Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 09:12:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 [152] 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 ... 338 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread  (Read 479234 times)
stenkross
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 05, 2013, 09:58:40 AM
 #3021

I feel that this discussion regarding potential competitors to ACTM is healthy in one aspect.
My gut feeling so far has been that those who are in favor of ACTM seem to assume that the competitors are going to sit on their hands, doing nothing while the 28 nm fast hashers get manufactured and shipped.
Of course that is not the truth, who knows what ASICMINER have up their sleeve for instance? And KnC? And other yet unknown companies.

At least now even the most blinded cheerleader of ACTM should be aware that we are not alone in the bitcoin mining universe.
Vbs: In your future projections sheet you posted a while ago, how big market % of hashing and sales did you guess ACTM would have? Has it been updated lately?

Disclamer: I am still long on this stock, and you guessed it, english is not my native language.
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714770763
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714770763

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714770763
Reply with quote  #2

1714770763
Report to moderator
1714770763
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714770763

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714770763
Reply with quote  #2

1714770763
Report to moderator
1714770763
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714770763

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714770763
Reply with quote  #2

1714770763
Report to moderator
Vbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 10:26:51 AM
 #3022

I feel that this discussion regarding potential competitors to ACTM is healthy in one aspect.
My gut feeling so far has been that those who are in favor of ACTM seem to assume that the competitors are going to sit on their hands, doing nothing while the 28 nm fast hashers get manufactured and shipped.
Of course that is not the truth, who knows what ASICMINER have up their sleeve for instance? And KnC? And other yet unknown companies.

At least now even the most blinded cheerleader of ACTM should be aware that we are not alone in the bitcoin mining universe.
Vbs: In your future projections sheet you posted a while ago, how big market % of hashing and sales did you guess ACTM would have? Has it been updated lately?

Disclamer: I am still long on this stock, and you guessed it, english is not my native language.

Yep, the competition will only increase and the >28nm feasibility argument of 110/130nm players is only going to hit the ground from now forward. Don't expect 20nm bitcoin mining hardware anytime soon, there are currently several technological hurdles to be resolved on that die shrink (better finFETs, etc) before it can be used to build power-hungry circuits made to operate 24/7.

I haven't updated my spreadsheet lately, but I'm expecting that with $200M appearing for chip development they are expecting at least 2-3x of that in chip sales, so I think ActiveMining will definitely be in a very good position on that too.
Vbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 11:46:39 AM
 #3023

Seems we'll be getting an eASIC Nextreme-3 too! Grin

Quote
http://www.easic.com/easic-announces-strategic-investment-by-seagate/

Cupertino, CA and Santa Clara, CA – August 5, 2013 – eASIC Corporation, a provider of NEW ASIC devices today announced a strategic investment by Seagate Technology (NASDAQ:STX). In addition to the equity investment, eASIC and Seagate also are exploring opportunities to jointly develop custom silicon solutions for Seagate’s portfolio of Solid State Drives (SSD) that would combine Seagate’s expertise in SSD with eASIC’s expertise in fast time-to-market, low-cost and low-power custom silicon solutions.
(...)
“We are extremely excited to be working with one of the world leaders in storage technology,” said Ronnie Vasishta, President and CEO of eASIC. “Seagate has an exceptional history in bringing world class technology and innovation to the storage market. Using our eASIC Nextreme-3 28nm single via configuration technology will help Seagate to bring storage innovation at a pace not yet seen in this industry,” added Vasishta.
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 12:10:22 PM
 #3024

Listen to todays EdAndEthan Bitcoin daily updates on YouTube for their opinion about the whole 200m$ investment.

