22naru
|
|
September 10, 2013, 01:22:33 PM |
|
i have reaperprime v1 from mtrlt and i get appcrash after couple of min . i have WIN7 x64 gpu drivers 12.8 and i used some ideeas from here to . i tested on my miner ,with intel dual-core & 3x 7950 win7 x64 , and cpu_mining_threads 1 or 2 - was more stable sievepercentage 10 sievesize 1024000 vectors 2 with this config my rig run 2 min (and i get 0 fermat/ n gandalfs ) than crash. mtrlt keep doing a good work , cheers.
|
|
|
|
spirale
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 10, 2013, 01:55:39 PM |
|
I followed the instructions and got it compiled all right (with one warning), but when i try to run I get this: I'm now mining primecoin! GeneratePrimeTable() : setting nSievePercentage = 1, nSieveSize = 100000 GeneratePrimeTable() : prime table [1, 100000] generated with 9592 primes Share thread started Available CPU mining algorithms: hp7 Using default: hp7 Creating 4 CPU threads. 1...Warning: can't set thread priority 2...3...4...done GPU not used. Error adding block template: JSON result is error RET! Invalid address Segmentation fault Am I doing something wrong? I'm using Linux with 4 GPUs.
|
|
|
|
balanghai
|
|
September 10, 2013, 02:16:19 PM |
|
Anyone willing to read? Hint: last page might be helpful <edit> This message is dedicated to balanghai. Next time I should quote properly... </edit> Sorry I missed the qoutes. I only read on the tech specs.
|
|
|
|
refer_2_me
|
|
September 10, 2013, 02:18:37 PM |
|
I followed the instructions and got it compiled all right (with one warning), but when i try to run I get this: I'm now mining primecoin! GeneratePrimeTable() : setting nSievePercentage = 1, nSieveSize = 100000 GeneratePrimeTable() : prime table [1, 100000] generated with 9592 primes Share thread started Available CPU mining algorithms: hp7 Using default: hp7 Creating 4 CPU threads. 1...Warning: can't set thread priority 2...3...4...done GPU not used. Error adding block template: JSON result is error RET! Invalid address Segmentation fault Am I doing something wrong? I'm using Linux with 4 GPUs. Top of this page. You need to redownload, compile and install the libblkmaker package.
|
BTC: 1reFerkRnftob5YvbB112bbuwepC9XYLj XPM: APQpPZCfEz3kejrYTfyACY1J9HrjnRf34Y
|
|
|
spirale
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 10, 2013, 03:33:54 PM |
|
Top of this page.
You need to redownload, compile and install the libblkmaker package.
I did, it's not that.
|
|
|
|
spirale
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 10, 2013, 03:47:14 PM |
|
I changed the config a bit and now I get: Warning: unknown property "use_gpu" in configuration file. I'm now mining primecoin! GeneratePrimeTable() : setting nSievePercentage = 1, nSieveSize = 100000 Share thread started GeneratePrimeTable() : prime table [1, 100000] generated with 9592 primes Available CPU mining algorithms: hp7 Using default: hp7 Creating 4 CPU threads. 1...Warning: can't set thread priority 2...3...4...done List of platforms: 0 AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing Using platform number 0
Using devices 0, 1, 2, 3 OpenCL device 0........ Compiling kernel... this could take up to 2 minutes. "/tmp/OCLn5hmbH.cl", line 338: warning: nested comment is not allowed /*/ ^
"/tmp/OCLn5hmbH.cl", line 672: error: too many arguments in function call uint16 a = Mul_512b_32b(FixedMultiplier,FermatNumbers[get_global_id(0)>>1],ORIGIN_LENGTH); ^
1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCLn5hmbH.cl".
Frontend phase failed compilation.
2013-09-10 18:41:27 Error: Error building OpenCL program
primecoin.conf: host 127.0.0.1 port **** user **** pass **** protocol primecoin
worksize 256 threads_per_gpu 1 cpu_mining_threads 4 vectors 2 primecoin_address ****
use_gpu true
|
|
|
|
usahero
|
|
September 10, 2013, 05:14:26 PM |
|
Has anyone actually mined some coins with the gpu miner? I read that paul's coins were a false positive and that he didn't mine them with gpu's but with vps...
|
|
|
|
crendore
|
|
September 10, 2013, 05:28:08 PM |
|
Has anyone actually mined some coins with the gpu miner? I read that paul's coins were a false positive and that he didn't mine them with gpu's but with vps...
I have seen several accounts in this thread of people successfully mining coins with this miner. And i'm pretty sure paulscreen said he used a different wallet so it was impossible to confuse with VPS.
|
|
|
|
usahero
|
|
September 10, 2013, 06:00:25 PM |
|
Has anyone actually mined some coins with the gpu miner? I read that paul's coins were a false positive and that he didn't mine them with gpu's but with vps...
I have seen several accounts in this thread of people successfully mining coins with this miner. And i'm pretty sure paulscreen said he used a different wallet so it was impossible to confuse with VPS. I would like to hear his comment. He found blocks on that wallet with his gpu miners off.
|
|
|
|
wyldfire
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
September 10, 2013, 06:47:25 PM |
|
Has anyone actually mined some coins with the gpu miner? I read that paul's coins were a false positive and that he didn't mine them with gpu's but with vps...
Well, I'm scratching my head on this one. I had two instances of reaper running overnight, both connecting to a single primecoind instance. Both of the reapers now show a nonzero count for the "10-chains per hour" stat. Based on my understanding of the code, this stat doesn't get filled in until/unless there's a single entry. Yet there's no record of a "immature" or "generate" (or even "orphan") entry in the primecoind's "listtransactions" output. I'm left wondering if maybe there's something wrong with how reaper returns work when it finds a block at difficulty? Or my primecoind is misconfigured somehow?
|
|
|
|
refer_2_me
|
|
September 10, 2013, 06:50:58 PM |
|
Has anyone actually mined some coins with the gpu miner? I read that paul's coins were a false positive and that he didn't mine them with gpu's but with vps...
