MERIT - A DEFINITION OF, RICH PEOPLE BECOME RICHER, POOR PEOPLE MAINTAIN POOR

[Durr_1412]

I don't agree with this system.

You are creating the definition of "Rich people maintain rich, poor people will be poor forever."

sMerit trading's even happening now in Chinese and Russian local, and does it support my theory, all high rank level now they can sell their Merit to earn money and I saw a Cooper Member from another page support this => Rich maintain rich.

Merit is created for anti-shitposter not for trading and how does it go?
It's ridiculous because right now, at this moment, many high rank level member created their own topic in Meta to give away sMerit for those who reply or report their posts. What is that about? We post and we have to report with you (you are not a dev) to ask for sMerit. How about the other members if they don't report?
Rich people scare of the others to replace their place or make profit more than them. They want to take everything under their control.

I guess in the near future, new members or even one-year members must pay for their post to get merited.
Who will get the most benefit from this Merit system? I don't have to reply this question, we all know the answer.

Example: if you was in bitcointalk forum a few years ago, you posted a lot of under-quality posts and you earned Legendary Rank, so it is unfair with new people joining this forum now.

Another one, the high rank level member is not everywhere in this forum. Even a quality post's made and got a lot of positive replies from another member, if none of them read your post, you won't receive any sMerit so your level will keep maintaining low.

And a lot of projects need bitcointalk rank level such as bitsend airdrop (need Legendary rank), so it is much harder if this new system running.

If you are trying creating a block and keep your high rank level people safety, you are successful. Congrat to devs.

And I lose my faith in this forum. I will still read and post in this forum but not in supporting anymore.

Currently, Merit system has been questioned a lots. Group of people, they will cheat by giving their team member, partner, friends their own Merit score, even their posts are spam posts. How are you gonna control that devs?

If a new forum created and quality much better than you, I will go a new place.

Good luck with your Merit score and congratulation to those who reached Legendary rank one more time (by now, they will get the most benefit of all thing in this crypto-world).

Before you create thing devs, can we make a vote in all member of this forum?

And if you decide create this such of thing, can you also create a new ranking level, which is higher than Legendary rank, and Legendary people must work to earn that level?

[1714926590]

1714926590

[actmyname]

You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

If you want to point out the Legendary members with shitty posts then I would recommend you to do so. Otherwise, sufficient action cannot be taken against them.

[Lauda]

Example: if you was in bitcointalk forum a few years ago, you posted a lot of under-quality posts and you earned Legendary Rank, so it is unfair with new people joining this forum now.

Equivalent example: If something was legal 10 years ago, and now it is not, it is unfair to all the new people that *might want to do it* now.

And a lot of projects need bitcointalk rank level such as bitsend airdrop (need Legendary rank), so it is much harder if this new system running.

That's the whole point.

And I lose my faith in this forum. I will still read and post in this forum but not in supporting anymore.

No argument.

If a new forum created and quality much better than you, I will go a new place.

You won't be missed.

[Durr_1412]

TWO LEGENDARY come saying.

I love this, Rich people now defending.

I hope listen to more, and look forward how Newbee say.

[supine]

At first, it seems to be unfair. However, just think and observe at the forum. Most of the posts were just senseless and obviously were just meant to do the required weekly posts or just to boost ranks. I really think the main aim of this forum is for crypto users to learn, share ideas and at the same time to earn (airdrop or camps.) Of course, I wouldn't wash my hands because at first I was just trying to post for the same reason, however, as I stayed longer, it's obviously not worth reading some of the posts and would be a waste of time reading some of the threads because of most users abuse lax community rules and regulations. I admit it too, that the new system  will be difficult for us to achieve higher rank, but take it a good way to learn and to work harder.

[Durr_1412]

You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

If you want to point out the Legendary members with shitty posts then I would recommend you to do so. Otherwise, sufficient action cannot be taken against them.

I am protecting Hero Member too.

The rank I saying in this TOPIC is your rank "LEGENDARY" in specific.

You got 952 Activity, maybe feeling yourself, "how lucky I am, I got this rank before this merit sh* come out"

[friends1980]

TWO LEGENDARY come saying.

I love this, Rich people now defending.

I hope listen to more, and look forward how Newbee say.

If you're starting to see huge sociological consequences and create "Rich maintain Rich" theories, following some internet forum rule, it will be better for your mental health to, indeed, get out of the forum.

[Lutpin]

TWO LEGENDARY come saying.
I hope listen to more, and look forward how Newbee say.

I'm not a legendary, am I allowed to agree with them?

Woohoo one of them is me

You've got 24 hours

[arallmuus]

Rich people now defending.

Actually Im just few activity away to be legendary and now Im stuck at 500 merit  . No complain from me  ( I guess Im not classified as the 'rich' one ? )

bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

Woohoo one of them is me

I'm not a legendary, am I allowed to agree with them?

No you are not ), you are classified as the 'rich people'

[ibminer]

And I lose my faith in this forum. I will still read and post in this forum but not in supporting anymore.

If a new forum created and quality much better than you, I will go a new place.

If you are still reading & posting, what "support" are you stopping exactly?  
Your "support" to campaign managers, bounties, etc. is not "supporting" this forum, it's supporting your greed, and advertisers and/or ICO scammers.

[Lecam]

You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

If you want to point out the Legendary members with shitty posts then I would recommend you to do so. Otherwise, sufficient action cannot be taken against them.

I am protecting Hero Member too.

The rank I saying in this TOPIC is your rank "LEGENDARY" in specific.