Btw, Ed and Ethan, are you here reading this topic? Smiley
xchrisxsays
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 05, 2013, 12:33:41 PM
 #3025

Seems we'll be getting an eASIC Nextreme-3 too! Grin

Quote
http://www.easic.com/easic-announces-strategic-investment-by-seagate/

Cupertino, CA and Santa Clara, CA – August 5, 2013 – eASIC Corporation, a provider of NEW ASIC devices today announced a strategic investment by Seagate Technology (NASDAQ:STX). In addition to the equity investment, eASIC and Seagate also are exploring opportunities to jointly develop custom silicon solutions for Seagate’s portfolio of Solid State Drives (SSD) that would combine Seagate’s expertise in SSD with eASIC’s expertise in fast time-to-market, low-cost and low-power custom silicon solutions.
(...)
“We are extremely excited to be working with one of the world leaders in storage technology,” said Ronnie Vasishta, President and CEO of eASIC. “Seagate has an exceptional history in bringing world class technology and innovation to the storage market. Using our eASIC Nextreme-3 28nm single via configuration technology will help Seagate to bring storage innovation at a pace not yet seen in this industry,” added Vasishta.

Is this the first public mention of the 28 nm by eASIC?
ArcticWolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:04:30 PM
 #3026

Ladies and gentlemen, the $200 million Avalon deal was complete baloney. Check for yourself: https://twitter.com/ScottWapnerCNBC/statuses/364370798892421120

https://www.crypto-trade.com/ref/arcticwolf Try CryptoTrade.com, a new exchange for trading Currencies and Securities
grimholt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:07:37 PM
 #3027

Ladies and gentlemen, the $200 million Avalon deal was complete baloney. Check for yourself: https://twitter.com/ScottWapnerCNBC/statuses/364370798892421120

What a shock. Grin

YinCoin YangCoin ☯☯First Ever POS/POW Alternator! Multipool! ☯ ☯ http://yinyangpool.com/ 
Free Distribution! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623937
canth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:08:54 PM
 #3028

Where's iCEBREAKER? Probably dying laughing at anyone that takes him seriously for investment advice.

steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:11:52 PM
 #3029

Ladies and gentlemen, the $200 million Avalon deal was complete baloney. Check for yourself: https://twitter.com/ScottWapnerCNBC/statuses/364370798892421120

In a way that's disappointing for two reasons:

1) It wouldn't have effected ACtM's mining or hardware sales for atleast 12months, so no impact on us for a long time,
2) It would have meant some serious money and very very experienced investors backing BTC and BTC would have been on the way up as a result.
kleeck
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


https://karatcoin.co


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:13:30 PM
 #3030

Ladies and gentlemen, the $200 million Avalon deal was complete baloney. Check for yourself: https://twitter.com/ScottWapnerCNBC/statuses/364370798892421120

In a way that's disappointing for two reasons:

1) It wouldn't have effected ACtM's mining or hardware sales for atleast 12months, so no impact on us for a long time,
2) It would have meant some serious money and very very experienced investors backing BTC and BTC would have been on the way up as a result.

Lies are frustrating, right? Let's all go spam WSJ with flames.  Grin


  █ █████       ▄████▀▄██▀
  █ █████     ▄████▀███▀
  █ █████    ████▀███▀
  █ █████  ▄███▀███▓
  █ █████▄███▀████▀
  █ ███████▀████▀
  █ █████▀▄█████▄
  █ ███▀▄█████████▄
  █ █▀▄██ ▀█████████▄
  █ ▄████   ▀███████▀█▄   
  █ █████     ▀███▀▄████▄
  █ █████       ▀▄████████▄
                   
                    █████                   
                ▄███  █  ███▄               
             ███      █      ███             
         ▄███         █         ███▄         
       ██    ███████████████████    ██       
    ████            ██ ██            ████   
    ██             █     █             ██   
    █ █           █       █           █ █   
    █ ██         █         █         ██ █   
    █  ██      ██           ██      ██  █   
    █   ██    ██             ██    ██   █   
    █    ██  ██               ██  ██    █   
    █     █ ██                 ██ █     █   
    █     █████████████████████████     █   
    █  ███  ██                 ██  ███  █   
    ███       █               █       ███   
      ███      ██           ██      ███     
         ███     █         █     ███         
            ▀███  ██     ██  ███▀           
                ▀████   ████▀               
▀███▀
                 
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
Rozal
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:19:27 PM
 #3031

Good morning everyone. I received a response from Douglas McMahon, Senior Managing Director of tavistock (of which Joe Lewis is Chair of).

Quote
Could you confirm recent rumors, or that Joe Lewis has an interest into Bitcoin?