Well, I'm scratching my head on this one. I had two instances of reaper running overnight, both connecting to a single primecoind instance. Both of the reapers now show a nonzero count for the "10-chains per hour" stat. Based on my understanding of the code, this stat doesn't get filled in until/unless there's a single entry. Yet there's no record of a "immature" or "generate" (or even "orphan") entry in the primecoind's "listtransactions" output. I'm left wondering if maybe there's something wrong with how reaper returns work when it finds a block at difficulty? Or my primecoind is misconfigured somehow? Did you run primecoind listtransactions "*" ? My guess is that it was orphaned.
|
BTC: 1reFerkRnftob5YvbB112bbuwepC9XYLj XPM: APQpPZCfEz3kejrYTfyACY1J9HrjnRf34Y
|
|
|
wyldfire
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
September 10, 2013, 06:56:46 PM |
|
Has anyone actually mined some coins with the gpu miner? I read that paul's coins were a false positive and that he didn't mine them with gpu's but with vps...
Well, I'm scratching my head on this one. I had two instances of reaper running overnight, both connecting to a single primecoind instance. Both of the reapers now show a nonzero count for the "10-chains per hour" stat. Based on my understanding of the code, this stat doesn't get filled in until/unless there's a single entry. Yet there's no record of a "immature" or "generate" (or even "orphan") entry in the primecoind's "listtransactions" output. I'm left wondering if maybe there's something wrong with how reaper returns work when it finds a block at difficulty? Or my primecoind is misconfigured somehow? Ok, more breadcrumbs: getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ERROR: CheckBlock() : size limits failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ERROR: CheckBlock() : size limits failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED Added 1 addresses from 5.45.100.162: 380 tried, 9853 new Added 1 addresses from 5.45.100.162: 380 tried, 9854 new received block 5fbaef6f07fe6ef32320d11e84216fe2c506092abcdbc54d970079e98d8dbc27 Committing 1 changed transactions to coin database... SetBestChain: new best=5fbaef6f07fe6ef32320d11e84216fe2c506092abcdbc54d970079e98d8dbc27 height=158801 difficulty=9.8662075 log2Work=25.636109 Maybe I'll find some time to move over to testnet and capture the submission over the wire from reaper to see what might've been wrong.
|
|
|
|
paulthetafy
|
|
September 10, 2013, 11:10:41 PM |
|
Has anyone actually mined some coins with the gpu miner? I read that paul's coins were a false positive and that he didn't mine them with gpu's but with vps...
I have seen several accounts in this thread of people successfully mining coins with this miner. And i'm pretty sure paulscreen said he used a different wallet so it was impossible to confuse with VPS. I would like to hear his comment. He found blocks on that wallet with his gpu miners off. Unfortunately usahero is correct. I generated a new address from my wallet specifically for the GPU miner and blocks were found with it. However after I switched off the GPU's another couple of blocks showed up in my wallet from the same address. The conclusion is that my VPS's (which share the wallet) had pulled the same address out of the keypool as the one I assigned to the GPU Miner. So there is no way to know whether the GPU mined them or not. There may be people who can confirm they have successfully mined blocks with the GPU miner, but I don't know of any. I think further testing may be in order before a public release (as if it wasn't public already!)
|
|
|
|
balanghai
|
|
September 11, 2013, 08:21:32 AM |
|
Hope some v 1.0 will be released and the source code as well.
|
|
|
|
Trillium
|
|
September 11, 2013, 08:43:27 AM |
|
Hope some v 1.0 will be released and the source code as well.
+1
|
BTC:1AaaAAAAaAAE2L1PXM1x9VDNqvcrfa9He6
|
|
|
YipYip
|
|
September 11, 2013, 10:01:16 AM |
|
Its been 2 weeks since the GPU release fiasco & so far crickets
Well to be honest mrlt aka realsolid aka CoinHunter has taken the money and said a nice big FUCKU all to the community after $10k
Has he even released the source so others can finish his abortion in a bucket...?
|
OBJECT NOT FOUND
|
|
|
refer_2_me
|
|
September 11, 2013, 12:26:16 PM |
|
Its been 2 weeks since the GPU release fiasco & so far crickets
Well to be honest mrlt aka realsolid aka CoinHunter has taken the money and said a nice big FUCKU all to the community after $10k
Has he even released the source so others can finish his abortion in a bucket...?
The source was with the leak. Has no one uploaded it to github yet?
|
BTC: 1reFerkRnftob5YvbB112bbuwepC9XYLj XPM: APQpPZCfEz3kejrYTfyACY1J9HrjnRf34Y
|
|
|
tbly13
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2013, 08:08:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ReCat
|
|
September 11, 2013, 08:21:14 PM |
|
Unfortunately, mr.Mtrlt has a tendency to look really shady and scammy for no reason at all.
|
BTC: 1recatirpHBjR9sxgabB3RDtM6TgntYUW Hold onto what you love with all your might, Because you can never know when - Oh. What you love is now gone.
|
|
|
YipYip
|
|
September 12, 2013, 12:02:40 AM |
|
Unfortunately, mr.Mtrlt has a tendency to look really shady and scammy for no reason at all.
If the rumour mill is correct and the mrlt realsolid coinhunter senario is true ... MicroCash 500BTC & nothing GPU miner ~100btc & nothing that works These are the recent "DONATIONS" operations he has pulled in the last 3 months
|
OBJECT NOT FOUND
|
|
|
|