprint. I'm new to GPG, but I think I've got the basics down. For example, I put the link to my key on MIT in my sig. Here's my fingerprint.
6662 DFF6 6813 DB72 B056 D580 1C01 D238 4D54 3737
Try: 6662DFF66813DB72B056D5801C01D2384D543737 I'll make it remove spaces. You never made it remove spaces
|
|
|
|
js1985
|
|
July 25, 2013, 09:57:41 PM |
|
how good is the free mixer? what volume of BTC is mixed daily?
|
|
|
|
Mooshire
|
|
July 25, 2013, 10:56:19 PM |
|
how good is the free mixer? what volume of BTC is mixed daily?
It's pretty decent
|
|
|
|
minimalB
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 674
Merit: 523
|
|
July 25, 2013, 11:09:45 PM |
|
how good is the free mixer? what volume of BTC is mixed daily?
I am also interested to know how it works. Is it instant, or do you have to wait for few confirmations before transaction shows up (like blockchain.info mixer) ?
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 (OP)
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
July 25, 2013, 11:21:12 PM |
|
how good is the free mixer? what volume of BTC is mixed daily?
I am also interested to know how it works. Is it instant, or do you have to wait for few confirmations before transaction shows up (like blockchain.info mixer) ? 3-4 digits of BTC volume per day. There's pretty high variance however. It's instant, there is no privacy issue with this as you're not sending to one address to have it sent to another - your balance is deducted 'off the chain' and an unrelated transaction is sent to the destination address. You can generate signed payment receipts to prove that you did send a transaction however if you want, for example for a group by.
|
|
|
|
|