Quote
No interest at all. WSJ is not true.
ActiveMining-PR
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0



View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:20:24 PM
 #3032

The Advisory board:

A rough draft for the initial Advisory Board and its members has been completed, based on valuable personal expertise and knowledge to the proper functioning and future directions of ActiveMining.  Regulation is being discussed for how to provide the best service to all shareholders of ActiveMining through the board. We also want to define mechanisms to help gather the opinion of large shareholders with significant expertise on the possible directions of the company.  The names of the members on the Advisory Board will be released when the legalities are finalized and responsibilities determined.

Who is ActiveMining-PR?

There have been some questions as to who the PR person is for ActiveMining and what their credentials are.  The name I previously went by on BitcoinTalk was Streets 2.0.  Ken contacted me and professed a desire for an active PR management presence on the forum.  In numerous talks with Ken and others, it was decided I would act as a liaison for communicating all important news from Ken to the shareholders. The objective is for communication to be expedited and more concise from here forward, taking into consideration that Ken will progressively have less time to focus on the forum discussion itself.

I would like to ask everyone to please not private message any questions or concerns to the previous account Streets 2.0 regarding ActiveMining, they will not be responded to.
steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:25:06 PM
 #3033

The name I previously went by on BitcoinTalk was Streets 2.0.


Great. Good to have you onboard, now go make me rich.  Cool
djbooth007
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
August 05, 2013, 01:36:47 PM
 #3034

Ladies and gentlemen, the $200 million Avalon deal was complete baloney. Check for yourself: https://twitter.com/ScottWapnerCNBC/statuses/364370798892421120

What a shock. Grin

To be honest, im disappointed. This deal would have made huge waves in bitcoin taking it further mainstream.
Although, such a deal could still happen in the future.
Rozal
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:38:19 PM
 #3035

It's spread now to be known as fact, except for us few savvy investors who have taken the time to confirm its invalidity. So either way, bitcoin got publicity today.
knybe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


decentralize EVERYTHING...


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 01:45:07 PM
 #3036

The name I previously went by on BitcoinTalk was Streets 2.0.


Xlnt. Great to have you on board...
djbooth007
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
August 05, 2013, 01:51:37 PM
 #3037

It's spread now to be known as fact, except for us few savvy investors who have taken the time to confirm its invalidity. So either way, bitcoin got publicity today.

Yes, even BS articles like today put bitcoin in front of more people. News like this (real or not) is still good for ACM as it indirectly introduces mining to new people.
steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 02:01:36 PM
 #3038

It's spread now to be known as fact, except for us few savvy investors who have taken the time to confirm its invalidity. So either way, bitcoin got publicity today.

Excellent point. Most news readers will never know this deal isn't going to happen but might get into BTC as a result of believing it. Maybe the bitcoin community should do more of this sort of profile raising awareness shenanigans.
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 05, 2013, 02:26:17 PM
 #3039


Quote
ROZAL from BTCgarden
"Good morning everyone. I received a response from Douglas McMahon, Senior Managing Director of tavistock (of which Joe Lewis is Chair of).


Quote

Could you confirm recent rumors, or that Joe Lewis has an interest into Bitcoin?


Quote

No interest at all. WSJ is not true.


A special thanks go to all the panic sellers who believed the ridiculous possibility of someone investing 200 million dollars into Bitcoin mining.  Just remember kids, we are mining Bitcoins.. not building rockets here.  I appreciate your willingness to hand over to me your cheap Activemining shares.  Please don't ever skydive, as your display of poor judgment during high stress would likely result in something that nobody should ever have to clean up.  Thanks again.

VE

ChefBorjan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 05, 2013, 02:29:37 PM
 #3040

It's so annoying, I was told to get off my ipad and stop checking these forums so often by the girlfriend... I missed the opportunity to liquidate on the way down on the 'news' and buy back in. I knew there would be a panic. Oh well. Still have my ActM so thats the important thing.

If you feel like leaving me a tip: 1MhxTnB5onvEMqF53TDXxVseQZzYZetxw3
Pages: « 1 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 [152] 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 ... 338 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!