Never invest no product ICOs

[SaracenRomero213]

Yes, I agree that you only need to invest in projects that have a real product. So you will have more chances that the project will survive and give you a good profit.

[Azna Azhar]

Investing in projects without a product in my opinion is risky. I doubt that such ICO will bring a good profit, and will it ever come ..

Yes, of course it's risky. Projects that do not have a good product will not attract investors, and conversely projects that have good products will certainly invite many investors to join in. If many investors join, it will get closer to success.

[TaliskerDarkStorm]

Yeah it’s kinda true. I believe the product is really important for an Ico. And i agree that it’s better to avoid to invest in ‘no product’ ICOs. The team and the product are really important.

[imutlinda]

silly thing when trying to invest in an ICO project that does not have the product offered. because in my opinion an ico product is the main thing that must be assessed before

[NazaConte]

Frankly speaking, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, ethereum, NEO, Ripple and other Top altcoins, why some companies and group of people are trying to promote their useless coins and just trying to divide the investment and caused good altcoins to struggle on their price value increase. I only do invest on altcoins that has a good projects like Oyster Pearl PRL that is for online storage in the tangle.

[petronus]

Influential products to determine the value of the project if it is listed on the stock exchange. it will affect enthusiasts and use of the products made by the ICO project.

[jiaoyi88]

ICO products are rare now, they are just their ICO, and we don't easily believe this.

[numbertech]

When an ICO have already a working product, the chances of being a scam ICO is less compared to an ICO launching that still has no working product. Not all the ICO that has no working product is a scam. They have a sample of working product but especially when their working product is more on hardware, they needed the funds in the ICO to get the working product operational. To make a good judgement in an ICO to determine if its a scam or not, better make your own research and execute your prior judgement .

[ataki]

I also prefer ICOs with ready product but I pay attention on ICOs which only have a good vision and raising funds for it.
It is most risky to invest into such a project but the reward also should be higher if you select the right one.

[raidenplus0327]

Of course who would invest to ICO that has no product ? Research is the best practice to prevent scam , many investor got lured to scam project because they based on community hyped and end with nothing which is sad. If you are looking for ICO that is  already implemented then go for Gemstra , the future social selling platform that aims to innovate retail marketplace by using blockchain technologies . Their Astra platform will allow brands and sellers to interact within a single community to perform transaction where they are free to choose what product to add in their catalog !

[extrajuu333]

i think msot of the time you have right, but sometimes an ico without a product can be valuable too

[pedropenduko001]

Yes they often don't have a  product and it will be risky or it will turn out to be scam because if there's no product how to give value on that thing if there's no basis

[Utyg]

Well Yes, you turned the topic. But first of all I would pay attention to the social importance of the product. Its relevance and demand in the market and the prospects of this project in the future. These indicators show the uniqueness and reliability of the project.

[yayat]

It is a good analysis because ICOs tokens are based on the real value of a project so why then do anybody have to give his hard earned cash to a project without full understanding of the product or service been offered.

I agree with you because the price of the token can be appreciated from the project in the future.
If the future project of the token is good then I certainly will increase the price.

Maybe it can also be said the Law of Economic Cryptocurrency.

[drevorub]

Of course, I think that it is better if the ico project is registered with the restoration of market conditions.

[NitroSmash631]

Yes. Completely agree.

[CoinCollect]

I agree with the main theme. Investing in ICO now is not the best idea, since most of them are frauds, and the rest of the ICO issue their tokens to the exchange at a price 10 times lower than originally planned.

[alister.kain]

I like investing in ICOs and in their projects, it gives me and opportunity to feel that I do something useful for the world  So I don't see something bad in this deal. You just have to be careful about doing the choice of aim for you investments and the result will be very nice I am sure.

[bamb]

The intention of majority of ICO is to have their product and services developed, and release. But majority of project are inexperience and do not forecast difficult and set back that may happen in the course of business hence they failed!

[UnreasonableInvestor]

The call for this topic to refuse to invest in ICO projects is bad advice. I plan to select several ICO projects and invest in good marketing a good product.