You got 952 Activity, maybe feeling yourself, "how lucky I am, I got this rank before this merit sh* come out"

It's a new system to avoid people from posting nonsense in the forum. Just imagine there are people here that joined, just to be part of twitter, facebook, airdrop and so on, and just posting reports and application forms. This forum was built for people to share and gather information from one to another. What substance will you get from people posting "that's cool", " a great project", "joined airdrop", etc.

[Durr_1412]

At first, it seems to be unfair. However, just think and observe at the forum. Most of the posts were just senseless and obviously were just meant to do the required weekly posts or just to boost ranks. I really think the main aim of this forum is for crypto users to learn, share ideas and at the same time to earn (airdrop or camps.) Of course, I wouldn't wash my hands because at first I was just trying to post for the same reason, however, as I stayed longer, it's obviously not worth reading some of the posts and would be a waste of time reading some of the threads because of most users abuse lax community rules and regulations. I admit it too, that the new system  will be difficult for us to achieve higher rank, but take it a good way to learn and to work harder.

I agree with you in part of not worth reading some spam.

However, if devs want to create such as Merit thing, THEY SHOULD INVENT ONE MORE LEVEL HIGHER THAN LEGENDARY. So everyone work for that. In this topic, "Do you think those Legendary people feel comfortable, free, happy and lucky about this merit score come out?"

[gopaljiverma]

I am a poor as per your standards and I also think that the concept favors old members. But it is the decision of admin and we as members do not have any control over it.

[Durr_1412]

You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

If you want to point out the Legendary members with shitty posts then I would recommend you to do so. Otherwise, sufficient action cannot be taken against them.

I am protecting Hero Member too.

The rank I saying in this TOPIC is your rank "LEGENDARY" in specific.

You got 952 Activity, maybe feeling yourself, "how lucky I am, I got this rank before this merit sh* come out"

It's a new system to avoid people from posting nonsense in the forum. Just imagine there are people here that joined, just to be part of twitter, facebook, airdrop and so on, and just posting reports and application forms. This forum was built for people to share and gather information from one to another. What substance will you get from people posting "that's cool", " a great project", "joined airdrop", etc.

I agree with that, if devs create new system, then create a new level system too.

Do you know who get the most benefit now?

And those Legendary may be not have to work hard on this forum at all. So should devs create one system, if those who miss this forum in a certain time, lower their level then.

[Jet Cash]

You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

Now I wonder who that can be?

What I am seeing is that people still seems to consider Bitcoin as a form of employment, and Bitcoin Talk as an employment bureau and a recruitment medium. It would be great if we could go back to discussing the Bitcoin system, and the way we can use, optimise and expand it. For example it would be really useful if the escrow possibilities were explored, and gained public acceptance.

[minifrij]

However, if devs want to create such as Merit thing, THEY SHOULD INVENT ONE MORE LEVEL HIGHER THAN LEGENDARY. So everyone work for that. In this topic, "Do you think those Legendary people feel comfortable, free, happy and lucky about this merit score come out?"

This was discussed quite a while ago, and I think that theymos said he was open to the idea when enough people turn Legendary. Perhaps you should properly propose that idea, I'd be happy to join in.

[Durr_1412]

I am a poor as per your standards and I also think that the concept favors old members. But it is the decision of admin and we as members do not have any control over it.

Yup that's why we have to stand up and say our opinion. They are a lead, but not mean anything without us.

We can leave this if it become so unfair.

[Durr_1412]

You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

Now I wonder who that can be?

What I am seeing is that people still seems to consider Bitcoin as a form of employment, and Bitcoin Talk as an employment bureau and a recruitment medium. It would be great if we could go back to discussing the Bitcoin system, and the way we can use, optimise and expand it. For example it would be really useful if the escrow possibilities were explored, and gained public acceptance.

I love this idea.

Make a vote for any new system coming.

Don't act like a COMMUNIST country, president give the law and people only can follow without any right for agree or disagree.

In this case, you are pretty the same, BITCOINTALK DEVS.

[DarkStar_alt]

You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.

Now I wonder who that can be?

What I am seeing is that people still seems to consider Bitcoin as a form of employment, and Bitcoin Talk as an employment bureau and a recruitment medium. It would be great if we could go back to discussing the Bitcoin system, and the way we can use, optimise and expand it. For example it would be really useful if the escrow possibilities were explored, and gained public acceptance.

I love this idea.

Make a vote for any new system coming.

Don't act like a COMMUNIST country, president give the law and people only can follow without any right for agree or disagree.

In this case, you are pretty the same, BITCOINTALK DEVS.

Dude, it's a discussion forum, where one can easily choose to not participate in. Don't like it? There's the subreddit, bitcoingarden, etc.

I'm a Full Member - can I agree that it's a good system? 

[Durr_1412]

There's no correlation between amount of merit with poor/rich. For member with high rank, it's their reward for join in this forum earlier, just like early investor who got advantage.
Also, main goal of this forum is to discuss Bitcoin (and altcoin), not join project which require high rank.

If you're looking for another cryptocurrency, r/bitcoin and r/cryptocurrency are perfect place from you as long as you avoid controversial or bait topics.

One more Legendary show up and defending.

So you mean American is still British because you are one of them too. Why would you be United States.

My friends and I laughing so hard, "it's their reward for join in this forum earlier, just like early investor who got advantage."

What did you invest?

The only thing you did is you joined this forum at early that I don't deny.

Do you think a lot of people in this world, this moment may be their first time to hear about Bitcoin, crypto-currency. If they know such as thing exist, they may join sooner than you.